Supplemental Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc EnclML20053D145 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Indian Point |
---|
Issue date: |
05/26/1982 |
---|
From: |
Blum J, Potterfield A NEW YORK UNIV., NEW YORK, NY, POTTERFIELD, A., PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, NEW YORK, UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS |
---|
To: |
CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC., POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
---|
References |
---|
ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8206040123 |
Download: ML20053D145 (9) |
|
|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20069L2091983-04-22022 April 1983 Supplemental Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069L1991983-04-22022 April 1983 Interrogatories & Document Request.Related Correspondence ML20071D2941983-03-0303 March 1983 Supplemental Response to 820621 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2,transmitting Form for Recording Continuous Type Releases.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083Q3931983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry on Licensee Controlled Land to Observe 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Control Rooms & near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20065C2111983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry Upon Land Controlled by Licensees & to Allow Observance of 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Both Units 2 & 3 Control Rooms & from near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20028C8671983-01-0707 January 1983 Response to Licensee 821203 Ltr Requesting Supplemental Responses to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20064C4481982-12-30030 December 1982 Suppl to Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20070L5471982-12-24024 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Under Commission Question 1 ML20070L5491982-12-22022 December 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Under Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20070F7581982-12-17017 December 1982 Supplementation of Interrogatory Response,Naming Question 1 Witnesses.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069Q5231982-12-0707 December 1982 Supplemental Response to Interrogatories on Commission Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069P7641982-12-0606 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20067B1761982-12-0303 December 1982 Response to 820716 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20067B2391982-12-0202 December 1982 Response to Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Related Correspondence ML20028B2981982-11-24024 November 1982 Replies to 820718 Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20028B4011982-11-22022 November 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20066J2611982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to Interrogatories & Document Requests on Commission Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20066J0411982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028A0491982-11-0303 November 1982 Response to 820526 Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Question 6.Interrogatories Received on 821015 ML20058D5921982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058G5211982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to Final Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5681982-07-21021 July 1982 Response to 8206221 Interrogatories,Objecting to Interrogatories 1-11 as Irrelevant,Beyond Scope of Permissible Discovery & Beyond Scope of Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5791982-07-20020 July 1982 Response to Second Round of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055B8621982-07-19019 July 1982 Interrogatory on Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069C8621982-07-19019 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on Board Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20055A9981982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055A9961982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20055A9901982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Question 1 ML20063E4491982-07-0707 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories on Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5771982-07-0202 July 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories on Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L7991982-07-0101 July 1982 Addl Response to Interrogatories Under Commission Questions 3 & 4 Per ASLB 820625 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5201982-07-0101 July 1982 Supplemental Response to Licensee 820503 Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054M1791982-06-30030 June 1982 Reply to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5501982-06-30030 June 1982 Supplementary Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J9301982-06-25025 June 1982 Final Response to Util Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J5871982-06-25025 June 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H8901982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20054H8941982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J1221982-06-22022 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Requests for Admissions.Details Surrounding TMI-2 Accident Would Require Burdensome & Oppressive Research.Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J1471982-06-21021 June 1982 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2.Related Correspondence ML20054H5661982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H5411982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H5301982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H2601982-06-17017 June 1982 Reply to NRC 820526 Interrogatories ML20054F9801982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re ASLB Contention 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H6081982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 6 ML20054H2631982-06-16016 June 1982 Reply to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories,Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H5811982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to West Branch Conservation Assoc Supplementary Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20054H5881982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Supplementary Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054F6251982-06-14014 June 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl 1983-04-22
