ML20054M765

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards RA Wiesemann 811117 Affidavit,Page 5.Westinghouse No Longer Claims Affidavit Entirely Proprietary But Only Contains Proprietary Info.No Arguments Waived by Furnishing Page 5.W/o Encl
ML20054M765
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/06/1982
From: Davis F
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To: Patricia Anderson
WISCONSIN'S ENVIRONMENTAL DECADE
References
ISSUANCES-OLA, NUDOCS 8207140380
Download: ML20054M765 (1)


Text

_

Westinghouse '

tanoepamnen:

Electric Corporation g/ Westinghoust Building Gateway Center Pittsburgh Pennsytrenia iS222 P. O. Box 355 -

sPittsburgh, PA '15230 July 6, 1982 Mr. Peter Anderson -

Wisconsin's Environmental Decade 114 North Carroll Street Madison, Wisconsin 53703 Re: Wisconsin Electric Power Company

_ Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-266-OLA and 50-301-OLA

Dear ."r. Anderson:

In accordance with paragraph 8 of the Memorandum and Order in this proceeding dated May 26, 1982 and our July 1, 1982 telephone conversation, enclosed is page 5 of the affidavit of Robert A.

Wiesemann dated November 17, 1981. When it was originally prepared ~

and submitted, Westinghouse asserted that it was proprietary in its entirety, and it bears the original markings and assertions indicat-ing this claim. While Westinghouse no longer claims it is proprietary in its entirety, it contains Westinghouse proprietary data, and that information has been marked with brackets.

By furnishing page 5 of the affidavit, Westinghouse waives no ..

arguments heretofore asserted, including those that 10 CFR 2.790(bk allows such a supporting affidavit to be protected as proprietary i l in its entirety, that it need not-be furnished to other parties in a licensing proceeding whose contentions are safety related, that the jurisdiction, if any, of this or any other licensing board concerning proprietary matters is preempted when the regulatory staff has acted on a claim for proprietary protection, and that such jurisdiction exists only if a party properly has raised an issue regarding a prom ..utary claim (unless the requirements of 10 CFP 2.760 (a) are net. which is not the case in this instance.

Very truly yours, (1

w -

' Francis X. Davis

!_ G207140300 820706 Attorney for Westinghouse --

t PDR ADOCK 05000266 Eieptric Corporation, G PDR Appearing Specially i

FXD:bjk cc: Service List (w/o enclosure) i M