ML20054C940
| ML20054C940 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07106347 |
| Issue date: | 02/19/1982 |
| From: | Mowry W GENERAL ATOMICS (FORMERLY GA TECHNOLOGIES, INC./GENER |
| To: | Macdonald C NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054C941 | List: |
| References | |
| 20402, SHP-3051, NUDOCS 8204220143 | |
| Download: ML20054C940 (2) | |
Text
w.
/
a*
kh%
7/PM
~
4M7 Q
ENERAL AToMK'IEEEEllli?Rll:25:5%Am=-
""N""""
" """m2 U Y)
GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY In Reply)3 d
II P.O. BOX 81608 SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92138 s
'Q' e pupss-acoo February 1 Refer Tor SHP-3051 g
c
-o RECEWED 'N" C
m g
a.=
m o
fj?l?
MAR 1 71982 o E
r Mr. Charles MacDonald, Chief
{y U.S.Nud.u % %
.2 o
Transportation Branch ce
^ 'g, _
u9 q,
m
...,d Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Sa fm3
" S*S '
p' E P 4-g U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission q,
Washington, D.C. 20555
/p y
s 71-6347, FSV-3 Package Renewal; Submittal of Con
Subject:
' Docket Safety Analysis.
(7 copies)
]['rrr
<6a Q
' / c.
Dear Mr. MacDonald:
c -
,s;>
General Atonic Company has requested renewal of the Certificate of Com]iliance;/
6347 authorizing the continued use of the FSV-3 fissile radioactive material package. We herewith submit a consolidated safety analysis which you have requested. We believe that the consolidated analysis fairly reflects all the previous submittals which comprised the safety and licensing considera-tions resulting in issuance of the subject Certificate of Compliance. We request your reinstatement of the Certificate so we may continue to ship HTGR fuel elements, principally to the Fort St. Vrain power reactor whic!
52' q
is scheduled to recelve its next reload segment in the period between i
June 1982.
g'
,9 DOCKETED In an effort to assist your review of the consolidated safety analysis we y
7 wish to call your attention to the following.
p._
gg i g jggg >
\\-
}
1.
He have redrawn, for clarity, the Figure FFE 613 Issue D. 7,
[.lj,,,
C 6
vm e: ra 2.
We have, for clarity, restructured Section 3 to indicate the te's't Y
7 results in the same paragraph as the described test.
D' 3.
We have made copics of the best available photos documenting the test packages, test apparatus and the tested packages after sub-jecting them to the prescribed tests. Note, our file indicates that duplicate photos were submitted with our original application.
You may wish to retain them as part of the cc,ntinuing docket content as we contemplate doing here.
4.
The nuclear safety analysis was originally submitted as added ap-(o pendices. We have folded these appendices into one nuclear aafety g MD analysis, now included as section 5 of the attached safety doeurcent.
1%U Sections 6 and 7 have been added. These sections contain the re-uired procedural practices which have been extracted fron our manu-
-9 r
77 ' gggg,
racturing procedures, approved under our.10 cFE.50.. Appendix B, F
voverning the manufacture and; shipping.of.t;l e. fuel, ele:;ents as a 20402
~
l
.. MG.
nuclear reactor component.,!
. 3 0.3..o./.2 ').
I g
I LSn % nA.
s
,a
.,. x3// HEM.
8204220143 820219 L
.L.
- n PDR ADOCK 07106 m
t,.
g/m j
f
~,
U g{
9 e
Charles MacDonald SHP-3051 6.
Finally, we have included a new statement reflecting the equivalency of U-235 to U-233.
Inclusion of this additional material on the re-vised certificate is desirable in the event we must include special U-233/U-235 fuel elements in the shipment.
Should your staff have any questions about the content or organization of the attached, please don't hesitate to contact us.
Meanwhile we look forward to your reinstituting the Certificate so we can continue to plan for our next reload shipment.
Very truly yours,
/0/1/;
William R. Mowry Licensing Administrat Nuclear Materials Control Division WRM:he
Attachment:
FSV-3 Renewal Consolidated Safety Analysis.
f F
4
)
.___...._.._....#