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARJPN-99-029, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20212E4181999-09-15015 September 1999 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting OL for Unit 2 Be Modified or Suspended to Prevent Restart Until Reasonable Assurance That Licensee in Substantial Compliance with Terms of OL & Has Proper Consideration for Public Health & Safety JPN-99-022, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds1999-06-22022 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds ML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20198E9721998-12-21021 December 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities. Orders That Wh Clark Prohibited for 1 Yr from Engaging in NRC-Licensed Activities JPN-98-052, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects1998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects ML20198L2731998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting NEI Re Proposed Rules 10CFR50, 52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments JPN-98-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal ML20155F4561998-08-26026 August 1998 Demand for Info Re False Info Allegedly Provided by Wh Clark to Two NRC Licensees.Nrc Considering Whether Individual Should Be Prohibited from Working in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 JPN-97-037, Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated1997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated ML20148M6471997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Porposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems ML20133N0511997-01-0505 January 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Resturcturing & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20149M4621996-12-0909 December 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Utility Industry ML20077G3481994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Nuclear Power License Renewal ML20070P0561994-04-19019 April 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NRC Draft Policy Statement on Use of Decommissioning Trust Funds Before Decommissioning Plan Approval ML20029C5771994-03-11011 March 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Draft Rule on Decommissioning.Informs That 15 Mrem/Yr Unreasonably Low Fraction of Icrp,Ncrp & Regulatory Public Dose Limit of 100 Mrem/Yr ML20059C3031993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Definition of Commercial Grade Item ML20045H8751993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule ML20045F2451993-06-28028 June 1993 Comment on Proposal Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning NRC-licensed Facilities.Opposes Proposed Criteria ML20044F5681993-05-20020 May 1993 Comment on Draft Commercial Grade Dedication Insp Procedure 38703,entitled Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. Endorses NUMARC Comments Dtd 930517 JPN-02-034, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl JPN-91-021, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants1991-05-13013 May 1991 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants JPN-91-005, Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended1991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended ML20066G4411991-01-23023 January 1991 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Substantive Typo in 901015 Filing on Behalf of Licensee Noted ML20058G6341990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program JPN-90-068, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS1990-10-22022 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS JPN-90-067, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20065H7541990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 on Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Commission Assessment of Four Alternatives Should Be Expanded to Include Not Only Safety Considerations But Other Atomic Energy Act Objectives JPN-90-052, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR1990-07-0909 July 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR JPN-90-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary1990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary ML20012C6491990-03-0909 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events. Any Utilization of NRC Proposed Application of Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2,would Be Inappropriate W/O re-evaluation by NRC ML20005F6521989-12-13013 December 1989 Comment on Proposed Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Concurs w/industry-wide Position Presented by NUMARC & Offers Addl Comments ML20246P6061989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Significant & Independent Industry Efforts Already Underway to Address Issue ML20245K1941989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V9011989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Supports NUMARC Position.Proposed Rule Will Hinder Important Initiatives to Improve Maint JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20205L8521988-10-21021 October 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Cleaning or Disposing of Nuclear Waste.Incineration of Radwaste Oil Should Not Be Allowed JPN-88-015, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site1988-04-18018 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site JPN-88-002, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed1988-01-25025 January 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed JPN-87-062, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex1987-12-31031 December 1987 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex JPN-87-053, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection1987-10-15015 October 1987 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection JPN-87-051, Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl1987-09-28028 September 1987 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl ML20235Y9911987-07-20020 July 1987 Notice of Issuance of Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 Re Emergency Planning for School Children in Vicinity of Indian Point.* Request to Suspend OLs Denied ML20151C5061987-02-18018 February 1987 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning ML20093H6421984-10-15015 October 1984 Comments on Staff Presentation at Commission 841002 Meeting. Commission Should Conclude Proceedings Due to Inescapable Conclusion That Facility Safe to Operate & Poses No Undue Risk to Public.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098D2721984-09-26026 September 1984 Comments on Commission 840905 Meeting Re Facilities,Per Sj Chilk 840911 Memo.Licensee Agrees W/Staff That Further Mitigative Features or Plant Shutdown Unnecessary Due to Low Risk.Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
F s
I J UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGUINIORY COMMISSION 'c7 < -1 F) M3 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:
Louis J. Carter, Chairman Dr. Oscar H. Paris Irederick I. Shon -
~
x In the Matter of:
Docket Nos. 50 -247 SP CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF 50-286 SP NEW YORK (Indian Point Unit 2);
April 26,1982 POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (Indian Point Unit 3). .- 9-
~ s. v- ---
x UCS/NYPIRG SUPPLEMENTARY INTERROGATORIES TO CON EDLON AND PASNY ' 1 The New York Public Interest Reseasch Group,.JInc. (NYPIRG) and the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) serve on Con Edison and .M PASNY the interrogatories and requests for production of documents that ,.? ~ ; ~=
. M'r- appear below. A sworn response ' o them must be provided to NYPIRG - ~ T" at 9 Murray Street , New York, New York in accordance with the terms se of 10 CFR $2.740(b) and 2.741(d) and in acommdnace with the Board's Order 1 of April 23, 1982 and the Mailgram of May 12, 1982. If the answer to any question is not known when the response is filed, the answer must be provided as soon as the missing information becomes available.
