ML20054F968
| ML20054F968 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 05/26/1982 |
| From: | Krimm R Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| To: | Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054F969 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8206180287 | |
| Download: ML20054F968 (3) | |
Text
avw
[D
$ Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 S,
/
2 6 MAY 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR: Brian Grimes Director Division of Emergency Preparedness U.S.
uclear Regu at ry Commission FROM:
1 Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards
SUBJECT:
Evaluation of Of fsite Emergency Preparedness for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Exercise Attached is a copy of the final Report prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region V, on the December 8,1981, offsite exercise at the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant.
The States of Minnesota and Wisconsin were provided copies of the "execrit composites" after the exercise so remedial action could be taken on the deficiencies which surfaced during the exercise. Both States responded with corrective actions. However, the exercise report is now in final form and has been transmitted to Minnesota and Wisconsin for their review.
Region V indicates that the governments in the vicinity of the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant have an adequate offsite capability to protect the public in the event of a radiological emergency, except for the significant deficiences currently being addressed. Both States have been requested to provide a statement of corrective action taken or a schedule for corrective action. Contact Vernon E. Adler, Chief, Technological Hazards Division, at 287-0200 for additional information.
Attachment 8206180287 820526 PDR ADOCK 05000282 l[$
F PDR
l i
APR 2 71982 i
Joseph LaFleur, Administrator ilisconsin Division of Emergency Covernment 4802 Sheboygan Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53702 Dear Mr. LaFleur Composites" with a Previously you were provided "Exercrit summary of findings pertaining to the Prairie Island site-This format specific off-site exercise of December 8, 1981.
has been superseded by a new and different reporting format.
To better facilitate the dissemination of findings, the evalu-ation of the exercise has been rewritten in the new format at Enclosed is the " Final the request of our National Office.for the Prairie Island site-specific off-site exercise Report" of December 8, 1981.
We received your letter of corrective actions pertaining to the We need additional information to Prairie Island deficiencies.
determine the level of adequacy in protecting the public.
information for each of the sig-Please provide the following A
IV of the enclosure:
deficiencies listed in Part statement of corrective action taken (State / County) for each nificant the action was completed; or, the deficiency and the date projected date for completion of corrective action for each deficiency.
Sincerely yours, A
[ S j^cr i
Edwin W. Hakala Acting Chief Technological Hazards Branch Enclosurc
1 l
l APR 2 71982 3r. Ianneth Parach Acting Director Division of Emergency Services Department of Public Safety 1-5 state Capitol St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Dear Mr. Parach:
Previously you were provided "Exercrit Composites" with a summary of findings pertaining to the Prairie Island site-specific off-site exercise of December 8, 1931.
This format has been superseded by a new and different reporting format.
To better facilitate the dissemination of findings, the evalu-ation of the exercise has been rewritten in the new format at the request of our National Office.
Enclosed is the " Final Esport" for the Prairie Island site-specific off-site exercise of December 8, 1981.
We received your letter of corrective actions pertaining to the Prairie Island deficiencies.
We need additional information to determine the level of adequacy in protecting the public.
Please provide the following information for each of the sig-nificant deficiencies listed in Part IV of the enclosure:
A statement of corrective action taken (State / County) for each deficiency and the date the action was completed; or, the projected date for completion of corrective action for each deficiency.
Sincerely yours,
..q 4k s~
Edwin W.
Hakala ActinF Chief Technological Hazards Branch enclosure s
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _. _ _