ML20053E542
| ML20053E542 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/15/1982 |
| From: | NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 ALAB-653, ALAB-664, NUDOCS 8206080518 | |
| Download: ML20053E542 (5) | |
Text
...
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
(
/
l COMMISSION MEETING In t:he Mutter af:
PUBLIC MEETING AFFIRMATION / DISCUSSION SESSION SICY 82-70 REVIEW OF ALAB-653 SECY 82-124 REVIEW OF ALAB-664 l
f m.
April 15, 1982 pgggg 1-5 1
A;;
Washington, D. C.
l l
l i
l l
l l
l ALDE%T N TO
~ \\j
(
400 Viry "da Ave., S.W. Washing==, D. C. 20024 d
Telephena: (202) 554-2345 l
8206080518 820520 PDR 10CFR PT9.7 PDR l
1 1
UNITED STAT,ES OF AMERICA 2
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3
AFFIkMAIION/ DISCUSSION SESSION 4
SECY 82-70 Review of ALAB-653 5
SECT 82-124 Review of ALAB-664 6
PUBLIC MEETING 7
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Room 1130 8
1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
9 Thursday, April 15, 1982 10 The Commission net, pursuant to notice, at 11 3:40 p.m.
12 BEFORE:
13 NUNZIO PALLADINO, Chairman of the Commission JOHN AHEARNE, Commissioner 14 THOMAS ROBEPTS, Commissioner VICIOR OILINSKY, Commissioner 15 STAFF HAKING PRESENTATIONS:
16 S. CHILK 17 L. BICKWIT MR. RE3ICK 18 J. RCDRIGUEZ R.
LEVI 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ALDER $oN REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
400 VIRGINIA AVE. S.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20024 (202) 564 2345
DISCLAIMER This is an unafficial transcript of a meeting of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission held on Aoril'15, 1982 in the Connission's offices at 1717 H Street, N. W., Wasnington, D. C.
The meeting was open to public attendance and observation.
This transcriot
- has not been reviewed, corrected, or edited, and it may contain inaccuracies.
The transcript is intended solely for general infomational purooses.
As provided by 10 CFR 9.103, it is not part of the forinal or informal record of decision of the matters discussed.
Expressions cf opinion in
.this. transcript do not necessarily reflect final determinations or beliefs.
Ho~ pleading or othe'r paper may be filed with the Commission in any proceeding as the result of or addressed to any'orize.
statement or argument contained herein, except as the Comission may auth e
2 1
EE9CEERIEEE i
2 (3: 40 p.m. )
3 CHAIRMAN PALLADIN0s The meeting vill please 4 come to order.
This is an affirmation / discussion 5 session.
We will ask the Secretary to go over the items S listed.
7 MR CHILKa Okay.
The first item is SECY 8 82-70, Review of ALAB-653 in the matter of Pacific Gas E 9 Electric, where the Commission is being asked to 10 consider an order responding to petitions for review.
11 The order that is before you denies the petition for 12 review.
The paper also asks you to approve a staff 13 requirement memo from the staff requesting information 14 to be used by the Commission in review of the design 15 basis threat.
16 The majority of the Commission has voted for 17 the order denying the petition for review: the Chairman, i
18 Commissioner Ahearne, Commissioner Roberts; Commissioner 19 Gilinsky non-concurs.
The order is subject to the i
20 modification proposed by Commissioner Ahearne.
As I I
21 understand it, the general counsel vill rewrite the 22 order as appropriate.
23 COMMISSIONER GILINSKYs I wonder if you have 24 had a chance to look a t my comments.
25 00F.5I5310NER AHEARNE:
My answer to your l
l ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W. WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345
3 1 comments is that I will have to add a short sentence, l
2 and I have to figure out exactly how to word it.
As Mr.
3 Rosenthal once pointed out, you have to be careful as to 4 what is allowed to.be present.
5 I have to say somethings that I disagree with 6 Tour interpretation of what the Commission's action is.
7 COMMISSIONER GILINSKYs Were you here at the 8 time?
9 CO MMISSION ER AHEARNE:
No, not what it was at to the time.
