ML20054F735

Cross-examination Plan for Intervenor,Nrc,Fema,Licensee,Ny State & County Witnesses.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML20054F735
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	06/14/1982
From:	Duboff D WESTCHESTER PEOPLES ACTION COALITION, INC.
To:
References
ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8206170265
Download: ML20054F735 (7)

Text

l i

1 a

9 y

e::

g c:

ll;41 T Kl. -TATI..'. h AMt.HICA

..CE, h

ra mAi-i,v an.An.in eOMMIssIOu g

te

'82 J316 A!1:09 5

bUl' ORE Tlit; ATuMIC sal'I.TY Arid LICErlSIt4C BOARD r-

,3-3 r

=:

,4, ; -.

g if

)

-g

)

ii In the Matter of

=.

)

g

=

)

CONSOLIDATED EDISO!1 COMI'ANY Ol' NEW YORK Docket Nos. 50-247 SP 5

(Indian Point Unit 2) 50-286 SP

,. =.

)

E POWER AUTilvRITY OF Tile ETATi; OF NEW YORK)

June 14, 1982

'll

=

(Indian Point Unit 3)

I XkE If n

WESPAC'S CROSS EXAMINATION

[.5 E

PLAN FOR THE FOLLOWING INTERVENORS' WITNESSES

=

FE To Beyea, Polenik, Zelman, Smith, Hall, Murphy (with respect to Westchester b

County) Siegel, Hare, Conklin, Narod-Shier, Corwin, Turner, Livingston, Kahn, g

Bulleit, Ancona, Connelly, Solnit E

iii' F:

1.

Indicate any deficiencies in the emergency plans about which the witness is E

testifying.

E E..

E 2.

What recommendations would the witness make to improve the plans?

E:=

3.

Respond to the licensees' arguments that the plan is adequate with regards to

{

your area of testimony.

g W

4 Respond to the State of NY arguments that the plan is adequate with regard to 5

your area of testimony.

{

=

i

=

5 t

rz.

• n DSD3 E

7..

t

f

~

e 5

5 f.'.

8206170265 820614 PDR ADOCK 05000247 G

PDR v

n J

t t;;;IT1:0 states or AM1HICA O [EdE[

!;t1CIX.AR HEGUIETORY CO!9IISSION 22 JJN 16 R1:10 BEFORE THit ATOMTC SAFETY AND IICENSING BOARD

-.,:z5. -... I,

. n C '."

)

In th'e Matter of

)

)

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK )

Mcket Nos. 50-247 SP (Indian Point Unit 2)

)

50-786 SP EE fir POWER AUTHORITY OF Tile STATE OF NEW YORK))

Ane 14, 1982 it (Indian Point Unit 3) g

)

5

=,5 b

r:

WESPAC CROSE EXAMINA" ION PLAN FOR NPC STAFF 2.ND FEMA WITNESSES 5l:.

5"52

~

=:7 1

Respond to County of Westchester testimo y that the plan currently is c:.;;;

inadequate in areas of your testimony.

55l?

,{,_,~

2.

Respond to intervenors' testimony that p~an is inadequate concerning areas E

of yo.ur testimony.

3.

Respond to Westchester County criticism cf the. March 3 exercise.

ba M

==:

M f5 mi 55 iY

.i;;a

=::.-t

-p

. aa.

[M

,-m s::

..rs 5 017

= :.

r=:. r

.N.E.S hhh[*** a

• ??55Y

..,..Z.*"*.

y,.;......

L

.:[ hh.h.

. ::~.:.: 1 t

- i.

4 i

UNITED STATES OF AfGRICA C.,T [~

f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION

, q' : -

~

• 79 U-Ms10 kiMO BEFORE THE A'IVMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

{

^

t.

2, :.

I E

r

=

)

5 In the Matter of

)

a=

)

5ra CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK ))

Iocket Nos. 50-247 SP Ed

.iIndian Point Unit 2) gj

)

50-286 SP Ej 5

FOWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF $1EW YORK)

Cune 14, 1982 (Indian Point Unit 3) bw fi E

WESPAC CROSS EXAMINA' ION PLAN FOR LICEllSEES' WISTESSES

=.

To Dr. Lecker:

J 51 5.

1.

Respond to intervenors' witnesses concerr.ing human responses to radiological h

accidents.

Eih

~5il 2.

Respond to federal regulations for emerge:cy planning standards contained iis h

10 CFR 50.

=a

=i%

To Rocca, Podwal, and Rosenblatt:

=11

~~.i IE y

=-.

1.

Explain the assumptions made and methodolcgies employed in arriving at your travel time estimates for evacuation.

2 2.

Explain the margin of error in your estimates.

E' 2 3"

3.

Respond to county testimony that consultants did not respond to county rZil

[51i suggestions.

=r i.=_

Bi1 5

==,

'~r7:

M2

..s i~.I?L r.=_

h

= = - -

. =

.a.

.p==

• • b

_5_f

.r__..

