|
---|
Category:AFFIDAVITS
MONTHYEARML20073B6731994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Re License Amend Request 94-015 ML20073B6951994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Authorizing Signing & Filing W/Nrc OL Amend Request 94-016 ML20128D6111993-01-26026 January 1993 Joint Affidavit of I Barnes & Ft Grubelich Re Borg-Warner Check Valves.* Discusses Issues Re Borg-Warner Check Valves Raised by Cfur & Adequacy of Actions Taken by TU Electric ML20127L9661993-01-26026 January 1993 Affidavit of Rl Pettis Re Borg-Warner Check Valves.* Statement of Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127L9321993-01-26026 January 1993 Affidavit of Re Architzel Re Thermo-Lag Installation at Testing for Unit 2.* Statement of Prof Qualifications Encl ML20086Q3931991-12-26026 December 1991 Affidavit of Case President J Ellis.* Affidavit of Case President J Ellis Re Motion for Leave to File Response to Portions of Motion of R Micky & Dow to Reopen Record. W/Certificate of Svc ML20154G7841988-09-0909 September 1988 Affidavit of Jj Macktal Re Oppressive Terms of Settlement Agreement for Addl Safety Concerns.Related Info Encl ML20207E6061988-08-12012 August 1988 Affidavit of B Brink.* Discusses Concern Re Operation of Plant.W/Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc ML20207E5941988-08-0505 August 1988 Affidavit of K Mccook.* Discusses Concerns Re Operations of Plant.Unexecuted Affidavit of P Reznikoff Encl ML19325D6431988-07-12012 July 1988 Affidavit of B Brink.* Expresses Concern That Operation of Plant Will Cause Loss of Health to Author & Family & Safety Problems at Plant Will Jeopardize Life & Property ML19325D6461988-07-12012 July 1988 Affidavit of L Burnam.* Expresses Concern That Operation of Plant Will Cause Loss of Health to Author & Family & Safety Problems at Plant Will Jeopardize Life & Property.W/ Certificate of Svc ML19325D6401988-07-12012 July 1988 Affidavit of P Reznikoff.* Expresses Concern Re Danger to Health & Safety Posed by Normal Operations of Plant & by Possible Accidents ML20197E3011988-05-23023 May 1988 Affidavit of JW Muffett.* Encl Review Issues Lists (Rils) on Pipe Stress & Pipe Supports Document That All Issues Closed by Cygna.Job Responsibilities of JW Muffett Stated. W/O Rils.W/Certificate of Svc ML20154E5391988-05-13013 May 1988 Affidavit of Ha Levin.* Related Documentation Encl ML20154E5281988-05-0606 May 1988 Affidavit of RP Klause.* Discusses Design Validation & for Large & Small Bore Piping Supports at Plant During Preparation of Project Status Repts.Author Statement of Training & Experience Encl ML20196B0751988-02-0101 February 1988 Affidavit of Rd Pollard Re Environ Qualification of RG-59 Coaxial Cable ML20236X2501987-12-0202 December 1987 Affidavit of Dn Chapman.* Discusses Mgt Analysis Co Audit Rept ML20236E0481987-10-23023 October 1987 Affidavit of Bp Garde in Support of Motion for Reconsideration.* ML20236E7501987-07-23023 July 1987 Affidavit of Jt Merritt.* Affidavit Discusses Mgt Analysis Co Audit Repts.Related Correspondence ML20236E7411987-07-22022 July 1987 Affidavit of JB George.* Affidavit Discusses Mgt Analysis Co Audit Repts.Related Correspondence ML20236E7551987-07-22022 July 1987 Affidavit of Eg Gibson.* Affidavit Discusses Mgt Analysis Co Audit Rept.Related Correspondence ML20211D0591987-02-11011 February 1987 Affidavit of Eh Johnson.* Responds to Statements in Case Motion Re Trend Analyses or Trend Repts.Trend Analyses & Repts Incorporated Into SALP Repts in 1980.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20212E8631986-12-26026 December 1986 Affidavit of Case Witness J Doyle Re Case 861230 Partial Response to Applicants 861201 Response to Board Concerns.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20211J4721986-11-0101 November 1986 Affidavit of J Doyle Re Scope of Cygna Role.