ML20054K891
| ML20054K891 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yellow Creek  |
| Issue date: | 04/30/1982 |
| From: | TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054K889 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8207060258 | |
| Download: ML20054K891 (31) | |
Text
A TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT YCNP - SMR-7 June 30, 1981 Knoxville, Tennessee April 1982 m
8207060258$$bo 6
i CONTENTS Page Background....
1 I.
Monitoring Results.....
1 II.
Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions 5
III. Summary of Mitigation Expenditures.
12 Tables Table 1.
Estimates of Population and Population Change for Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi, and Hardin County, Tennessee, for Monitoring Secondary Socioeconomic Impacts of Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Construction June 30, 1977 - June 30, 1981..
6 Table 2.
Traffic Evaluation.
13 Table 3.
Summary of Mitigation Expenditures as of June 30, 1981 14 Appendixes Table A-1.
Town of Current Residence.
16 Table A-2.
Source and Location of Construction Employees 18 Table A-3.
Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community...
19 Table A-4.
Comparison of Survey Results with Projections and Selected Parameters.
20 Table A-5.
Mover Summary.
21 Table A-6.
Alcorn - Employees Living Within the County......
22 Table A-7.
Tishomingo - Employees Living Within the County.
23 Table A-8.
Hardin - Employees Living Within the County.
24 Table A-9.
Corinth - Employees Living Within the City Limits 25 Table A-10.
Iuka - Employees Living Within the City Limits 26 Table A-11.
Savannah - Employees Living Within the City Limits 27 Appendix B
- Definition Level of Service D.......
28 Appendix C Employee Questionnaire 29 Appendix C Follow-up Questionnaire.
30 EXHIBIT Figure 1.
Towns Containing Construction Employees.
31
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT SOCIOECONOMIC HONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT BACKGROUND
^
This is the seventh in a series of reports describing the monitoring o
and mitigation of socioeconomic impacts which result from the construction of the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant. This reporting.
period began January 1, 1981, and ended June 30, 1981, and the discussions in this report are in that timeframe. These semi-annual reports are prepared to fulfill a commitment made by.
TVA in the construction permits hearings. The impact area is defined as portions of Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi, and Hardin County, Tennessee. This area was selected because it was projected to receive a significant population influx due to the project. However, the impact area may be redefined if significant impacts are identified elsewhere.
I.
Monitoring Results In August 1981 TVA conducted a survey of all TVA employees at Yellow Creek as of June 30, 1981. The timelag between employment and survey gives the employees who moved an opportunity to make personal adjust-ments and should provide a better view of employee distribution, family characteristics, and housing choice. There was an increase i
in the employment level this period from 3,002 to 3,687, and information was available for 67 percent'(2,467). Based on that Information, 440, or 18 percent indicated that they moved into the area to work at the project (movers). Of the total 440, 226 located in the impact area. Local employees (nonmovers) commute to the project from a widespread area, but 36 percent of the total work force consisted of residents of the impact counties. The information obtained with respect to the distribution of movers and nonmovers is contained in tables A-1 and A-2 as well as figure 1.
Additional information on the distribution, family characteristics, and housing choice of movers is contained in tables A-3 through A-11.
Table A-1 lists the towns of current residence of all employees.
It is basically a " mailing ado.. ss" location rather than a jurisdictional location since all employees must provide a place name even though they may not live within any municipal limits. Figure 1 is based on this table.
At the county level and above, both the origin and location of all employees are contained in table A-2.
The diagonal line of the "from-to" tabulation shows resident employees (nonmovers); for example, resident employees from Hardin County are found by locating Hardin County in the "from" column and going across the table to the "to" column, in which Hardin County also appears.
In this survey 535 residents of Tishomingo County were employed at the end of June. Movers are shown by all other information in the table. For example, 8 employees moved from "Other Recruiting Counties" to Alcorn County, Mississippi.
Table A-3 provides extrapolated data for the impact area including the number of movers within the city limits for the three primary impact communities. To compare the survey results with projections, selected parameters from the Socioeconomic Impacts section (revision 4, dated June 16, 1978, of the " Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Environmental Report") were applied to the number of employees surveyed. The results of this comparison are found in table A-4.
No mover rate was projected except for peak employment (30 percent). However, the family characteristics, housing choice, and location pattern can be compared.
Surveyed employee characteristics are similar to those projected.
Sixty percent were expected to bring their families. This survey found that 73 percent did, and the remaining 27 percent did not have families in the impact area.
Projections indicated one school-age child per family, and the survey result was the same. The average family size was larger than projected at 3.3 compared with the projected 3.0.
A considerable difference has been experienced in the projected (30 percent) mover rate and surveyed mover rate (18 percent).
A 30 percent mover rate for employment level 3,687 would be 1,106 movers, and the projected population influx would be 2,434; but there were only 658 movers (18 percent), and the total surveyed population influx was 1,764.
The housing choice of movers is continuing to vary considerably from projections, which were made only for peak employment. Fifty-six perter.L of the movers chose houses, and 26 percent chose mobile homes. The peak projections were that 35 percent would choose houses and that 45 percent would choose mobile homes. The projec-tions (20 percent) and survey results (18 percent) remain close for those choosing apartments, sleeping rooms, and other accommodations.