I am saying you can draw an inference from 11 what you have said as to what the concurrent 12 Commission's action means, and I disagree with that.
13 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:
What I said was, what 14 was intended at the time was approved.
15 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE:
I understand that.
16 COMMISSIONEB GILINSKYa We specifically did 17 not want to pick a particular number and we didn't want 18 to have a standard where so many is safe, and if it is 19 one more, it is unsafe.
20 COMMISSIONER AHEARNEa And I cannot disagree.
21 COMMISSIONER GILINSKYa It seems to me that is 22 a feature of the standard that one would want to re tain.
23 COEMISSIONER AHEAENE:
What I am saying is 24 that there can be an inference drawn from the way you 25 characterized it, that by our denying the petition we ALDERSoN REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIROINIA AVE., S.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345
4 1
are disagreeing with your 1,nterpretation, because you 2 are saying this interpretation clearly is different.
3 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:
Well, if my inference 4 is wrong, 5
MR. BICKWIT How long do you think this 6 discussion will go?
If it is going to go for a while, I 7 would suggest closing the mweting.
8 CHAIRMAN PALLADIN,0s I have a feeling it is 9 going to go on for a few minutes.
And I have a feeling 10 slso the same thing might be true for the next one.
11 MR. BICKWIT:
We don't have to close it.
12 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:
Let me just say that 13 if I am wrong in my interpretation --
14 COMMISSIONER AREARNE:
That is all I wanted to 15 say.
I will just put a sentence in tha t I am denying 16 the petition for review, letting the appeal court i
17 decision stand.
And we also have a staff requirement 18 meno out asking f or some inf orma tion.
19 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO:
May I suggest that we 20 vote on closing the meeting?
21 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:
That is fine with me.
22 (Chorus of syes.)
23 CH AISHAN P ALL ADINO:
Then I guess we vill 24 close the meeting.
25 (Whereupon, at 3:50 p.m.,
the meeting ALDERSoN REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345
5 1 continued in closed session.)
1 2
3 5
i 6
i 7
a i
9 10 11
\\
12 l
13 t
14 15 16 17 18 19 1
20 l
21 22 t
i 23 24 25
- l RDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC.
4 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2346
}
2 NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO.WISSION This is to certify tha: the attached proceedings before the COMMISSION MEETING in the matter ef:
Public Meeting - Affirmation / Discussion Session SECY-82-70 Review of ALAB-653-SECY 82-124 Review of ALAB-664
- Date of Proceeding: April 15, 1982 Docket tiu=ber:
Pitce of Proceeding:
Washington, D. C.
wore neld as herein appears, and that this is the original transcript therec f for the file of the Cc==1ss4-~
Susan Harris Official Reper er (Typed)
- lMf Offic!.al Repcrter (Signature)
[
t
l[
1 2/81 p
5
~i Document Control D2sk, k
TP.ANSMITTAL TO:
/r 016 Phillipz "s l g
S ADVANCID COPY TO':
C The Public Document Boom DATE:
20h 2 k
cc: OPS File Ercxn: SECY OPS Branch
~
,)
Ettached-arelcopiesofaCommissionmeeting transcript /s/ and related meeting documen't/3/.
They are being forwarded for entry on the Daily Accession m@
List and placement in the Public Document Room.
Ho E
other distribution is requested or required.
Existing DCS identification numbers are listed on the individual documents wherever known. -
g Meeting
Title:
MA Wn^ -
W
/
G
~
open I
. 6 0 DATE:
/
hE Closed DCS COPIES:
N Copies (1 of each Checked) h IIZM DESCRIPTION:
Advanced May p
To PDR:
- Original be Duplicate 5 1.
- Document Duo
- Coev* k V
f e
~$
g m
2."
~$
5y h
3-n 4.
'h h
5.
a N
- Verify if in DOS, and k
~
ch'ange to "PDR R
(PDR is advanced one of each document, two available."
k of each SECT paper.)
k R
e