ML20054H625
| ML20054H625 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1981 |
| From: | SARGENT & LUNDY, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054H619 | List: |
| References | |
| SL-3876, NUDOCS 8206240273 | |
| Download: ML20054H625 (200) | |
Text
I I
I g
muc<E R s rE1v. Ret 1Eo SRV/LOCA HYDRODYNAMIC LOADS
,I REVISED DESIGN-BASIS
SUMMARY
REPORT l
LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 I
I I
REPORT PREPARED FOR l
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY I
I I
I REPORT SL-3876 OCTOBER 1.1981 I
I ll SARGENT$l. UNDY m_._s I
I prae 8 neagua PDR
I I
NUCLEAR SAFETY-RELATED SRV/LOCA HYDRODYNAMIC LOADS I
REVISED DESIGN-BASIS
SUMMARY
REPORT g
LA SALLE COUNTY STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 I
I I
neeOsr esEe seo rOs COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY g
I I
I I
REPORT SL-3876 OCTOBER 1.1981 I
=
SARGENT&LUNDY g
_, ~ o,~ e e n e.
I I
SARG ENT & LUN.DY ENGINEEHf4 FOUNDED BY FREDERIC A S ARGENT-98 91 i
55 CAST MONROE STREET CHICAGO.lLLINOIS 60603 TELERHoNE 312-269 2000 C ABLE ADDRESS - S A RLU N-CHIC AOO ft. J. M AZ2 A PARTNER 312 269-3936 October 1,1981 I
Mr. B. R. Shelton Project Engineering Manager Commonwealth Edison Company P. O. Box 767,35 FNW Chicago, Illinois 60690
Dear Mr. Shelton:
I am including herewith four copies of the following Sargent & Lundy report:
Report SL-3876 SRV/LOCA Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Design Basis I
Summary Report, Revision 1 La Salle County Station - Units 1 and 2 Dated October 1,1981 Additional copics are being distributed in accordance with the Project Distribution List for cesign criteria.
I I
This report documents the final design basis for the SRV/LOCA hydrodynamic loads for the La Salle County Station. It supersedes Revision 0 of the same report, dated December 3,1979, which was issued to Commonwealth Edison Company under cover of Mr. G. C. Jones' December 5,1979, letter to Mr. J. S. Abel.
The format of the report has been revised to agree with that of an S&L engineering report, and to reflect the various changes to the dynamic load definitions and their l
incorporation into the plant design that have occurred since Revision 0 was issued.
A detailed summary of these changes is provided in Section 4 of the report. This 1
l l
l
@@W
SARGENT & l.U N DY
'""'"EER' Mr. B. R. Shelton October 1,1981 Commonwealth Edison Company Page 2 section of the report also addresses how the 4TCO Test results were assessed on La Salle, and how we plan to address the generie load definitions provided in NUREG-0808.
Your v y truly, I
R. J.
zza RJ M:tr Proj Director in duplicate Enclosures Copics:
T. E. Watts (1/2)
E. E. Spitzner (1/0)
J. S. Abel (1/1)
I W.11. Koester (1/1)
A. W. Kleinrath (1/1)
G. P. Wagner (1/1)
R. II. Ilolyoak (1/2)
L. J. Burke (1/1)
T. E. Quaka (1/1)
G. E. Peterson (1/1)
D. C. Ilaan (1/0)
W. G. Schwartz (1/0)
E. R. Weaver (1/0)
G. C. Jones (1/0)
R. II. Pollock (1/0)
B. Obersnel (1/0)
C. N. Krishnaswamy (1/0)
D. E. Olson (1/0)
J. Sinnappan (1/0)
S. D. Killian (1/0)
File 35.2 (1/0)
I
@@PY
CECO: LSCS 1&2 Project: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA Rcvision 1 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report T A ll L E OF CO N T E N TS PAGE 1.0 PURPOSE 1.0-1 2.0 STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS NOT SUBJECT I
TO SUBMERGED STRUCTURE LOADS 2.0-1 2.1 LOCA BOUNDARY LOADS 2.0-1 2.1.1 Water Jet 2.0-1 2.1.2 Charging Air Bubble 2.0-1 2.1.3 Pool Swell 2.0-1 2.1.4 Condensation Oscillation 2.0-1 2.1.5 Chugging 2.0-2 2.2 LOCA BOUNDARY LOAD RESPONSE SPECTRA /
DIFFERENTIAL ANCHOR MOVEMENTS 2.0-2 I
2.2.1 Condensation Oscillation 2.0-3 2.2.1.1 Load Definition - Condensation Oscillation Levy-Creare Recommendation 2.0-3 2.2.2 Chugging 2.0-3 2.2.2.1 Load Definition 2.0-3 2.2.3 Special Considerations 2.0-3 2.3 SRV BOUNDARY LOADS 2.0-3 2.3.1 All Valves 2.0-4 2.3.2 ADS 2.0-4 2.3.3 Single Valve 2.0-4 2.3.4 Asymmetric 2.0-4 2.4 SRV BOUNDARY LOAD RESPONSE SPECTRA /
DIFFERENTIAL ANCHOR MOVEMENT 2.0-4 2.4.1 All Valves 2.0-4 2.4.1.1 Load Definition - KWU Load Definition 2.0-4 i
l 2.4.2 ADS 2.0-5 2.4.2.1 Load Definition - KWU Load Definition 2.0-5 2.4.3 Single Valve 2.0-5 2.4.3.1 Load Definition - KWU Load Definition 2.0-5 2.4.4 Asymmetric 2.0-5 2.4.4.1 Load Definition,- KWU Load Definition 2.0-5 l
2.5 OTIIER SRV/LOCA LOADS 2.0-5 2.5.1 Annulus Pressurization 2.0-5 2.5.1.1 Pressure Time History 2.0-5 l
SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 Proj:ct: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA Revision 1 Hydrodynamic Lords Revised Dr.te: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report PAGE 2.5.1.2 Response Spectra and Time Histories for Original Shell Model 2.0-6 2.5.1.3 Response Spectra and Time Histories for Modified Shell Model 2.0-6 2.6 STRUCTURES 2.0-6 2.6.1 Containment 2.0-6 2.6.1.1 Design Load Combinations 2.0-6 2.6.1.2 Special Considerations 2.0-6 2.6.2 Structural Steel 2.0-7 2.6.2.1 Design Load Combinations 2.0-7 2.6.2.2 Special Considerations 2.0-7 2.6.3 Concrete Structures-Slabs and Walls 2.0-7 I
2.6.3.1 Design Load Combinations 2.0-7 2.6.3.2 Special Considerations 2.0-7 2.7 PIPING (NONSUBMERG ED) 2.0-7 2.7.1 Design Load Combinations 2.0-7 2.7.2 Special Considerations 2.0-7 2.7.2.1 Functional Capability 2.0-7 2.7.2.2 SRV and SRV Response Spectra 2.0-8 ggg ADS 2.7.2.3 Method of Load Combination 2.0-8 2.8 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT, CABLE PANS, AND SU PPORTS 2.0-8 2.8.1 Design Load Combinations 2.0-8 2.9 IIVAC DUCTS AND SUPPORTS 2.0-8 2.9.1 Design Basis for Both Inside and Outside Containment 2.0-8 2.9.1.1 Design Load Combinations 2.0-9 2.9.1.2 Special Considerations 2.0-10 2.9.1.2.1 Axial Restraints 2.0-10 2.9.1.2.2 Support Design 2.0-10 2.10 EQUIPMENT 2.0-10 2.10.1 Design Basis for All Components 2.0-10 2.10.2 Design Load Combinations 2.0-10 I
iii SL-3876 I
CECO: LSCS 1&2 Project: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA Revision 1 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report I
PAGE 2.10.2.1 ASME Components 2.0-10 I
2.10.2.1.1 BOP Components 2.0-11 2.10.2.1.2 NSSS Components 2.0-11 2.10.2.2 Non-ASME Components 2.0-11 I
2.10.2.2.1 BOP Components 2.0-11 2.10.2.2.2 NSSS Components 2.0-12 2.10.3 Special Considerations 2.0-12 2.11 PIPING PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES 2.0-13 2.11.1 Design Basis 2.0-13 I
2.11.2 Load Conditions 2.0-13 2.11.3 Design Loads 2.0-14 2.11.4 Design Load Combinations 2.0-15 3.0 SUBMERGED STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS 3.0-1 3.1 LOCA DRAG LOADS - GENERAL 3.0-1 3.1.1 Vent Clearing 3.0-1 3.1.2 Charging Air Bubble 3.0-1 I
3.1.3 Pool Swell 3.0-1 3.1.4 Fallback 3.0-2 3.1.5 Condensation Oscillation 3.0-2 3.1.6 Chugging 3.0-2 3.2 SRV DRAG LOADS - GENERAL 3.0-2 3.2.1 All Valves 3.0-3 3.2.2 ADS 3.0-3 3.2.3 Asymmetric 3.0-3 3.2.4 Single Valve 3.0-3 I
3.2.5 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation 3.0-3 3.2.6 Miscellaneous 3.0-3 3.2.6.1 Multiple Valve - Subsequent Actuation 3.0-4 3.2.6.2 Subsequent Actuation During LOCA (SADL) 3.0-4 3.3 SUPPORT COLUMNS 3.0-4 3.3.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.0-4 3.3.1.1 Vent Clearing 3.0-4 3.3.1.2 Charging Air Bubble 3.0-4 I
3.3.1.3 Condensation Oscillation 3.0-4 3.3.1.4 Chugging 3.0-4 iv SL-3876
I CECO LSCS 1&2 Pr$ct: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA Revision 1 flydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report I
PAGE 3.3.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.0-5 3.3.2.1 All Valves 3.0-5 I
3.3.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation 3.0-5 3.3.3 Design Load Combinations 3.0-5 3.3.4 Special Considerations 3.0-5 3.4 DOWNCOMERS 3.0-5 I
3.4.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.0-5 3.4.1.1 Vent Clearing 3.0-5 3.4.1.2 Charging Air Bubbles 3.0-5 3.4.1.3 Condensation Oscillation 3.0-5 3.4.1.4 Chugging 3.0-6 3.4.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.0-6 3.4.2.1 All Valves 3.0-6 3.4.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation 3.0-6 3.4.3 Design Load Combinations 3.0-6 3.4.4 Special Considerations 3.0-6 3.5 LOWER DOWNCOMER BRACING 3.0-6 3.5.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.0-6 3.5.1.1 Vent Clearing 3.0-6 3.5.1.2 Charging Air Bubble Load 3.0-7 3.5.1.3 Pool Swell 3.0-7 I
3.5.1.4 Fallback 3.0-7 3.5.1.5 Condensation Oscillation 3.0-7 3.5.1.6 Chugging 3.0-7 3.5.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.0-7 3.5.2.1 All Valves 3.0-7 3.5.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation 3.0-7 3.5.3 Design Load Combinations 3.0-7 t
l 3.5.4 Special Considerations 3.0-7 3.6 SRV LINES AND SUPPORTS 3.0-8 3.6.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.0-8 3.6.1.1 Vent Clearing 3.0-8 3.6.1.2 Charging Air Bubble 3.0-8 I
3.6.1.3 Pool Swell 3.0-8 3.6.1.4 Fallback 3.0-8 3.6.1.5 Condensation Oscillation 3.0-8 3.6.1.6 Chugging 3.0-8 l
v SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 Proj: cts 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA Rcvision 1 Hydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report PAGE 3.6.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.0-8 3.6.2.1 All Valves 3.0-8 3.6.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation 3.0-9 3.6.3 Design Load Combinations 3.0-9 3.6.4 Special Considerations 3.0-9 3.7 SRV QUENCHERS AND SUPPORT BASES 3.0-10 3.7.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.0-10 3.7.1.1 Vent Clearing 3.0-10 3.7.1.2 Charging Air Bubble 3.0-10 3.7.1.3 Pool Swell 3.0-10 3.7.1.4 Condensation Oscillation 3.0-10 3.7.1.5 Chugging 3.0-10 I
3.7.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.0-10 3.7.2.1 All Valves 3.0-10 3.7.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation 3.0-10 3.7.3 Other Loads (Thrust) 3.0-11 I
3.7.4 Design Load Combinations 3.0-11 3.7.5 Special Considerations 3.0-11 3.8 ECCS SUCTION STRAINERS AND SUPPORTS 3.0-11 3.8.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.0-11 I
3.8.1.1 Vent Clearing 3.0-11 3.8.1.2 Charging Air Bubble 3.0-11 3.8.1.3 Pool Swell 3.0-12 3.8.1.4 Fallback 3.0-12 3.8.1.5 Condensation Oscillation 3.0-12 3.8.1.6 Chugging 3.0-12 3.8.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.0-12 3.8.2.1 All Valves 3.0-12 3.8.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation 3.0-12 3.8.3 Design Load Combinations 3.0-12 3.8.4 Special Considerations 3.0-13 3.9 MISCELLANEOUS WETWELL PIPING AND SUPPORTS 3.0-13 3.9.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.0-13 3.9.1.1 Vent Clearing 3.0-13 3.9.1.2 Charging Air Bubble 3.0-13 I
3.9.1.3 Pool Swell 3.0-13 3.9.1.4 Fallback 3.0-14 3.9.1.5 Condensation Oscillation 3.0-14 3.9.1.6 Chugging 3.0-14 l
vi SL-3876 I
CECO: LSCS 1&2 Project 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA Revision 1 flydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report PAGE 3.9.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.0-14 3.9.2.1 All Valves 3.0-14 3.9.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation 3.0-14 3.9.3 Design Load Combinations 3.0-14 3.9.4 Special Considerations 3.0-15 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION OF REVISIONS 4.0-1 4.1
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES INCLUDED IN REVISION 1 4.0-1 4.1.1 Revisions to Section 1.0 4.0-1 4.1.2 Revisions to Section 2.0 4.0-1 4.1.3 Revisions to Section 3.0 4.0-4 4.1.4 Revisions to Appendix A 4.0-4 4.1.5 Revisions to Appendix B 4.0-4
4.2 ASSESSMENT
FOR 4TCO TEST RESULTS 4.0-4
4.3 ASSESSMENT
FOR NUREG-0808 4.0-5 APPENDIX A - SRV/LOCA IlYDRODYNAMIC LOAD DEFINITION DOCUMENTATION Table A.1 LOCA Boundary Load Table A.2 LOCA Submerged Structure Loads Table A.3 SRV Boundary Loads Table A.4 SRV Submerged Structure Loads Table A.5 Miscellaneous Loads I
vii SL-3876 I
CECO: LSCS 1&2 Proj:ct: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA Revision 1 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report l
LIST OF T A BLES 2.6-1 Structural Design Load Combinations 2.6-2 LOCA and SRV Design Load Combinations-Structural Steel Elastic Design 2.6-3 LOCA and SRV Design Load Combinations-Reinforced Concrete Structures Other Than Containment 2.7-1 Piping Load Combinations 2.7-2 Piping Load Combinations Bounded by Analyzed Combinations 2.7-3 Damping Values for Piping Analysis 2.11-1 Piping Penetration Assemblies Allowable Stress 3.4-1 LOCA and SRV Design Load Combinations-Downcomers and Downcomer Bracing 3.6.3-1A Limiting Stress Combinations for Wetwell Piping and Piping Components Considering flydrodynamic Loads 3.6.3-1B Limiting Load Combinations for Wetwell Piping Supports Considering Hydrodynamic Loads 3.7-1 Quena'..c Design Load Combinations I
I I
viii SL-3876
5^EN*WN CECO: LSCS 1&2 Proj:ct: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA
${EE"5 Revision 1 Date: 10-01-81 SRV/LOCA HYDRODYNAMIC LOADS REVISED DESIGN-BASIS
SUMMARY
REPORT LA SALLE COUNTY STATION - UNITS 1 AND 2 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY 1.0 PURPOSE The primary purpose of this report is to specifically detail which revisions of the I
SRV/LOCA hydrodynamic loads are to be considered for the final reanalysis and redesign of the La Salle County Station. Other purposes of this report are: (1) to document the concurrence of Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) in the version of the SRV/LOCA hydrodynamic loads to be considered; and (2) to ensure that all source information used in the generation and incorporation of these loads in the reanalysis and redesign is properly documented.
Section 2.0 addresses the La Salle County Station structures and components which are not subject to submerged structure loads. The section identifies the SRV/LOCA load definition versions to be used and provides the definitions of the specific response spectra and differential anchor movements that are to be used for the final design. A definition of load combinations and special considerations for each major category of structure and component for the La Salle County Station is also presented. In Section 3.0, structures and components subject to submerged structure loads are considered.
Appendix A contains a tabulation of input and output documentation for each type of SRV/LOCA hydrodynamic load which corresponds to
'I the response spectra and differential anchor movement definitions. Appendix A will be utilized to insure that all analysts are using the appropriate load definitions and response spectra.
Any necessary revisions to this report shall be prepared in the same manner as the original report. Since any revisions to this report may result in major reanalysis and redesign, revisions will be made only if technically necessary or to significantly shorten the schedule for reanalysis and redesign.
Section 4.0 of the report,
" Implementation of Revisions," specifically describes how each necessary revision has been or will be incorporated in the reanalysis and redesign effort.
PROJECTS 4266-00 1.0-1 SL-3876
)
l 4267-00 l
1
SARGENT & LUNDY CECO: LSCS 1&2 project: 4266/4267 E"C3"EE"3 SRV/LOCA Revision 1 cnicac Ilydrodynamie Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 2.0 STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS NOT SUBJECT TO SUBMERGED STRUC-TURE LOADS 2.1 LOCA BOUNDARY LOADS LOCA loads occur because of steam and air flow into the suppression pool following a pipe break in the drywell.
LOCA loads must be considered in conjunction with appropriate seismic, thermal, SRV dischart', and normal loads. The load combina-tions used for design of structures, piping ano equipment are described in Sections 2.6 through 2.11.
2.1.1 Water Jet The boundaries are designea to withstand a uniform pressure of 33 psi below the vent exit and linearly attenuated to 0 psi at the pool surface.
2.1.2 Charging Air Bubble The charging air bubble load is preaicted by analysis of the vent air flow transient.
This load is defined from the time of water clearing until bubbles from neighboring vents coalesce. These loads meet the requirements of NUREG-0487 and do not exceed the design capability of the containment.
2.1.3 Pool Swell The compression of the wetwell airspace by the rising pool slug results in pressure loading on the wetwell walls and a transient upward force on the drywell floor. The loads are predicted by MK-II-SWELL (S&L implementation of GE Pool Swell Analytical Model(PSAM)). The bounding uplift pres.sure on the drywell floor is taken to be 2.5 psi based on 4T results. In addition, an asymmetric load of 22 psi (maximum predicted vent clearing load) has been assessed for static application to a 180* sector of the wetwell (in addition to hydrostatic load). The loads on the walls are bounded by the design load of 45 psig.