The "other" category includes tents, campers, and recreational vehicles.
i The largest and most significant variation from the projections continues to be the mover distribution to the Corinth area and to areas outside the impact area. Some 50 percent of the movers were projected to locate in the Corinth area, but only 9 perceat of the movers have located there. No movers were projected to locate outside the impact area, but in fact 49 percent located outside the impact area. While there is no real explanation for the Corinth result, the location of movers outside the impact area is not unexpected.
Based on past survey results, about 20 to 30 percent of the movers were expected to locate outside the impact area. However, in order to prepare for the maximum numbers of movers, the total influx was allocated to the impact area as basis for estimating impacts. Of the towns outside the impact area, Florence, Alabama, has received the largest number of movers (37). Florence has a population of about 37,000; so the additional movers would not create a significant adverse impact. The projections (40 percent) and survey results (32 percent) were close for the Burnsville and luka areas of Tishomingo County, Mississippi. The projections (10 percent) and survey results were the same for the Savannah and Counce areas of Hardin County, Tennessee.
i f
Detailed data on family status and characteristics and housing choice of surveyed movers for the whole project are found in table A-5.
The same information for the impact counties is found in tables A-6 through A-8 while tables A-9 through A-11 present the information on movers within the city limits of the impact communities.
1 t
II.
Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions Secondary Employment--Secondary employment is defined as a temporary increase in the trade-and service-related resident population which can be attributed to the Yellow Creek project.
If the population increase in a county is greater than that arising directly from the o
project or from other primary employment increases, we would conclude that the possibility of secondary employment exists. Since the project began, Alcorn and Hardin Counties have experienced increases in population exceeding any increases which can be explained by projected-related influx and change in population associated with other primary employment (see table 1).
Start of project population estimates were revised based on 1980 revised census data.
Education--TVA, the Mississippi and Tennessee Departments of Education, and the affected school boards are cooperating in efforts to ensure that the influx of project-related students will not impair the ability of local schools to maintain a quality educational environment.
In accordance with the cooperative effort, TVA is providing financial assistance for four local school districts in Mississippi and one in Tennessee for the acquisition of needed schoolbuses to provide trans-portation services for the inmoving students. The local school districts received financial assistance from the United States Office of Education under Public Laws81-815 and 81-874. Public Law 81-815 provides assistance to the local school districts which are temporarily impacted by Federal programs. The funds are to be used to build classrooms needed to accommodate children of Federal employees.
Table 1 ESTIMATES OF POPULATION AND POPULATION CHANGE FOR ALCORN AND TISHOMINGO COUi4 TIES, MIS $1SSIPPI, AND HARDIN COUNTY, TENhESSEE FOR MONITORING SECONDARY SOCI0 ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTION JUNE 30.1977 - JUNE 30,1981 Remainder of Population Population Change In Monproject Related Change in Population Change in Estimate Estimate Population Estimate Related Population Population as of Possible from Other Population 6/30/77 6/30/81 6/30/77 - 6/30/81 6/30/77 - 6/30/81 6/30/81 Primary Employment Unexplained Alcorn County 31.259 33.797 2.538 220 2.318 1.022 1.296 Tishomingo County 17.368 18.892 1.524 559 965 5.745 Hardin County 21.043 22.810 1.767 194 1.573 1.004 56 1 I
Source:
U.S. Bureau of the Census.1980 Census of Population and Housing.. Advanced Reports. Alabama and Tennessee. PHC80-V-2 and PHC80-V-94.
Community Economics March 15, 1982
_ _. _ _ __ - _ _ _.. _. _ _ --- _. _ - _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _. -. - _ - _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
l Planning and other technical assistance are provided by the appro-priate State agencies. The local districts provide educational services to direct impact students on a comparable basis to regular enrollees. Public Law 81-874 assistance has been used to offset additional operating costs not available from local and State funds.
No TVA mitigation funds were needed for schoolbus transportation during the time period of January 1,1980, through June 30, 1980.
The schoolbus transportation services previously provided by TVA are sufficient to serve the number of impact students surveyed December 1979.
Local Government Budgets--Monitoring of project impact on local govern-ments is an ongoing process handled by the program coordinator. The coordinator lives and works in the local area and maintains continuous communications with local government officials. The following is a a
summary of activities to mitigate the impacts on local governmental services during this period. Contracts with three counties for the implementation of county-wide emergency response systems continue in effect.
In Hardin County the procurement of equipment for the system is complete.
Local volunteer units have been organized in each county and operation of the system is improving.
It is expected that each of the three counties will have effective county-wide fire protection upon completion of existing contracts. Payments made to the counties for emergency fire systems are as follows:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City / County Payments this Period Total to Date Savannah
$15,000
$ 15,000 Alcorn County
$ 5,704
$ 11,627 Hardin County
$35,646
$174,231 Tishomingo County
$12,392
$ 12,392 Iuka
$24,750
$ 24,750
$93,492
$238,000 TVA and the impact counties are continuing to work on developing a coopera-i tive project for an industrial training center. TVA expects to provide up
)
l to $50,000 for the project upon completion of the county-wide emergency l
l response system.
I l
1 Assistance to local governments for law enforcement continued during this period. Agreements with Iuka, Tishomingo County, and Burnsville remained in effect. Payments made during this period are as follows:
l City / County Payments this Period Total to Date Tishomingo County
$51,552
$ 81,121 Iuka
$ 8,622
$ 54,574 Burnsville
$11,200
$ 17,741
$71,374
$153,436 Implementation of the computer system in the town of Savannah continued.
l
-No payments were made during this reporting period.
l l
l s
Local Recruitment and Training--Full-time classes were held for both carpenters and operators. The carpenters program graduated 13 students, and the operators program graduated 15 students. Upgrade classes were held for mechanics, iron workers, carpenters, laborers, and office workers. Of the 187 students who participated in this skills improve-ment program, 176 students graduated.
