ML20054F322
| ML20054F322 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/10/1982 |
| From: | Bordenick B, Lanpher L LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO., NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD), SHOREHAM OPPONENTS COALITION, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY |
| To: | |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8206160084 | |
| Download: ML20054F322 (10) | |
Text
P
-i
..t 4'
~ m.
_n 4# s s d.K UNI TED.' STATl;S OF. AMI:R1 cA.
MisCLRAR : RI:GUI. ATOP'.' CC MI11SS 1ON "a2 JUN 14 NO:09 Before the Atomic Safety and Licensinij Board
=:t' u
7,' :6EWi 4 3Ein In the Mat f.er of BRANCH
.}
~)
1,0NG ISLAND 1,tGitTING COIPANY
)
.D,cket No. 50-322(U!)
)
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,
)
Unit 1)
)
SETTLl' MENT AGREEMENT CONCERI.ING SOC 16 -- CLAD SWELLING AND PLON RLOCl' AGE Thi s a.jrecraent, by and amoniJ'LCNG ISLAND LIGIITING COMPA:4Y (LILCO), the S110REllN1 OI PONENTS COAI.ITION (SOC),
the MUCLPAR ltEGilLAl'OR( COMM138 !CN HMGUI ATul(Y STAIT (NRC Staf f) a nti GulTOLK COUNTf (SC) (In s en na f tui co llect ;.vely, 8 he Pa rties), da t eil a:, of June 10,
.l ') 6.I.
~
WilEREAS, SOC, an intervenor i. r Lite above-captioned proceeding, inas 1 i l.ed SOC Con ten t. ion i
16, alleging t ha'_ bectiuse of eln'i sw<l1in.; and j
flow blockage, the emergency core cooling system (1:CCC) dc::igne.! for t he Shorehani Nuclear Power 5 ta t i on.na y not iiert the t i -- t t i. rerac n t s o :- 11; Cl'R 1
i Part 50, in renpoeta set torth in d tail in the i
ful.1 contention, a copy of which is attached as Exhibtt I hereto: and 4
8206160084 820610 DRADOCK05000g 9
-2 Wi!ERLAM, the Patt=Les'belicve that resolu tion. of:
the substantjvr issues raised by SOC L'ontention 16 on mutually' acceptable terms is preferable to..
litigat ion t hereaf and have met' in an ~ attempt to resolve SOC'n substantive concet ns-Vi th leSpect i
to SOC Contention 16; and WilEREAt', on the basis of t. hone-discussions, SOC i
in willing' to withdreiw ('ontention 16 in return for the performance of an analysis by LILCO on the termu and conditions contained herein; and 1
WI! E R E A S, the Staff and SC do not. oppose the resolution of SOC 16 oa ihe terms agreed t.o by SOC and LILCO; i
Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual'repre-sentations and pton.isen contained herein, the Parties agrec a: fol 1 awn:
i 1.
1.1LCO will perform, within 14 days from the signing hereof, an anal sis of a " worst case" i
desiqn banis accident, deuctibed below, which analyzos t.he performance of the Shoreham ECCS 1
using Shoreham's actual plant parameters.
Such analyui.s chall use actual valuec for the Shoreham reactor i ncluding act.ual va lues with respect to the following parameters:
(1) vessel size and internaln; (2) iuel desirtn (ptopres: uri ved 8x81<) ;
f
- ~ - - -
-s.
( 3).~ ECCS conf 1 urat.1on; 9
(4) refJood t.ime; (5)'0WN-4 design features rolevant'to design basis accident' analyses not otheiwise specified: and (6) vo t q t-case t uel oi.cr a t i ng - hi s tory.
2.
The analysis'will duplicate theidhoreham speci-fic analfsis provided in t he PSAlt.
No assumptic,ns or pa ramet er values _will be u:. sed. that dif fer fro.n those used in the. FSAlt f or the initial core bundlen with the tollowing enct pt ions:
(1) The ndjusteel GE/Nid' rupture st.ress versus temperatute-curve (approved by Nile in letter, dat<d May 11, 1982, from.
11a rold Berna t d - (Nite) to Dr.
G.
G.
Sherwood (GE),."Gupplementary Acceptance Licensing Topical liepott NEDE-20566A-(p)") will be used in place of the former GR curve.
(2) Prepi cusuri.'.ed 8xHit fuel will.bc analyzed tinen that will be the fuel actually. loaded into the Shoreham reactor.
This Shoreham specific analysis will incorporate-the parameters referenced by SOC in its request for settlement and referred to in paragraph 1 above.
'Ihe analysis e, hall i nclude:
]
4-(l) a donoript. ion of the cek.. and proco.':ses used in the analpis; (2) a list of tiic;n i f ica n t input pa rit:t e t e rs used for the Snoreham
- peciiit analysin;
( ?) a li s t.
of the t.uult of tne analy c i n anii an m:pi a na t i.,n vi
!bem: and (4) a comi.arison of thone analysin results with previous Shoreham resu1ts.
3.
Uuoa comple!ina a:- such anaJyris, and i n tuiy evcut not later then June 25, 1982, except as may oc exten.lui. by conaut ci SOC, whien shall not he unrear.nnal'l y wi thh, ici, I,t LCO wi ll prov i ch cop.nes of the analyr.ic to alI the l' art ies he re to.
4.
Except ao provided in parat;raph 5 helow, LILCO arol SUC nhall prc';ent the analyr.is to the Atomic Safety and 1.icensing braid ' l S hil) on the next av.ailable hearing day, and SOC ; ball at that time requo.:t tne ASLB, by v: tion, to accept-the analy-
- 13 into the rei:ord of t-h e t'r o<'eedi ng in renolution.
or the issues rajsed by 40C Centention 16.
S.
