ML20054F735

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Cross-examination Plan for Intervenor,Nrc,Fema,Licensee,Ny State & County Witnesses.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20054F735
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/14/1982
From: Duboff D
WESTCHESTER PEOPLES ACTION COALITION, INC.
To:
References
ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8206170265
Download: ML20054F735 (7)
v • d • e


Text

i l 1

, a y

. . * . 9 e::

g c:

h ll;41 T Kl . -TATI ..' . h AMt.HICA ..CE, ,

ra mAi- i,v an.An.in eOMMIssIOu g te bUl' ORE Tlit; ATuMIC sal'I.TY Arid LICErlSIt4C BOARD

'82 J316 A!1:09 5 r

r-

,3-,

3

=:

,4, ; - . g if

) g

) ii In the Matter of =.

) g

=

)

CONSOLIDATED EDISO!1 COMI'ANY Ol' NEW YORK Docket Nos. 50-247 SP 5

' 50-286 SP (Indian Point Unit 2) ,.=.

) E

=

POWER AUTilvRITY OF Tile ETATi; OF NEW YORK) June 14, 1982  ;'ll (Indian Point Unit 3) $

I X k

E If n

WESPAC'S CROSS EXAMINATION [.5 PLAN FOR THE FOLLOWING INTERVENORS' WITNESSES E

=

FE To Beyea, Polenik, Zelman, Smith, Hall, Murphy (with respect to Westchester b County) Siegel, Hare, Conklin, Narod-Shier, Corwin, Turner, Livingston, Kahn, g Bulleit, Ancona, Connelly, Solnit E iii' F:

1. Indicate any deficiencies in the emergency plans about which the witness is E testifying. E E..
2. What recommendations would the witness make to improve the plans? E E
=
3. Respond to the licensees' arguments that the plan is adequate with regards to your area of testimony.

{g W

4 Respond to the State of NY arguments that the plan is adequate with regard to 5 your area of testimony. {

=

i =

5 t

rz.

  • n DSD3 E 7..

t ~

f e

5 5

f.'.

8206170265 820614 PDR ADOCK 05000247  :

G PDR v

n _ _ _ _ _

J

. . . . t t;;;IT1:0 states or AM1HICA

!;t1CIX.AR HEGUIETORY CO!9IISSION O [EdE[

BEFORE THit ATOMTC SAFETY AND IICENSING BOARD 22 JJN 16 R1:10

- . ,:z5. - .':. . I , .

. n C '."

)

In th'e Matter of )

)

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK ) Mcket Nos. 50-247 SP (Indian Point Unit 2) 50-786 SP EE

)

fir Ane 14, 1982 it POWER AUTHORITY (Indian Point Unit 3) OF Tile STATE OF NEW YORK)) g

) 5

=,5 b

r:

WESPAC CROSE EXAMINA" ION PLAN FOR NPC STAFF 2.ND FEMA WITNESSES 5l:. ~

5"52

=:7 ,

1 c:.;;;

Respond to County of Westchester testimo y that the plan currently is inadequate in areas of your testimony. 55l?

,{,_,~ .

2. Respond to intervenors' of yo.ur testimony. testimony that p~an is inadequate concerning areas E
3. .".

Respond to Westchester County criticism cf the . March 3 exercise. -

b a M

==:

M f5 mi 55 iY

.i;;a

- ..' =
:.-t  :

-p

... aa.

[M

,-m s:: ..rs 5 017

= : .

r=:. r

.N.E.S.

hhh[*** a

  • ??55Y

..,..Z.*"*.

y,.;......

L .

.:[ hh.h.

. ::~.:.: 1 t

- i. I

4 .

  • i UNITED STATES OF AfGRICA C.,T

, q' : -[~

f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION ' -

~

  • 79 . , , . . ,

BEFORE THE A'IVMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD U-Ms10 kiMO  :.

{-

^

.  : t.

'; 2 , :. I r E

=

)

5 In the Matter of ) a

=

) 5 ra CONSOLIDATED Iocket Nos. 50-247))SP Ed

.iIndian Point Unit 2)EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK 50-286 SP gj

) Ej 5

FOWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF $1EW YORK) Cune 14, 1982 (Indian Point Unit 3) $

b w

fi E

WESPAC CROSS EXAMINA' ION PLAN FOR LICEllSEES' WISTESSES . . _

=.

To Dr. Lecker: J 51

1. 5.

Respond to intervenors' witnesses concerr.ing human responses to radiological accidents. h Eih

2. ~5il Respond to federal regulations for emerge:cy planning standards contained iis 10 CFR 50. h

=a

=i%

To Rocca, Podwal, and Rosenblatt: =11 IE

~~.i

1. y

=-.

Explain the assumptions made and methodolcgies employed in arriving at your travel time estimates for evacuation. $

2

2. Explain the margin of error in your estimates. E' 2 3.

3" Respond to county testimony that consultants did not respond to county rZil suggestions. [51i

=r i.=_

Bi1 5

==,

'~r7:

M2

..s i~.I?L r.=_

h

==--

. =
.a.

p==

    • b

_5_f

.r__..

