ML20054M285
| ML20054M285 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/25/1982 |
| From: | Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Doi K Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy Project |
| References | |
| FOIA-82-204 NUDOCS 8207120232 | |
| Download: ML20054M285 (2) | |
Text
g
=
/g* g Kf C 'o, UNITED STATES k
O e
l'_
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
g, C
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
- ., t a
g
/
June 25, 1982 Ms. Kathy Doi Critical Mass Energy Project 215 Pennsylvania Avenue, S.E.
IN RESPONSE REFER Washington, DC 20003 TO F01A-82-204
Dear Ms. Doi:
This is an additional response to your letter dated April 19, 1982 in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, documents relating to the cancellation, postponement, termination or deferral of nuclear plant construction since 1/1/80.
The documents listed on the appendix were recently identified by the Commission and are being placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20555.
The charge for reproducing records located in the PDR is five cents ($0.05) per page, as specified in 10 CFR 9.14(a).
Copies of these documents can be purchased by writing directly to the PDR. The number of pages per document is indicated in the appendix. Upon your agreement to pay the reproduction charges, the PDR will arrange for the records to be reproduced by Literature Research Company, a private reproduction contractor servicing the PDR.
You will be billed by Literature Research Company for the reproduction charges, plus tax and postage.
Sincerely, n
~ Z" J. M. Felton, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration
Enclosure:
As stated
~
8207120232 820625 PDR FOIA DOIB2-204 PDR
Re:
FOIA-82-204
- ^
Appendix 1.
3/19/82 Memo to Comissioner Ahearne from K. Cornell (2 pages) 2.
11/5/81 Speech by Commissioner Gilinsky, American Nuclear Society Bethesda, MD (6 pages) 3.
5/24/82 Speech by Commissioner Gilinsky, Atomic Industrial Forum, Kansas City, M0 (8 pages) i I
4 T
k l'
L
- s"'
~
./(,
+
- s
+.
)
?*.
/*** **N, UNITED STATES
]
(.,,.i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
i, %. )'
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 i
I OFFICE OF THE
& rch 19, 1982 DEPUTY EXECUTIVE. DIRECTOR
,FOR OPERATIONS Note to:
Comissioner Ahearne The attached is in response to your request.
Kevin Cornell Enc 1: Table cc w/ encl:" Chairman Palladino Comissioner Gilinsky Comissioner Roberts
,\\l I
9l;i,
~ 0' ') ^ fi /
-1 p
a--d JU (.) Lf C O
ee 4
f e
l
?
3/l q7.82.,-
I ESTIMATE OF UtlITS TO BE CANCELED OR INDEFIllITELY DEFERRED Applicants '
Applicants' Percent Estimated
,i Complete Completion Plant Name Estimate Dates NRC Staff's Remarks 1.
Cherokee 1 18%
N/S Already indefinitely deferred.
2.-
Cherokee 2 0%
N/S
~
Already indefinitely deferred.
3.
Cherokee 3 0%
N/S Already indefinitely deferred.
4...Clinton 2.
Ih N/S Already indefinitely deferred.
5.
Grand Gulf 2 22%
N/S Construction halted Dec.1979, not yet restarted.
I 6.
Harris 2 4%
6/88 Units 3 and 4 recently canceled, less than 33% complete and limited ongoing activity on Unit 2.
7.
Hartsville B-1 17%
N/S Already indefinitely deferred.
8." Hartsville B-2 7%
N/S Already indef)nitely deferred.
9.
Limerick 2 30%
4/87 Extensive intervention in hearings, less;than 33% complete.
10.
Marble Hill 2 14%
6/87 Less than 33% complete.
11.
Nine Mii'u Point 2 37%
3/86 Conflicting reports on the demand for power.
.~
12.
North Anna 3 8%
4/89 Less than 33% complete.
13.
Phipps Bend 1 29%
1/93 Construction indefinitely deferred.
14'.
Phipps Bend 2 5%
N/S Already indefinitely deferred.
15.
River Bend 2 1%
N/S Already indefinitely deferred.
16.
Seabrook.2-9%
.2/86 s r Less than 33% complete.
17.
South Texas 2 18%
N'[S Large schedule uncertainty, constructor being changed.
i Less than 33% complete and limited ongoing activity.
18 / Vogtle'2 8%
3/88 Less than 33% complete and limited ongoing activity.
19.
Yellow Creek 2 3%
N/S Already indefinitely deferred.
gg,
t t ;
m-D 0
0 fL__]
JL A Branch of Public Citizen,Inc.
EREEDOM OF INFORMATION Apr.tl 19, 1982 ACI REQUEST Mr. Joseph Felton
[Q
,_g g Division of Rules and Records U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission QigqQI
{
Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Felton:
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.
S9 (subpart A), the Critical Mass Energy Project hereby requests copies of, and otherwise access to, the infor-mation detailed as follows:
Any and all documents, including letters, memoranda, reports, studies, and testimony which discuss, project, predict, or suggest the cancellation, postponement, termination, or deferral of nuclear plant construction.
t Specifically included in this request is a memorandum supplied to Commissioner Gilinsky in 1981 which is referred to by William J.
Dircks (EDO) in his February 19, 1982 memorandum for Commissioner Ahearne.
Also requested is Commissioner Ahearne's initial request for data which the above cited memorandum is a response to.
Also included in'this request are preparatory and draft materials and other documents and studies used as sources in formulating Dircks' Feb. 19, 1982 memo-randum to Commissioner Ahearne, as well as any similar studies prepared by EDO, MPA, or Commissioners' offices pertaining to the subject as outlined above.
(I have already contacted Mr.
R.A.
Hartfield, MPA, who has been very helpful in supplying the Merrill Lynch report which was presented at the American Nuclear Society meeting in San Francisco in December 1981.
This document is therefore excluded from this request.)
Lastly included in this request are any and all documents, including letters, memoranda, reports, studies, and testimony to any of the Commissioners (or their staffs or offices) or to any Commission office (e.g., EDO, MPA, OGC, OPE, OPA) from AIF, ANEC, EEI, EPRI (or other industry, utility, or investment company) which discuss, project, predict.or suggest the 215 Pennsylvania Ave., SE a Washington, DC 20003 m (202) 546-4790 6'} wn t
- -o.,
L
e :..
FOIA request /2 cancellation, postponement, termination,_or deferral of nuclear plant construction.
Only documents written, transmitted, or routed after January 1, 1980 are being sought by this request.
We request a complete waiver of all costs you might incur in-processing this information or providing us access to it under provisions of 10 C.F.R.
sec.
9, 14, as.the information will be used in the general public interest.
Nothing in this request should be interpreted as a request for the private records of any specific individual.
Hence, no pro-visions of the Privacy Act should be deemed applicable.
If all or any part'of this request is denied, please cite the specific exemption (s) which you think justifies your refu-sal to release the information and inform us of the appeal procedures available to us under the law.
We expect a substantive reply to this request within ten (10) working days, as required by the Freedom of Information Act.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely, Kathy i
,_. _