Health and Medical Services--Eighty-three percent of the employees reported no need to travel for medical services. Out of area travel for specialty care was mostly to Birmingham, Memphis, Huntsville, and Jackson, Tennessee, with some travel to other points.
Agreements with Alcorn County and the city of Inka for a school health nurse were in force during the reporting period, but no invoices were received and no payments were made. Fifty thousand dollars was paid to Tishomingo County Hospital for renovation and expansion of their emergency room.
Housing--Conditions in the local housing market are generally the same as indicated in the last two reports.
Increases in mover population were reported in all area counties over those in the December 30, 1980 report, but there appears to have been sufficient housing to accommodate the increased inmoving population.
_ _ Water and Sewer--During this reporting period the amount to be provided under Contract No. TV-47290A to improve the Short Coleman Park Water Association's system was increased to $130,000. The Association has contracted with a company to improve and renovate the existing wells and treatment plant and has contracted for a new well to be located near the north end of the system.
TVA will continue to evaluate the water and sewage treatment capability for the systems in the impact counties to assess any additional mover impacts as they occur.
Recreation--TVA continued to monitor impacts on recreation during the reporting period. Two requests for planning assistance were received.
The city of Burnsville requested assistance in developing standards for the construction of a new city park. The new facility is being developed with matching funds acquired through a Land and Water Conservation Grant on property donated to the city by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Facility design assistance was also provided to the town of Golden for the development of a new community playground.
In response to increased demands on recreation services at J. P. Coleman and Tishomingo State Parks, TVA agreed to provide funding assistance for the operation of their summer recreation programs.
TVA will provide up to A40,000 for additional staff and equipment to help meet the increased demand on park services attributed to impacts of the construction to Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant. Funds will be disbursed over a 2-year period.
The following table lists total TVA financial payments for recreation through June 30, 1981.
TVA Recreation Mitigation Payments Expenditures Expenditures this Period to Date City of Corinth 734
$ 7,929 Tishomingo County 7,707 33,986 Mississippi Bureau of Recreation and Parks (State Parks Project) 20,000 20,000 City of Savannah 50,000
$28,441
$111,915 Employee Transportation--During this period, the employee transportation program at the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant increased the number of buses and vans used in the program. Two additional buses and three additional vans were put into operation bringing the total number of operating buses to 23 and the total number of operating vans to 33.
The transportation program is carrying 45 percent of the day shift employees or approximately 1,100 people per day. This has reduced the traffic flow by approximately 630 vehicles per day.
TVA's expenditure for employee transportation this period was $313,154.
j Traffic--In December 1978, the Mississippi State Highway Department began supplying TVA with traffic counts for eleven locations on a semiannual basis.
A twelfth location was added in 1980 when State Route 350, connecting Corinth, Mississippi, to State Route 25 north of Cross Roads was completed. To supplement these counts, TVA began in 1979 taking intersection counts at
[
four intersections near the site on the same semiannual basis.
With 3,700 employed at the site, 830 commuter vehicles are used in the transportation of the peak shift employees. Peak-hour volumes and hourly volumes during the peak TVA commuting hour for twelve key highway segments are shown in table 2.
The hourly volumes indicate level of service D or better operation is provided on all the key highway segments (see appendix B).
1 As indicated in Table 2, the peak TVA commuting traffic occurs during an l
hour other than the peak hour for some of the highway segments being monitored.
This can be attributed to the fact that the shifts are scheduled such that the majority of the TVA commuter traffic does not coincide with the current peak hours.
i i
i i
III. Summary of Mitigation Expenditures TVA's mitigation expenditures this reporting period totaled $562,165, with major expenditures were for employee transportation and local governments budgets.
i TABLE 2 TRAFFIC EVALUATION (JANUARY 1981 TO JUNE 1981)
Peak Hour Volume During During Peak TVA TVA Commuter Daily Peak Shift Change Traffic Volume Iuka-Red Sulphur Springs Road North of Road Project 1002 1030 1030 830 Iuka-Red Sulphur Springs Road North of Patrick Church Road 590 590 525 luka-Red Sulphur Springs Road (Project 1001) between Patrick Church Road and SR-25 550 550 525 SR-25 North of U.S. 72 Junction 730*
620 465 U.S. 72 West of Alabama State Iine 500 500 325 SR-25 South of SR-365 Junct.Dn 530 530 240 SR-25 South of Tennessee State Line 340 340 130 SR-350 West of SR-25 Junction 75*
70 50 SR-25 Southwest of SR-25 Junction 80*
75 60 SR-25 South of Inka 430*
410 75 U.S. 72 West of SR-365 Junction 540 540 15 SR-25 Midway between Patrick Road and Iuka-Red Sulphur Springs Road 220 220 60
- Because of the shif t schedule at the project, the peak TVA commuting traffic occurs during an hour other than the peak hour for some of the highway segments being monitored.
O
,_s-,.-v.