The definitions listed on pp. 1-2 of UCS/NYPIRG First Set of f*==r tand Request for Production of hnte.to Gon Edison and PASNY apply herein.
8206040123 820526 Dgo3 S
~
PDR ADOCK 05000247 0 PDR
1.S . Referring to Fig. 22-25 of the November Draft Report provided to UCS/NYPIRG in informal discovery (" Parsons Brinckerhoff Guade m . and Douglas, Inc., Draft Methodology to Calculate Evacuation Travel Time b -- Estimates for the Indian Point Emergency Planning Zone, November 1981"), 1, NV- i..please praaricia the zates ei evacuationMcentage of evacueesy: time) , Q for other scenmulos, sectors or ERPA1 estettisted butwdectnGed in1he -
November Draft Report.
2.S. The Parsons Brinckerhoff Draft Reports provide the number of P.C.E.'s evacuated as a function of the scenario of a winter, weekday evening. Please provide the number of P.C.E.'s evacuated D' " '- as a function of scenario, and of course, zone for'other times, especially p during a daytime, school in session , scenario. Please provide the assumptions on which the calculations are based, 'especially the assumptions 4:: about the availability of ' buses and how many banda.are expected to_amake - .
multiple trips. 4 T 3.S. Are there changes in.tesudent times as a fnar-taan of l scenario ?
4.S. Referring to Appendix D, pleasa.. provide the physical ...
characteristics of the rest, the northern half, af10ser network.
5.S . Referring to Appendix E, please provide a schematic of the rest of the network, that part not indicated in the Appendix.
6.S. Referring to Appendix F, please provide traffic signals for the rest of the network. J
- 7. S . Referring to Appendix H, please" provide the traffic -v" P' -
P zone trip dataa,( incl uding terminal times, P.C .E. rates) for the rest of ,
l the network.
l 8.S. Please provide the zonal Evacuation Routes for the l -7b rest of the network not indicated in Appendix L. ,
l 9.S. Pleaserprovide the equivalent of Appendix M to tins c
,1 Januaar 1981 Dsaft Repost (" Parsons Enckerhoff Quade and Douglas, he.
-w%% tstinnen W Ensuet h akusame Busceusema.
l January,1981), for the rest of the network.
10.S. Please provide the names of and biographical data for behavioral and/or social scientists vh o participated in preparation of the Farsons Brincherhoff reports and draft reports relating to the Indian l
l Point nuclear power plants.
l
'" E ll .S , Picase provide all meteorological information about l
Indian Point, including but not limited to precipitation frequency, wind l "
l 2% persistence, dominant wind trajectories, wind speed and direction data, I' wind rose data, snowfall data- (including amounts, frequency and duration), $ .
and other data considered in the preparation of the Pmunes Brinckerhoff *w evacuation time estimate reports and draft reroris.
12.S. Please provide all documents ovatturting the accuracy -
"of radiaticon dose projections systems and/or radionuclide concentration #
predictions systems, including but not limited to MIDAS and ARAC.
13 .S . Please provide all. documents in your possession or
, available to you or to Par' sons Brinckerhoff discussing the use of sheltering 1
as a protective response for radiological emergencies.
s -
14.S. Please provide all documents in your possession a- *
> available to you or to Parsons Brinckerhoff discussing the extent to which
- 1 performance in an actual radiological emergency can be predicted based upon
I
_4_
emergency drills and exercises.