2.1.4 Condensation Oscillation The condensation oscillation load is defined by a modified version (Creare, Inc. and S.
Levy, Inc.) of GE trial Specification No. 2. The GE specification is presented in GE letter MK-ll-1299-E (June 25,1979). This load is defined by GE as the combination 2.0-1 Sle3876
SARGENT & LUNDY hem *UWUU CECO: LSCS 1&2 Enciwssas Revision 1 SRV/LOCA cmcaco flydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report l
of three components with various amplitude and frequency range. The vent exit (VE) component is the direct result of the collapse of the steam bubble at the vent tip. It consists of a primary signal at a frequency between 3 and 7 hertz, with lower I
amplitudes at the second and third harmonics: The vent acoustic (VA) component occurs in a 2-hertz band around the frequency corresponding to the vent acoustic length. The nondeterministic (ND) component is a low amplitude signal which occurs at random frequencies up to 50 hertz.
The modification to this load revises the definition of the nondeterministic component and revises the method of combining the components. (See Creare letter I
to J. Abel (CECO), October 25, 1979, and R. M. Crawford letter to J. M. Healzer (S.
Lesy, Inc.) Nove:mber 14, 1979). The components (including revised nondeterministic, RND) are combined as follows:
CO
= 0.80 WE42WRQ LEVY-1 CO 0.80 @.WE+W0.71 RNW LEVY 42 The two combinations reflect the CO load at different stages of the LOCA transient.
When ADS actuation of the SRVs is being considered, only CO is used.
LEVY-2 2.1.5 Chuning Symmetric and asymmetric chugging loads are defined in Revision 3 of the DFFR.
The symmetric load is a pressure oscillation of magnitude +4.8/-4.0 psi on the submerged walls and floor uniformly over 360". The asymmetric load is defined as
+20/-14 psi applied at 180* and attenuating to a minimum at 0. Both symmetric and asymmetric loads are applied uniformly in the radial and vertical directions below the vent exit and attenuate to 0 psi at the pool surface. The time history of the load is defined by a representative 4T hug trace, the predominant frequency of which is E
5 varied over a frequency range of 20 to 30 hertz.
2.2 LOCA BOUNDARY LOAD RESPONSE SPECTRA / DIFFERENTIAL ANCilOR MOVEM ENTS (Refer to Appendix A for dates of transmittal memoranda.)
I 2.0-2 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUNDY Proj: cts 4266/4267 SitV/LOCA ENGINEER 5 R: vision 1
!!ydrodynamle Loads Revised unce Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 2.2.1 Condensation Oscillation 2.2.1.1 Load Definition - Condensation Oscillation Levy-Creare Recommendation Ac defined to Subsection 2.1.4.
Response spectra were generated for the two combinations, CO-Levy-1 and CO-Levy-2, as explained in Subsection 2.1.4.
Response Spectra - Transmitted on. January 31.1980.
Anchor Movements - Tratismitted on Dec 1979.
2.2.2 Chuggir.g 2.2.2.t Load Definition Asymmetric chugging with maximum pressure of +20/-14 psi used with 4T traces of 20 and 30 hertz. (Refer to DFFR, Rev. 3 pp. 4-116 x and G.E. i.etter No. CGE-585 -
April 14,1976). This load bounds the symmetric load definition in Subsection 2.1.5.
Response Spectra - Transmitted on April 12,1978.
Anchor Movements - Transmitted on November 5,1979.
2.2.3 Special Considerations Attenuation - The effects of pool dynamic loads outside of the reactor building are considered to be insignificant. Ilowever, any system or component which is attached to the common reactor building / auxiliary building wall should be assessed for the building response at the appropriate reactor building wall elevation.
2.3 SRV BOUNDARY LOADS The containment design basis is the T-quencher SRV loads, as described in the LSCS DAR., The quencher device being used is the two-arm T-quencher developed for the Mark 11 Susquehanna Plant by KWU.
The associated load definition is fully documented in the Susquehanna DAR (Chapter 4). LSCS has used this definition with a frequency range slightly extended at the lower end to account for differences in the LSCS SRV discharge configuration in the suppression pool.
1 I
2.0-3 SL-3876
SARGENT & LUNDY CECO: LSCS 1&2 Proj: cts 4266/4267 E WW E E RS SRV/LOCA Revision 1
!!ydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Ilasis Summary Report 2.3.1 All Valves The all-valve T-quencher load case is given in Chapter 4 of the Susquehanna DAR.
This load definition consists of three data traces with the time scale multiplied by factors from 0.9 to 2.0 to give a wide frequency range and the magnitude multiplied by 1.5 to provide bounding amplitude. This load definition was formed to bound all first and subsequent actuation cases and also to bound the range of initial conditions and geometries in the LSCS containment. This load definition assumes that all I
bubbles oscillate in phase.
2.3.2 A DS Actuation of the LSCS Automatic Depressurization System (ADS) results in the discharge of seven safety relief valves distributed around the suppression pool. The KWU ADS load definition is very conservative and is essentially the same as the all-valve load definition (Subsection 2.3.1). Use of the all-valve load will provide a very conservative bounding ADS load.
2.3.3 Single Valve The single-valve load definition is given in Chapter 4 of the Susquehanna DAR. This is a distribution (localized effect) modification of the all-valve case (Section 2.3.1) and bounds subsequent actuation loads.
I 2.3.4 Asymmetric The asymmetric load is defined in Chapter 4 of the Susquehanna DAR as the actuation of three adjacent valves. This load is similer to the single valvo load in that it is a modification to the distribution of the all-valve case (Section 2.3.1) and will bound subsequent actuation loads.
2..
SRV 1100NDARY LOAD RESPONSE SPECTRA / DIFFERENTIAL ANCHOR MOVEMENT 2.4.1 All Valves 2.4.1.1 Load Definition - KWU Load Definition Responso Spectra - Transmitted vertical on June 14, 1979 and horizontal on July 23,1979.
I 2.0-4 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 Projects 4266/4267 SARGENT e LUNDY SRV/LOCA R:;visi n 1 E N GIN E E RS flydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Dasis Summary Report Anchor Movements - Transmitted on November 5,1979.
2.4.2 ADS 2.4.2.1 Load Definition - KWU Load Definition Response Spectra - Use envelope of SRV and SRV AR ASYM Anchor Movements -(Use envelope of SRV and SRVASYM)
ALL 2.4.3 Single Valv_e 2.4.3.1 Load Definition - KWU Load Definition Response Spectra - Transmitted on June 20,1979.
Anchor Movements - Transmitted on November 5,1979.
2.4.4 Asymmetric 2.4.4.1 Load Definition - KWU Load Definition Response Spectra - Transmitted on June 19,1979.
Anchor Movements - Transmitted on November 5,1979.
2.5 OTilER SRV/LOCA LOADS 2.5.1 Annulus Pressurization Annulus Pressurization results from a high-energy line break within the sacrificial shield.
2.5.1.1 Pressure Time liistory Double ended breaks are assumed at the reactor vessel nozzle safe end for two cases, feedwater line and recirculation pump suction line. The blowdown accounts for system inventory and subcooling effects. The recirculation pump suction line break blowdown is limited by pipe displacement parameters. The feedwater line break, however, is assumed to be a double-ended full guillotine rupture.
The RELAP computer code was used to produce time histories of the pressure distribution on the RPV, sacrificial shield wall and shield doors.
1 2.0-5 SL-3876 lI
CECO: LSCS 1&2 Proj: cts 4266/4267 5 ARGENT c LUNDY SRV/LOCA Rcvision 1 twciuttas Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 cmcAco Design-Basis Summary Report 2.5.1.2 Response Spectra and Time IIistories for Original Shell Model The sacrificial shield wall pressure distribution was approximated with a Fourier series, and the time dependent Fourier coefficients were utilized in the generation of the response spectra.
Itesponse Spectra - Transmitted for feedwater inlet line on January 11, 1980 and for recirculation outlet line on January 16,1980 Anchor Movements uno Time liistories - Transmitted for feedwater inlet and re-circulation outlet lines on February 14, 1980.
2.5.1.3 llesponse Spectra and Time Ilistories for Modified Shell Model Overall shield wall response corresponding to a " stick" model is approximated by cosine one-theta component of the annulus pressurization loads.
The resulting response time histories of O' azimuth represent the overall response of the shield at I
each break location. Cosine one-theta harmonic acceleration time histories from the original shell analysis are utilized in the generation of the response spectra.
Itesponse Spectra - Transmitted for feedwater inlet and recirculation outlet lines on December 23,1980.
Anchor Movements and Time IIistories - Transmitted for feedwater inlet and recircu-lation outlet lines on December 23,1980.
l 2.6 STitUCTURES l
2.6.1 Contamment i
i 2.6.1.1 Design Load Combinations (See Table 2.6-1.)
2.6.1.2 Special Considerations Containment shall also be assessed for additional loads due to reactions from I
downcomer bracings and SRV line guides.
l 2.0-6 SL-3876 lI l
CECO: LSCS 1&2 5 ARGENT n LUNDY Proj: cts 4266/4267 E NGIN E E M R: vision 1 SitV/LOCA CHN Date: 10-01-81 flydrodynamic Loads Revised Design-Basis Summary Report 2.6.2 Structural Steel 2.6.2.1 Design Load Combinations (See Table 2.6-2.)
2.6.2.2 Special Considerations To determine the inertia loads due to self-weight of structural steel, all dynamic loads are combined in an absolute manner. Ilowever, structural steel loads resulting from pipe support loads are designed in the same manner as the piping supports, utilizing the load combinations from the piping analysis.
2.6.3 Concrete Structures - Slabs and Walls 2.6.3.1 Design Load Combinations (See Table 2.6-3.)
2.6.3.2 Special Considerations All dynamic loads will be combined in an absolute manner.
2.7 PIPING (NONSUBM ERGED) 2.7.1 Design Load Combinations Piping will be analyzed to the load combinations shown in Table 2.7-1.
Load combinations considered but not analyzed are shown in Table 2.7-2.
These combinations are bounded by the combinations of Table 2.7-1.
Damping values are given in Table 2.7-3.
2.7.2 Special Considerations 2.7.2.1 Functional Capability All essential systems will meet the functional capability described in Subsec-tion 3.9.3.1 of the FSAR.
1 2.0-7 SL-3876 1
l
CECO 1 LSCS 1&2 SARGENT a LUNDY Prohet 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA E N GI N E f. R5 Rcvisi:n 1 cmCAGO Date: 10-01-81 flydrodynamic Loads Revised Design-Basis Summary Report 2.7.2.2 SitV and SitV Rem nse Spectra ALL ADS As indicated in Section 2.3.2, the SRV and SRV I ad definitions are ADS essentially the same. The response spectra for each load are, therefore, identical.
The response spectra used are the envelopes of the quencher all-valve discharge and quencher asymmetric (three-valve discharge) response spectra.
This enveloping approach is further described in Table 2.7-1.
2.7.2.3 Method of Load Combination In general, the loads are combined by the SRSS method as shown in Table 2.7-1.
2.8 ELECTRICAL CONDUlT, CABLE PANS, AND SUPPORTS 2.8.1 Design Load Combinations Itefer to Table 2.6-2.
2.9 IIVAC DUCTS AND SUPPORTS 2.9.1 Design Basis for Both Inside and Outside Containment The structural integrity of the safety-related IIVAC ducts and supports for all applicable loading combinations is achieved by the following design rules:
a.
Determining, and controlling if necessary by modifying the support structure, the frequencies of the duct-support assembly to avoid peak responses.
b.
Analyzing the supporting structures for all applicable loadings (in all directions including axial direction) and obtain the resultant stresses in members and connections.
c.
Transmitting all calculated loads at the interface between the support and the structural steel to the Structural Department to be used in I
checking the structural steel.
d.
Selecting a set of design limits to be associated with applicable loading combinations (see 2.9.2).
These design limits will not permit the 2.0-8 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT a LUNDY Proj: cts 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA E NGIN E E Rs R: vision 1 OHC^Co Date: 10-01-81 flydrodynamic Loads Revised Design-Basis Summary Report l
stresses to exceed the yielding stress. This will be strictly followed in designing the support members and connections; however, local yielding in the duct may be allowed on a case by case basis after additional I
studies.
2.9.1.1 Design Load Combinations The same loading combinations will be used inside and outside the containment, flowever, it is worth mentioning that some of these loads attenuate considerably outside of the containment. The loading combinations used in the design of ducts.ind supports are consistent with those used in designing other components. If it seemed that some are slightly different or some have been omitted, it is only because the bounding loading combinations were considered:
Stress Plant Loading Combination Limit Conditions a.
N + OBE (1% damping) +
0.9S SRV (1% damping) y Upset ALL b.
N + SSE (2% damping)
+ COLEVY-2 (2% damping) 1.2S Emergency Y
+ SRVADS (2% damping) c.
N + SRVADS (2% damping) +
Chugging (2% damping) +
1.2S Emergency Y
SSE (2% damping) d.
N + SSE (2% damping) +
I 1.2S Emergency AP (2% damping) y e.
N + SSE (2% damping +
COLEVY-1 (2% damping) 1.2S Emergency The seismic loads are combined with the pool dynamic loads by SRSS method except case (c) and (f) where CO is combined using absolute sum.
Note: SRVALL = envel pe of SRVALL ASYM and SRV SRVADS * *^V*I P" IbNv and SRV AR ASYM I
2.0-9 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT n LUNDY Proj: cts 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA s uciu t t as Rcvision 1 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised cmcaco Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 2.9.1.2 Special Considerations 2.9.1.2.1 Axial Restraints Axial restraints along the direction of ductrun may be placed, if necessary, to provide longitudinal rigidity and strength. A minimum of two-sided attachment between duct and support interface will be used.
2.9.1.2.2 Support Design The supports on each side of active llVAC component (such as dampers) will be de-signed to assure that the loads used in qualifying these cvmponents would not be exceeded.
2.10 EQUIPidENT 2.10.1 l>csign Basis for All Components a.
Analysis and/or test shall be donc using the loading combinations and design limits shown in 2.10.2.
b.
Where qualification is done by analysis the structural integrity and operability where applicable shall be shown by calculating the stresses and deflections at critical sections and comparing them with appro-priate allowables.
c.
All active instruments shall be qualified by proper vibration testing.
I The operability of these components shall be verified by monitoring their function before and after the testing.
I 2.10.2 Design Load Combinations 2.10.2.1 ASalE Components I
I 2.0-10 SL-3876 I
CECO: LSCS 1&2 5 ARGENT a LUNDY Proj::ct: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA EN GIN E E Rs Revision 1 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised cmc ^co Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 2.10.2.1.1 BOP Components Service Stress I
Load Combination Limit Limit a.
N + OBE (1% damping) +
B (upset)
Per ASME SRVggg (1% damping)
BPVC Sect. Ill b.
N + SSE (2% damping) +
C (emergency) Per ASME SRV amping) +
MC ADS CO
- E "E LEVY-2 c.
N + SRVADS (2% damping) +
C (emergency) Per ASME Chugging (2% damping) + SSE I
gg d.
N + SSE (2% damping) +
C (emergency) Per ASME AP (2% damping)
BPVC Sect. 111 e.
N + SSE (2% damping) +
C (emergency) Per ASME COLEVY-1 (2% damping)
BPVC Sect. Ill Note:
SRVALL *""V"IE" I 8NY and SRV ALL ASYM SRV
= envelope of SRV and SRV ADS ALL ASYM 2.10.2.1.2 NSSS Components NSSS components were originally qualified to old design basis loads by GE. The requalification to the new loading combinations has been performed by S&L, except for the reactor pressure vessel and internals and the main steam and reactor re-circulation system piping. The load combinations and the design limits that will be used in the requalification will be the same as given in Subsection 2.10.2.1.1.
i 2.10.2.2 Non-ASME Components 2.10.2.2.1 BOP Components Loading Combination Acceptance Criteria Active Nonactive and Active Elastic Deflection (Exact Deflection)
N + OBE (1% damping) + o * ~< 0.6S o < 0.6S a.
Y
- ~
Y SRVALL (1% damping) 10.7S 10.9S t
y t
y 2.0-11 SL-3876 I
SARGENT & LUNDY prohet: 4266/4267 CECO: LSCS 1&2 E NGIN E E RS Revision 1 SRV/LOCA C"'C^C Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 I
Design-Basis Summary Report Loading Combination Acceptance Criteria Active Nonactive and Active Elastic Defeletion (Exact Deflection) b.
N + SSE (2% damping) +
SRVADS (2% damping) c.
N + SRVADS ( %
s 0.7S a
< 0.9S m
y m
y damping) + Chugging +
o < 0.9S o
t 1.5S damping) + SSE y
y d.
N + SSE (2% damping) + AP (2% damping) c.
N + SSE (2% damping) +
I COLEVY-1(2% damping) where:
= membrane stress, m
o = membrane + bending stress, and S = yield stress at corresponding temperature.
Note: SRVALL = envel pe fSRV and SRV ALL ASYM SRVADS = enVel Pe of SRV and SRV ALL ASYM 2.10.2.2.2 NSSS Components NSSS components were originally qualified to old design basis loads by GE. The requalification to the new loading combinations is being performed by S&L. The load combinations and the design limits that will be used in the requalification will be the same as given in Subscetion 2.10.2.2.1.
2.10.3 Special Considerations Nonactive fluid system components will be checked for structural integrity using design limits per ASME Section III.
I 2.0-12 SL-3876 I
CECO: LSCS 1&2 oj0 cts 4266/4267 I
SARGENT a LUNDY SRV/LOCA Revision 1 suc Nesas Date: 10-01-81 flydrodynamic Loads Revised cu oco Design-Basis Summary Report l
l Operability of active fluid system components will be checked using deflection criteria.
The piping reactions on mechanical equipment will be maintained within the equipment vendor allowables.
If they exceed the allowables, nozzle local stresses and equipment foundation loads will be checked.
The seismic qualification reports for floor-mounted equipment will be amended to include the new loading combinations.
For Seismic Category I valves, the valve accelerations will be computed from the new I
piping analysis which considers all LOCA and SRV related loads. The valves will be qualified to meet these dynamic coefficients or a new piping support arrangement will be developed to reduce the dynamic coefficients (accelerations) to acceptable levels.
In addition, active valves will undergo a review to assure that the stress allowables are also met.
Equipment foundation loads for floor-mounted equipment and mounting details for locally mounted instruments will be checked using the new loading combinations.
2.11 PIPING PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES 2.11.1 Design Basis The structural integrity of penetration assemblies shall be assured by using the load conditions / combinations and meeting the stress limits as outlined below.
2.11.2 Load Conditions All primary containment process and instrumentation penetration assemblies and all ASME class penetrations in other support buildings shall be designed to the load combinations and associated stress limits in Section 2.11.3. The stress limits are in accordance with the ASME B&PV Code, Section 111, Divisions 1 and 2, as applicable.
The stresses are shown in Table 2.11-1.
I I
2.0-13 SL-3876 I
I CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUNDY Proj:ct: 4266/4267 Revision 1 SRV/LOCA E n cIN E E RS Date: 10-01-81 liydrodynamie Loads Revised cmcuo Design-Basis Summary Report 2.11.3 Design Loads For each condition, the applicable loads are:
a)
Design Condition:
1.
Weight 2.
Design Pressure and Temperature 3.
OBE 4.
liydraulic Transients b)
Normal and Upset Conditions:
For Expansion Stress Evaluation:
1.
