ML20054E681
| ML20054E681 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/27/1982 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054E680 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900521 NUDOCS 8206140063 | |
| Download: ML20054E681 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
APPENDIX A Bechtel Power Corporation Los Angeles Power Division Docket No. 999000521/82-01 NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE Based on the results of the NRC inspections conducted on March 8-12, 1982 and March 22-26, 1982, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in accordance with NRC requirements as indicated below:
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states:
" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accom-plished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished."
Contrary to Bechtel's implementing procedures on audits, the following non-conformances were identified.
A.
QADP 5.3 " Quality Assurance Management Audits," sta.es in part:
" Department / project / construction manager or other designee shall attend the pre and post-audit conference."
Contrary to the above, no department / project / construction managers or their designees attended the pre-and post-audit conference for the management audit of SONGS 2 and 3 engineering office. Also, no department / project / construction manager or their designees attended the pre-audit conference for the management audit of the Vogtle design office.
B.
QADP 5.3 " Quality Assurance Management Audits," states in part:
" Respond to Audit Corrective Action Requests (CARS) within 30 days of issue... When the action or action completion data cannot be established, the audited organization response shall include scheduied date for the proposed corrective action."
Contrary to the above, the response to CAR-002 was 11 days beyond the 30-day j
requirement and no scheduled date for the response had been established.
l CAR-002 related to the management audit of the Vogtle design office.
a 9206140043 920527 PDR GA999 EECBECH 99900521 PDR
~
r-Bechtel Power Corporation Los Angeles Power Division Further, the management audit of division engineering had the scheduled corrective action for CAR-001 set for March 20, 1981, but this item was still open at the time of the inspection almost a year later.
CAR-001 required the establishment and documenting of a system that would provide for implementing quality requirements consistent with ANSI N45.2 in engineering initiated technical service agreements and consultant agreements.
C.
QADP 5.1 " Project Quality Assurance Audits," states in part:
"Each project shall prepare a Monthly Audit Activity Report for distribution to QA and project management.
The report shall be consistent with Figure 5.1-7 and shall contain the following:
c.
Personnel contacted during the pre-audit and post-audit."
Contrary to the above, the Vogtle Audit Activity Report for January and February 1982, did not identify the personnel contacted during pre-audit, audit and post-audit.
D.
Palo Verde Quality Program Procedure No.18.0 " Audits," states in -,rt:
" Final audit report will include the audit scope, a summary of audit results, a summary of observations noted and corrective action (s) taken if applicable, names and position titles of persons contacted during the pre-audit, audit, and post-audit activities...."
Contrary to the above, Palo Verde Project Audit Reports PVH 5/18-29, PVH 7/81-16 and PVH 5/81-9 did not include persons contacted during pre-audit, audit and post-audit activities.
l l
This item was corrected prior to the close of the inspection and no l
further written response is required.
I I