ML20054M992
| ML20054M992 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saxton File:GPU Nuclear icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/28/1982 |
| From: | Dircks W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Shuster B HOUSE OF REP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054E595 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8207150238 | |
| Download: ML20054M992 (4) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:v e Docket lio. : S0-146 JUN 2 81992 The Honorable Bud Shuster United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 2051S
Dear Congressman Shuster:
In correspondence dated June 14, 1982, you requested that we provide internation to you for your response to a letter f rom Mr. Janes H. Elder of Saxton, Pennsylvania on the Saxton reactor unich has been shutdown since May 1,19/2. Mr. Elder was concerned in particular about plans to disnantle the nuclear reactor contairuient building. Since its shutdown, the Saxton reactor has been maintained in a safe storage, nothballed node consistent with fiRC decomissioning regulations dnd Regulatory Guide 1.86, (enclosed). To date, we nave not received any correspondence from the Saxton fiuclear Experinental Corporation (SNEC) with respect to dismantling the Saxton facility. Recent conversation with fir. C. tiontgorery of Si4EC, nowever, indicates that SilEC has corpleted a study of dismantling costs and that they plan to request NRC authorization to dismantle the Saxton facility during the latter 1980's. Prior to dismantling a reactor f acility, a licensee rust subnit a disnantling plan to the fiRC and obtain our approval. We will review this plan to deternine that acceptable procedures are incorporated to protect the health and safety of the public and the environment. One issue of concern to us in our review is that disnantling will be accos plished such that potential releases of radioactivity be adequately controlled. Reactor dismantling generally involves dismantling of the radioactive structures inside the reactor containment building prior to renoval of the containuent building. The containnent building provides the barrier that prevents the transport of any radioactive dust into the environrent that may be produced when renoving the various internal reactor systens or shielding. 11r. C. Montgomery indicated that SliEC plans to disnantle tne Saxton facility in the nanner discussed above. In any event, the NRC will require adequate control of radioactivity during any dismantling operation. 8207150238 820628 PDR ADOCK 05000146 H PDR OF FICE ) SURNAZE) . * " = = = " " *
- "a*""*""***
......u.... osar > -. - " " -. ~ " - OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usam e-mm unc rosu ais o>em sacu em
ri Honorable Bud Shuster The liRC is required by the Code of Federal Regulations,10 CFR 50.82 to publish a " Notice of Proposed Issuance of Order Authorizing Dismantling of Facility" in the Federal Register at least 30 days before authorizing asiy reactor dismantling. If Mr. Elder wishes to receive a copy of this notice when it is published for the Saxton f acility, he may request such of the US NRC, Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Peter B. Erickson, SSPB, DL, (Phone Husaber 301-492-9784). Sincerely, IS W ) T. A, % uilliam J. Ulrcks Executive Director for Operations
Enclosure:
Regulatory Guide 1.86 DISTRIBUTION: beenent Control (50-146) w/ incoming OR NRC PDR w/ incoming L PDR w/ incoming PRC R. Minogue Davis Cunningham Underwood Case /Denton PPAS S. Hanauer R. Mattson R. Vollmer H. Thompson i P. Check B. Snyder SSPB Reading w/ incoming SSPB BC P. Erickson P. Anderson w/incomi ng D. Eisenhut/P. Purple / Marie 3 R. Tedesco/L. Berry T I g/ f h Attorney, OELD S. Cavanaugh NRR (EDO# 11997) g M. Bridgers EDO (EDO# 11997) ctF f gR ED f HDerton WD s I&E SECY (3) u g) (( i i 6Q/82 6/eyta2 W. Dircks p&g bDfD/L y D:T %RR DL:SSPB B DL;SSPD:ABC raaah @, erGr sj@@ OELD ,_;'::pigper - ~Ypf """ ur' Wy. ur' wwur - gpr- -{6m p r w;ys>er - qger - ggy ,,, p mc ronu sis oo-sos ecu cao OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usam mme
FROM: ACTION CONTROL l DATES CONTROL NO COMPL DE ADLINE 6 /f jf f') 58'E b?.N bbMISII ACKNOWLE DG ME NT DATE OF DOCUMENT INTERIM REPLY (/]4[#Q TO: PREPARE FOR SIGNATURE OF: FINAL REPLY p' /,1~ O CHAIRMAN FILE LOCATION D EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR f -l ' mi t l: v OTnER: DEE RIPTION Q LETTER OMEMO O REPORT O OTHER SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS j tsci ltr in Jan: M. E14cr co.cerning discantle of naclear re:cter contafrnent l building at site of the forcer Suten uturn f::ccalcg w/raply. Ecclear Ex serinantal 0; oration CLASSIFIED DATA OOCUMENT/ COPY NO. CLASSIFICATION l NUMBER OF PAGES CATEGORY Nh.N. 4 POSTAL REGIST RY NO. O Nsi O RD 0 rRo ASSIGNED TO: DATE INFORMATION ROUTING LEGAL REVIEW U FINAL U COPY ASSIGNED tor DATE NO LEG AL OBJECTIONS Df3 COG. IiD 6/l6/M MICQTJ$ 1. PPAS NVIE 2 URnaufl O EoO Aouin s. coRnr.s an r 1.. L., c 11 t' / e Ccnsf righa$' 3, [ Snyder 'l ' ~ ~ ' ' y g bGr'Oci 4. YOllmar COMM E N T S. NO TIF Y: Case /Denton 5. TMm JCAE NOTIFICATION RECOMMENDED: 0 YES U NO NRC FORM 232 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS DO NOT REMOVE THIS COPV PRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL i o 1 3 ".it b L C ~' O O e N O U U u f C U X Z s ! E !O Q g u 3 e-N L 4 3 % E l 4: Ous.tB 2 g e o l*,. e e s e e ,S, U
- e oS5" 2 t E
J:*4: E o -r e u e .c
- fn.
C C Sb W
- o.*
c u sa s a + O O 4 lw. >= N .C. O,. c ( 4J r e W t.
- m 4
g h b c m W a c g 8 2CP U U c
- r= &
O r 7 -"x E L L m r c 3 3 e z, g e m u o u o u - r 8 i 2 E. - Y j W c a g. z e c M u O e U _:l oa m a o .8 m - o = :: t&c a eO S 'e c 8 m g u m.o w 8 c c 5 i a S e ii !2:5 2 a ' u ;; i 8 o 1 -8 a2 Z ~E v E g t } lo 5Ng3 8 a 2; y x g gg o .c E 3 o e 3 .? 3 g g u w u n. u a g - o 3
- *E QO O
rg ,e st a }5 g8ag !.sgi ..m L O -0 52 38 5 6o j 8 a s @s 4 z f m 5 y 00 a a a f o w w w g il O @OO e --}}