Thermal Expansion Loads 2.
Relative Dynamic Displacement Loads For Primary + Secondary Stress Evaluation:
1.
Weight I
2.
Operation Pressure and Temperature 3.
Thermal Transients 4.
Thermal Expansion Loads 5.
Relative Dynamic Displacement Loads 6.
Hydraulic Transients 7.
OBE 8.
SRV c)
Emergency Condition:
1.
Weight 2.
Operating Pressure & Temperature 3.
Ilydraulic Transients 4.
SSE 5.
SRV 6.
LOCA 2.0-14 SL-3876 i
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUNDY Projtet: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA twciussns Revision 1 cmcAco Date: 10-01-81 Hydrodynamic Loads Revised Design-Basis Summary Report d)
Faulteo Conditions:
Case 1.
1.
Weight 2.
Operating pressures & temperatures 3.
Pipe Rupture and jet impingement loads Case 2.
1.
Process pipe maximum operating pressure applied in the annulus between the pipe and the penetration sleeve.
l 2.11.4 Design Load Combinations Load Combination Service Limit lOBEl lTRl Design a.
W+P
+
+
g DISPL))
2 2
b.
Tilt
+
(OBE
+ PD Normal and Upset env DISPL (Expansion Stresses) c.
W+P + THL
+
Normal and Upset g
eny (Primary +
2
+
L ec n ary Suesses)
(OBE DISPL+
DISPL) where UDL is the envelope of:
A=
QBE2 + SRV2 2
l B=
QBE2 + SRV2 2
ALL + TR d.
W+P + EDL Emergency g
where EDL is the envelope of:
A+
SSE2 + SRV2ADS + CHUG 2 + TR2 B=
SSE2 + SRV2 2
+ CQeny C=
SSE2 + SRV2 2
+ TR D=
SSE2, gp2 2.0-15 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUNDY SRV/LOCA Revision 1 EN ERs liydrodynamic Loads Revis:d Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report Load Combination Service Limit e.
P
+F Faulted g
f.
P, applied in the process pipe Faulted and in the penetration annulus, simultaneously where:
= Annulus pressurization CliUG
= Asymmetric chugging I
CO
= Envelope of condensation oscillation, Levy definition com-eny binations 1 and 2 P
= Faulted loads OBE
= Operating-Basis Earthquake OBE
= OBE building displacement DISPL PD
= Pool dynamic displacement DISPL P
= Design pressure D
P
= Operating pressure g
= All valve discharge - quencher definition enveloped with ADS asymmetric three-valve discharge SRV
= All-valve discharge - quencher definition enveloped with ALL asymmetric three-valve discharge SSE
= Safe Shutdown Earthquake THL
= Envelope of all thermal expansion loads eny TR
= Hydraulic transient loading W
= Weight Loading I
I 2.0-16 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUN DY Project: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA E N clN E E Rs Revision 1 c nc^co Date: 10-01-81 flydrodynamic Loads Revised Design-Basis Summary Report 3.0 SUBMERGED STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS 3.1 LOCA DRAG LOADS - GENERAL Various phases of the LOCA event will cause fluid motion and create drag loads on structures in the suppression pool. The loads are calculated in accordance with NUREG-0487 as described in Appendix C of the LSCS-DAR (Rev. 9).
3.1.1 Vent Clearing The LOCA water jet load is calculated for structures in the pool below the vent exit using the modified NRC Acceptance Criteria described in Subsection 3.3.2.1 of LSCS DAR (Rev. 9). This model predicts a transient jet with a sphere of fluid at its leading edge. This moving sphere is assumed to create a flow field throughout the pool. Drag loads result from the flow field and from impingement of the jet itself.
3.1.2 Charging Air Bubble The LOCA air bubble transient predicts the air bubble growth rate. The Method of Images is used to predict the fluid velocity and acceleration at the location of the I
structure. The duration of this load is from vent clearing until adjacent bubbles touch.
3.1.3 Pool Swell The pool swell transient is predicted by MK-II-SWELL. The velocities and accelera-tions are increased by 10% to meet the requirements of NUREG-0487. The decelera-tion portion of the time history is expanded to give a peak pool swell elevation of 1.5 x Vent Submergence as required by NUREG-0487. The velocity and acceleration are used to calculate drag loads on structures above the vent exit and below the peak pool swell elevation (pool swell zone). Structures in the pool swell zone above the initial pool surface are subject to impact loads. Impact loads are calculated using the methods in DFFR (Rev. 3) and assessed for the methods recommended in NUREG-0487. Because of the size and natural frequency range of the structures in the LSCS suppression pool, the DFFR method provides the mest conservative load.
Only 3.0-1 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUN DY project: 4266/4267 E N GIN E E Rs Revision 1 SRV/LOCA cmCACO Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report a small number of structures are located in the pool swell zone in order to minimize j
the number of affected structures.
3.1.4 Fallback Af ter the pool swell peak elevation has been reached, the pool swell slug (thickness equal to the vent submergence) falls back into the pool under the influence of gravity.
Structures in the pool swell zone are loaded by fluid moving at the predicted falling velocity and gravitational acceleration.
3.1.5 Condensation Oscillation A forcing function to be applied at the vent exit is derived from the condensation oscillation load specification for boundaries (see Subsection 2.1.4). Only the Vent Exit component is used because the Vent Acoustic and Nondeterministic Components are acoustic effects only and create pressure waves which do not cause significant submerged structure loads.
3.1.6 Chugging The chugging forcing function is derived from 4T test data. The Method of Images is used to determine the effect of a group of chugging downcomers around the sub-merged structure with worst case phasing. The resultant load is then reduced by applying a probability multiplier (Figure 3.3-1, LSCS-DAR), in compliance with NUREG-0487. The load is given as an amplitude applied to a damped sinusoid of 20-30 hertz (GE supplied sample 4T traces are used).
3.2 SRV DR AG LOADS - GENERAL SRV discharge creates drag loads from the water jet and from the oscillating air bubble. Water jet loads are required to be calculated only within a cylindrical area with a 5-foot radius concentric with the quencher arms (NUREG-0487). No structures I
in the LSCS pool are located within this zone. Oscillating air bubble loads use Method of Images to determine velocity and acceleration and calculate drag loads incorporating the methods in Appendix C of the LSCS-DAR (Rev. 7). The T quencher loads for all the submerged structures listed in Subsections 3.3 through 3.9 are cal-culated using the magnitude predicted by the DFFR quencher correlation using the 3.0-2 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUNDY Proj::ct: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA tuciwcens Revision 1 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised aucAco Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report S&L SRV analytical models and the Method of Images. Although all cases are con-sidered, the all-valve and subsequent actuation cases are frequently the bounding cases for SRV submerged structure loads.
3.2.1 All Valves Submerged structure loads from multiple SRV actuation may be maximized when out-of-phase SRV bubbles are on opposite sides of the structure. The all-valve case most likely to give this result is the resonant sequential symmetric discharge (RSSD). The RSSD case is described in the LSCS-DAR, Revision 7.
3.2.2 A DS The ADS case (seven valves) yields lower submerged structure loads than the RSSD case because the discharge devices are evenly distributed around the pool and gen-erally have less severe phasing.
3.2.3 Asymmetric The asymmetric submerged structure case is the subsequent actuation of one of the two low setpoint valves with the initial actuation of an adjacent device.
3.2.4 Single Valve The single valve actuation case is identical to the subsequent actuation case.
3.2.5 Single Valve - Subsequent Antuation The subsequent actuation T quencher loads are calculated using the magnitude pre-dicted by the DFFR quencher correlation for subsequent actuation and the method-ology of the S&L SRV analytical models and the Method of Images. The DFFR l
quencher correlation is assumed to account for all differences between first and l
subsequent actuation (e.g., pool temperature, water leg, air mass).
3.2.6 Miscellaneous Several additional load conditions have been addressed and are commented upon in the following subsections.
3.0-3 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT c LUNDY Proj::ct: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA E N cIN E E Rs Revision 1 cmcaco Date: 10-01-81 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Design-Basis Summary Report 3.2.6.1 Multiple Valve - Subsequent Actuation This condition is not applicable for LSCS because of Low-Low Setpoint Logic.
3.2.6.2 Subsequent Actuation During LOCA (SADL)
Assessments have been made of predictions of loads for this case. SADL was found to be bounded by other cases.
I 3.3 SUPPORT COLUMNS Each load is calculated for the unique column which is most heavily loaded to generate a bounding load for all columns. These bounding loads are then combined as described in Subsection 3.3.3.
3,3.1 LOCA Drag Loads
(
3.3.1.1 Vent Clearing l
The column is loaded only by drag loads induced by the LOCA water jet (Subsection 3.1.1). The column is not impacted by the jet.
3.3.1.2 Charging Air ilubble The column is loaded by the net effect of the vents surrounding it. The resultant load is that due to the asymmetries of the vent arrangement since the air bubbles grow simultaneously (Subsection 3.1.2).
3.3.1.3 Condensation Oscillation The condensation oscillation load (Subsection 3.1.5) is applied assuming symmetric, j
in-phase loads from neighboring vents.
l 3.3.1.4 Chugging The chugging load on support columns was calculated using a Monte Carlo technique.
I The data base used for the chugging load was the 4T chug library supplied by General Electric. The resulting load was applied as a damped sinusoid. This method gives a design basis which bounds the method described in Subsection 3.1.6.
3.0-4 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENTst LUNDY Proj:ct: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA EN GIN E E RS Rsvision 1 liydrodynamic Loads Revised cmcaco Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 3.3.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.3.2.1 All Valves All-valve SRV loads are calculated for the column subjected to the worst phasing situation in the RSSD case (Subsection 3.2.1).
3.3.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation This load is calculated for the column nearest a low setpoint valve (Subsection 3.2.5).
3.3.3 Design Load Combinations Refer to Table 2.6-1.
3.3.4 Special Considerations There are no cases which require special consideration.
3.4 DOWNCOMERS 3.4.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.4.1.1 Vent Clearing The LOCA Water Jet does not significantly load downcomers.
3.4.1.2 Charging Air Bubbles Downcomers are loaded by adjacent vents, ignoring the bubble at the downcomer's own exit. The vents are loaded by the asymmetries in the vent arrangement, since all air bubbles grow simultaneously (Subsection 3.1.2).
3.4.1.3 Condensation Oscillation l
l Downcomers are loaded by adjacent vents, ignoring the condensation oscillation (CO) event at the downcomer's own exit. Vents at the edges of the downcomer array will be exposed to the highest CO loads because all CO events are considered symmetrie l
and in phase (Subsection 3.1.5).
l l
3.0-5 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUNDY Proj:ct: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA E NGIN E E RS Revision 1 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised cmcaco Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 3.4.1.4 Chugging Downcomers are loaded by drag loads and by a self-induced lateral load during chug-ging. The drag load is calculated by assuming the worst-case distribution of chugging at neighboring vents and adjusting the resulting load by the probability multiplier (Subsection 3.1.6). The lateral load is calculated following NUREG-0487.
I 3.4.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.4.2.1 A11 Valves I
All-valve SRV loads are calculated for the downcomer subjected to the worst phasing situation in the RSSD case (Subsection 3.2.1).
3.4.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation This load is calculated for the downcomer nearest a low setpoint valve (Subsec-tion 3.2.5).
3.4.3 Design Load Combinations See Table 3.4-1 for these combinations.
3.4.4 Special Considerations Includes consideration of fatigue loads on downcomers.
3.5 LOWER DOWNCOMER BRACING 3.5.1 LOCA Drag Loads The downcomer bracing is loaded by drag because of the moving suppression pool water in addition to loact; transmitted by the downcomers.
3.5.1.1 Vent Clearing LOCA water jet does not significantly load downcomer bracing.
3.0-6 SL-3876
SA GNawm CECO: LSCS 1&2 Project: 4266/4267 ENC'"EE"5 SRV/LOCA Revision 1 "C^
Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 3.5.1.2 Charging Air Bubble Load 1
Bracing loads are calculated assuming all bubbles are growing simultaneously (Subsec-tion 3.1.2).
3.5.1.3 Pool Swell Pool Swell exerts a vertical drag load on the bracing. Interference and blockage effects are considered in conformance with NUREG-0487 (Subsection 3.1.3).
3.5.1.4 Fallback The bracing is subjected to a downward drag load as the pool swell slug falls back to its original position (Subsection 3.1.4).
3.5.1.5 Condensation Oscillation Condensation oscillation results in a periodic primarily vertical load when the load definition in Section 3.1.5 is applied.
3.5.1.6 Chugging The chugging load is applied as described in Subsection 3.1.6.
3.5.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.5.2.1 All Valves The downcomer bracing load is calculated for the segment of the bracing subjected to the worst phasing situation in the RSSD case (Subsection 3.2.1).
3.5.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation This load is calculated on the sections of the bracing in the vicinity of the low setpoint valves (Subsection 3.2.5).
3.5.3 Design Load Combinations See Table 3.4-1.
3.5.4 Special Considerations There are no cases which require special consideration.
I I
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENTct LUN DY hM[U I 0
on 1 SRV/LOCA tucinsans Date: 10-01-81 flydrodynamic Loads Revised aucxo Design-Basis Summary Report 3.6 SRV LINES AND SUPPORTS 3.6.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.6.1.1 Vent Clearing SRV lines and supports are subject to drag loads from the induced flow field (Sub-section 3.1.1).
3.6.1.2 Charging Air Bubble The SRV lines and supports are loaded by neighboring vents with bubbles growing simultaneously (Subsection 3.1.2).
3.6.1.3 Pool Swell Impact and drag loads are calculated when applicable horizontal members in the pool swell zone have been avoided if possible (Subsection 3.1.3).
3.6.1.4 Fallback The SRV lines are not subject to fallback loads. Ilowever, the SRV line supports are loaded by fallback (Subsection 3.1.4).
3.6.1.5 Condensation Oscillation The SRV lines and supports are loaded by condensation oscillation (CO) from neigh-boring downcomers. All CO events are considered symmetric and in phase (Subsec-tion 3.1.5).
3.6.1.6 Chugging SRV lines and supports are loaded by chugging from adjacent downcomers as de-scribed in Subsection 3.1.6.
3.6.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.6.2.1 All Valves All-valve SRV loads are calculated for the SRV line and supports subjected to the worst phasing situation in the RSSD case (Subsection 3.2.1).
0 3.0-8 l
1
SARGENTc: LUN DY C ECo: LSCS 1&2 tucingex3 Project: 4266/4267 Revision 1 SRV/LOCA cmcaco I
liydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 3.6.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation This load is calculated for the lines and supports associated with the low setpoint valves (Subsection 3.2.5).
3.6.3 Design Load Combinations The design stress combinations and applicable loadings for the MS-SRV lines are given in Table 3.6-1 A.
The load combinations for the associated supports are given in Table 3.6-111.
Where certain load combinations are bounded by another load com-bination, only the bounding combination is considered. A brief description of the loadings used is given in the Abbreviation / Definition portion of the tables. These loadings are discussed further in the applicable sections of this document. The method of load combination is delineated at the bottom of each table.
3.6.4 Special Considerations Modifications have been made to the wetwell piping systems to increase their capa-bility to sustain the applied loadings. Modifications to the piping include replacing sections of pipe with heavier schedule pipe and rerouting the line when necessary.
Modifications to the support systems include both the addition and climination of restraints along with upgrading, when necessary, the load capacity of existing restraints.
A specific example of the above is the replacements of the original MS-SRV discharge line elbows with Schedule 160 elbows. In addition, lateral guides have been added to the discharge line risers. The effects of the submerged structure loadings on the guide components (rigid struts and clamps) are considered. The discharge lines have been supported exclusively by rigid restraints.
The wetwell portions of the MS-SRV discharge lines will be assessed as to their ability to meet ASME HPVC Section III Class 1 fatigue requirements. These lines are clas-sified as Class 3 piping, and Class i requirements will be used only to evaluate the fatigue capacity of the piping.
3.0-9 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUNDY Proj:ct: 4266/4267 Revision 1 i
SRV/LOCA tuciutens I
liydrodynamic Loads Revised auc^co Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 3.7 SRV QUENCIIERS AND SUPPORT BASES 3.7.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.7.1.1 Vent Clearing The LOCA water jet load is calculated using the method described in Subsee-tion 3.1.1, 3.7.1.2 Charging Air Bubble Loads on the quencher are calculated assuming simultaneous growth of all bubbles (Subsection 3.1.2).
3.7.1.3 Pool Swell Quenchers are not loaded by pool swell.
I 3.7.1.4 Condensation Oscillation The quencher is loaded by condensation events at nearby downcomers. Condensation oscillation is assumed to be symmetric and in phase at all vents (Subsection 3.1.5).
3.7.1.5 Chugging The quencher is loaded by chugging from adjacent downcomers.
The method described in Subsection 3.1.6 is used to conservatively estimate the bounding load.
I 3.7.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.7.2.1 A11 Valves The all-valve design load is the most severe loading experienced by any quencher during the RSSD case (Subsection 3.2.1).
3.7.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation Drag loads are calculated for both self-loading and loading of an adjacent quencher during subsequent actuation of a low-setpoint SRV (Subsection 3.2.5).
I 3.0-10 SL-3876
CECO LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUNDY Proj:ct 4266/4267 E N GIN E E R5 R: vision 1 SRV/LOCA C"'C^C Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 3.7.3 Other Loads (Thrust)
The quencher body and pedestal are subjected to downward thrust loads due to air and water clearing of the SRV line. These loads are calculated by the Sargent & Lundy (S&L) computer code SRVA. The quencher body, pedestal and arms are subjected to thrust loads due to uneven air and water clearing.
3.7.4 Design Load Combinations The design load combinations for the quencher are delineated in Table 3.7-1.
3.7.5 Special Considerations The MS-SRV quenchers and support bases have been analyzed according to the prelim-inary bounding load requirements given in S&L Design Specification DS-MS-02-LS, Rev. 2,5/2/79. The analyses of the quenchers were conducted by their manufacturer, Sargent Industries-Afrite Division, and the analyses results are presented in the manufacturer's Technical Report R-S-1079000, Rev. A,5/8/79.
Simplified quencher models have been included in the MS-SRV discharge line analyses; this enables the effects of the interaction between the discharge lines and quenchers to be evaluated. Quencher loads obtained from analyses and revised loading defini-tions were compared to the loadings given in the S&L design specification to verify I
that the quencher design loads remain conservative.
3.8 ECCS SUCTION STRAINERS AND SUPPORTS 3.8.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.8.1.1 Vent Clearing The 8-inch (RCIC) suction strainer is not close to the LOCA water jet path and is exposed to only negligible drag loads. Ilowever, the 24-inch suction strainers (HPCS, LPCS and RHR) are subject to water jet loads.
3.8.1.2 Charging Air Bubble Charging air bubble loads are calculated assuming all bubbles grow simultaneously (Subsection 3.1.2).
l l
3.0-11 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUNDY Project: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA E N GIN E E RS Revision 1 cmcaco Date: 10-01-81 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Design-Basis Summary Report 3.8.1.3 Pool Swell The 24-inch ECCS strainers are not loaded by pool swell due to their orientation in the pool. Loads on the RCIC strainers were calculated as described in Section 3.1.3.
