ML20053E609

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Motion to Dismiss Licensee Motion to Impose Sanctions for Default & to Strike Contentions.Intervenor Has Acted in Good Faith & Should Not Be Subj to Sanctions.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20053E609
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/04/1982
From: Scheiner C
WESTCHESTER PEOPLES ACTION COALITION, INC.
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8206090068
Download: ML20053E609 (6)


Text

l l

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA .s NUCLEAR REGULATORY Cg6 EMISSION e N

  • 7 G ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD g Before Administrative Judges: -

Louis J. Carter, Chairman.p-Frederick J. Shon P1 :05 is

,f $

Dr. Oscar H. Paris 3

////7,  %

B

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _x g B

In the Matter of )

Docket Nos.

h CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, ) 50-247 SP ..

INC. (Indian Point, Unit No. 2) ) 50-286 SP }

}

une 4, M82 POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK )

(Indian Point, Unit No. 3) )

  • I

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x y Westchester Peoples' Action Coalition, Inc. (WESPAC's) Motion to Dismiss Licensees ' b motion to impose sanctions for default and to strike contentions a

WESPAC respectfully moves that the licensees' motion to impose sanctions for default and to strike contentions be dismissed by the atomic safety and licensing M Board (Board) . -

The licensees' motion incorrectly states the facts and is without merit..

{

~

I. WESPAC HAS COMPLIED WITH THE SPIRIT OF THE BOARD'S ORDER The licensees create the impression that WESPAC simply did not bether to send the gj licensees any sort of response to it derelict in meeting its obligations.y interrogatories and that WISPAC had been g

%s This is not correct. WESPAC did send answers to the licensees but the answers were g to interrogatories posed by the NRC staff. M q

WESPAC believes that the NRC staff's interrogatories accurately reflected the $

Board's order that interrogatories be " direct and to the point, aimed at obtaining _

useful information with minimal effort, and in no way designed to harass",2 while 7 most of the licensees interrogatories did not follow the Board's directive. L 8

y es p

1. See " Licensees' motior to impose sanctions for default and to strike contentions". pp3-4 (May 28, 1982) g 3

d i

2. Memorandum and Order (formulat.ing contentions, assigning intervenors, and j

setting schedule; Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, p. 21 April 23, 1982. .

po3 f 206090068 820604 ~~ '

E4 PDR ADOCK 05000247 ..- E O PDR , y --

~ " -

,g

o - .

I ~

c k.

The licensees' interrogatories document consisted of six pages of definitions, i two pages of instructions, and 184 interrogatories. The licensees made no attempt to specify what cuestions WESPAC was to answe r. In fact, most of the

(

e interrogatories were not relevant to WESPAC'S care. To require WESPAC to repeat h l each interrogatory and then state that the questi.cn is not relevant requires iir more than a minir.al effort for WESPAC. and is construed by WESPAC to be a form of [

harassment. E-E;

, =

Because the Board stated in its above cited order on page 21 that it expected an E..

absolute minimum of legal maneuvering, WESPAC refrained from seeking a protective [

orde'r or from filing a protest with the Board concerning the licensees' tactics. E is WESPAC did, however, provide the licensees with all the information they were I cntitled to in the form of answers to the NRC staff interrogatories. WESPAC E answered these questions as fully as it was able to at the time as per the Board's order. WESPAC is now in the process of supplementing these answers with a list of witnesses, and the nature of their testimony II. WESPAC HAS FA'.TUAL BASES FOR ITS CONTENTIONS h5 c

It is improper for the licensees to allege that WESPAC has no factual bases for b its contentions w^1en the licensees have yet to read our testimony. [

c WESPAC believes that the testimony of our witnesses will adequately set forth our E factual bases and respectfully suggest to the licensees that they read the testimony [i before jumping to any conclusions. ~

h III. RELIEF REQUESTED WESPAC believes it has acted in good faith and has not done anything that would m; subject it to sanctions by the Board. E b.

WESPAC respectfully moves that the licensees' motion be denied in total.

{

h Res fully Submitt. , E l

Y Charles A. neiner F Co-Chairperson WESPAC E e

~

2:

h f

c:

=.

n .

5.N E

E E.

1 9

9 b

' .a ' ,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g",4 IEO t'  ? o -

ATOMIC SATETY AND LICENSING BOARD -

Before Administrative Judges: -

g,@

Lot:is J. Carter, Chairman '62, M. , ~I Frederick J. Shon Dr. Oscar H. Paris p-[ ; , ,

)

che Matter of )

)

Docket Nos.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK,) 50-247 SP -

INC. (Indian Point, Unit No. 2) )

50-286 SP -

POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE O? NEW YORK)

(Indian Point, Unit No. 3) June 4, 1982

}


1 m

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE u

I hereby certify that copies of WESPAC'S motion to dismiss Licensees' motion to icpose sanctions for default ard to strike contentions in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, gg g5 first class, this 4th day of Jtme, 1982, except an asterik denotes service by Express Mail. fil

!M eel eel d

E E

Ifl Ed 5

53 5

El

.El b

i5 1.W um iE b

E.1 Tl sl 21

.a n

b

=

t***.'.

