ML20052H401
| ML20052H401 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinch River |
| Issue date: | 05/14/1982 |
| From: | Check P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Longenecker J ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8205200326 | |
| Download: ML20052H401 (7) | |
Text
..
I k
e s
Distribution Docket File t'
(b May 14, 1982 NRC PDR
,9 Local PDR 9
[% l yIO82h. -
eqE Docket tio.: 50-537 RStark CThomas F
%k* g
//
PCheck Hr. John R. Longenecker DPerrotti
\\c s
Licensing and Environmental Coordination WFoster Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant PShuttleworth
'd U. S. Department of Energy, NE-561 ETomlinson Washington, D.C.
20545 CRBR Staff
Dear Hr. Longenecker:
SUBJECT:
CLIiiCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PLAf4T, REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATI0H As a result of our review of your application for a construction permit for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant, we find that we need addi-tional information in the area of Emergency Planning.
Please provide your final responses within 60 days.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
If you desire any discussion or clarification of the information requested, please contact R. H. Stark, Project Manager (301) 492-9732.
Sincerely, OMnal sig::cd by Pad S. Check Paul S. Check, Director CRBR Program Office Office of Huclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated cc: Service List 8205200326 820514 PDR ADOCK 05000537 F
PDR tO n s,U
..G8BRPf;h,,,CRBRPO:NRR CRB 1RR C
omce>
i sua - e>..BS.9.r.k/.N.n.... d, %f.,,h Xe r.........
..P,,
, hec,k,,,,,,,,
..El. h.8 2,,',,,,,,,,,5g/,82,......,,,5,/,/h,0,R.,,,,,,5/, r,}/,82,,,,,,,
onre )
l Nac ronu ais omaoi sscu oao OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usam mi mma
. cc:
Dr. Cadet H. Hand, Jr., Director Barbara A. Finamore S. Jacob Scherr Bodega Marine Laboratory University of California Ellyn R. Weiss P. O. Box 247 Dr. Thomas B. Cochran Bodega Bay, California 94923 Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Daniel Swanson 1725 I Street, N.W.
Office of the Executive Suite 600 Legal Director Washington, D.C.
20006 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Eldon V. C. Greenberg Washington, D.C.
20555 Tuttle & Taylor 1901 L Street, N.W.
William B. Hubbard, Esq.
Suite 805 Assistant Attorney' General Washington, D.C.
20036 State of Tennessee Office of the Attorney General L. Ribb 450 James Robertson Parkway LNR Associates Nuclear Power Safety Consultants Nashville, TN 37219 8605 Grimsby Court William E. Lantrip, Esq.
Potomac, MD 20854 City Attorney Municipal Building P. O. Box 1 Oak Ridge, TN 37830 George L Edgar, Esq.
~
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 Herbert S. Sanger, Jr., Esq.
General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority Knoxville, TN 37902 Chase Stephens, Chief Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Raymond L. Copeland Project Management Corp.
P. O. Box U Dak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
~_
ENCLOSURE REVIEW REQUESTS ON CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PSAR AftENDMENT 65, SECTION 13.3 DOCKET NO. 50-537 PSAR SECTION REQUESTS CS810.01 13.3.2 Discuss how sufficient onsite emergency organization personnel and augmented capability will be provided in accordance with the recommended staffing guidance expressed in NUREG-0654, Table B-1.
CS810.02 13.3.2 Describe the means for notification, in the event of an emergency, of persons assigned to the emergency organizations.
Provide a block diagram (s) that illustrates the onsite and offsite emergency response organizations.
Show the interface with Federal, State and local response organizations.
Provide the location and preliminary information on the near-site Emergency Operations Facility (E0F) in enough detail to demonstrate that the facility will provide an adequate basis for management of overall licensee emergency response, coordination of radio-logical and environmental assessment, determination i
of recommended public protective actions, and coor-dination of emergency response activities with Federal, State and local agencies.
CS810.03 13.3.3; Identify the principal North Carolina State office 13.3.1.5 with responsibility for ingestion pathway protective actions.
Describe contacts and arrangements made with local governments within the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) counties of Loudon, Morgan and Knox.
CS810.04 13.3.3 Letters of Agreement or State and local plans that Table 13.3-1 provide for prompt (15 minute) protective action decisionmaking on a 24-hour basis by offsite agencies must be provided.
This must include a description of the decisionmaking chain, times required, and pro-visions for 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> availability of decisionmakers and communications.
Back up communications not vulnerable to loss of normal power or overload by public use must also be provided to each individ-ual in the decisionmaking process (See NUREG-0654, Appendix E).
\\
CS810.05 13.3.4 Commit to develop EALs in accordance with the recommended guidance expressed in NUREG-09654, Cri-terion I.1 and Appendix 1.
The EAL recognition methodology for Site Area and General Emergency classes must not include the performance of any calculations, personnel actions, etc., that can-not be completed within 15 minutes during the back-shift.
CS810.06 13.3.5.1 Commit to develop a method to account for site personnel within 30 minutes.
CS810.07 13.3.5.1 Describe the provisions for the development of specific criteria (action levels) to be used to implement onsite protective measures.
CS810.08 13.3.5.2 Describe the methodology to be used to determine the protective action recommended to offsite authorities to include:
1.
Development of EALs corresponding to plant conditions (core, containment),
2.
Use of evacuation time estimates for conditions at the time of the accident and for special populations,
3.
Use of protection factors for homes, schools, etc.,
4.
Consideration of special populations and facili-ties, and 5.
Discuss the need and provisions for onsite corrective a6tions under accident conditions.
CS810.09 13.3.5.2 Describe in general the system proposed to alert and provide an information message to the public in the 10-mile EPZ within 15 minutes in accordance with recommended guidance expressed in NUREG-0654, Appen-dix 3.
Provisions for special instructions to spe-cial populations (e.g., schools) should be discussed along with provisions for river traffic populations.
CS810.10 13. 3.7 Provide the proposed location (show relation to emergency centers) and physical layout of the first aid and personnel decontamination facilit.ies.
CS810.11 13.3.8 Revise the general description and frequency of drills to conform to NUREG-0654, Criterion N.2.
CS810.12 13.3.9 Provide a training program which includes emergency plan training for all employees assigned to the site.
CS810.13 13.3.9 Include in the descripiton of training for offsite agencies, site orientation familiarization and the aspect of conditions that they may encounter onsite that are not part of their normal duties / training.
CS810.14 Table 13.3-1 Include in the listing of participants in the CRBRP-REP, the counties ef Loudon, Morgan and Knox.
CS810.15 Appendix 13.3A Performs an evacuation time estimate study that con-forms to NUREG-0654, Appendix 4.
Submit the study for the staff's review.
CS810.16 Appendix 13.3A Provide Figure 13.3.A-4, " Elapsed Exposure Time To Reach Whole Body Dose Verses Downwind Distance."
Include in the plans for evacuation / sheltering of the public, consideration of workers at the K-25 complex, operated by DOE-0akRidge (Union Carbide).
Provide additional description of onsite facilities, systems and methods for identifying the degree of seriousness and potential scope of radiological consequences.
Include radiological and meteoro-logical instrumentation, and slaves of the SPDS at the TSC and EOF.