3.8.1.4 Fallbad The 24-inch ECCS strainers are not subjected to fallback loads. Loads on the RCIC strainer were calculated as described in Section 3.1.4.
3.8.1.5 Condensation Oscillation Strainers are loaded by assuming that nearby vents experience in-phase condensation oscillation (Subsection 3.1.5).
s 3.8.1.6 Chugging Chugging loads are calculated in accordance with Subsection 3.1.5.
3.8.2 SRV Drag Loads I
3.8.2.1 All Valves All-valve SRV loads are calculated for the ECCS strainers and supports subjected to the worst phasing situation in the RSSD case (Subsection 3.2.1).
I 3.8.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation This load is calculated for the strainer and supports nearest a low-setpoint SRV (Subsection 3.2.5).
3.8.3 Design Load Combinations The design stress combinations and applicable loadings for the ECCS suction strainers I
are given in Table 3.6-1A. The load combinations for the associated supports are given in Table 3.6-1B. Where certain load combinations are bounded by another load combination, only the bounding combination is considered. A brief description of the loadings used is given in the Abbreviation / Definition portion of the tables.
3.0-12 SL-3876
CECO 2 LSCS 1&2 5 ARGENT & LUNDY Project: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA ENGINEERS Revision 1 oncaco Date: 10-01-81 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Design-Basis Summary Report These loadings are discussed further in the applicable sections of this document. The method of load combination is delineated at the bottom of each table.
3.8.4 Special Considerations Modifications have been made to the ECCS suction strainer subsystems to increase their capability to sustain the applied loadings. For instance, the piping elbows were replaced with heavier wall elbows, and the original suction strainers were replaced with reinforced strainers. The reinforced strainers'have been analyzed according to the preliminary loading requirements given in Acton Enviro:imental Testing Corp.-
Report No.14502, Date August 10,1979. This design report was commissioned by the strainer's manufacturer, Permutit Company,Inc.
Simplified strainer models have been included in the ECCS suction line analyses.
Strainer loads obtained from analyses and revised loading definitions were used to reanalyze the strainers and verify their adequacy.
3.9 MISCELLANEOUS WETWELL PIPING AND SUPPORTS Piping Systems not included in the previous categories were assessed in a similar manner as required by the geometry and location of the piping and supports.
3.9.1 LOCA Drag Loads 3.9.1.1 Vent Clearing The LOCA water jet does not impact any of this piping. Only minor induced rag i
loads are present. These loads will be calculated only for p! ping close to the LOCA water jets.
3.9.1.2 Charging Air Bubble Loads are calculated assuming all air bubbles grow simultaneously (Subsection 3.1.2).
3.9.1.3 Pool Swell Impact and drag loads are calculated when applicable. Horizontal pipe runs in the pool swell zone have been avoided if possible (Subsection 3.1.3).
3.0-13 SL-3876
CECc: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT n LUNDY Proj cts 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA E N CIN E E Rs R: vision 1 cmc ^m Date: 10-01-81 liydrodynamic Loads Revised Design-Basis Summary Report 3.9.1.4 Fallback llorizontal pipe and structures in the pool swell zones are subject to fallback loads (Subsection 3.1.4).
3.9.1.5 Condensation Oscillation Condensati~ n Oscillation loads are calculated using the load definition in Subsee-o tion 3.1.5.
3.9.1.6 Chugging The method of application of the chugging load is described in Subsection 3.1.6.
I 3.9.2 SRV Drag Loads 3.9.2.1 All Valves For each pipe or structure, a calculation is made for the resultant load of the RSSD case for the uniqueloedtion of that pipe or structure (Subsection 3.2.1).
3.9.2.2 Single Valve - Subsequent Actuation aI The load from a single valve actuation is calculated for each pipe or structure (Sub-section 3.2.5).
l 3.D.3
, Design L_ond Combinations The design stress combinations and applicable loadings for the ECCS discharge lines are given in Table 3.6-1 A.
The load combinations for the associated supports are given in Table 3.6-1B. Where certain load combinations are bounded by another load l
l combination, only the bounding combination is considered. A brief description of the loadings used is given in the Abbreviation /I;efinition portion of the tables. The loadings are disetr. sed further in the applicable sections of this document. The i
method of load combination is delineated at the bottom of each table.
l l
The RTD temperature monitoring tubes have a minimal submergence in the pool and the submerged structure loadings on these lines have been determined to be i
3.0-14 SL-3876
CECc: LSCS 1&2 sARGENT & LUNDY Proj:ct: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA ENGINEEas Revision 1 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised cmc ^G Date: 10-01-81 I
Design-Basis Summary Report negligible.
These lines are supported acco: ding to the applicable design tables generated from the La Salle Srnall Piping Procedure. In addition to the restraint I
loads given in the small piping design tables, pool swell and fallback loadings are considered for the affected restraints.
3.9.4 Special Considerations Mcdifications have been made to the miscellaneous wetwell piping and supports to I
increase their capability to sustain the applied loadings. Sections of various ECCS discharge lines were replaced with heavier schedule piping. In addition, for some lines the portion of discharge piping originally routed into the water was cut off. The removal of this piping significantly reduces or eliminates the submerged structure loadings on the balance of the routings. Modifications to the sur ort systems include both the addition and elimination of restrainte along with upgrading, when necessary, the load capacity of existing restraints.
E I
I I
I I
3.0-15 SL-3876
CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT e LUNDY Project: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA EN GIN E ERS Revision 1 liydrodynamic Loads Revised cmc ^co Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION OF REVISIONS 4.1
SUMMARY
OF CilANGES INCLUDED IN REVISION 1 Since the issuance of Revision 0 of this report in December 1979, numerous changes to the original design basis SRV/LOCA hydrodynamic loads have occurred due to the continued Mark II Owner's Group efforts and the NRC acceptance criteria issued by NUREG-0487. Additional changes have bee:: required in order to refine the loads and present them in a format more suited to the needs of the various analytical and design groups. The summary provided in this section documents those changes and provides the basis for their incorporation into the LSCS design.
In addition to the technical changes, many changes of an editorial nature were also I
required. Changes of this type will not be discussed herein, except to acknowledge here the format change to agree with that of S&L QA Procedu're GQ-3.11 and the deletion of references to the CPM task list numbers. The format change was made to ensure proper documentation of review and verify design control. The task list numbers were deleted in order to reflect the fact that the CPM networks are no longer used on the project.
4.1.1 Revisions to Section 1.0 Reference to General Electric's concurrence with this report was deleted as a purpose of the report. General Electric established their own design control documents and would not accept this report for that purpose. All other changes were editorial.
4.1.2 Revisions to Section 2.0 a.
For clarity, the description of the asymmetric load during vent clearing was moved from Subsection 2.1.2 to Subsection 2.1.3. This change had no impact on plant design, since the load was bounded by the design pressure load on the containment walls.
I b.
Reference to the original design basis condensation oscillation load defined in DFFR, Revision 3 was deleted from Subsection 2.1.4.
The Levy definition described in the remaining portion of Subsection 2.1.4 is established as the only design-basis CO load for LSCS.
4.0-1 SL-38 /6
SAEEM & WM CECos LSCS 1&2 Project: 4266/4267 ENGWEERs SRV/LOCA Revision 1 "C^
Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report c.
Again, reference to the CO boundary load defined in DFFR, Revision 3 was deleted, as described in item (b), from Subsection 2.2.1.
The transmittal dates for the response spectra and anchor movements were also updated. In both cases, the besis of the updated loads remained the same as that previously transmitted, and the only change was a format clarification to the interfacing design organization. The design basis was unchanged by this updated version, and no design changes resulted.
d.
All reference to the rams head SRV loads has been deleted from Subsec-tion 2.3.
In this case, the LSCS desiga basis was changed from SRV rams head to SRV KWU T-quencher. All necessary design changes and analyses have been revised to reflect this revised design basis, e.
Reference to rams head loads and the associated transmittal dates of response spectra and anchor raovements has been deleted from Sub-section 2.4.
As discussed in item (d), the KWU load definition is the LSCS final design basis.
f.
References to annulus pressurization loads for an original shell model I
and a modified shell model have been added to Subsection 2.5.
In the case of the original shell model, the references to the response spectra, j
anchor movements and displacement time histories have been updated to reflect a revised design basis from that originally established in Revision 0 of this report. All design and analysis, except that utilizing the modified shell model, has been updated to reflect this revised design basis. This load forms the basis for the design of most of the large-bore piping for LSCS.
The description and transmittal dates of the modified shell model annulus pressurization loads have been added to the report. This load was utilized in developing the support guidelines for the small-bore piping and has been utilized in reconciling the installed condition of the piping subsystems with their design-basis analysis.
4.0-2 SL-3876
SARGENT A LUNDY CECol LSCS 1&2 Project: 4266/4267 E""""E"5 SRV/LOCA Revisior.1 Ilydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report Both of these loads form the design basis for IECS. It is a matter of timing as to which particular load is utilized for a specific structure, component, or subsystem. The original shell model load represents a very conservative approach that had to be utilized in some cases because of schedule demands. The modified shell modelload represents a more refined and lower-magnitude load that could be utilized for design or reconciliation of those structures, components, or subsystems that were finalized after the availability of this reduced load. Both are acceptable design bases, and both have been utilized in various portions of the LSCS design as the design basis.
g.
Reference to inertia loads due to the self-weight excitation of I
structural steel under dynamic loading was added to Subsection 2.6.
Again, this is a revised design basis from that originally called out in Revision 0 of the report, and all required design modifications and analyses have been implemented.
h.
Reference to the absolute method of combination of the CO load with other dynamic piping loads has been deleted from Subsection 2.7.
I NUREG-0487 acknowledged that the SRSS method of load combination was acceptable for this dynamic load also. Therefore, the LSCS design basis was revised to reflect this. Table 2.7-1 has also been revised to reflect this change from absolute to SRSS methodology.
l 1.
Reference to the absolute combination of the CO load has been deleted from Subsection 2.8 for the same reasons outlined under item (h).
I 1
j.
Subsection 2.11, which addresses piping penetration assemblies, was added to the report. Subsection 2.10 on components did not meet the specialized needs of the piping penetration assemblies. Therefore, this subsection was added, and forms the design basis for these components I
for LSCS. All design modifications and analyses have been done to i
reflect this basis.
4.0-3 SL-3876
CECO LSCS 1&2 NMU MUMM Ewc w En SRV/LOCA Revision 1 cmCAGO liydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report 4.1.3 Revisions to Section 3.0 a.
References to the LSCS-DAR have been updated to address Revision 9 rather than Revision 7 referenced in Revision 0 of this report. These DAR revisions have been made to reflect the revised design basis, such as the adoption of the KWU T-Quencher load definition, and do not change the basis from that outlined herein.
b.
Section 3.2 has been revised to reflect the consideration of the subse-quent actuation-during-LOCA loads. The assessment for these loads did not change the LSCS design basis and is acknowledged herein for information purposes only.
I c.
Section 3.6 has been revised to reflect that the LOCA submerged struc-ture loads do act on the SRV discharge lines and supports. This revised design basis has been reflected in the plant design, and all required plant modifications and analyses have been implemented.
d.
Section 3.8 has been revised to reflect that the LOCA submerged strue-ture loads do act on the 24-inch ECCS suction strainers. This revised design basis has also been fully incorporated into the plant design and analysis.
I 4.1.4 Revisions to Appendix A Appendix A has been added. This appendix specifically identifies the load transmittal dates, describes the interface inputs and outputs between the various analytical organizations, and reflects the final design-basis information.
l 4.1.5 Revisions to Appendix B Appendix B was deleted, since its original purpose of identifying bounded load combinations was accomplished in the text of the report, instead of in the special l
Appendix. Reference to Appendix B has also been deleted from the report.
4.2 ASSESSMENT
FOR 4TCO TEST RESULTS l
Subsequent to the adoption of the design basis described in this report, the Mark II I
Owners' Group conducted a series of steam condensation tests in the 4T Test Facility 4.0-4 SL-3876
1 l
SARGENT & LUNDY CECO: LSCS 1&2 Project: 4266/42s7 ENGM E E R5 SRV/LOCA Revision 1 C*C^
flydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 Design-Basis Summary Report to confirm the adequacy of the CO load definition. The results of these tests indicated that the CO and chugging loads appear to be somewhat different than the LSCS design-basis steam condensation loads. Due to the difference between the characteristics of the design basis and the observed data from the test, no direct load comparison could be made.
Therefore, a plant assessment was performed and reported as Appendix II to the LSCS-DAR to ensure the adequacy of the LSCS design for the 4TCO test condensation oscillation and chugging loads.
The results of this assessment clearly show that the steam condensation loads observed in the 4TCO tests were less severe than the loads used in the LSCS design.
At each of the representative locations, the response spectrum with a load derived from the 4TCO test results was less than the response spectrum used in the design of the plant.
This result confirms that sufficient conservatism has been incorporated into the LSCS design to accommodate load redefinition due to additional test results which may become available. No additional analysis or design work is required to establish the I
adequacy of the LSCS design for hydrodynamic loads.
4.3 ASSESSMENT
FOR NUREG-0808 In a letter from D. G. Eisenhut to L. O. DelGeorge dated September 24,1981, the NRC transmitted NUREG-0808, " Mark 11 Containment Program Load Evaluation and Acceptance Criteria."
This letter required that LSCS perform a confirmatory review for the condensation oscillation, chugging load, suppression downcomer vent lateral load and drywell floor reverse pressure load, as described in NUREG-0808. This confirmatory review is to be completed and submitted to the NRC by September 24,1982.
It is intended to address these revised loads in the same manner as the 4TCO Test Loads were addressed (see Section 4.2). An assessment of these revised loads will be made, and the results will oe reported to the NRC as an additional appendix to the LSCS-DAR.
l As stated for the 4TCO loads, it is the firm consensus that the LSCS design basis will again be found to bound the loads specified in NUREG-0808, and that no additional i
l l
4.0-5 SL-3876 1
Project: 4266/4267 CECO: LSCS 1&2 SARGENT & LUN DY SRV/LOCA Revision 1 gyc,ygeg3 flydrodynamic Loads Revised Date: 10-01-81 miam Design-Basis Summary Report l
l analysis or design work beyond the assessment will be required to establish the ade-quacy of the LSCS design.
SARGENT & LUNDY Prepared by:
Md.
Rev.1,10-1-81 G. C. J6hes,"
Mechanical Project Engineer Reviewed by:
Rev.1,10-1-81 R. H. Pollock, Mechanical Project Engineer Approved by:
[
ev.1, 10-1-81 D. C. Haan Project Manager
/y(,,..m.....
gG C. f.!'%
~
l 4 l,' -; ;,"2 ' ';e i. f's,
..', 7
. TU ID..;,
,f a r, r m,. ;.L :
t *. ENGL E: 8 /
f S... Of '.+t i
/
I I
4.0-6 SL-3876
w
- a.. _ - _
4 w
a an.
I 4
I T A BLES g
I I
I g
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
M STRUCTURAL DESIGN LOAD COMBINATIONS CECO L5CS 1 & 2 PROJECT: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA HYDRODYN AMIC LOADS REVl5ED REVISION 1 DE51GN BA515 5UMMARY REPORT DATE: 10-01-81 LCAD SINGLE EQN COND D
L F
P T
^
- ^
- ^
O O
O O
SS B
A A
A R
1 Normal w/o Temp 1.4 1.7 1.0 1.0 1.5 0
X X
2 Normal w/ Temp 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 0
X X
3 Normal (Ay Sev. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.25 1.25 0
X X
- g O
4 Abnormal 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.25 1.0 1.0 1.25 x
0 X
2 QO,q 4a
- 1. 0 1.0 1.0 1.25 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
0 0
X X
Z 8hd 5
Abnormal
$m@
Sev. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 X
0 X
0m{
5a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
0 0
X 3
6 Normal 2
Ext. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
X X
7 Abnorral Ext. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 X
0 X
7a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
0 0
X LOAD DESC1!PTION D
= Dead Lotds Po = Operating ?rcssure Leads T = Pipe Break Temperature Load A
L
= Live Loads S'tV = Safety / Relief Valve Leads RA = Pipe Break Terperature Reaction l
F
= Prestressing Loads Eo Cperatirg Basis Earthquake Locds
=
To = Operating Temperature Loads Es 3
Safe Shatdown Earthquake P = DBA LOCA Loads
=
g Ro = Operating Pipe Reactions Pg SLA an; IEA LOCA Loads RR = Reactions and Jet Ferces Due to
=
Pipe Ercak W -4 w co CD r N r"1 7
hJ mb
M M
M LOCA AND SRV DESIGN LOAD COMBINATIONS -
CEC STRUCTURAL STEEL ELASTIC DESIGN LSC51 & 2 PROJECT: 4266/4267 5RV/LOCA HYDRODYN AMIC LOAD 5 REVISED REV1510N 1 DE51GN-B A515 $UMMARY REPORT DATE: 10-01-81 ASY%
t MET-DESICN Eg C
D L*
S PO T
R E
E P
P I
R RR SRV**
ADS g RICAL SINCLE STRESS O
O O
gg B
A A
A 1
Normal AISC w/o Temp 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
X X
Allowable 2
Normal AISC w/ Temp 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 -
1.0 0
X X
Allowable 3
Normal AISC Sev. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
X X
Allowable 4
Abnormal 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 X
0 X
1.6 AISC
=
4a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 -
1.0 0
0 0
X Allowable 1 95 Fy M>
I 3
Abnormal M O Sev. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 -
1.0 1.0 1.0 X
0 X
1.6 AISC Z
Sa 1.0 1.0 1.0 -
1.0 1.0 1.0 -
1.0 0
0 0
X Allowable oo 1.95 Fy Eq OZ a.