.- TABLE 3
SUMMARY
OF MITIGATION EXPENDITURES AS OF JUNE 30, 1981 Expenditures Expenditures This Period To Date Education
$ 155,582 Employee Transportation
$ 313,154 1,226,216 Health & Medical Services 50,000 88,347
.i Local Recruitment and Training 380,000 Local Government Budgets 170,570 398,465 Recreation 28,441 111,915 l
Water and Sewer 31,000 Total
$ 562,165
$2,391,525 l
e
f Appendixes f
t
{
(
s e
d
(
i
(
n
,-n,.--
wr-.
._-,,,-_,,-----,,,,,,__,,,--4
,.,g.,
s..e--
,,g, v--,-.
M, f,
~
Table A-1 FOLLCW UP SO4 /E 4 Tod1 3F CU4 RENT 4E513EPCE R IN DAT E 03/19/82
~
YLLLud CREEA NUCLE AR PL ANT E MPLOY E ES R AN T11E 164430 '
ACTIVE EMPLOYEt h 06-30-81 4!Poaf 2
l TUwN
-MOVr.D TO AL R E ADV
'~
l I Unte IN TOWN TUTAL POPULAT ION CHEROKEL AL 11 71 82 1.4 84 FLLMtNCE AL 37 263 3 3 ',
36.000 K ILL EN 4L 8
41 4i
- 1. 2 31 MO5LLE sNUALS AL 23 62 Sk 6.907 l
xd5 5L L LV IL LE AL 5
52 5e 7.814 SHLFFIELD AL 22 63 8'
12.000 1U500M8tA 4L 20 114 1 34 8.828 buRNSV IL L E M5 10 69 7'8 784 00k! NTH MS 43 135 lii 10,900 l ud. A 15 132 367 498 2.3d9 il5HOMINGO MS 7
44 5t 4 16 ELLINGTON GLEN M5 5
5 11 SAVANiAH T4 27 154 18L 5,57o COUNC E TN 17 30 4f 600 suuTu l AL 270 1502 187.!
ATHLN5 AL 3
19 21 13,637 COUNIL AN D 4L 0
5 5
547 LEXINGTON AL 1
8 9
278 klu UAY AL 2
to 17 2.464 kUG Lks V ILL E 4L 4
23 27 9 50 Tuht4 CRELK AL 0
16 16 1,203 mATLALDO AL 3
9 12 2 62 bELMONT MS 3
22 25 1.237 800htVILLE M5 4
43 47 5,895.
F UL TON MS 1
5 6
2.899 l
Rit td21 M5 4
8 12 3 63 ulNt415 M5 I
9 13 125 AUAM5VILLE TN 2
13 15 1,344 ULIHLL SPRINGS IN O
7 T
842 CLIFTON TN O
5 5
7 37 COLLINnUCD TN O
7 7
922 JLLATURVILLE TN 3
5 5
958 LL A INGTUf4 TN 2
8 10 5,024 LukETTU TN O
15 15 1.557 MICHIE T N' 2
18 23 569 P AkSut45 TN 1
7 8
2,167 HAMER TN O
9 9
451 SELMLM TN O
11 13 3.495 hiANIOhWILLE IN 2
5 F
2S6 WAYNL500Hu TN' 3
15 15 1,983 CkUMP TN O
6 6
3 50
- m a
1
-- Table A-1 (Continued)
FULLOW UP SU4VEr TOWN 08 CURRENT RESI DE K.E RUN DATE 03/19/82 YELLud CREEE MJCLEAR PL ANT EMPLOVE ES SUN TINE 164430 ACTlyk LNPLufEES 06-30-81 REPORT 2
40VLD TJ ALREADY T0wN l owN IN TOWN TOTAL POPUL A TION GOV 5 TN 0
5 5
150 LL UMA TN 0
5 5
300 LUTIS TN 0
7 7
2 00 MORRIS CHAPEL T4 1
7 8
120 SHILOH TN O
10 10 SUBTOTAL 36 349 385 OTHtR 34 176 210 1
i iOTAL RLSPONSES 440 2027 246i YCNP nuknf UdCE T OT AL 3687 06-30-81 O
s e
4 i
Table A-2 FOLLOW UP SURVEY SOURC E AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTICN EMPLOYEES RUN DATE 03/01/82 YELLOW CREE K NUCLE AR PLANT RUN TIME 190747 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 36-31-81 REPORT 4
OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER
=
--IMP ACT COUNTI ES -
REC.
AL A8AM A MISS.
TENN.
Fh04 --- TO ALCORN T I SHOMINGO H AR DIN COUNTIES COUNTIES COUNT IE S COUNTIES O TH E R 843 ALCORA til 154 9
3 4
17)
IISHOMINGO Ill 7
535 3
13 1
1 1
561 HAk0th (la 1
206 2
1 210 OTHER RLCAUITING ;0UN 823 8
51 5
1224 1
1 2
1 1293 OT HE R AL. COUN T I ES ( 3) 7 20 6
22 13 64 I
14 1
5 1
23 5 I
JIHER IN. COUN TIES I 38 17 30 20 18 1
6 92 ARM NSAS 1
1 2
otukGIA 1
1 KEt4TULAY 2
2 1
5 N.
LAROLINA 2
1 2
5 U THE R STATES 4
11 7
14 1
37 TUTAL 202 675 252 1306 15 3
10 4
2467 NOTE: D A T A ON DI AGON AL INDICAT E NONMOVERS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MOVI S hl THIN A COUNTY.
ALL OTHER DATA INDICATE MOVERS.