Within one ucck :sf ter receip t of su ch ana ly:;i.s,
'pt ar mw b.
, x t "rol. d by conu at o r' L l !,CO, whien
r, _
thal 1 not be unreas>nably withheld, 30C shall pro-vide to LILCO any objections it has to the results or methodology used thi roin.
Such objections shall be limited to specific contentions that blLCO has not p(. rf o t med the analynL: in the manner st.ited in paingsaph ?.thove, itnd any such contention shall (a) ident il y the items in the analysic alleged to be inconsistent with p:iraqraph ?, and (b) state.W 's belict of what should have been done along with SOC's basic for that belief.
L]LCU agreen to cooperate with SOC in resolving any quesLions or objections COC may have to the analyni.n.
I f, at the end of one week following teceipt of the analycis by SOC, no objectiont, to iLa tesults have been received by LiLCO or, if after LILCO's trans-missi.an of the renults of the initial ana lynic to COC, L1LCO and SOC.; hall have reached a mutually acceptable resolution of any questions or objections raised by SOC, the Parties shall p r c. ce n t the analys is protipt ly to the Atomic safety and Licensing ILa rd ( AS T.8) in the nanner desetibed.tn paragraph 4 above.
I 6.
In the evant that LILCO, for any reanons not acce}'t able to SOC, doi-not pe -f orm _he analy: -
.6-curat.umplaled hereby in a timely-tashion, or if the l' art ies are _ unable to atiree:upon.an appro-priate resolution at_questiotis or ob;cctions-raised.by SOC pursuant to parag:aph 5 t:0. the -
ana J ynia au pc'rf43rmed ' by L t LCO, then fiOC or ~ LII.CO' cha31 yronptly'at any time following the deadline fos perfor;oance of such action or consummation of.
such agrecident, requent the Licensing Boat:d to ret.,chedule the SOC _ Cont 6ntion'16'in the hearia.'J tor cront-examinalion'.
?%
-i J w --
[~
Counsel for Iong Island sitnael fc r Shoreham Lighting Cotagiany Oppoinents Coalition
'^
j O
D%s%lnsktQ\\ ?](jQ[$L;JQ Counsel for NitC I(egulatory Staff 4
a pm a t c
Counsel for fiutfol. County
!? ATEll:
.Intic 10, 1932 4
5 l
l 1
umwrtu u a Ipage 1 of 2) g s
a) the system i r. ope rn t.; ce alarms fc* the I
screenwell pumphcuse vent zyn..:. re l a y,
emargency switchgear re exhaust air systen the battery rcom,,4ent system, the RBSWS ch
'er equipme E room vent symtem and the dies.'
rect emer gency ' rent sys-tem cannot be m-111y activatucl in the contto1 rocam /
g N (b) the por on of the.: n:np : e s:.. - ai: c3st.em serv 3 the SRV's doeu not have a unique s' y not suitably conservative properly protect the health safety ot-the public (i.e.,
e m
_ drogen generation, radiat shie
'ng, scurce t e r.ns, a r.d v:ngle failure criterion s0C contends that NRC Staff has not req $1 LILCO to in-
- orporate measu of to assure that Shoreham con t 9 with the
. standards or als of safety criteria contained in t Latory s.
As a result, the Staff has not require
' hat ent regu, p,hore structures, systems, and compenent be backfit as e-It by 10 CFR 5 50.55a, 5 50.57, and 5 50.309 with regar tr.
s
g l
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY; COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of
)'
)
LONG ISLAND LIGilTING COMPANY
-)
Docket No ' 50-3221(OL)
)
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,
)
Unit 1)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copics of " Settlement' Agreement Concerning SOC 16--Clad Swelling and Flow Blockage" were served upon the following by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on June 11, 1982, or by hand, as indicated by an asterisk:
Lawrence Brenner, Esq.*
Secretary of the Commission Administrative Judge U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Atomic Safety and Licensing Commission Board Panel Washington, D.C.
20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Washington, D.C.
20555 Appeal Board Panel U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory.
Dr. Peter A.
Morris
- Commission Administrative Judge Washington, D.C.
20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Board Panel Commission U.S.
Nuc1 car Regulatory Washington, D.C.
20555 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Dr. James 11. Carpenter
- Administrative Judge Bernard M.
Bordenick, Esq.*
Atomic Safety and Licensing David A.
Repka, Esq.
Board Panel U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555
' David J.
Gilmartin, Esq.
Stephen B.
Latham, Esq.*
. Attn: Patricia-A. Dempsey, Esq.
Twomey, Latham & Shea County Attorney.
33 West Second Street Suffolk County Department of Law P.
O.
Box 398 Veterans Memorial-liighway
lierbert 11. Brown,- Esq.
- Cammer and Shapiro, P.C.
Lawrence Coe Lanpher, Esq.
9 East 40th Street Karla J.
Letsche, Esq.
New York, New York 10016 Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Ilill, Christopher & Phillips floward L.
Blau, Esq.
8th Floor 217'Newbridge Road 1900 M Street, N.W.
Ilicksville, New Ycrk 11801 Washington, D.C.
20036 Matthew J.
Kelly, Esq.
Mr. Mark W.
Goldsmith New York State Energy Office Energy Research Group Agency Building 2
~
400-1 Totten Pond Road Empire State Plaza Waltham, Massachusetts 02154 Albany, New York -12223 MilB Technical Associates
- Mr. Jay Dunkleberger 1723 ilamilton Avenue New York-State Energy Office Suite K Agency Building 2 San Jose, California 95125 Albany, New York 12223
/i
. 4
)
l/t
\\
, $i q}< 4A
_ xpi
~
Donald P.
Irwin llunton & Williams 707 East Main Street P.
O.
Box 1535 Richmond, Virginia 23212 DATED:
June 11, 1982
-_.