6 Normal 1.6 AISC
$m@
1.0 -
1.0 0
X X
Allowable Om, Ext. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 g
w i
1.95 h 2*CZ 7
Abnormal 1.6 AISC D
Ext. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 X
0 X
Allowable
-C 7a 1.0 1.0 1.0 -
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
0 0
X 1.95 Fy LOAD DESCRIPTION Safe Shutdown Earthquake D
Dead Loads E
=
=
gg L
Live Loads P
=
an A
ads
=
B S
Stability Loads T
Pipe Break Temperature load
=
=
g Operating Pressure Differential R
=
P
=
Pipe Break Temperature Reactions O
Load loads Operating Temperature Loads P
7 A
loads
=
0 A
Operating Pipe Reactions b
R
=
O Pipe Break l
P Operating Pressure loads
=
Only One SRV Should be Combined
=
y I
at One Time in -4 Safety / Relief Valve loads 7>
=
l TO Operating Basis Earthquake
$h
=
l
=
Varies in Magnitude and Intensity M
NOTE: In loading Combinations 2 and 3. the design stress is 1.5 AISC Allowable when T * * " " ***
O bJ
m M
M M
M M
LOCA AND SRV DESIGN LOAD COMBINATIONS -
REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES OTHER THAN CONTAINMENT CECO L5C51 & 2 PROJECT: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA HYDRODYN AMIC LOADS REVISED RE\\ 1510N 1 DESIGN-B ASIS SUMM ARY REPORT D ATE: 10-01-8' ASYM-LOAD MET-DESIGN FON COND D
L*
F Po T
R E
P P
T R
R SRV**
ADS ALL RICAL SINGLE STRENGTH O
O O
SS g
g A
g R
1 Normal 1.5 0
X X
ACI 318 71 w/o Temp 1.4 1.7 1.0 1.0 2
Normal w/ Temp 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 -
1.3 0
X X
Normal Sev. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.25 -
1.25 0
X X
ACI 318-71 y) 4 Abnormal 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.25 -
1.0 1.0 -
1.25 I
O X
Yield Limit 23 m O 4a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.25 1.0 1.0 -
1.0 0
0 0
X 2 m 2
5 Abnormal Sev. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.t 1.0 1.0 -
1.1 X
0 X
Yield Limit 8 d 2
1.1 1.0 1.0 -
1.0 0
0 0
X
$m@
5a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 Om 6
Normal 2g 1.0 0
X X
ACI 318-71 (n 7 Ext. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
7 Abnormal 4
1.0 1.0 -
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 X
0 X
Yield Limit Ext. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
0 0
X 7a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 LOAD DESCRIPTION Safe Shutdown Earthqvake Dead Loads E
D
=
=
gg SBA and IBA LOCA Loads Live Loads Pg L
=
=
Pipe Break Temperature Load Prestressing Loads T
F
=
=
g o
Normal Operating Pressure RA Pipe Break Temperature Reactions P
=
=
Differential Load Loads DBA LOCA Loads Operating Temperature loads P
To
=
=
g Operating Pipe Reactions RR Reactions and Jet Forces Due to Ro
=
Pipe Break Varies in Magnitude and Intensity
=
gq Only One SRV Load should be 7>
Safety / Relief Valve loads
=
=
Combined at one Time n
E
=
T w
SARGENTG LUNDY ENG1NEERS TABLE 2.7-1 SL-3876 PAGE 1 OF 2 PIPING LOAD COMBINATIONS
- CECO LSC51 & 2 PROJECT: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA HYDRODYN AMIC LOADS REVISED REvlslON 1 DESIGN-BA5is
SUMMARY
REPORT DATE: 10-01-81 SERVICE LEVEL 1.
N + (OBE2,ggy 2 + TR )1/2 B (UPSET) 2 ALL/ASY 2.
N + (OBE2 + TR2 + SRV 2 + CO 2h C (EMERGEEP ALL/ SIN LEVY-1 3.
N + (SSE2 + TR2 + SRV 2 + CO EMERGENC P ALL/ SIN LEVY-1 4.
N + (OBE2 + TR2 + SRV 2 + CO 2h C (EMERGENCW*
ADS /ASY LEVY-2 5.
N + (SSE + TR2 + SRV 2 + CO 2h C (EMERGENCP ADS /ASY LEVY-2 6.
N + (OBE2 + TR2 ggy 2 + CHUGY C (EMERGENCW*
ADS /ASY 7.
N + (SSE2 + TR2 + SRV 2 + CIIUG )1/2 C (EMERGENCY)"
2 ADS /ASY 8.
N + (SSE2 + AP )1/2 C (EMERGENCY)"
2 I
where:
N
= Normal Loads Operating Basis Earthquake OBE
=
=
ALL/ASY = Envelope of All and Asymmetric Valve Discharges - Quencher SRV Definition ADS /ASY = ADS Valves Discharging - Same Envelope as SRVALL/ASY SRV Ilydraulic Transient Load Where Applicable TR
=
Condensation Oscillation, Levy Definition Combination 1.80 CO
=
LEVY-1 (VE+0.2VA+RND) lI
- These combinations may be obtained by either a response spectrum analysis of each load followed by the combination of the results or by using a single response spectrum combined from the response spectra for the individualloads.
l
" Faulted service level limits shall apply for determining the allowable stress in the piping for systems not required to meet the functional capability criteria (nonessential) and for support design of all systems.
SARGENT & LUNDY E PS G 1 N E E R S TABLE 2.7-1 St.3876 PAGE 2 OF 2 CECO L5CS 1 & 2 PROJECT: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA HYDRODYNAMIC LOADS REVISED REVISION 1 DE51GN-BA515 5UMMARY REPORT DATE: 10-01-81 CO Condensation Oscillation, Levy Definition Combination 2.80
=
LEVY-2 (0.1VE+VA+0.7RND)
CHUG Asymmetric Chugging
=
=
=
Envelope of One and All Valve Discharge - Quencher Defini-ALL/ SIN tion I
I I
SARGENT & LUNDY EN INEERS TABLE 2.7-2
,o SL-3876 PlPING LOAD COMBINATIONS BOUNDED BY ANALYZED COMBINATIONS CECO L5C51 & 2 PROJECT: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA HYDRODYNAMIC LOADS REVISED REVISION 1 DESIGN. BASIS
SUMMARY
REPORT DATE: 10-01-81 BOUNDED BY LOAD SERVICE COMBINATIONS NO.
BOUNDED LOAD COMBINATIONS LEVEL (TABLE 2.7-1)
1 2
ALL/ASY N + (OBE2 + TR )1/2 B
1 2
3 2
N A
1 N + (SSE2 + TR2 + COLEVY-2 )
C 5
7 2
ALL/ASY I
l SARGENT & LUNDY E
TABLE 2.7-3 ENGj,NEERS SL-3876
,o I
DAMPING VALUES FOR PIPING ANALYSIS CfCo L5C51 & 2 PROJFCT: 4266/4267 l
SRV/LOCA HYDRODYN AMIC LOAD 5 REVISED REVl510N 1 DE51GN-8A515 $UMMARY REPORT DATE: 10-01-81 NSSS BALANCE OF PLANT LOAD DAMPING VALUE(3)
DAMPING VALUE OBE 1/2%
1/2%
SSE 1%
1%
1,2 M 1,2 b SRVALL/ASY I4)
SRV 1,2%
2%
ADS /ASY 1,2 M COLEVY-1, COLEVY-2 2%
I4)
CIIUGGING 1,2%
2%
1,2%(4) 2%(2)
ANNULUS PRESSURIZATION SRV 1,2 M 2%
ALL/ SIN Footnotes: (1)
- Damping values for Service Level B (Upset) and C (Emergency) respectively.
I (2)
- When Response Spectra Loading rather than Time IIistories are used.
(3)
- Reference G.E. Design Report 22A7429, " Main Steam Piping and Equipment Loads."
(4)
For 12-inch NPS and smaller piping,1% damping is used. For piping larger than 12-inch, 2% damping is used.
I 1
SARGENT & LUNDY E N G l PS E E R S TABLE 2.11-1 CHICAGO SL-3876 PIPING PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES ALLOWABLE STRESS CECO L5CS 1 & 2 PROJECT: 4266/4267
$RV/LOCA HYDRODYNAMIC LOADS REVISED REVISION 1 DE51GN-BA515 5UMMARY REPORT DATE: 10-01-81 l
ALLOWABLE STRESS VALUES FOR EACH LOADING CONDITION (NOTE 1)
STRESS NORMAL DESIGy gMERGEyQY FAULIED CATEGORY AND UPSET (NOTE ])
(NOTE JJ (NOTES 3 & 4)
The larger The larger of I
_; w
<z a: 4 e w g
,e (Note 2)
S, of 1.2S 0.7S or m.
u, S"-SY wE v or S Sy+
Oy y
3 mwm my y
The larger The larger of w
J<
n o".
(Note 2) 1.5S, of 1.8S,
1.05S or u,
S -S or v f
E or 1.5S 1.5Sy+
2 y
rc w$
The larger The larger of k 5
^.a I
5g (Note 2)
- 1. 5S, o f 1. 8 S 1.05Su' 0:
o, Em S -S a
" Y E+ O or 1.5S 1.5Sy+
y NOT E S
=
F;j 1.
Values s or Sm, Sy, and Su shall be temp-erature-dependent and taken from Section m
mm
-s N (*
3S III Tables, as follows:
Sy from Tables a
m j Q$ "
I-2.0; Su from Tables I-3.0; Design Stress Intensity values from tables 1 - 1. 0,
a wm 7.0, 8.0 or 10.0 as applicable.
- m 2.
There are no sp ec i f ic limits established
^
3 on the Prinary stresses that result from Q + g +,
a
>< a Operating Conditions.
+
3S 3.
Design. Emergency and Faul t ed Co nd i tio ns 5
Q@
m m
do not require Secondary and Peak stress S
ho y e
n: w
.2 evaluation.
O 4.
The s p ec if i ed stress limits for Faulted Conditions are applicable for System in-I clastic and Component elastic evaluation.
w (Note 5) 5.
U s ed in combination with all Primary and V
m j y Secondary stresses f or calcula ting alter-ratiPue evaluation).
n.iting stresses (for M_
u I
M M
M M
M M
M E
M LOCA AND SRV DESIGN LOAD COMBINATIONS -
DOWNCOMERS AND DOWNCOMER BRACING CICo L5CS 1 & 2 PROJECT: 4266/4267 SRV/lOCA HYDRODYNAMIC LOADS REVISED REVISION 1 DESIGN-B A515 $UMMARY REPORT DATE: 10-01 81 EQ1 LOAD COND D
L*
S P
E
^8
^
^$
- ^T
- ^
$8 O
O O
0 SS B
A A
A R
1 Normal w/o Temp 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
X X
operating 2
Normal w/ Temp 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
X X
operating 3
0 3
Normal 2 m Sev. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
X X
l'p se t QQ Z
~ -4 4
Abnormal 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 X
0 X
Emergency h2 E 4a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
0 0
X X
r 5
Abnormal 3 C Sev. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 X
0 X
W Z Sa 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
0 0
X X
Emergency 0
6 Normal Ext. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
X X
Emergency 7
Abnormal Ext. Env.
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 X
0 X
Emergency 7s 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0
0 0
X X
LOAD DESCRIPTION T
Operating Temperature Loah
=
O L = Live Loads SRV = Safety / Relief Valve Loads RA = Pipe Break Temperature Reactions S = Stability Loads Eo = Operating Basis Earthquake Loads P = Operating Pressure Differential O
= Varies in Ma;aitud and Intensity PA = DBA LOCA Loads Load Ess = Safe Shutdom Earthqua'se Rg = Reactions and Jet Forces Due to Ro = Operating Pipe Reactions FB = SEA and 13A LX.A Laads Pipe Ereak l
- = Only One SRV Should be Combined l
at One Time
(
MH w to i
CD F Nm W
"Zs O
~. -. - _..
.--.... -. ~...
~
TQ8(E 301A 51*)$76 142 MOwCT. m an?
sev/ LOC A HvDRODVNAMIC LOADS atvntD 80 " I DESK.N-s4ses suum 4ev etroer D""
LOAD StRVICE COMBINATION
, TH P
W TRNI UI P5F CO ' 4 I CHUC LEVEL APPLICABLE CODE EQ.($I SRV OBE
$$E I
X X
A (Normal)
Eq. %
2
.X X
X X
X B (Upset)
Eq.
i 3
X X
X X
X C (Emergency)
Eq. )
4 X
X X
X X
C (Emergency)(6) gg, 3 i
C (Leergency)(6) 5 X
X X'
X X
X gy, 3 i
6 X
X X
X X
X
- C ( t'me rge ncy l( 6) gg,,
UI 7
X N/A Eq. LO 8
X X
.X N/A Lg. 11 Combination Method
+
+
+
e 1
4 4
5 LIMITING STR(55 COM81 NATION 5 f 0R WETWELL PIPING AND PlPlNG COMPONENTS j
CONSIDERING HYDRODYNAMIC LOADS h
l 4
)
TABLE 3 6-18 St. C 6 sup 9
aus CECe LtC516 2 FeOetCT m eM Sev40C A HVDeODve=AMsC LOADS elvfMD st 40% SON S Dewcm eAus ummeAev espoe r DATL iset si II' IAAD LOADS StRytCF I 88 W
TR(2)
$$r.
PSF CO CHUC LEVIL COMBINATION TH 1
X X
X X
X 3 (Upset) 2 X
X X
X X
C (Emergency) e C (Emergency)(*I 3
X X
X X
X C (Emergency)IUI 4
X X
X X
X X
C (Emergency)(6) 5 X
X X
X X
X Casabination N thW
+
+
e LIMiilNG LOAD COMBIN ATIONS f OR WETWELL PIPING 50PPORT5 CON 51D(RING HYDRODYNAMIC LOADS
~
~.-
SARGENT & LUNDY W
ENGINEERO CHICAGO CECO L5C51 & 2 PROJECT: 42 % /4267 5RV/LoCA HYDRODYNAMIC LOAD 5 REVISED REVl51oN 1 DESIGN-3 ASIS
SUMMARY
REPORT DATE: 10-01-81 TABLES 3.6-1A & B (Cont'd)
ABBREVIATION DEFINITION (Applicable to Tables 3.6 - 1A & IB)
TH Thermal Expansion Loads P
Pressure W
Weight TR Hydraulic Transient Loads I
SRV Main Steam safety relief valve discharge loads, KWU quencher load definition.
Building response consists of the envelope of response spectra for all valve and asymmetric valve actuation cases. Submerged structure loads consist of the bounding load case for single valve subsequent actuation (SVSA) and all-valve resonant sequential symmetric discharge (RSSD) Building response and submerged structure reactions are added together via SRSS.
OBE Operating Basis Earthquake:
Building Response SSE Safe Shutdown Earthquake:
Building Response PSF Pool Swell or Fallback Loadings.
The load combination includes the governing reactions from pool swell impact and drag loadings or pool fallback drag loadings.
CO Condensation Oscillation Loads.
Building response consists of the envelope of response spectra derived from CO an O
ad com-LEVY-1 LEVY-2 binations.
Submerged structure loads consist of bounding loads resulting from the vent exit component of CO.
Building response and submerged I
structure reactions are added together via SRSS.
CHUG Chugging Loads.
Building response consists of response spectra for asymmetric chugging.
I
CARGENT Q LUNDY ENGINEERO CHICAOO CECO LSC51 & 2 PROJECT: 4M6/4267 SRV/LoCA HYDRODYNAMIC LOADS REVISED REV15foN 1 DESIGN-BASIS $UMMARY REPORT DATE: 10-01-81 ABBREVIATION DEFINITION CHUG-cont'd Submerged structure loads consist of bounding loads derived from 4T test data.
The shape of the submerged structure forcing function is obtained from a sample 4T trace.
The frequency content of the trace is modified to represent frequencies in the range of 20-30 Hz.
Building response and submerged structure reactions are added together via SRSS.
+
Indicates load is added vit olute SUM (ABS) to other loads in the load case.
Indicates load is added via Square 'oot Sum of the Squares (SRSS) to other loads in the load case.
NOTES:
1)
In the dynamic analyses of submerged structures 1% damping is used for upset conditions and 2% damping is used for Emergency and Faulted conditions.
Note that Water Jet an.
Charging Air Bubble loads are not considered in the load combinations because they are bounded by other loadings.
2)
Hydraulic transient loads are not combined with PSF for the main steam safety relief valve discharge piping.
3)
If SSE response spectra are less than OBE then OBE spectra are used.
4)
The design basic stress reports conservatively add via absolute sum CO loads to the balance of the loads in the load case.
Subsequent reports and assessments add CO loads via SRSS.
5)
Stress equations from ASME BPVC Sec. III NC-3600 or ND-3600.
I 6)
Functional Capability requirements (ref. LSCS-FSAR 3.9.3.1) are met in addition to Service Level C (Emergency) stress limits for essential systems.
Service Level D (Faulted) stress limits are used for non-essential systems.
7)
The requirements of either Eq. 10 or 11 must be met.
8)
The piping support load combinations are performed with and without the piping thermal expansion loads.
This is done to envelope to total possible range of loading.
QUENCHER DESIGN LOAD COMBINATIONS CECO L5C51 & 2 PROfECT: 4266/4267 SRV/LOCA HYDRODYNAMIC LO ADS REVISED REVISION 1 DE5tGN-BA515 $UMMARY REPORT DATE: 10-01-81 LOAD COS1hATIO'E AN3 ACCEPTANCE CRITERI A ECityAL 1.TS ET LNI.kCENCY FAUI.TLD f
X X
X l
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
Weight + Thermal 5eteate - C3C X
X
' X f
X
{
X X
X X
Seisele - 05E Y
,,.X
--==
- r i -
tr:ternal Pressure X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X l
X.
water Cleartat X
X X
Air Clearing X
X X
X X
X
, ll X X
)
Self I posed Dras X
X X
ll X
[
Alt trle N1tiple 2
NX g
g su Dru X
X X
O z rrt r.
h X7 Inter,.tteat nO CnNcnsatten I
X I
'X y
q nZ inertia Loads X
X X
X l
X X
l j X lX I
$ m $p og
-u lX-1 X-1 L1 3
Chugglet Drag - SBA X
X X
ConJensation W 2 X-1 X-1
(-l OscIIlatton Drag - TEA Demcu,er Jet
[
4 X
Drst - DEA Chugli g 93 r Bu%1e l
x g J rit - DNA P
~
Incetta - 58A
'X X
X X-)
X-3 X-3 Incrtia - ISA l
X-J X-3 X-)
Inertta - DBA X
hX X
I X Xl t
?..
X iX X
h Intermittent Condensation
,X X
X X
NOTES:
1.
Use SBA, IBA, whichever governs.
y5 2.
Use SBA inertia or IBA inertia, whichever governs.
g$
3.
IBA Intermediate Break Accident.
M*
4.
DBA Design Basis Accident.
Q
.'.a
s__.
a m-I I
I I
APPENDIX A l
SRV/LOCA HYDRODYNAMIC LOAD l
DEFINITION DOCUMENTATION I
I l
I I
I I
I I
I
n
~~ -- _~,.
~- - -.
-.~ -
-w w
aa.-
-..,.-na.n..
a x
4
==
9 TABLE A.1 i
54-36 4 PAGE 1 Of 2
~
( I(e Lift 1 A J Seb 40C 4 HVDRODVAAnsaC LO ADS tivrWD Ptost(1-4AA4AF DepS451% WMM4at atPORT StwinsO*e 1
~
!* sign Basta Input !ata Output Inta NBC Asceptance Documentation Incomenta son Cr$teria Reepensible Report
. St ructure Los t tn*
Refererx* Iemert Referme Iveascent Refere.ee 'St atus O w rte tert. Gl e.
Refereee
~
STE:lCT/SES 2.1.1 Boundary laCA Water NTR Rev. 2 Not required stace load NUB 3"A487. Section Bounded by contairment deeldn Jet to not bounding. No III.B.2 (Acceptable) presoun load of 45 pois.
7 interface output.
STRUCT/SW 2.1. 2 Doundary Chartire IFFR. Rev. 2 sot swquired etnee load NCREG-Ok87. See.
Bounded by ocatainment design Air Bubble to not bounding. No III.3.3.a.1 and Supp.1 preesure load of 45 peig.
Interface output.
See II. A.3 MECH /MSLD to STRUCT/SES 2.1.)
