ML20053A264
| ML20053A264 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/19/1982 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Sewell D INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CORP. |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900285 NUDOCS 8205250153 | |
| Download: ML20053A264 (3) | |
Text
,,
y,AY 19 M Docket:
99900285/82-01 ITT Grinnell Pipe Hanger Division Engineering Department ATTN:
Mr. D. M. Sewell Division Quality Assurance Manager.
621 Dana Avenue Warren, OH 44481 Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspec. tion conducted by L. E. Ellershaw, of this office on February 9-12, 1982, o,f your facility at Providence, Rhode Island, associated with the design and fabrication of component supports and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. M. Gr'osso and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
This inspection was made as a result of:
previous inspection findings and the identification of an item requiring further inspection pertaining to the -
riveted construction of pipe clamps during our inspection at your Warren, Ohio plant (Itispection Report 99900282/81-01); a potential Construction Deficiency Report (COR) issued by Southern California Edison Company pertaining to the use of washers other than hardened, steel washers tprovided to San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3; a CDR is::ued by TVA pertaining to linear indications'being founC in hanger material supplied to Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; CDRs, issued by Duke Power Company pertaining to the use of a riser clamp fabricated by an unapproved vendor and an extension piece of a snubber t3eing welded off tenter,,both of which were supplied to Catawba Nuclear Station,~ Unit 1, and.a regional heq'uest pertaining to incorrect torque specifica-tions which caused snubber threads to stfip at Public Service of Colorado's Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station.
Areas examined and o'ur findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within i
.these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and
'reiresentativs records, interviews with personnel., and observ4tions by the inspector.
During the ins ~psction it was found that the implementation of'your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements.
The specific findings and references
, lc to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.
~
7 l Ellershaw/bb IBarnes KVSeyfrit UPotapovs JTCollins
/
3/11/82 3/ '/82 3/ /82' 3/ /82 3/ "/82 8205250153 820519'-
0 PDR GA999 ENVITT d,
k 1, [
28' u
i i
. u.
ITT Grinnell 2
Please provide us within 30 days from the date of this letter a written state-ment c.ontaining, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time for a good cause shown.
The response regaested by this letter is not subject to the clearance pro-cedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such information.
If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than seven days are available for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established.
Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure.
This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).
The information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Program Branch
Enclosure:
Appendix A - Notice of Nonconformance i
Appendix B - Inspection Report No. 99900285/82-01 Appendix C - Inspection Data Sheets ( Pages 2) l
ITT Grinnell 3
bcc:
NRC Files AE0D NMSS NRC: PDR QAB Reg. Administrator I, II, III, IV, V KVSeyfrit, RIV ASME NBB&PVI l.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -.