ML20054F328

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Ucs Has No Need to Respond Since Neither NRC or Licensee Made Any Substantive Comment on Relationship Between Special Master Decision & Partial Initial Decision on Plant Design & Procedures
ML20054F328
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/1982
From: Weiss E
HARMON & WEISS, UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS
To: Jordan W, Little L, Smith I
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8206160094
Download: ML20054F328 (1)


Text

V.

=

.i h

HARMON 8e WEISS 172 5 s ST R CCT, N.W

^"*((Cl,Y"^""

WASHINJToN,D.C.aooos TCLCPHONC c20,3

33. 070 2 M l4 h} ((4 WI LLI AM S. JOR D A N, lit LCC L.alSHOP OF COUNSCL DIANC CURRAN L. THO M AS G ALLOWAY LYNNC SCRNASCI f ;((; l,.

LUCIA S. ORTH U *tc-June 11, 1982 Ivan W.

Smith, Chairman Dr.. Walter H. Jordan Dr. Linda W. Little Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel i

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 ii

Subject:

TMI-l Restart, Docket 50-289 i

Dear Members of the Board:

I wrote to you on June 1 noting that no party other 3

than UCS had yet commented on the relationship between the Special Master's decision and P.I.D.

on plant design and procedures and asking for time to respond if any reply comments did so.

5

=}~

Neither the Staff nor the Licencee made any substantive

~5 comment on these issues so UCS has no need to respond.

Very truly yours, m

h([,\\

f '('

c d

(ii Ellyn R. Weiss f:1

=

a cc:

Service List f

ERW: law

  1. ~

if 53 E

E L:.

8206160094 820611 j

PDR ADOCK 05000289

~

Q PDR

--