ML20055A408
| ML20055A408 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000142 |
| Issue date: | 07/12/1982 |
| From: | COMMITTEE TO BRIDGE THE GAP |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055A406 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8207160277 | |
| Download: ML20055A408 (2) | |
Text
- _ - _
MODIFICATIONS E C_0NTENTION IANGUAGE
- In the tasis section of Contention I, add a new part 2 c its inclusion by reference of " Analysis of Credible Accid Reactors"by Hawley, et al, and " Fuel Temperatures in an A Core Following a Hypothetical Design Basis Accident (DBA
- Restate part 3 of Contention I to reads Material and inaccurate statements have been sub
- Change page citation after quoted material in item 3 a
.. to re (page 5, 2/80 application, as amended 6/82)
- Change page citation after quoted material in 3.b, to reads (page 7, 2/80 application, as amended 6.82)
- Change page citation after quoted material in 3.c. to reads (page V/1, 2.80 application)
- Replace '"have been" with '*werd' and remove "2 3" and "3 54 that it reads rc the excess reactivity limits were changed from %dk/k to $
3
- Remove "to 14 months" from I.3.c.(ii)
- Replace the last word in I.3.c(v) [" removed"J with " altered "
- Change page citation for I.3.d.e. and f so that afterpage is 1 (2/80 application, as amended 6/82)
- Change the page citation for 3.g. to reads (page V/3, 2/80 application, and parallel statement, 6/8 page V/3-7
- For Contention II.b., remove the phrase "the application indi cat
- For Contention V.3, insert the werd " currently" between "The" at the beginning of the sentence.
an
- For contention V.4, insert "value for the" between "The" and "
at the beginning of the sentence.
re "3 54" from between "$" and "in", and remove o 2.62%".
8207160277 820712 PDR ADOCK 05000142 o
PDR l
- For contention V.6, add "and Spert I" after the two places where " Borax I" is mentioned.
- For contention V.8, change the second word to plural (i.e., to " analyses"),
remove " submitted in the application", change " fails" to " fail", and change the phrase " include a current review of the nuclear" to read " include an adequate review of the current nuclear".
- For contention V.9, replace the first three words with "The analyses",
change the verb "is" to "are" at the end of the first line, and change the last sentence to read:
Additionally, error tars have not been provided for the computations and analyses.
O For contention V.ll, rave the parenthetic material (* $3 54) and (* 2.3 %Ak/k)
- And in V.14, make sure "eutectic" is spelled correctly in the official version of the cantantion language
- Change Contention VIII to read Radiation exposure to the public from the maximum credible accident at the UCLA reactor would be unacceptably high.
Specifically,
- 1. the 1980 Safety Analysis Report and 1960. Hazards Analysis, despite being based on unrealistic assumptions which minimize the expected public exposure, postulate an unacceptably high radiation dosage of 1800 Rems thyroid.
The insufficiently conservative assumptions are
- a. assumption of a release limited to only 10% of the volatile fission products and none of the non-volatile products,
- b. assumption that the reactor'has been operated at 10 kw long enough to have attained equilibrium concentrations of relatively short-lived fission products, l
t
- c. assumption that the reactor is in a two-story building with possible exposure to the public occurring outside the building,
- d. assumption of a building leakage rate of 20% of the reactor room volume per hour for a 30 mile per hour wind, assumed to be directly proportional to wind velocity 3
- e. furthermore, the assumptions upon which the analysis was based have not been adequately tested nor have they teen adequately reviewed against the current nuclear safety literature regarding dose and dispersion models.
- Replace "U235" in Contention XIII with "SNM"
- Insert " adequately" betwesen " failed to" and " analyze" in Contei tion XIV.