2 7 '. E I E C"!

4

':i N = -

k UN ITI:ll MTATES OF MIUkICis NUC1.1:AR hi:GULATORY CUMMISSION M 'W 16 p"u :10

]

NE i

'2

~, E -

BE!' ORE Tlil: ATO,MJ C sal (l"PY AND LICENSING BOARD

~~.iii':3 3 3Er g

a

q ;, ;; g,.,

t 6

E F

In tlie Matter of

)

8

)

6 CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK '

Docket Nos. 50-247 SP h

(I'ndian Point Unit 2)

)

50-286 SP POWER AUTHORITY OF Tile STATE OF NEW YORK) g June 14, 1982 es (Indian Point Unit 3)

?!

$n er EIt WESPAC CROSS EXAMI!aTION w

~

PLAN FOR NY STATE WITNESSES

• m sse Davidoff and Czech

.=.=

:

1.

d%

Respond to Westchester County criticism of the plan

~f.?

fst 2.

Respond to Westchester County criticism of the March 3 exercise.

==s l5 5

55 25

=

f5i 5

sr 5IE

= = =.W Es kU5 4E.

_~ ~ ~~.

7 :.~:'

. $h Mb 55f

=

555 ME:

.5.. 5 5."Zi

===

ff5f

==:

50$

55

~ ~ ~ *...

.5?N

((.~.

=~s.:

l!

p a

E E

e

..s.---

l llN I TI-:ll MTATE.% Oi' AMERICA

.. _D..

IJIR't.l:AR lit:GUI.ATOl<Y mMMISSION u[

[Y.

22 S116 G :'.s.

y bEFOhE Tlil:_ _ _ _A.T__OM I.C._S_AF._l:T_Y. _AfDs LI CENS I NG BOARD [

, _.6..

h. :: - -

t

" :. ! ; !. s,y;.

E

=w

~i

)

="

In the Matter of

=

I 5..

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK )

Docket Nos. 50-247 SP EE (Indian Point Unit 2) f

)

50-286 SP

.E_.

POWER AUTliORITY OF Tile STATE OF NEW YORK)

=

June 14, 1982 (Indian Point Unit 3) 5_.5..

s

)

20

=

_ =. _.

WESPAC CROSS EXAMINATION

=

=_.

FOR COUNTY WITNESSES

gr

.~. "

=

t=

The County is uncertain as to who will testify on its behalf.

=.=:a

=

WESPAC intends to 55 cross examine all of the county's witnesses.

__4_

1.

Respond to the State of NY's testimony that the emergency plans are adequate.

5 Re'spond to the licensees' testimony that the emergency plans are adequate 2.

'5"",

.Enr g

3.

Indicate deficiencies in the plan and how they can be corrected.

555 E=

EEEE 5

E

==

=

'. '. ~

N EE r.'

- -. = = * -

""d*2

?!EE' s_5. 5..

5 I.

==

.~=:.

ll.g

!Y754

==

~1lli:

E _E.

e-:.:.

e m**

I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA E

j'. *,E i E !

l NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W~

}'

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD k

g.g I Gunn E

In the Matter of

' ' ' 3 0. A MCF.

R

)

}

E CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK )

Docket Nos. 50-247 SP

=

(Indian Point Unit 2)

E_

)

50-286 SP 9

)

POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK)

June 14, 1982 (Indian Point Unit 3)

)

[E

-=5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE h'

Ifi D~i I hereby certify that copies of WESPAC'S Cross examination plans in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit h

in the United States mail, first class, this 14th day of June 1982.

p~

=

54

=:

.=

=.=.:.-

14

==

N 2

=2

==

=

=

E'.

WE.

w.-.--

.,.7 r_-.:

N..

M.

.5._..

[~2i.*

???

===:.

N.-.1 1G"-

n= = =

..~5.~.

?$b.

ses

$5=

l dss.t

• IZ~~'".

EQ

t..S.I

Dr. Oscar H.

Paris

• ' Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory I

3 Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 i

b i

c

+

Mr. Frederick J.

Shon E

Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

,=

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory E_

Commission E

E:.

Washington, D.C.

20555 fi Docketing and Service Branch

=

Office of the Secretary U. S.. Nuclear Regulatory.

5 Commission E

Washington, D.C.

20555

~

EE 55 Louis J.

Carter, Esq., Chairman E

u=.

Administrative Judge EE Atomic Safety and Licensing 57:

E

_,_.f.

Board 7300 City Line Avenue

$1 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19151

$5.

"-=

em c:,r 5$

=nr

==

[f

,~_

Atomic Safety and Licensing 5

Appeal Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory M

Commission

@F5 Wnshinato.ns D I.,__

20555

=

dEE

, Atomic Safety and Licensing ZZ.

Board Panel

sa U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory h"

Commission G2:.i l

y ;I

/

25e2e Washington, D.C.

20555

==

_y g.;

bodh Du

~

a 55.:

- = = -

-- - - - -