ML20054B830
| ML20054B830 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas, Comanche Peak, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 04/13/1982 |
| From: | Laurenson J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | BROWNSVILLE, TX |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-A, NUDOCS 8204190237 | |
| Download: ML20054B830 (2) | |
Text
_
e UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
I James A. Laurenson Administrative Law Judge In the flatter of HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY,
)
Docket Nos. 50-498A 1
SERVED APR 51982 et al.
)
50-499; (South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2)
)
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY, Docket Nos. 50-445A N
et al.
)
50-446A #
ON N
\\
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, )
y;.%
Units 1 and 2)
)
April 13, 1982
~24Tr i B 1982s.,
s bs d$, $ijjgep*s ORDER CONCERNING RESPONSE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD OF THE CITY OF BROWNSVILLE
\\ 'h
@C R:
TO PROPOSED SETTLEMENT CONDITIONS 1,.
J f' At the Conference of Counsel on April 13, 1982, all parties in the above proceeding, except the Public Utilities Board of the City of Brownsville (hereinafter "Brownsville") indicated that they approved of the :roposed settlement conditions.
Counsel for Brownsville requested additicnal time for it to consider the matter at its next meeting on April 19, 1982. Counsel was asked to submit Brownsville's response to specific questions of We Administrative Law Judge. The other parties tn this proceeding were given an opportunity to respond to Brownsville.
Accordingly, upon consideration of the entire record in this matter, it is this 13th day of April, 1982, ORDERED, That:
1.
On or before April 27, 1982, Brownsville file answers tc the 5d questions as follows:
9 i
I O 8204190237 820413 PDR ADOCK 05000445 M
. a.
Does Brownsville presently oppose approval of the proposed settlement in the South Texas Project Units Nos.1 and 2?
b.
Does Brownsville want me to reject this proposed settlement?
c.
How do the conditions in this proposed settlement affirmatively harm or prejudice Brownsville?
d.
Do the conditions in the proposed settlement themselves create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws or policy?
2.
Within ten (10) days after service of Brownsville's Answers to the above questions, all other parties herein may file their responses to Brownsville.
p-1 7.
a- -
.v:
4.n JAMES A. LAURENSON Administrative Law Judge
/
/