Boundary Pool Swell hoo dated 10-20.*!8 frva Bot required since load NURE-01.87, See, Basaded by containment design Wall Prosaure W. Choudhury to R. Cheboub to not bounding. No Ig g.R. h b pressure load of h5 peig.
interface output.
( Acceptable) 4 I
EB/MSLD 2.1 3 Drywell Uplif t Memo dated 031k-79 NURE-01.87 Bounded by drywell floor to
. Floor Pressure fra B. Taseta to go Sec. III.B.).4.2 assessment of 9 pold upward '
8TEDCT/SM R. Chebout interface output require 48
( Acceptable) acting pressure.
SES performe final
])
analyets.
STRUCT/ SAD 2.1.k Boundary condensation D78. Rev. 3 Response Spectro. Memo IMtE-01.87.
IAVY/CREARE Modified were1on to Cecillation CREARE letter to dated 01-3180 from Supplement 2 Trial Spee. f2 j
STRUCT/SDD J. Abel.10-25 79, and D. C. Curta/t. Eumar to
( Acceptable)
IWCR/MD R. M. Crawford letter E. B. Weaver IWCE/CreD to J. M. Realtner.
Anchor displacemente.
11 14 79 Memo dated 12-03 79 frw D. C. Gupta/T. Eumar to E. R. Weaver STRUCT/SpE 2.1.4 Boundary Condensation 1%mo dated 02 0180 from Unwidened.esponse spectra EURM-01.87.
to Oscillation D. C. Gupta/V. Kumar trenamitted by letter Supplement 2 CE to R. Srinivasan dated 02 28.80 from
( Acceptable)
E. 3. Weaver to 3. R. Peffer i
s
.u.
tOCA BOUNDARY LOADS i -
1 4
TABLE A.1
' St-m PACE 2 Of 2 (t(e itC51 & 2 PROltC1. sheJh?
.%#W40C4 HYDRODVh4McC LOAD 6 RivtSID tatrwom t DtisC#e 94tillUMMART RtPORT D4TI 194% 41 Design Basie Input Ilata Output Data Igic A0 3eptance Reeponestle heport Doeweentation Docuentation Criteria Dent./Di v.
Reference St ruc ture L%S Tree Reference Document Reference Doc ment Reference / Status comment s PfEUCT/SES 2.1.5 soundasy Chusstre cE apptseation Reeponse spectra-Me o manmo-487 to
. %-11.-76 from R. Cheboub/R. Marshalla Suppelmont 2 STRUCT/SDD to E. R. Weaver, et.al.,
(Acceptable)
IWCE/ BID dated 01.-12-79.
pW E/0QD Anchor Movemente-Memo from J. Carrasco to S. D. E1111an and D. E. Cleon, dated 11-C6-79 Acceleration Time Eastories
( ATE)-Memo from 3. Bealey to D. E. Clean dated 10-23-79 SMDCT/SEE 2.1.5 Soundary Chugging Response Spectra-Deep Spectra-Intter from Umur,.%87.
to Memo from R. Cheboub/
Y. Bekleitia to B. 3. Perfor supplement 2 SfMCT/SPE E. Marsha11a to
. dated Ote-20-78.
(Acceptable) to E. a. W.sver. et.a1.,
ATs (vertical)-sett.r fra GB dated %-12-78 E. R. Weaver to 3. R. Peffer AM (Vertical)-Memo dated 02-25-80, from R. Cheboub/
AM (Borisontal)-Imiter from J. Carrasco to E. R. beaver E. R. Weaver to B. R. Peffer dated 02-25-80..
dated Ole-11-80.
ATE (Bortsental). Memo from B. Benley to E. E. Weaver dated
%-11-80.
W H
sup w-e-se e O
T ABLE AJ 5L-3876 PAGE 1 Of 10 C1Ce PeOstCT 4Jm 4a7 inCS g & 2 atmeo% t saw ^tOCa HDDRODYN4McC LOADS Rf mtD D4 Ti 4 41-41 DihBAWS SUMuant atPoe f Doeism amate Input Data Output Deta umC acceptance Documentation Documentation Criteria asepomeable Report amet aniv.
asf structure toad True nef m noeumont aeference noement mererence status commente r
nuCn/uSLD 331.1 suppor t IoCA Water 3C7-0278-002. Rev. 2 Ro interface output umur,.01.8v. S.e.
Corrections of 07-08-81 do Column Jet with memo from requireds SES performe 111.D.I.a and Supp.1 not affect this load.
to B. Oberenet to 3. Cheboub final analysis.
See. !!.C.1 hMng load with its time STEDCT/SES dated 0612-81, and
( Acceptable) history to provided.
corrections with memo from B. Oberonel to B. Cheboub dated 07-08-81.
PeCB/uSLD 331.2 Support Charging 3C7-0278.002. Rev. 2 No interface output EURF,.Ol.87. See.
Correctione of 07-08-81 do to Column Air Bubble with memo from requiredt SES performe III.D.2.4 and Supp.1 not affect this load.
- 3. Oberenel to R. Cheboub final analpels.
See. II.C.2 Time histories are provided 31gDCT/33 dated 06-12-81, and (Acceptable) for bounding tangential load component and for bounding corrections with seno radial load ecoponent.
from B. Obere. el to B. Cheboub dated 07-08-81.
MCE/uSLD 333.3 Support C oteneation 3C7-0273-002, Rev. 2 with 50 interface output NURE-01.87, Sec.
Trial Spoo. #2 load defini-to Column Dr. utstion memo from 9. Oberenel to requireds SES performe III.D.3 t ion. Ioad magnitude provided pfRUCT/Sg R. Cheboub, dated final analyeis.
( Acceptable) for bounding tangential and 06 12-81, and correctione bounding redaal loalcomponente, with memo from Corrections of 07-08-81 de
- 3. Oberenel to 3. Cheboub.
not affect this load.
dated 07-08-81.
pgE'B/uSLD 3 31.k Support Chugging 3C7-0278-002. Rev. 2 with 50 interface output WURE-01.87. Sec.
Interia ohuaring load defini-to Column meno from B. Oberonel to required: SES performe III.D.3 tion. Load magnitude, reported STRUCT/SES R. Cheboub. dated final analysis.
(Acceptable)
La 3C7-0278-002. Rev. O, 06-12-81. and corrections transmitted frm 30 to RC with memo from 01.-26 78, confirmed by Monto
- 3. Obersnel to R. Chebout.
Carlo almulation. (See memo from 3. J.
dated 07-08-81 Basseroley to R. Cheboub dated 06 29-81).
Ses used saae load magnitude with GE eupglie traces for frequency range
~
MECE/ USLD 3.4.1.1 Downoomer IoCA Water 3C7-0181-002. Rev.1. with No laterface output NURY, Ole 87. Sec.
Calculated net load lose than to Jet memo from B. Oberenet to requireds see comments III.D.I.a and Supp.1 200 lb,s loads are not STRUCT/SES R. Cheboub dated 08-13-81.
Sec. II.C.1 report &d.
(acceptable) g.
~
men /am LOCA 5UBMERGID STRUCTURE LOAD 5
= = _. _. _., _ -
h J
em
m...__ _
..m.
m T ABLE CL2 5L-38?6 PACE 2 OF 10 '
Cete 4%C5 9 4 2 o,M.OC.4.HvDRODvhAnaC,o.A,D5 sivneD te 1O
-.. 1 DA,E t>4141 Doeist ansie laput Data Output Data MC Acceptance Beeponsible Report Documentation Doomentation Criteria Dent. /hi v.
Reference Structure Load trae Reference Document Reference Document Reference /5tatus
"-te IECH/MSLD 3.k.1.2 Downemer Charging JC7-0181-CA2, Bew. I with Meso from B. Bealey te EURE-Oi,87 See, Imad time history la reparted to Air memo tem 3. Obernsel to D. E. Olson dated III.D.2.a and Supp. I for each downocmer la two FI'RDCT/SM Bubble
- 3. Cheboub dated 08-1)-81.
06-26-80 (1aput for Sec. II.C.2 sectore.
to fatigue ar,alysis)
(Acceptable) n -
BBCE/BtB MER/WSLD 3.k.1 3 Downoomer Condensation
):7-0191-002 Rev. I with Meen from B. Benley to 50kgrAl.87, Sec.
?"141 Spee. f2 load definittom.
t.
Caelllation memo from s. Chernmel to D. E. 01 eon dated III.D 3
- a. port.d are leada on each STRUCT/SM
- k. Cheboub dated 08-1)-81.
06-26-80 (tr.put for
( Acceptable) downoemer la two sectore, to fatigue analysis)
IM3/ BED IW2/MSLD 3.4.1.k Downconer Clu.ggtv, 3C7-0181-002, Rev.1 Memo from 3. Benley NCREG-01.87, Sea.
Imade on lad.widual down-to with memo from to D. E. Oloco dated III.D.)
comere are senerated so that STRUCT/SE
- 3. Obe- "
-w 06-26 80. (Imput for (Acceptable) the sector loads (radial to
- ..eamboub, dated fatigue analysis) and tangential componente, pK3/ BED 08-13-81.
resultant) are maatalsed.
Self-inhood lateral load to not reported.
PSCE/MSLD 3.5.1.1 Downoomer IACA Water 3C7-1179-002, Bev. 2 No taterface output EUREG-Cl,87, Sec.
Ioade found insignificant to Bracing and Jet with memo from require 43 ese sammente III.D.I.a and $spp.1 and were not reported.
~
Sft0CT/SES Cueset B. Oterenet to See. II.C.1 Platee R. Chenoub dated 08-14-81.
DECE/BSLD 351.2 Don. comer Charging 3C7-1279-002, nov. 2, no taterface output s m 4,87,S.e.
to Breeing and Air with meno from required. SES performe III.D.2.s and Supp.1 STRUCT/SES Casset Bubble B. Obersnel to final analysis.
See. II.C.2 Plat.e
- n. Chebout dated (Aoceptabl.)
08-14-81.
t MBCE/ESLD 3.5.13 Downswer Pool 3C7-1179-002, new. 2, no interface output uenE-c487. Sec.
Methodology of Calculation to Bracing and Swell with memo from required. 5:IS performe III.B.} end Supp.1 Bo. 3C7-1075-001, sev. 5 STRUCT/SES Cueset B. Oberenel to final analysia.
Sec. !!.A.2 was used.
Plates B. Cheboub dated (Acceptable) 08-14-81.
MER/uSLD
). 5.J.k Dwneomer Fallback 3C7-1179-002, Rev. 2 No interface output NCRBG-Ot.87, Sec.
Methodology of Calculation to Bracing and with meno free required. SES performe III.D.2.a No. JC7-1075-001, Sev. 5 was STitDCT/SES Cueset B. Oberenel to final analysis.
(Acceptable) used.
Platea B. Cheboub dated 08-14-81.
5 e
b r
+
1.
t
.m_
__m m
T e
,q 5
,o e
g ij T ABLE A.2 a
M-3876 FACl 3 CW W
- d,m I
(-
CfCe thCS 14 2 nav40C4 HYDEODtMhes(10ADn tavtt40 PEONCY 4M1Jb7 DintCJe44Sf1 %OMMART RfPOst alvence s D4TB 1e4141 Design Basis Input Data Output Data NRC Acceptance '
Reeponsible Report Docuser.tation homentation Criteria Do rt. /Di v.
Reference St ruc ture Loat ? rte
'Beforence Docent '
Reference trieument Refereve/3te ' rue Comment s
$ eCu/uSLD 3.5.1.5 Downoon+r condensation 3C7-1179-Oo2. new. 2 ma interface susput venaG-oi.87, see.
Trial ape..g #2
' ? ta.
Bacing and Oscillation with meno from required 4 SES performe III.D.3 STRDef/SES Cueee t B. Oberenel to
. final analysis.
( Acceptable)
Plate.
R. Cheboub dated 5
08-14 81.
1 fECE/11SLD 3.5.1.6
>>=noamer Chusging 3C7-1179-002. RN. 2 No Interfs.e output EURE-01.87, Sec.
Interie 'ca g
- g. 4 to Bracing and with aseo fece rep! red: Saw performe III.D.3 load.wath ledr.
STRUCT/m Cusset
- 3. Ober nel to fine. anaissia.
(&oceptable)
Plates R. Cheboub dated 08-1L 81.
...1 s
PGCE/uSLD 3.6.1.1 i SRT Lines 14CA Water 3C7-1Q78-00b, Dev. D.
No 3aterface output MUREG-0467, Sec.
to Jat with meno from requireis BG perfoms.
/ III.D.1.a and Supp.1, ISCE/ BED B. Oberenel to f> pal analysia.
Sec. II.C.1 G
D. E. Olson, dated (Acceptable) r s
12-18-60.
fER/IISLD '
3.6.1.2
@s? Lines Charging 3C7-1078-001., Rev. 0 do interface output NUEBbOb87, Sea,
~
to Air with meno free require 43 StD performe 111.D.2.s and Supp.1, IWCII/ BED Bubble
- 3. Obersnel to final analysis.
Sec. II.C.2 D. E. Olson, dated
- ( Acceptable) 12-18-80 feCE/MSLD 3.6.1.3 SET Lines Pool 3C7-1075-001, Rev. 6, 30 interface output NCREG-Ol.87, Sec.
to Swell with meno from requireds NED performe III.B.3 and Supp.1.
BBCE/ BED
- 3. Obersnel to final analysis.
Sec. II. A.2 R. Cheboub and (Acceptable)
D. E. Olson, dated 10-09-81.
8KE/IISLD 3.6.1.k SET Lines Fallback 3C7-1075-001. Rev. 6, so interface output NUIEG-Ob87 Sec.
to with memo from required; BtB perfome III.D.2.a
. IGCE/ BED B. Oberenel to final analysis.
. ( Acceptable) a R. Cheboub and D. E. Olson, dated 10-09-81.
i
)
t e
enw
.[umshMI-w,.e---wm ga maie O
.m x-14att 43
~
W3s4 PACE 4 Of 16 4
e.
OCe t%Ch t & &
pag.g y. w w
- wwrot e eevoeODr%4neC 404Db BivneD g.,,gy, g,
ptwC,444wn hLeen4Asv estos t gg.,y w
' Deelen Basis Zeput Data Ctstyst Date U* &cceptance Deepanettle Report Drementet:en Daciasetetten traterie Bent. /Di e.
Referertee St ract ure Le af *rme Sef eren e hae-t Refewe ht Refensace *Ite*a e-t e l
IWCH/1EELD
).6.1.5 suf La ee Candementaan 3C7-107841oL. aee. c.
ne.aterface e txt
- ^ *7. sec.
Trtel spoo. M j
ts Cecillataan with meme fra regatreds 30 performe III.3.)
iSca/me
- s. Nr. net to final analyste.
( Ace.ptat.le)
D. E. Clean, dated 12 18-80 i
IKE,W
).6.1.6 SBT Linee Cthering 3C71079 401. See. C.
Se laterface estet
- a 87 Iaterza emetag leed i
to with ames from requireds EW perfense See. III.D.)
dettaathen, am e =en j
MDC D. Oberenel te final analysis.
(&asettable) lande were omlemiates for i
D. E. Clean dated 4 amer /emter ring.
1215-80s corroeted pese 9 treneelsted by 02-19-81 ases.
MW 3.4.1.1 SNT Lime 14CA Water 3C71W80-001. Ree.1 No interface output 5M.01.87. See.
to Supporte Jet oath ames free rogmireds 50 performe 111.3.1.s one Supp.1 sEE/WS
- 3. Nrenel te final analysia.
See. II.C.1
- n. E. Clean aat.a (esseriest.)
os.01 al.
i IECE/RELD
).6.1.2 SET Line Charging JC7-10804101. See.1 Be interface entpt stMG-01.87. Sea, to Supporte air with sens from requirees BED performe III.D.2.a and Supp.1 IEE/BS Dubtle
- 3. brunel to flasl er.alyaae.
See. II.C.2 D. E. Clean dated
(&eceptable) 05-01.-81.
IECE/ WELD 3.6.1.)
SkT Line pool 3C7-1000 001. See.1 Se laterfu entput 6. See.
JIsthedoleer of Colemletten to Sapparte Seell with meno free requirets BED perfasse III.B.) and Supp.1 Be. 3C7-1075-col. Dee. 5 IEE/ BID
- 3. Nansel to fiaal ana',--**
- -= ** e s une need.
D. E. Olsea dated
(&aceptable) 0441 81.
em I
W m
>w a
e----ww
.s_
. _ ~. -. _ _ __ _.
_. =..
-m
_ _ - m m. ___ _._ _.__- ~_.
_m-.__
-a t
l i
I A4114 2 St.)e?6
}
PAca soe w I
~
r l
Ene t wnla l I
to w 40C A tevDSOpve=444sC 6040l ef wf%AD i,
DeWQo 94W5 tunensAar etPDet f
peon (t w ant
)
Deelan 3 mete egge s heepenethle Report Zeput hta Der?. /f,t e.
Re f erenc e Eter*ure 1,eal *rT*
Output Data gpyg w gg i
h__
-tatson MC &oeoptenee tet ten -
e Beforence E ht Crs teria
(
hafn-. hmert sect /REI.D 3.6.14 SN Line Fa11 beck bef--
itatue C-i n t
+
sucs/as 3apports 3C7-0180-GC1. See.1 So interface output 5 6. Sec.
to with memo fame
- 3. mrenet to requirees BED perfoaus
!!1.3.7.a siethoeelee of emicaletten t
Jimal enalysie.
(aeceptenle) me. JC71075 001, neo. 5 L
n a. Czeae anted
=no mes.
06-01 -81.
setEigLS 36.15 sp Lane canaemaattaa 3ct-01eo 001, neo.1 m 1sterfeos euty.s stanG-Oi.87.
Trial spee. 92 F
to t
fm3/58 supporte Coe111atten with same from g
- 3. Oberenet te requireda BS portomme See. III.S.)
final analyste.
(Aceeptable)
{
D. E. Olsen dated 05 01-81 sucE/usLD
).6.1.6 sur Line Chuaring I
i( "
- EEW Supports 3C74114001. Bew.1, Wo 1.terface output EUREr. Ot.87 to t
Interia thagnag Lone
[
with memo fran
- 3. Obersnel te requireds BS perfesas See. !!I.B.)
Sof1mittee.
l fiama analyste.
(eseeptable)
- n. s. clean antes 05-01.-81.
6 3.7.1.1 Quencher IKa Water N71078.001.. Rev. O, De asterface output 567. Sec.
to
)
- E3/58 Jet with meme free
- 3. Oberenel to regnareda SS pufesmo III.D.I.a and Supp.1.
flaal analsete.
See. II.C.1 j
- 3. B. Olson ented.
12-15 4.
( Acceptehle) t IEEW 3.7.1.2 hencher Charging 3C71078-cok, new. O, so laterface outset gema'.-01.87, Sec.
te 1E3/38 Air with memo fras Bubble B. Obermeet to requirees SED pertesmo III.D.2.a and Supp. I, i
final analsele.
See. 11.C.2 k
D. E. Olson ested I
12 18-80.
(Acceptable) t ISt3/NEIa 3.7.1.k beacher Camdensattes JC71078401.. Rev. 0 to anterface output 503EC 0147, See.