4 2 ':i7 N'. = -E I E C"!

k UN ITI:ll MTATES OF MIUkICis '

NUC1.1:AR hi:GULATORY CUMMISSION M 'W 16 p"u :10

]

i '2 NE

~, E -

g BE!' ORE Tlil: ATO,MJ C sal (l"PY AND LICENSING BOARD ~~ .iii':3 3 3Er a

q ;, ;; g,., t 6

E

' F In tlie Matter of ) 8

) 6 (I'ndian Point Unit 2)EDISON COMPANY Docket CONSOLIDATED OF NEWNos. 50-247 YORKSP' 50-286 SP h

)

g POWER AUTHORITY OF Tile STATE OF NEW YORK) June 14, 1982 es (Indian Point Unit 3)  ?!

n er EIt WESPAC CROSS EXAMI!aTION w

~

PLAN FOR NY STATE WITNESSES  %

m sse Davidoff and Czech .=.=

:

1. d%

Respond to Westchester County criticism of the plan ~f.?

2. fst Respond to Westchester County criticism of the March 3 exercise. ==s l5 5

55 25

=

f5i 5

sr 5IE

===.

W Es kU5

_~ ~ ~~. 4E.

7 :.~:'

. $h Mb 55f

=

555 ME:

.5. . 5 5."Zi

===

ff5f

==:

50$

55

~ ~ ~ *...

.5?N

((.~.

=~s.:.

p .

l!

a

. .: E E

e  :;

llN I TI-:ll MTATE.% Oi' AMERICA

..s.--- ,

l

.. _D.. '

u[

IJIR't.l:AR lit:GUI.ATOl<Y mMMISSION

[Y.

22 S116 G :'.s. y bEFOhE Tlil:

_ [

_ _ _ _A.T__OM I.C._S_AF._l:T_Y. _AfDs LI CENS I NG BOARD , _ .6 . . .

. h . :: - - t

" :. ! .; ,!.: s,y;.

.' E

=

w

-__ _ _ ~i

) =

In the Matter of =

I 5..

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK ) Docket Nos. 50-247 SP (Indian Point Unit 2) 50-286 SP EE f

)

.E_.

=

POWER AUTliORITY OF Tile STATE OF NEW YORK) June 14, 1982 -

(Indian Point Unit 3)  ;

s 5_.5. .

) 20

=

_=._.

=

WESPAC CROSS EXAMINATION =_.

FOR COUNTY WITNESSES :gr

~. "

. =

==

t=

The County is uncertain as to who will testify on its behalf. WESPAC intends to

=.=:a

=

cross examine all of the county's witnesses. 55 1.

4 _

Respond to the State of NY's testimony that the emergency plans are adequate. 5

2. '5"",

Re'spond to the licensees' testimony that the emergency plans are adequate Enr g

3. 555 Indicate deficiencies in the plan and how they can be corrected. E

=

EEEE 5

E==

=

N

'.'.~

EE r .' - - *. = = * - ',",*'.**.

""d*2

?!EE' 5

s_5. 5..

I.

==

.~=:.
ll.g

!Y754

==

~1lli:

E _E.

e-:.:.

e m**

. . . . . -: I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ' E

j'. *,E i E ! l NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W~ }'

k BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD g .g I Gunn E

In the Matter of ) ' ' ' 3 0. A MCF. R

} E

=

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK ) Docket Nos. 50-247 SP (Indian Point Unit 2) ) 50-286 SP E_

9

)

POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK) June 14, 1982 (Indian Point Unit 3) ) ...

[E=

5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE h' -

Ifi D~i I hereby certify that copies of WESPAC'S Cross examination plans in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit h in the United States mail, first class, this 14th day of June 1982. p~

=

54

=:

=

=.=.:.-

14

==

N 2

=2

==

=

=

E'.

WE.

w.-.-- -

_.,.7 r_-.:

N ..

M.

.5._. .

[~2i.*

???

===:.

N.- .1 1G"-

n= = =

..~5.~.

?$b.

ses

$5=

l dss.t

  • IZ~~'". .

EQ

t..S.I

Dr. Oscar H. Paris .

  • ' Administrative Judge .

Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 3

I Commission  :

Washington, D.C. 20555 i i b c

+

Mr. Frederick J. Shon E Administrative Judge  !

Atomic Safety and Licensing $

Board ,=

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory E_

Commission E Washington, D.C. 20555 E:.

Docketing and Service Branch fi

=

Office of the Secretary @

U. S.. Nuclear Regulatory. 5 Commission E Washington, D.C. 20555 EE

~

55 u= .

Louis J. Carter, Esq., Chairman E Administrative Judge EE Atomic Safety and Licensing 57:

E Board _,_.f.

7300 City Line Avenue $1 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19151 $5.

=

em c:,r 5

=

nr

=

=

[f

,~_

Atomic Safety and Licensing 5 Appeal Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory M Commission @F5 Wnshinato.ns D I.,__ 20555 =

dEE

, Atomic Safety and Licensing ZZ.

sa Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory h" Commission G2
.i Washington, D.C. 20555 y ;I 25e2e

- l _y < , -

/ ==

g.;.

bodh Du ~

a 55.:

-==-

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20054F735&oldid=2590181"