ML20054J560

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 820224-26
ML20054J560
Person / Time
Site: 07001100
Issue date: 06/08/1982
From: Martin T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20054J557 List:
References
70-1100-82-02, 70-1100-82-2, NUDOCS 8206290250
Download: ML20054J560 (1)


Text

._

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Combustion Engineering, Inc.

Docket No. 70-1100 Windsor, Connecticut License No. SNM-1067 As a result of the inspection conducted on February 24-26, 1982, and in accordance with tF2 NRC Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR 2, Appendix C, the follow ng violations were identified:

A.

Condition 15 of License No. SNM-1067 requires that each encapsulated plutonium source be tested for leakage at intervals not to exceed six months.

Contrary to the above, five encapsulated plutonium sources were only tested for leakage in February 1980 and February and October 1981,which was in excess of the six month maximum interval.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement VI.D.1)

B.

Section 8.2 of License No. SNM-1067 requires that procedures be developed and adhered to.

Procedure 15 of the Health Physics and Safety Procedures Manual, developed pursuant to Section 8.2 of License No. SNM-1067, requires a Radiation Work Permit for nonroutine maintenance or repair operations on equipment in contaminated areas.

Contrary to the above, on February 24, 1982, an operator was performing a non-routine enrichment cleanup operation in the Recycle Hood, a contaminated area, in the Uranium Manufacturing Area and no Radiation Work Permit had been issued.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement VI.D.2).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Combustion Engineering, Inc. is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement o" explanation in reply, including:

(1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending this response time.

k 8 JUN 1982

_NW j/N W

N Dated homas T. M pfin,sDirector ivision of Yngineering and Technical Programs 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY 8206290250 820608 PDR ADOCK 07001100 C

PDR

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.