/
to
]
IEE#BS Oscilletten with meno from
- 8. Oberenel to requireta SID perfesas III.B. )
k B. B. Oleos dated finni aanlysts.
(Acceptable) r i
12 18-80,
(
F 1
1 4
4 3
1 b
M&E o.
I I
J j
i L
4
)
4 i
e L
T ABit 42 SL-384 P ACE 6 Of 10 C IC e PeOe(i en eJU aMS1&2 et wwus.
uvaor 4 HvDeoovstaw 1040s alwrum Da ft men ei De seCA SAM tt,MMAst stroet Iesis. Bas.e Irip.t '.a ta
&.* y.t Int a EBC Accepter.co Bee;rr o a tie Depart h.eusec ta t a ar.
Ac ae-tatts.
Cr.teria
- - r * 'r: -
F*fere-
- S'ra * :re L a1 *va fie fer*+ e '# N. - t hefere-r, Jr - r **
- Pe reme 'Y' e*.e C o- *
- fGCH/MSLD
- 3. 7.1.5 remacher Chwird 3C7-1379-aw. Bew. O.
Ba ir.terface output 5" REG-Of.P 7 tr.terim CAggtrg I iad with meno f r-At requireda D'L performe Sec. III.D. )
De fina t &on.
Mang loade to DUER/M B. Oteronel to final ar.alyeae.
( Acceptatle) on temer/ easter rtos.
D. E. Clean dated 12-19-M.
PUEH/MSLD
). 7. )
4encher Uneven Aar 3C7-0181-004.. Rev. 1.
E2 nnterfees output NQtEE-Od.87 does not Sequehanna IAR aescribee te
& Water with esso from requireds 90 performe aAAroes these loade loa 4 baete.
PGEH/DQ Clearing B. Obersnel to final ar.alyele.
on T-quencher.
D. E. Olson aated 05-c1-81.
fGCE/NSLD 3.8.1.1 ECS
!*1C A 3C7-1079-002. Gev. 2 DC) Accesoton so.
W W 87. Sec.
Lomas em 8* etramer to Suction Water with aseo frat C22351 ard 022025. DC III.D.1.e and Supp. 2 nog 11(181e and est act PGrB/DQ Strainere Jet B. Cheronel to calculatione noter Sec. II.C.1 reported.
te D. E. Olson datei RE2. Dev. O. dated
( Acceptatle)
PGiCE/C4D 09-30-63.
11-07-80 and RIt9. Rev. O.
dated 11-07-80.
PQlCB/MSLD 3.8.1.2 ECCS Charging 3C7-1979-uCJ. Rev. 2 DC Acceemion 30.
F' REG-CL8 7. See.
to Suction Atr with memo frne 022 351 ard 022025. DO III.D.2.a and Saf p. 1.
PGCE/DC Strainers Bubble B. Oterenel ts c alculat tar.e number Sec. II.C.2 to D. E. 01 erat dated RE2. Rev. C. dated (geceptag ge) fGCE/C4D 09-y 81 11 07-80 and RI69. Bew. O.
dated 11-07-80.
PECE/MSLD 3.8.1.]
ECS Pool Swell 3C7-1075-001 Bev. 6 90 Acceselm 50.
WCREG-d.67. Sec, to Suction with meno from C22351 and 022025. DQ III.B. ) and SuFD. 1.
PGCE/DQ Strainere B. Oterenel to calculatione nister Sec. II. A.2 to D. E. Clean dated RE2. Rev. C. dated
( Acceptabic)
JGCE/CGD 09-30-81.
11-07-80 and RI69. Bew. O, dated 11-07-80.
~
=.
O
148tt 4 2
% W6 P AGE 7 OF 10 I
cue I
twsiaa enoecs em es se. tor a uvtwooe%==4.c a04tri etwuo ei..s.m i onpu. assn waaa4=ev eeroer unti w ei es Ieelan Basas Input I=t*
Output Inte ERC Acceptance seasonestle neycrt Duc eentat i on A.eeetation criteria Ie c rm,
Pe terem e strr + ee tras *yre Petere ~ e > ~4e-
- serere~e > =e-e ser,mee st e +.,
une-t e MEIL1 sLD 3.6.14 ECS Suction Falltea
)C7-1075 cm 1. Rev. 6 DQ Access.an b. C22 )'1 5"Rnr.-Gl.M.
to 5 trainers with esso frse and ^.JrJ5. WQ calcule-Sec. III.D.2.e MER/DQ B. Oberenel to s ton amtere RL2, Bee. O
( Acceptable) to R. Chetwa and antes 11-07-&1 and RI49.
I DEK2/C4D D. E. Oleum dated new. O. dated 11-07-80.
10-09-81.
MIE2/MSM
). 8.1. 5 ECs cona.nea t ion 3C7-Ic79-oc2 aev. 2 so acc.estaa h. c22r;1 stas c6.P7.
Trial speo. #2 I
to Swe t t ae Deca 11 atlas with eseo foam and C220J5. HQ calcula-Sec. III.D. )
bundard Awaae for 8*
MER/WO Straanere S. Oteranel to tim metiero RE2, See. 0
( Acceptable) s.4 24* etrainere. roepectave'y.
se D. E. cleon a.tes ates 11 c7-eu and ale 9 poK2/CGJl 09-yM!1.
Bew. O. aated 11-07-80.
DEK5W 3.0.1.6 EC3 Craggtrg JC7-1W-002. Rev. 2 DG Aecenatom b. 022351 IFEIG oi.87.
Interia erm.sst:4 losa eef tal-to Set & om with aseo frv.e and 0.'2C25. IBQ calculataos Sec. III.D.)
t 1em.
Samasag leede for IGK3/BQ 5trainere B. Oberenel to metere R%2. Rev. C.
( Acceptable) 8* end 24* etratmore.
I to D. E. Olson, dated dated 11-07-80 and 1169.
roe pec t 1 *el2 MEE/CC.D 09-30-81.
Rev. O. dates 11 07-80.
IOK3/HSLD
).9.1.1 E m-SRV LOCA 3C7-117%-002. Dev. 2 So interface output 5"'oir N R7 Sec.
Loade found eeg11gible and are to Lines mater Jet with memo frue repareas DQ perfome III.D.1.a and supp.1, not reported.
MkCE/WO B. Oberenet to final analpete.
Sec. !!.C.1 D. E. Clean aated
( Accep table) 05-20-81.
poK3/BSLD
).9.1.2 E m-SNV Chargtre 3C7-1175-002. Dev. 2 No interface output WCitBr,-01.07. See.
Iced ca 12132C-2 food to Lines Att htble with meno fra require $4 DQ perf ares III.D.2.4 and Shpp. 1, Regligible end it to not MEE/CrD
- 3. Oberenel to f tmal analpese.
See. II.C.2 reps.rted.
D. E. cleon aat.O
(&eceptatie) 05-20-81.
IGCB/MSLD
). 9.1. )
Bon-SRV Pool Swell 3C7-1075-OCI Bew. 6 Bo interface output BCF E-04.8 7. Sec.
I to Lines with meno from reisAreds DQ performe 111.3. ) and Supp.1 IGE 2/DQ
- 3. Oberenen to final aralyene.
S-t. II. A.2
- 9. Cheboub and (a ceptable)
- 3. E. Cleon dated 13-09-81.
1 I
l I
[umnu I
I
==
~
T Asa t 4 2 M 18.4 P ACE 8 Of to I
I me att t t & 2 Peuen f SJbb 4Jh?
g
_tew4CX.4 evvDAUOv%44est 104tn etwrWD e_tttts(W 1
. _..e.e _,
....-1.
, t D..
m,, D.,.
......t_.
Desponalble Reps.rt Imc emeta t ica Docuser.tett on Criterie Der t.fri e.
Pe f e re~ e 9*r a-t m L e t *n.
Referes e Dr.ect Defere~e In+ aac' Refere re 'Ste*2e C ne-t e
'*43/3I3*.2 39.1.1.
E m-53V Felltect JC7-1375-Ocl. Bee. 6 So interface cm.tput F?PE al.87, to Linee with sono fera reguireda DQ perfsme Sec. III.D.2.e I
IGICE/DED
- 9. Oberenel to (tral ar41pois.
(&eceptakle)
- 9. Chehout and D. E. Cleos dated 1 W 1.
IGER,W 3.9.1.5 Bar.-SET Condeneetion 3C7-11%0C2. Ree. 2 Es interface output FJB W7.
Trial Spee. #2 Icede to Linee Cecilliation with sono frw rwaareds DQ performs Sec. III.D. )
reported for teaseshi MERM B. Oberer.el to final analyste.
(&eceptat te) 11ees. Led en 111kT-2
- 3. E. Clem dated fenend sogligible and at 05-20-81.
18 met reported.
IGER/IISLD 3.9.1.6 Non-SBY Ctaeggird 3C7-1173402, see. 2 No interface output BrBE.01.97 1steria cae sglag load def tal.
I to Lins e with soo> fra requireds DQ performe Sec. III.D.)
taan. :end on 1AI)2C-2 MM B. Oberenel to final esslyote.
( Acceptatle) found negligibt and are act D. E. Olson dated reported.
05-20-6:.
MBCE/IISLD 3.9.1.1 E m-SET
!aca JC74W-032. Ree. O.
No interface outpist 573E.01.87. Sec.
Loads found mes11gible.
to Line water Jet with meno from requireds ap!D performe III.D.I.e er.4 Sepp.1.
MIK'E/IDQ Supporte
- 3. Oberenel to final analyste.
Sec. 11.C.1 I
B. E. Cleon dated
( A cceptable) 08-18-81.
Mi[R/MSLD 39.1.2 Bon-SIT Chargird 3C7-08%.OG2. Ree. O.
52 interface outpist H:'EE Ot.$7 See, to Line Air puttle wi th moo > from regstreds DQ performe III.D.2.e and Supp.1.
MIC2/IIMD Supports B. Oberenel to final ar41yelo.
3+c. !!.C.2 D. E. Olson, dated
( Acceptable) 06-19-81.
I I
I I
r I A51E 4 2 i
- u. -
P AGE 9 Of 10
'r I*
<u.
m..-...., ~, D% St b N D
%e n t 4 te9 L20DT%4MsC 4 04 I,p, I.1 or me,,_e
- e, I...o,t x, _, t I.t.
C,,, t e r s.
m _ t.1 -
r t.,,
.e.,- 1 u.
.ex.e,e e g
e.e,e~e r.. >.
w,,
I.m e.
s. m..
.e L e, m.
.. r e -. m _.
...e - e 3 IGL'R/33'.D
). 9.1.1 Ex-SBT IJ.A hater 3Cbbbil. Pee. G.
5.3 ar.terface output 5"RL12'. Sec.
M gag glig;p;,,
l to Lisse Suppcrt Jet w a ta mean fre req 4Arets EPC perfome I!!.L.1.s are am.pp. 1.
t[
M'EMD Claspe B. Otersrel to f aral a:Aye6s.
Sec. 11.C.1 D. E. Cleon dated
(&:ce pat iel
[
01-27-81.
}
IGEE/MSLD 39.1.2 B*-SIT Crarg erg JC7-%%-T1. Rev. O pa interf ace output M 7, see.
F-i to 54p pc et Air Mtle e;th om f re re p a re 2 ; EPC performe III.D.2.a ar.$ Supp. 1 MECE/DC Clampe B. Oterenel ta faral analyela.
Sec. II.C.2
{r
- . E. cl.on eases (axeptatle) f C1-27-tl.
(I MECH /uSLD
).9.1.)
Bun-SRT Pool Swell E7-Ir5-JC1. Bee. 6 Ec tr.terf ace outpat WM*?. Sec.
to Line Suppcrte eith nem f r-m requireds EPO perfome III.S.) ara Supp. 1.
MEE/DC and Claspo D. Cherer.el to final era;yesa.
Sec. II. A.2
- a. cheboue and
( u=ep tat ie) p
- 2. E. Clea cates IC@-81.
em PEDLtLL
).9.1.1 5 a-SRT falltaet
)C7 10754J1. Rev. 6 Sa icterfwe output 5"1tEGe%87, to Lane Supp.rta o t ta som f rom re4wareda EPC performe Sec. III. L. 2.e 10E"B/pQ and Classe B. Oberenel to final aralysis.
( Acceptatle)
R. chetout and 6
D. E. Cle,an datei P-10-09-81.
milch /N3LD 39.1.5 ma-SBT Conserisat a an 3C7mm. E.. C Ea anterface output s nc-cd.87 trt.1 spec. #2 to Line Supporte Cec allat aan esta meno fre regu red: DC performe See. III.D. )
iGam/no
- n. coer.41 to final ar lysis.
(acceptatle)
D. E. Cleon dated c )-l b81.
IGuL115LD
). 9.1. 6 Ne-SRT Chudgird W7-C8h0C2. Ree. C.
53 interfwe outy.t IrCRE-C& 9?.
Interia et.ggird land to Line Supports witn mem frw requireda IBG performe Sec. III.D. )
def tastion.
{
peri /DQ E. Oberenel to f.nal aralysts.
( Axeptable)
D. E. Olsen dated 03-18-81.
r k
es h
t se Y
k F
i
[
E f~
4
1 A8114 2
~
8L. W6 P AGE 10 Of 10
~
Eere liC 51 & 2 PeOdtI 4Jh6 4A'
%eb TOC 4 MVDeODT*s4Mf( LO4D% Sitf*4D te begaLA 1 onwcs. enwg glasuaa v strual D4 rt w et si Design Basis Ir:put Lata htput Data 30t0 A:ceptance Respone s ble Report Ducweent a t i on hemor ta t i on Cet teria Ie r t. 'ta v.
Referene St rv t ure Li af *rre Referen e &cmeet D.forence Ir.~ meet Re f erer.ce /St at.e C gen c.t o MEER/MSLD
).9.1.5 Son-SirW Condensat ion A7-OI.NhY1. Rev. O, No interfoe output II"RE-CM7 Trial Spec. #2 to Line Support Oscilla tion with meewi fr e requireds kMD performs Section 111.D.3 IGr.11/nMD Clampe
- 6. Obersnel to final analysts.
(acceptatle)
D. E. O! son dated 01-27-81.
6 seEa/n3LD 39.1.6 Un-Sav Chugging E7-oWo-or,1, pov, o.
za anterrace output utts-ci.87.
Interim ewtr4 toa4 to Line Support with mee, fre required kpG perfonts esf tas ti on.
Section 111)D.3 MIER/EpQ Claspo B. Otersnel to final analysis.
(acceptatle D. E. Olson dated 01-27-81.
me he 4
en e.
W M
emD
'L"""T."l'~
L A
e
Iff1ETL3 SL 130 P ACI 1 Of 3 (Ke LWSIa2 feueM t th e.t*
Set t(X 4 MtDe(M>t%4uK tO41M etbntD at brutys t DtWA S456 RMuant stros T pa rt ites as Design Basis imput Date Outpat Ilmte BBC Acceptance Beeponalble Report Die m tetta Dncumentation Criteria fort. / Die.
keferwe S t r.e ture 1,0a5 *yw Deferer.ce Dteet Refereece Dmet Deference 4teta Omte MICE /NSLD 2.31 Baundary SRT All 3CM PW1. Rev. O.
Respor.ee ST*ctra ta aEG-0.a f, wpple.
E'aC BePort R14 25/1975, to D al wee with meno from S. Yaesta
( Nor t rontal)-h f ra ment 1. Sec t ion Oe'- 3 STETT/SES to R. Chebout. Saled
- 9. Her ley to E. E. wever 31.3.3.gth g agc.oggg, to 03-22 79 dated 07-2 b 79. Desponse e, e-20 f or f rem y STR'JC7/SDD Spectre (Syn. Tert tcal)-
rense ( Acc eptatie )
psen/ m meno fra s. Eenley to g/g B. B. Meer Sated 06-1479.
STH-Moeo from B. henley to D. E. Olom dated 10-23-79 Anchor Displacemente-Nao free J. Carrasco to
- 8. D. E1111an and D. E. Clean dates 11-05-79.
Digitised Desponse Spect.e (Borizontal) Memo fram D. Benley to S. D. E1113 an dated 07-2479.
Digitised keepocoe Spectra (Syn. Tert.)-Memo from B. Benley to 5. D. E1111an dated 07-11-79.
srb BOUNDARY LO ADS S& MENT %LM l
_=:
__.._m.
T Aatt A.)
St-G6 P ACI 2 Of 3 I
i (nC.
PeOsE(1 eJeaeAF 11C% t & 2
(
tev 40C 4 HVDRODT44hesC LOADl alvsMD si t esso.s.
Dus ei ossiv..eams umas, apon:
Design Baele Input Date Output Data MC &cceptance aceponestle a port sk.c.entation Dmmentation cra tersa nor t. 'ti v.
neteren-e strucesr.
ws *n.
neference L -- t meterence w-t meterence itstas e-te i
STRtlCT/SB
- 2. 3.1 Boundary SET All Mesee free R. Chebeeh/
ATE (vertical )-
IILREG-0447. Supplement L.
to Yalves C. Ehlert to E.R.beewer.
Letter from E. R. Weever aeetten 11.D.5 with stEEG-STEDCT/5PE dated 02-20-40 to E. B. peffer. dated 0519. p.6-20 for f requeesy 02-26-80.
reage. (Accepteble) to GE 1aentical to 232 Doundary SBT AM Identical to SRT-all Id ettal to sav-all
!aentacal to SEV-all t
SRV-all Valves valves case.
valwee oese.
valves case.
i Case IEE/uSLD
- 2. 3. )
Boundary SET etagle 3C7-0579-001. Rev.1 Response Spectroh M7. Sepplement heported are EWU loads for to salve with memo from from B. Realey to 1, 5estien !!.B.3 with stagle valve first actestica 1
sfuoCT/ Sus
- s. Tessim to n. Chebomb.
E a. Weaver, dated suumac-0519. p. 6-20 fe, ease, utaen noende eingle to dated 0F22-79.
06-20-79 frequency see68
'*1'8
- - t ** * *** 108 j
(Asseptable) ease.
saA1 Report $16-25/1974, STRUCT/Sm IE3/WID ATB-Items from 3. Realey see.1 IKE/CQD to D. 5. Cleon, dated 4
10-23-79 z
AaeM-Displacemente-Ilmas from J. Carrasco to
- 5. D. E1111an and I
B. E. Cleon dated 11-05-79 1
e Digitised Response Spectra-j Ilmeo from 3. Eenley to 4
S. B. E1111en, dated 1
07-12-79 l
w e
v-i I
em 1
e 4
1
.I
'l l
T AStE A 3 M-C'6 PACE}OF3
~
t ac.
tsC19 A 2 peoptd 4 we&7 Set 40[ A HvDeODt%4McC 1040h atW15ED RiveWoest DIh4Anin SUMM4a7 etMMI D4 ft 44141 Deside hoste Input Data Output Data SC Acceptance Beeponalble Report Doomentatlan Docimentattaa Criteria Beat. /Di v.
Ref..
e St..; -
Load Trne Reference L - t amf.. _. L -.t Refs
- %tatua e
is STRUCT/SES 2 3.)