(1).1ECRUITING COUNTY (2) ALAB AMA COUNTI ES:
CCLBERT, CULLMAN, FRAELIN, L AUD E4 0AL E, L A WP. ENC E, LI ME S T ONE,
MARI ON MISSISSIPPI COUNTIES: B ENT ON, DESOTA. IT AWAMSA, LAF AYETT E, LEE, HAdSr1 ALL, PONTOTOC, PRENTISS TIPP AH, UNION TENNESSEE COUN TIES:
CHE S T ER, DECATUR, F AYET TE, GILES, HARDEMAN, HAYWOOD, HENDERSON, L AWRENCE, LEWI S, M ADISON, MCNAIRY, PERRY, SHEL BY. W A VN E 131 ALL COUNTIES IN AL ABAMA, MISSIS $1PPI, AND TENNESSEE DIHER THAN RECRUI TIM COJNTIES
(*l "OTHER" INCLUDES NON-RESPONSES OR ERR 0NEDUS RESPONSES FOR CURREN T ADDRESS.
Table A-3 YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT DISTRIBUTION OF MOVERS AND ASSOCIATED POPULATION BY COUNTY AND COMMUNITY JUNE 30, 1981 l
Number 2
I Percent of Population Influx County of Movers Movers School Age Total Alcorn, MS 11 75 55 220 Tishomingo, MA 35 232 127 559 Hardin, TN 11 69 61 194 Other Counties 43 282 214 791 Total 100 658 457 1,764 3
Community Corinth, MS 3
19 4
40 Iuka, MS 9
58 37 144 Savannah, TN 2
12 7
33 Total 14 89 48 217 1.
Numbers ext.rapolated.
2.
Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
3.
Within municipal limits.
9
_ _ _ _ ~ - _ _ -.
Table A-4 YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT COMPARISON OF SURVEY RESULTS WITH PROJECTIONS FOR SELECTED PARAMETERS EMPLOYMENT LEVEL - 3,687 MOVER LEVEL - 658 I
Projected Surveyed Percent Number Percent Number Movers with Families 60 395 73 478 Movers without Families 40 263 27 179 School-Age Children 395 457 School-Age Children per Family 1
1 Total Population Influx 1,448 1,764 Percent Number Percent Number Housing Choice Houses 35 230 56 368 Mobile Homes 45 296 26 172 Apartments, Sleeping Rooms, and Other 20 132 18 118 2
2 100 658 100 658 Percent Number Percent Number Distribution by County Alcorn, MS - Corinth Area 50 329 9
60 Tishomingo, MS - Iuka and Burnsville Areas 40 263 32 212 Hardin, TN - Savannah and Counce Areas 10 66 10 66 Other Areas 0
49 320 2
2 Total 100 658 100 658 1.
Numbers extrapolated.
2.
Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
i 1 t Table A-5 FULLJW UP SURVE Y WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO FELL 0m CREEK paJCLEAR PL ANT AREA P AGE 010 AUN DATE 03/01/82 MuYER SUMM ARY REPORT IF AC TIVE EMPLOYEES 06-30-81 RUN TIME 190639 WITH TOTAL CHI LD REN CHI LDRE N MOVERS CHILDRE N NUMBER IN IN MOVERS h! TH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOT AL F AM ILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOVLES HOUS L OW NE D 15 46 113 60 24 4
19 HOUSE RENTED 15 5
12 7
0 9
24 APAMTMENT RENTED 8
3 6
4-1 17 25 MOBILE HOME RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
M00lLL HOME OWNED 16 5
15 7
2 5
21 SLEEPING ROUM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MU TE L OTHER 2
1 2
2 0
1 3
TUT AL 116 60 148 80 21 39 155 HOURLY E MPLOYEES HUuS E Oh NE D 61 42 95 53 18 4
71 HOUSE RENTED 54 31 85 45 18 18 72 APARTMENT RENTED 16 5
16 9
0 12 28 l
MOBILE HOME RENTED 15 8
21 10 2
16 31
{
MOBILE HOML OWNED 45 22 49 32 9
to 61 SLLEPING ROOM 1
0 0
0 0
2 3
MOTE L 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
U T HE R 6
1 6
3 0
12 18 TOTAL 204 109 2 72 152 47 81 285 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 142 88 2f i 113 42 8
150 HOUSE RENTED 69 36 91 52 18 27 96 APAATMENT RENTED 24 8
22 13 1
29 53 MOBILE HOME RENTED 15 8
21 10 2
18 33 M081LE HOME UWNED 61 21 64 39 11 21 82 SLEEP ING ROOM 1
0 0
0 0
3 4
MOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
U THE R 8
2 8
5 0
13 21 iciAL 320 169 420 232 74 120 440 9
I 1
Table A-6 FULLOW UP SURVEY bOR4ERS WHO MOVED INTO V ELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT ARE A PAGE 004 ALCORN RUN DATE 03/01/82 kMPLOVEES LIVING WIIMIN IHE COUNTY ICIAL REPORT 18 ACT IVE EMPLOYEES 06-30-81 RUN TIME 190639 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHIL DREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WlIH IN OF GRADE H IGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHCOL SCHOOL F AM IL Y MOVERS ANNJAL EMPLOYEES HJuSE uwNEO 20 10 34 12 6
0 20 HOUSE RENT ED 1
0 0
0 0
1 2
APARTMENT RENit0 2
0 1
0 0
3 5
MUSILE HOME RLNIL)
MODILE HUML (MNtu 1
1 3
3 0
C 1
SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL UTHER 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
TOTAL 24 11 38 15 6
5 29 HOURLY EMPLUYEES n)uSE UWNED 4
3 7
4 2
2 6
HuuSE RENT ED 4
2 6
3 2
1 5
0 0
0 0
1 2
MOBILE HOME RENTE3 I
1 1
0 1
2 MOBILE HOME GdNED 5
3 5
4 0
C 5