15.S. Please provide all sensitivity and/or parametric studies L' s performed on evacuation time estimate methodologie4 gar computer programs and correspondence related1r.ito such studies. -
w i, > _. g h .gasensa prn=rida mM documente ja m pampalan or tw avanneteiti you 2.1s 1%ursons Brtnt!kerhoff discus %$ G,.act of ...ehnu ~
logical factors on evacuation times and evacuation time estimates.
17.S. Please provide all documents in;your possession or available to you or to Parsons Brinckerhoff discussing the impact of n topography on diffusion of plumes during nuclear accidents.
h= 18.S. Please provide all documents in your possession or available to you or to Parsons Brinckerhoff discussing any form of limitation on evacuation times, whether a maximua,or minimum limitatinn.
19.S. Please provide all documentsgyour possesston ar - . .: --
in the possession of Parsons Brinckerhoff, or avattable to you or to Barsons ~ 1 Brinckerhoff, discussing the establishment of the Plume Exposure Pathimmy ' c, r M EPZ and Ingestion Exposure Pathway EPZ at Indian Point.
L -
20.S. Please make available for ineqHon and copyhagJett its documer.ts listed in Con Edison's List of Documen[d Related to the March 3,1982 Emergency Planning Exercise dated May 19,;1982 and in the Power. Authority's Filing Pursuant to the March 10 an'd April 8 Orders dated May 10,1981.
Dated: New York, New York May 26,1982
/
p_ u ounsel for Union of Concerned Scientists New York University Law School 423 Vanderbilt Hail Washington Square South New York, New York 10012
? w- 212-598-3452 '- f . ,,g , _
-@rC C
- - w. n i Cainman JorJEsw. Yort PuhHe Inth wh Group. Inc.
l Box 384 '
- - Village Station New York, New York 10014 , -
212-227-0265 l
l l
l l
l l
l
24 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGUIATORY cot 44ISSION PE I BEEORE TIE A10t4IC SAFEIY AND LICENSING IDARD "'~' OM i -
l :: - -
'In the letter of )
) Docket Nos. 50-247 SP CONSOLID7(TED EDISON CCr4PANY OF NEN YORK ) 50-286 SP (Indian Point Unit 2) )
)
POWER A!JrfDRITY OF TIE STATE OF NEW YORK ) May 28' 1982 (Indian Point Unit 3) )
Certificate of Service I hereby certify tlut copies of:
UCS/NYPIRG SUPPIB4ENTARY INTERROGATORIES TO CON EDISQ4 AND PASNY UCS/NYPIRG FDTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY PURSUANT 1010 C.F.R.
2.740(f) and 2OORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF FDTIQi TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FOE /AUDUBON SUPPIE4 ENTAL RESPONSE TO LICENSEES' RD2UEST EOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS luve been served on the official minimum service list for the above l
captioned proceeding by depositing in the United States mail, first class, this 28th day of May 1982. The judges of the Atcaic M ety and l Licensing Board were each nailed a copy of the UCS/NYPIRG bbtion to Catpel and bbTorandum in Support of Ittion to Carpel Discovery by Express lhil on May 27, 1982. Mr. Brandenberg for Con Edison and Mr. Pikus of Shea and Gould for PASNY were served by hand on the norning o,{ Fuy 28, 1982 with l cach of the above ~ ted documents. [
M [d1A $ '
l Anunda Potterfield, Esq. { Joan t l P.O. Box 384 New rk Public Interest l Village Station Group, Inc. ~
i New York, NY 10014 9 Murray St.
New York, NY 10007
f.-
1 C ^' XE ,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION a d, -i 2345 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD m-
- b. i.\.1 ..l' In the Matter of:
Docket Nos. 50-247 SP CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF 50-286 SP NEW YORK (Indian Point, Unit 2) ;
POWER AtJTHORITY OF THE STATE OF HEW YORK (Indian Point, Unit 3) )
SERVICE LIST Docketing and Service Branch Paul F. Colarulli, Esq.
Office of the Secretary Joseph J. Levin, Jr., Esq.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Pamela S. Horowitz, Esq.
Washington, D.C. 205Q5 Charles Morgan, Jr., Esq.
Morgan Associated, Chartered Louis J. Carter, Esq., Chairman 1899 L Street, N.W.