Boundary SRT stagle ATH Derttaat)-elene ATR (Tertical)-letter 9taEc-0 87, Supplenest 8, EWU meport al.-13/&973,aev. I te valve-from a. Chebenh/
from E. R. Weever to intion !!.a.5 with grWDCT/Syg
- c. Ettert to E.a. beaver,
- 3. R. Peffer dated u;atc-OS!t, p. 4-20 f or to dated 02-22 40 02-26-80.
frequency range.(Acceptable)
GE ATN (Hertsental).Meme ATR (Borisontal)-
f ree a. Healey to letter from E. R. ha er E.a. beaver, dated to 5. R. peffer dated 06-14-80 01.-18-80.
pK3/MSLD 2 3.k poundary SNT 3C7-0379-001, Dev. O.
Beepanee Spectra-Meme ta:atC-oe47, supptement 8, est aeport a14 23/1978.new. a to Asymetrie
=1th eene fece S. Tessia free B. Benley to Su ttee 11.a.S with STRUCT/SES to R. Cheboub dated E. R. Weaver, dated watc-0519, p. 6-20 for to 03-22-79.
06-19 79.
f requency reage.(Acceptable)
STRUCT/SLD peCH/B(D Digittsed Beeponse Spectre-IE 3/CQD Meme face 3. Realey to S. D. E1111an, dated 07-12-79.
ATH-pieme from 3. Beales to D. E. Olson, dated 10-2)-79.
~
Anchor Displacements-Mene fras J. Carrasco to S. D. sillaan, dated 11-05-79.
stuuCT/sas 2 3.k poundary SET
- Tu (nortseatet)-no.e Aus (nortaastat). letter in:asc.0.a7, s.pplement 1, suu seport at6-25/19ta.ne.. a Asymetrio from a. nestey se from E.a.we.,or to sectaen 11.s.5 with se StuaCT/S75 a.a. weaver, deced u.a. pef ter dated 06-to-a0 uvasc-osto, p. 6-20 for to co-to-e0 frequency rease.(Acceptable)
CE ATH (Vertical)-Mene ATH (Vertical)-letter frea a. chebe.b/
free E.a. waver te c.thiert to a.a.w..er, u.a. perfer, dated 02-26-a0 i
deced c2-22-60 1
i r
6 t
, _.... ~..
T Asti A 4 51-3L4 PAC 11 OF 6
~
(f(e 4%($ 14 2 Pe(*(1 4.u 4AF
$8WLCK 4 HVDROOv%4MK 10AD6 8t trbtD Stw% SON t Dt%4C,Ps 845fl St/MM447 af Puel D4il 16 41 81 Seetan ameis input anta output Deta E deceptance Beeponalble Report Documentation Documentation Criteria Beat. /Di v.
Reference Stracture Load Trne Reference Documer.t Reference Docuent Reference / State e-te fmCE/MSLD 332.1 Support SBT-all 3C7-0276-002. Rev. 2 Bo interface output mainsG-oea7. supplement t, aseenant sequential to Coluum Talves with memo from required SIS performs baction Bl.C.2 with symmetrie discharge boundirq STEDCT/SEE
- 3. Oberenel to final analysis.
DE;RAL-0 Sit, p. 6 20 for toed to to applied to all R, Chehoub dated 06 12 816 frequency range, columne.
and corrections with mean (Acceptable) free B. Oberonel to.
R. Cheboub dated 07-08-81.
SWCR/MSLD 3.32.2 Support Single 3C7 0279-002, Rev. 2 No interface output NETBE-d.87. Supplement 1 Discharge through " low-low" to Colume Talve with meno free requireds SES performe Sectice ll.C.2 with setpoint valvoe. Icad STRUCT/ Sus Subsequent
- 3. Oterenel to final analyste.
sa anc-0 Sit, p. 6-20 for applicantitty limited so the Actuation R. Cheboub dated 06 12 818 f requency range.
columne near the low-low and corrections with aseo
( Acceptable) setpetat valves.
from 3. OSarenel to R. Chebomb dated 07-08-81.
MES/MSLD
).16.2.1 hnoamer ERT all 3C7 0181-002, Rev.1, Meme from B. Benley NURE-01.87.5upplement B.
Besonant sequential symtrie to Valves with meno fra to D. E. Olson. dated sorties it.C.2 with discharge load time histortee STRUCT/ Sus B. meenel to 06 26 80. (Input utafc. cst *, p. 6-20 for individunt :
- re of to
- a. Chebout, dated for fatta= analyste) ser f r.gwncy sange, the two sectere. based en g
IGCE/ BED 08 1)-81.
(Acceptable) 1-Smacher load deflattles Load reduetton factor son.
verting led bene to EW toad definition as provided.
5RV SUBMIRGED STRUCTURE LOAD 5 e
TABtt A.4
~~
SL-M PACE 2 Of 6
~
CICe LMSI&2 Fe(Nei1 em 4AF 5ev40CA M4DeOpvN44e( tOA05 alVISED atwrwom Dt 50pe sAtr5 WheneARV RIPoef Dart. met et Design Sneio Input Data output Data MC Acceptance Beeponsible Deport Documentation Documentation Criteria Emet. /Div.
Reference St ructure Load Tyne Beforence Document heferer.?e haent Reference /Statae Comment e MBC8/NSLD 3.l. 2.2 Downconer
$1ngle 3C7-0181-002, Rev.1.
Memo from B. Henley to WREC-064 7, Supplement 1 Each valve within the two to Valve with meno frwm D. E. Olson dated 06-26 80.
Section 11.C.2 with sectore treated as a low.
STRUCT/SES Subsequent B. Oberenet to (Ir4put for fatigue analysis) watC-0519, p. 6 20 f or low setpoint valve. Load to Actuatioe R. Cheboub, dated f requency range, time histories. based an PEB/MD 08 13-81.
( Acceptable)
I-Mencher load definition, are calculated for individual downconere at the two sectore.
Load reduction f actor converting lead base to EidU load definitten is provided.
M/MS!3 352.1 Downooner SRT 3C7 1179-002. Rev. 2, No snterface output marc-06g7,5=pplement 1, Seconant sequential symmetria to Bracing and All with memo from B.
requireds SE3 performe section it.C.2 with discharge mas. Icade on the ST110CT/SES Gueset plates Talves Obersnel to 3. Cheboub final analyelo.
IR: REC,-OSt9, p. 6-20 for inboard and outboard bsecing dated 08-11.-01.
f requency range, pipes and gumeet plates.
( Acceptable)
Imad reduction factor com-a verting load base to EklO load definition to provided.
MBCE / MELD 3.5.2.2 Downconer Sir gle 3C7-1179-002 Rev. 2, No interface output NtkEG-Ga87, Supplement 1, E88* low setpoint valve dio-to Bracing and Talve with memo from 3.
required: SES performe Section it.C.I with charge ama. lando en the SMUCT/SM Guseet Plates Subsequent Oberenel to B. Cheboub final analyste.
maEC-0519, p. 6 20 for inboard and outboard bracing actuation dated 08-11e-81.
frequency reage.
91 oe and gumeet plates.
P
( Acceptable) leads are based on I-4macher land deftaition. Read reductica factor aanverting base to EldU land definition to provided.
IW11/MSLD 3.6.2.1 SBT SBT 3C7-0979-001. Rev 0,
No interface output waEG-Oe47,5uppteneet 1, Seconant esquential ayuumetrie to Lines all with meno free B.
requireds SES performe Section 11.C.2 with discharge bounding resultant IWCE/MD Talves Oberenet to D. E.
final analysis, saftzc.0519, p. 6-20 for load, for inner and outer i
Olson dated 12-23-80.
f requency range.
ring, roepectively.
f
( Acceptable) 1 4
__.o-_._
9 S
-., ~. _.
-. ~-.
-~. _ _, __.
~ ~. -..
a
--,.- -.... ~
I ASlf /14 M-M4 PACE 3 Of 6 cue i
19C114 2 reogK T a.E4A7 bet 40C A HYDeOptN4MJC 104D5 elvtif D afvtw0a t n
DtisCP 64tn WMMAeV e1FOel D4 tt 168141 Boeip Smete Input Esta Output Data MC Acceptance Beeponsible Report Documee.attan Doesmontation Criteria Beat. ali v.
Reference Structure Load Tyne Reference Doemert Reference beummet t' L.w itetus
^~ ~ te DEEE/MSLD 3.6.2.2 SRT Lines Sirdle 3C7 0979-001. Rev. O Bo interface output E"kE'.-04.87. Supp.1.
Iow. low setpotat valve j
to Talve with meno Tras D.
requireds SES performe Sec. II.C.2 with EURE. '
dsscharge beemates compcment MECH /BtD Subsequent otersrael to D. E.
final analyale.
0519. p. 6-20 f ar fro.
load for inner and outer Actuation Cleon, dated 12 2).90.
quency rarge. ( Aceeptable) ring. respectively.
9ECE/IISLD
) 7.2.1 Quencher SBT all 3C7-0979-001. Rev.1 Bo it.terface output 5"RE-01.97. Supp.1.
Resonant eequential ayumetras to valves with memo from
}
FEES /WED requireds WED performs Sec. II.C.2 with dischage.
- 3. Oterenel te D. E.
finsi analysis.
MUIIc-oS19. p. 6-20 for 01eos dated 02-2f 80, frequency rarde.
( Acceptatie) sEEu/usLD
}.7.2.2 remacher Sirele 3C7-0979-001. Rev.1.
No anterface output uma7 Sure. I 1aw-low setpoint to valve sub-with mean frce reqstreds BID performe Sec.II.C.2 wita valve discharge.
IER/ BED sequent
- 5. Oterenet to D. E.
final analysis.
N':3E-0519. p. 6 20 for actuation Cleon dated 02 24-80.
frequency rarwe
( Acceptable) 1 PRCR/BSLD
}.8.2.1 ECS SET all 3C71079-002. Rev. 2 StD Accesalon Esatere EUREl.0687. Supp.1 Seconent sequential to suction valves with name frse B.
022351 and 022025: BED See.11.C.2 wita uCaso.
eyametrie discanry.
IECE/BtD strainere Obersnel to D. E.
calculattoo==h.co 0519, p. 6 20 for to Olson dated 09-30-81.
BRL2 Rev. O. dated frequency range.
DECE/CGD 11-07 80 and RI69.
( Acceptatle)
Rev. O. dated 11-07 80.
PER/IESLD
) 7.)
Quencher Uneven air 3C7-01810GL. Rev.1 No interface output EURIC.4L87. Supp. I v
to and water with asen fece B.
requireds BID performe Sec. II.C.2 wita NCRIC-fECE/IptD elearing Oterenet to D. E. Cleon, final analpole.
0519, p. 6-20 for dated 05-01-81 frequer.ey raree.
(Acceptable) i j
s Fuammummi 3-i I
J
s T Ast! A 4 st.m PACE 4 Of 6 E
St&2 sav40C4 MYDRODv%AueC LOADn alvlSED Dttac,m eAsss wMu4av atroa t Desip ansie Input hta Output Data 2C aceeptance Beepomethle Soport Documentetton Documentation Criteria f
Bent. /Bi v.
Bef _;
Structure Load Tyne Ref.._. L _.t bef..u; *_ _;
Rafawa Etatus P
to 6
' 3.6.2.2 ECS Sargle salve 3C7-1079-002, Bew. 2, IptD Accessica Ihabers NCREG-Gl.87, loada found te bewul by all to euction subsequent with mesa from 072351 and 022025s MD Supplement 1. Section valve case and are not PR.3/WED strainere actuation B. Oberenel to D. E.
calculation musters II.C.2 with WCEEG-0519.
reported.
to Cleon dated 09 781 R11.2. Rev. C. dates
- p. 6-20 for fregwncy
- ECE/CGD 1147-83 and 3169.
range.
Rev. O, dated 11-07-M e
T Atti A.4 5L.)$76 P AGE S Of 6 CICe PRORCT. sh4Jh1 J
15C514 2 attrbsore 1 5ev40C 4 HYDROOVesAMSC LOADS REVrhEO Daft Del et DinaGn64Wl5UMMAav etPOSI Design Emete Input Data output Data mic Aceoptance Respomelble toport Docemetataan Documentation criteria Emmt. /Biv.
Ref---
Struc ture W Tras Reference 1k-.t Ref-._e L i t Ref-c.u%tatus P-te IEE/gSLD 392.1 son-SET SET All 3C71176-002. Rev. 2 No interface output Nt1thol.87. Supp. 3.
Ecada em individual 11ase.
to Lino Valves with meno from B.
requireds WED performe Sec. !!.C.2. with EURE Ined on it!)2C-2 found amCE/stD Oberenet to D. E. Olson final analysis.
0519. p. 6-20 for englisible and it le not dated 05-20-81.
frequency resse.
reportes.
( Acceptable)
BECE/lRSLD 392.2 SW Sitwle 3C7.1178-002. Rev. 2 No interface output NUREG-OL.87. Supp. I to Line valve with meno from B.
required WID perfom see.11.C.2. with EUnh IER/ BED subsequent Obersnel to D. E. 01aan final analyste.
0519
- p. 6-20 for actuation dated 05-20-81.
frequency rarde.
(&oceptable)
IW:N/MSLD
).9.2.1 Son-SEY SET A11 3C74980-002. Rev. O.
No interface output NUna-m A7, supp.1 RSED peak leade en to Line Talves with meno froe 3.
requireds BED perfom Sec. II.C.2. with 5::I5 individual suppet pipe.
fW:R/WED Supporte Obersnel 5 D. E. Olson final analyets.
0159, p. 6-20 for dated 0).16-81.
frequency range.
( Acceptable)
PEICE/ESLD 39.2.2 Non-SRT Single 3C7 0880-002. Rev. O.
No laterface output EUREr,-01.87. Supp. l' poet loade en individaal to Line valve with esso free B.
requireds WID performe See. !!.C.2. with EUtp support pipe.
DECE/BtB Supporte subsequent Obersnel to D. E. Olson final analysis.
0159. p. 6-20 for actuatica dated 01-18-81.
frequency range.
(&eseptable) l i
l I
l l
...m_m
- _,. _... _ _._~
.m.
m.-.
_.m I
14SLE A 4
~
M*14 PACE 6 Of 6 4
4 CECe i
tR 4 4 HVDEODveeAMsC LOADt tivthfD y
DISKA 94%#n 10MMAav atros t g, g,,
Design Basis Input Data Okt.wt Esta E acceptance Desponsible Report Ducumentatica Doceentation Criteria De=t. /Div.
Reference Strue+ure bei fne Reference beunert Reference De~wt Reference ?Sta*us comment e 4
l K B/MSLD
}.9 2.1 Bon-SRV Srv MI 3C7480-001. Rev. O.
No interface output Ea&G-Oea7 Supplement 1 RSSD poen loade en smalvisual
+
l to Line -
Talves with memo frce 9.
requireds EED performe Sectise 11.C.2. with KREG support pipe.
BEE /EED Support Obersnel to D. E. Olson finst analpole.
0519. p.6 20 for f requency 7
Clamp isted 0127-81.
rense.
( Acceptable)
I.
IECE/uBLD 3.9.2.2 Non-SET Single 3C7-Ol.00-001. Rev. O.
No interface output ERIC-oss7. Sepplement 1 Peak leeds on individual to Line unive with meno from B.
requireds EED performs sectien !!.C.2. with EtEG support pipe.
IECE/EED Support subsequent Oberenel to D. E. Olson final analyele.
. 0519, p.6 20 fee f requency Clamp actuation dated 01-27-81.
ranse.
(Acceptable) e W
4 l
r i
e i
r i
)
1
(
lM&Wl
[
4 s
1 6
t i_
l r.
y
-r
. a
,w
-~...w--
. +.
~-a..
+nxs_u
+. -. -
.. - - ~. ~. -., -
~_w.-=
w.
W j
T48tt AS st.rm PAGE 1 Of 2 4
fme IKS1&2 t
b8b40C4 HvDRODthAM8C LOMn ttkt%fD PeOdtt am eAF F
Dt%ICh-84$t$ $UMMART RtPOeI atvinaOh 1 D4TI 4 41-41 i
Design Daele Ir.put Data Dutput Data ERC Acceptance y
Desponsible Deport Documentation Documentation Crateria Doct. /Di v.
Reference St ructure Loai?ne Reference Dremert Reference huneet Re ference4 ta t.we Cmte 3GICE/MSLD 251.2 Sacrificial Annulus Prese. 3C7-01.77-00). Rev.1.
Orisinal shell *Ir del het App!!ceble I
to Shield Wm11 Pressure to eene from 5. Yassin to Responee Spectre.Meme STNOCT/SBS Rectre. pump
- 3. Chebeub dated 10-23-79..
dated 01-16-80 fece to suction line
- 3. Realey to S. R. Esasi.
t fa2/ BID break.
et.al.
SFEUCT/ SED IW3/CQD ATB and Displacement T,
Memo from 3. Benley to S. D. Killian. et.al.,
dated 02-14-80, e
Digitised Response Spectra-fesso dated 02-14-80 from 3. Benley J.
to S. 3. Killian.
Wdified Shell Mel overst! shield respense cereespendtag d
Beeponse Spectra, ATH.
to a " stick" andet is apprestaeted by 7
Displacement T-B and the testne ene thets tempeaent of the Digitised Data-Rose annutes pressertsettee toede et break from H. Kosherick to lecettoaa per meno from S. A. Etter C. Podeservineat, to 3. 3. trench dated 18-20-80 dated 12-23-80, aesponse spectra and time hasteries are generated to accordance with the requirements spectised in the 11-25-40 meno f rom C. podcaerwinskt to R. Chebeub.
t B
MISCELL ANEOU5 TOAD 5
m
.~
m -_. -
__m.
.. i.
l t
14511 4 %
A1. MN PAC 12 OF 2 i
oc.
LKS1&2 PeOstO em 4&7 5ay TOC A HVDROOVNAMsC LO4DS Rf bralD tit rtsON 1 DIh6Akn SUMm44av RtPOt t Daft. Met et 1
Beetsi amate Input Data output 3mte BC 4eceptance Beeponalble Report aucumentation Boeumentation Criteria tent. /ht e.
Ref_ _e Struc ture land True hef.. __ e L -.t Ref..
e L-t Refu e %tatus
-a e
IE3/ESLD 2.5.1.2 Sacraftetal Annulus 3C7-Of.77 001., Bev.1.
Ortsinal stell pt,4el to Shield Pressurination-with memo from S. Yaseim Aesponse Spectra-Not App 1& cable STtDCT/SM Wall Pressun dise to E. Chebout dated Memo dated 01 11-80 from to to feedwater 10-19 79
- 3. Benley to S. M. Kaasi.
IW3/ BED line break.
et.al.
S'!WDCT/SDD leCE/ g All other references some es j
recies break on page 4 22 IE3/ESLD 2.5.1.2 Sacrificial Annulus 3C7-01.77 002. Rev. O, Inster free C. C. Jones to Shield Pressurisation-dated Q1.-27 77.
to B. B. Perfer. dated IW3/7 BID Wall Pressure due 05-09-77.
to to rectre, and G3 feedwater line 4
'~
breake.
I 4
4 N
e 7
i 4
.