SLEEPING ROOM MUIEL UTHER 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
TO T AL 16 9
19 12 4
5 21 ALL E MPL OY EES HOUSE OwNLO 24 13 41 16 8
2 26 HOUSE RENIED 5
2 4
3 2
2 7
0 1
0 0
4 7
MUdlLE HOME RENTE3 1
1 1
1 0
1 2
Muu!LE HCME UWNED 6
4 8
7 0
C 6
SLLEPING ROOM MOTEL OIHER 1
0 0
0 0
1 2
10 TAL 40 20 57 27 10 10 50 4
4
Table A-7 FOLLud UP SURVEY WORKERS hMO MOVED INTO r ELLOW CREEK NUCLE AR PL ANT AREA PAGE 015 T I SHOM INGO RUN DATE 03/01/82 LMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPO R T IB AC TIVE EMPLOYEES 06-30-81 RUN TIME 190639 WITH TO T AL CHIL DR EN CHILDREN MuvERS CHILDREN NUM BER IN IN EV ERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CH IL DR EN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY NJVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 17 11 22 15 5
2 19 WUSE RENIED 6
3 6
4 0
3 9
APARTMENT RENTED 1
0 1
0 0
3 4
MOBILE HCHE RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
8 1
2 4
16 SLEEPIN ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MuTEL UTHER 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
10TAL 37 16 3T 20 7
15 52 HOURL V EMPLOYEE h HOUSE OWNED 19 9
16 9
5 1
20 HUU5L RENTLD 16 to 22 12 6
7 23 APARTMENT RENTED 4
1 3
1 0
5 9
MuBILE HOME REN TED 7
3 10 3
1 7
14 Mo ulL E HOM E O WN ED 21 8
20 12 6
11 32 SLLLP1W ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MOTEL OTHER 3
1 4
3 0
1 4
TOTAL 10 32 T5 40 18 33 103 ALL LMPLOYLES HOUSE ObNED 36 20 38 24 10 3
39 HuuSE RENTED 22 13 28 16 6
1 4
1 0
8 13 MOBILE HOME RENTED F
3 10 3
1 9
16 MU SIL E HOM E CwN ED 33 10 28 13 8
15 48 SLEEPihG ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
MuTEL OTHER 4
1 4
3 0
1 5
TOTAL 107 48 112 60 25 4e 155 4
Table A-8 FOLLuW UP S URVE V WORKER $ WHO MOVED INTO T ELLOW CREEA NUCL E AR PL ANT AREA PAGE 006 HARDIN Ruh D ATE 03/01/82 EMPLOVEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL RE PO RI 16 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 06-30-61 RUN T IME 190639 WITH TO T AL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDRtN NUMBER IN IN MOVE R S WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT T OT AL F AM ILY SC WOL CH IL OREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL LMPLOVEES HOUS E OW NE D 18 12 25 12 7
C 18 HOUSL HENTED 1
1 2
2 0
1 2
APAR TMENT RENTED M081LE HDML RENTED MoulLE HOME OWNED 1
1 2
2 0
0 1
SL EEPING ROOM MO TL L UTHER TOT AL 20 14 29 16 T
1 21 HOUNLV EMPLOVEE5 HOUSE OWNLD 4
4 6
4 2
0 4
HOUSE RENTED 6
4 d
5 1
2 8
APAR TMENI RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
H081LE HOME RENTLD 1
1 2
2 0
4 5
Mud!LE HOME OWNED 3
2 5
1 3
2 5
SLLEPING kOOM MO TE L O T HER 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
TOT AL 14 11 21 12 6
11 25 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OnNED 22 16 31 16 9
0 22 HOUSE RENTED 7
5 13 7
1 3
0 0
0 0
2 2
MOBILE HCME RENTED 1
1 2
2 0
4 5
MUBILE HOME OWNED 4
3 T
3 3
2 6
5LEEP ING ROOM MOIE L O T HE R 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
TOI AL 34 25 50 28 13 12 46 I
e
+
Table A-9 FOLLOW UP SURVEY W0kKERS WHO MOVED INTO YELLOW CREEK NUCLE AR PLANT ARE A PAGE 001 CORINT H RUN DATE 03/01/82 EMPLOYEES LIVING WI THEN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLUVEES 06-30-81 RUN TIME 190639 WITH IOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDRcN NUMBE R IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GR ADE HIGH htTHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHIL DREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS APsMJAL EMPLOYEES tOUSE UWNED 3
1 4
1 0
0 3
HOU5E RENTED AP AR TMENT RENTED 1
0 0
0 0
2 3
MuulLE HONL RtNIEJ MUb!LE HGME OdNED SLEEPING ROOM MOILL OTHER 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
TUIAL 4
1 4
1 0
3 7
HOURLY EMPLO YE L S house OWNED 1
1 2
2 0
0 1
HOUSE RENTEU 1
0 0
0 0
1 2
APARTMENT RENTED 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
Mue!LE HOME RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MO BI L E HOM E OW N ED 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
SLEEPING ROOM MofEL OTHER TOTAL 4
1 2
2 0
2 6
ALL EMPLOVEES HOUSE OhNED 4
2 6
3 0
0 4
HUUSE RENTED 1
0 0
0 0
1 2
AP ARTMENT RENTED 2
0 0
0 0
2 4
M081LE HOME REN TED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MOBIL E HOME OWNED 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
SLEE PING ROOM MuiEL OTHER 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
10TAL 8
2 6
3 0
5 13 e