Administrative Judge Washington, D.C. 20036 At'omic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Charles M. Pratt, Esq.
Washington, D.C. 20555 Thomas R. Frey, Esq.
Power Authority of the Dr. Oscar H. Paris State of New York Administrative Judge 10 Columbus Circle Atomic Safety and Licensing Board New York, N.Y. 10019 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C. 20555 EllynR.WeisfEsq.
William S. Jordan, III, Esq.
Mr. Frederick J. Shon Harmon & Weiss Admi.pistrative Judge 1725 I Street, N.W., Suite 505 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Washington, D.C. 20006 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C. 20555 Joan Holt, Project Director
, Indian Point Project l Janice Moore, Esq. New York Public Interest Counsel for NRC Staff Research Group Office of the. Executive 5 Beekman Street Legal Director New York, N.Y. 10038 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C. 20555 John Gilroy, Westchester Coordinator Indian Point Project i
Brent L. Brandenburg, Es.q. New York Public Interest
. Assistant General Counsel Research Group Consolidated Edison Co. 240 Central Avenue i of New York, Inc. White Plains, New York 10606 l 4 Irving Place l
New York, N.Y. 10003
F - . .
. e Jeffrey M. Blum, Esq. N rc N r71s D sq.
' New York University Law School County Attorney 423 Vanderbdilt Hall County of Rockland 40 Washington Square South 11 New Hemstead Road New York, N.Y. 10012 New City, N.Y. 10010 Charles J. Maikish, Esq. Geoffrey Cobb Ryan Litigation Division Conservation Comittee The Port Authority of Chairman, Director New York and New Jersey New York City Audubon Society One World Trade Center 71 West 23rd Street, Suite 1828 New York, N.Y. 10048 New York, N.Y. 10010 Greater New York Council on Energy
~
Ezra I. Bialik', Esq.
Steve Leipsiz, Esq. c/o Dean R. Corren, Director Environmental Protection Bureau New York University New York State Attorney 26 Stuyvesant Street General's Office New York, N.Y. 10003 Two World Trade Center New York, N.Y. 10047 . Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Alfred B. Del Bello U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Westchester County Executive Washington, D.C. 20555 Westchester County 148 Martine Avenue Atomic Safety and Licensing 3 New York, N.Y. 10601 Appeal Board Panel J U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Andrew S. Roffe, Esq. Washington, D.C. 20555 i New York State Assembly Albany, N.Y. 12248 Honorable Richard L. Brodsky Member of the County' Legislature Renee Schwartz, Esq. Westchester County Botein, Hays, Sklar & Herzberg County Office Building Attorneys for Metropolitan White Plains, N.Y. 10601 Transportation Authority 200 Park Avenue Pat Posner, Spokesperson New York, N.Y. 10166 Parents Concerned About Indian Point Stanley B. Klimberg P.O. Box 125 General Counsel Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y. 10520 New York State Energy Office 2 Rockefeller State Plaza Charles A. Scheiner, Co-Chairperson Albany, New York 12223 Westchester People's Action Coalition, Inc.
Honorable Ruth Messinger P.O. Box 488 Merrber of the Council of the White Plains, N.Y. 10602 City of New York District #4 Alan Latman, Esq.
City Hall 44 Sunset Drive l
New York, New York 10007 Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y. 10520
)
l
O
,- - o . ,,
f Lorna Salzman Mid-Atlantic Representative Friends of the Earth, Inc.
208 West 13th Street New York, N.Y. 10011 Zipporah S. Fleisher West Branch Conservation Association 443 Buena Vista Road .
New City, N.Y.
10956 Mayor George V. Begany Village of Buchanan 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, N.Y. 10511 Judith Kessler, Coordinator Rockland Citizens for Safe Energy 300 New Hemstead Road New City, N.Y. 10956 David H. Pikus. Esq.
Richard F. Czaja, Esq.
330 Madison Avenue New York, N.Y. 10017 Ms. A anda Potterfield, Esq.
P.O. Box 384 Village Station New York, New York 10014 Mr. Donald L. Sapir, Esq.
60 East bbunt Airy Road .
RFD 1, Box 360 l
Croton-on-Itadson, New York 10520
.