D2 John Gilroy, Westchester g Dr. Oscar H. Paris 5 Administrative Judge Coordinator 5 Atomic Safety and Licensing Indian Point Project U.S. Nuclear Regulatory New York Public Interest []

Research Group Commission @

Washington, D.C. 20555 240 Central Avenue ,y White Plains, New York 10606 =

0. .

Janice Moore, Esq. =

Mr. Frederick J. Shon Counsel for NRC Staff y Administrative Judge g Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of the Executive E Board Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory r:f Commission Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 y Washington, D.C. 20555 fi E,,

Jeffrey M. Blum, Esq. [

New York University Law T School 423 Vanderbilt Hall

[r 40 Washington Square South m New York, N.Y. 10012 EI

=

r"g Marc L. Parris, Esq. Charles J. Maikish,.Esq.

Litigation Division h Eric Thorson, Esq. f; The Port Authority of County Attorney New York and New Jersey @

County of Rockland 5 11 New Hemstead Road One World Trade Center .

10956 New York, N.Y. 10048 l;;

New City, N.Y. y 5

t Geoffrey Cobb Ryan Ezra I. Bialik, Esq.

Steve Leipsiz, Esq. f l Conservation Committee Enviromental Protection Bureau [

Chairman, Director l New York City Audubon Society New York State Attorney  ?!.

71 West 23rd Street, Suite 1828 General's Office New York, N.Y. 10010 Two World Trade Center New York, N .Y. 10047 Alfred B. Del Bello g l Greater New York Council on Westchester County Executive [

1 - Energy Westchester County 5 c/o Dean R. Corren, '

Director 148 Martine Avenue New York University White Plains, N.Y. 10601 {

26 Stuyvesant Street  :

New York, N.Y. 10003 h e ,,

l 1

i

?

. Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing @

Board Panel Appeal Board Panel 6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory &

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory d Commission Commission Washington,.D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 f s

N Andrew S. Roffe, Esq. Honorable Richard L. Brodsky b

New York State Assembly Member of the County Albany, N.Y. 12248 Legislature h Westchester County 7 County Office Building $

White Plains, N.Y. 10601 g i

Renee Schwartz, Esq. Pat Posner, Spokesperson h Paul Chessin, Esq. Parents Concerned About -

Laurens R. Schwartz, Esq. Indian Point Margaret Oppel, Esq. P.O. Box 125 Botein, Hays, Sklar & Herzberg Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y. 10520 200 Park Avenue New York, N.Y. 10166 5

Stanley B. Klimberg Charles A. Scheiner, Co-General Counsel Chairperson New York State Energy Office Westchester T,. ;ple 's Action  :

Coalition, Inc.

2 Rockefeller State Plaza Box 488 Il*

Albany, New York 12223 P.O.

iWhite Plains, N.Y. 10602 8*

Alan Latman, Esq. e Honorable Ruth Messinger Member of'.the Council of.the 44 Sunset Drive .

l.

l'

~

Cit'y' of New York Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y. 10520' <

('.,' District No. 4

. City Hall'

". ' ,New York, New York .10007 Lorna Salzman Zipporah S. Fleisher Mid-Atlantic Representative West Branch Conservntion ^

Friends of the Earth, Inc. Association 208 West 13th Street 443 Buena Vista Road New York, N.Y. 10011 New City, N.Y. 10956 5

=

,r . - , .

t. ,

m ie .

fit f,f E

b Mayor George V. Begany Judith Kessler, Coordinator i=-

Village of Buchanan Rockland Citizens for Safe in 236 Tate Avenue Energy @

Buchanan, N.Y. 10511 300 New Hempstedd Road E New Ci ty , N . Y . 10956 , 5'-

~

=

E m

Ms'. Amanda Potterfield, Esq. 15 P.O. Box 384 55 Village Station New York, New York 10014 fi2 C

Docketing and Service Branch Ellyn R. Weiss, Esq. e*

Office of the Secretary William S. Jordan, III, Esq.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Harmon & Weiss g 1725 I Street, N.W., Suite 506 si Commission 20006 E Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C.

Louis J. Carter, Esq., Chairman Joan Holt, Project Director E Administrative Judge Indian Point Project E Atomic Safety and Licensing New York Public Interest @

Research Group gi Board if 7300 City Line Avenue 5 Beekman Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19151 New York, N.Y. 10038 h;r 5:-:

=

Charles Morgan, Jt.'

.-i CONSOLIDATED EDISOlj, COMPANk. E Joseph J. Levin, Jr. OF N EW YORK , INCg E Paul Colarulli Licensee of Indian Point 5 1899 L Street, N.W.

20036 Unit 2 E!

Washington, D.C. 4 Irving Place @

(202) 466-7000 New York, New York 10003 E Thomas R. Frey 97

% (212) 460-4600 E General Counsel Charles M. Pratt Assistant General Counsel 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 (212) 397-6200 E. . .

MORGAN ASSOCI ATES, CHARTERED -

[

1899 L Street, N.W.

Washinc, ton , D. C. 20036

~

f {

SHEA . GOULD Y

'\ -

b 330 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10017 David Duboff f [:1 F.:]

(212) 370-8000 [N POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATEk fi.,

OF NEW YORK q Licensee of Indian Point Unit 3 Ej 10 Columbus Circle 10019  !!)

New York, New York

.