Table A-10 FOLLiJW LP S URVE V W0kEERS WHO MOV ED INTO V ELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT AREA P AGE 002 tuna RUN DATE 03/01/82 EMPLOYEES LIVI.1G WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A AC TIVE EMPLOVEES 06-30-81 RUN TIME 190639 WITH TO TA L C HI LDRE N CHILDREN MOV ERS CHILDRtN NUM 8ER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOT AL F AMILY SCHout CHIL DREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOVEES HuuSE Od NE D 6
5 9
6 3
C 6
HOUSL RLNTED 3
0 1
0 0
2 5
APARTMENT RENTED 1
0 1
0 0
2 3
MOeILE HOME REN(ED Mud!LE HOME OWNED 5
1 4
0 1
1 6
SLEEPING ROOM HuTEL OTHER IUT AL 15 6
15 6
4 5
20 HOURLY EMPLOVEES HOUS E OWNED HOUSE RENTED 5
3 T
3 3
1 6
AP ARTMENT RENTED 4
1 3
1 0
2 6
mom 1LE HOME RENTED 1
0 0
0 0
2 3
MOBILE HOME OWNED 1
1 6
6 2
2 3
SLEEPING RDOM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
16 10 5
8 19 ALL EMPLOVEES HOUSE OmNED 6
5 9
6 3
0 6
HOUSE RENTED 8
3 8
3 3
1 4
1 0
4 9
MOhtLE HOME RENTED 1
0 0
0 0
2 3
M0 MILL HOME OWNED 6
2 10 6
3 3
9 5LELPING ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
M0iEL O IHER IOTAL 26 11 31 16 9
13 39
.--~c r
--rp,
Table A-ll FOLLuw UP SURVEY WORKER S WHO MOVED INTO VELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PL ANT AREA PAGE 003 SAVANNAH RUN DATE 03/01 /82 L MPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN T HE C ITY LIMIT S REPORT IA AC TIVE EMPLOYEE S 06-30-81 RUN TIME 190639 WITH TO T AL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WI IFOU T IOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCt00L F AM IL Y MOVERS AhNUAL EMPLOVEES HOUSE UhNED 5
2 6
2 1
0 5
HOUSL RENIED AP AR T MENT RENTEU MusILE HOME RENTED MOBILE HOME OWNED SLEEPING ROOM Mu IE L OTHER TOTAL 5
2 6
2 1
C 5
I HLJURLY EMPLOYEE S HOUSE OWNED touSE RENIE0 1
1 2
2 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
2 2
MOBILL HOME RENTED MoulLL HOME OWNED SLEEPING ROOM MO TE L OTHER TOTAL 1
1 2
2 0
2 3
ALL EMPLOYEES HOUS E UWNED 5
2 6
2 1
C 5
HOUSE RtNTED 1
1 2
2 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
2 2
M081LE HOME RENTLD MU8ILE HOME OWNED SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL O Tt* R TOT AL 6
3 8
4 1
2 8
l l
l l
Appendix B TRAFFIC LEVEL DEFINED Level of Service D Level of Service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained though considerably affected by changes in operating conditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low, but conditions can be tolerated for short periods of time.
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board Special Report 87, 1965.
1
_m______.____
_____________ APPENDIX C-1 EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NO.
LAST FIRST 1.
WHERE DID YOU LIVE BEFORE BEGINNING WORK ON THIS PROJECT?
CITY COUNTY
~
STATE 2.
WHERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURING THE WORK WEEK?
STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE 3.
DO YOU LIVE INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS?
YES NO 4
IN WHAT TYPE OF RESIDENCE IN THE PROJECT AREA DO YOU LIVE?
- 1. BOARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM
- 4. MOBILE HOME
- 2. MOTEL
- 5. HOUSE
- 3. APARTMENT
- 6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 1 l
l l
S.
IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR MOBILE HOME IN THE PROJECT AREA, DO YOU OWN IT7 l
YES NO l
6.
IN THE PROJECT AREA,WITH WHOM DO YOU LIVE?
- 1. BY MYSELF
- 3. WITH ROOMMATES, HOW MAW?
- 2. WITH MY FAMILY
- 4. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 7.
HOW MANY CHILDREN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA DURING THE WORK WEEK?
OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO GRADE SCHOOL?
OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL?
8.
HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS 7 _ _YES NO THANK YOU FOR COOPERATING IN THIS SURVEY.
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT NEW EMPLOYEE SURVEY APPENDIX C-2 FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONNAIRE 1
YES.
IF SO, SKIP TO QUESTION 2.
NO.
IF NOT, PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
WiERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURING THE WORK WEEK 7 STREET ADDRESS CITY C0tXITY STATE DO YOU LIVE INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS?
YES NO CHECK WHICH TYPE RESIDENCE IN THE PROJECT AREA YGJ LIVE IN 1.
BOARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM 2.
M0rEL 3
APARTMENT 4.
MOBILE HOME 5.
HOUSE 6.
orHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 2.
IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR MOBILE HOME IN THE PROJECT AREA, DO YOU OWN IT?
YES NO 3
IN THE PROJECT AREA, CHECK WITH WHOM YOU NOW LIVE:
1.
BY MYSELF 2.
WITH MY FAMILY 3
WITH ROOMMATES. HOW MANY?
4 orHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) le. HOW MANY CHILDREN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA?
0F THESE, HOW MANY GO TO GRADE SCHOOL?
0F THESE, HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL?
5.
HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS?
YES NO 6.
HAVE YOU OR ANY OF YOUR FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD ANY DIFFICULTY OBTAINING HEALTH TREATMENT?
YES.
IF SO, CHECK THOSE WHICH YOU HAD DIFFICULTY OBTAINING 7 DOCTOR (NOT EMERGENCY)
DENTIST DERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT HOSPITALIZATION OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 7 HAVE YOU OR ANY OF YOUR FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD TO TRAVEL OUTSIDE YOUR PRESENT COUNTY TO OBTAIN HEALTH TREATMENT?
YES. IF SO, WHAT WAS THE SERVICE AND WHERE DID YOU HAVE TO G07 NO THANK YOU FOR COOPERATING IN THIS SURVEY.
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT
,,,\\
\\
f 4A k
,j{
f' l
L
~
/
I,(#:""~~/
g //
l,
"-'; y '..
W
)
,.x / (/ ~
t..c.,q% A,,4 _......
l 7 \\ m
~g ~a.s.: J M., Qs
' 5 j'
- 1,. $
.J conu y z4ACnson..< v-ypIh+ y' @.,.-d.
]
-g:7
~ ^
~
c n.u
~
i l,
--- p/
( -.
bn
-/ 2 N
a 3
u j c s es \\ /. A y -- ~.
i,P
Qp "f'
.ty
(
v e
lj
)x.
3 o
e,
^
p. Wrus
"--$.e.--.L --%
t IW or
..ht.4. J 3
c
~
x 4 y y <>l r.
4f t c'.sA,
t
=,,
. :r., "
- v m
/
.p,.,
g
,g
~-.
v.
r
--4 s
- 7 u
/
~
~ ~ ' "
f
^'
h- =.m.
b-MA L
~..
w1 j
w...
u\\
m i
1
-.s, 1,.. _.
- ~
y--.
/
.=
t G.....PM-t
+
,s J/
('j l
- b - - ---
.(
~
i y ~, ~~, }. _:
u
./...L,../
,,n,--
wa en s
c j
... s..~ _ y l
.. a,j/
.~
^ec.>
s...
l u-ac. q nAaog 9
~--
)
f
~.3 v.
- - + -.
1 l
..... o f.,
- l I
- y....
,.n
, W, m
/
r.
e" l _----l
-t..~.. e 3
7 1
b j/'.. 5..?
\\/
~~
U,
[% g,
'f
- y l
y
?
'~ I
..h.s cm\\ Y
,,7.._..
..\\. 4
~*Eg"~--c.:
I{._
J M--,J W _
E.L.,
~
~
h
--h Q.
,..:-... i -] l w-..., M /.
s}
~
- ~ ~
.J.
7
-m
= -
3 no. on..mu. n 3
),
,, T,..
[j
- ;; A} (.
l --- %j,
\\
., cormth S
7
.....f g
N.
l t^ut,ee ftc 7 2,,,,,,,,
j
~* :
s --- /,,,,,
q-y, t
.e
-- ~
+
g
'e/
, : ~9 j==.,
- l L -]
i,
~
A'
\\
I
, ng.m. c
. b ),,[,[,,'"\\
. a
?
..., % A c, y A/g
=,
l g.
~.--
y s-rg
.~
1 d.,, ! [" /
h_,k
[
"^*"'Y 8
l' h.
"^p)(
J "f,_
ya,hh~G~
j :0[
h
,,.i
(
'S;C?l
'\\-
l V
~~
\\
.r-b.
bV
\\
%. ). ";l " L\\
T-N;Aq 3 / ',.,.
~ V....
/r
_.y se-e l
/
{,f-
.,,,,1
,' h,$. _.. ___ _ _. 7
DECMTUd, 5lk %g-, %7/ ',"
y f
k, o - p* N.-...., c _. y * --
f--
G h-,
a\\
h$s
~ ' s.......
./
C [/
b~
t s
d '" Ns,..c
- N,.;m
.. } - g,,,,,,',-
~ " L M,,
jw<
W...,/
I 7
FIGURE I m.-
--.g U.
, -,. d. - ~, <e,.. ".
['
..(.. N
- 1. F A.
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT
.s u,,,..#..-
,/
p ___ _..._,
K 1,,,
....t,.
g,p
.}
A PL ANT SITE
. - ~ ~
[/
e,;, y g
.s O
.k
/
DL C
J U N E 19 81
.Jf'."*L Q1iO W c l& l tcgr _. g.pf,.
-}.----}, g(,x c
,D ' '
~~
,n e si
, ~
r-s'-
0 l5 30 J
a........
%y. g,4.,.,..
s s
' =,
p, r
- ~'7 "q
...J 9.,,,
scAtE or uitEs
...ll:-
Uj n N
' f *"
"t
- 4. 3
. ~...,
,.. j l
K NOTE: TOWNS UNDERLINED CONTAIN EMPLOYEES g
- -