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20211J4141986-10-28028 October 1986 Affidavit of DC Garlington Re Irregularities in Plant Const or Operations Noticed During Site Visits.Emergency Lights Not Aimed & Locked & Trash in Diesel Room Noted in Monitoring Repts.W/Certificate of Svc ML20211J3551986-10-0303 October 1986 Affidavit of MD Nozette Re Events Concerning Participation as co-owner of Plant Between Nov 1984 & Feb 1985.Discusses Util Failure to Answer Questions Posed in Re Participation in Project ML20214L6911986-08-18018 August 1986 Affidavit of Tg Tyler Supporting Applicant Response to a Palmer Affidavit Re Case 860731 Response to Applicant 860716 Motion for Protective Order & Motion to Compel.W/ Certificate of Svc ML20214M4271986-08-0505 August 1986 Joint Affidavit of D Lurie & E Marinos Clarifying 860404 Joint Affidavit on Statistical Inferences from Comanche Peak Review Team Sampling ML20207E3071986-07-16016 July 1986 Affidavit of Le Powell on 860716 Re Estimate of Time & Effort Required to Prepare Responses to Questions 4-7 of M Gregory Set One Discovery Requests.Related Correspondence ML20207F7741986-07-16016 July 1986 Affidavit of Le Powell Re Discovery in CP Extension Proceeding.W/Certificate of Svc ML20197C1301986-05-0606 May 1986 Affidavit of M Walsh,Advising That Statistical Sampling Being Performed & Proposed for Facility Inappropriate. Applicant Reliance on Statistical Sample Will Not Identify Problems W/Pipe Supports.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20197C1051986-04-26026 April 1986 Affidavit of J Doyle,Addressing Applicability of Statistical Sampling to Facility ML20155A6851986-04-0404 April 1986 Joint Affidavit of D Lurie & E Marinos Re Board Concerns on Statistical Inferences from Comanche Peak Review Team Sampling.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20138B1711986-03-13013 March 1986 Affidavit of SD Mckay Re Likelihood of Reactor Coolant Pump Restart Due to Operator Error W/No Occurrence of Inadequate Cooling Event.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20138B1071986-03-12012 March 1986 Affidavit of CE Mccracken Re Core Flow Blockage Due to Fine Paint Particles ML20138B1431986-03-12012 March 1986 Affidavit of B Mann Re Treatment of Operator Error in Licensing Process & Likelihood of Reactor Coolant Pump Restart During Inadequate Core Cooling Event.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20215E7171986-01-27027 January 1986 Partially Withheld Affidavit Re Allegations Concerning Drug Use & Distribution ML20138P5551985-12-14014 December 1985 Affidavit of Jj Doyle in Response to Applicant Changes to 1984 Motions for Summary Disposition ML20137X1831985-12-0505 December 1985 Affidavit of R Mcgrane Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits Only Recent Awareness of Rept.Related Correspondence ML20137X0201985-12-0505 December 1985 Affidavit of Dh Wade Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits No Knowledge of Rept Prior to May or June 1985.Related Correspondence ML20137W9971985-12-0404 December 1985 Affidavit of Nh Williams Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits No Knowledge of Rept Prior to 850625.Related Correspondence ML20137X2101985-12-0303 December 1985 Affidavit of R Siever Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits Awareness of Audit & Rept Preparation Through General Onsite Conversation in 1985.Related Correspondence ML20137X0881985-12-0202 December 1985 Affidavit of Rc Iotti Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits No Knowledge Apart from News Publicity & ASLB Documents in mid-1985.Related Correspondence ML20137X1291985-12-0202 December 1985 Affidavit of G Krishnan Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits General Awareness of Discovery Process Re 1980 Licensing Proceedings.Related Correspondence ML20137X0601985-12-0202 December 1985 Affidavit of Jc Finneran Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits No Knowledge Apart from News Publicity & General Onsite Conversations Earlier in 1985.Related Correspondence ML20137X1611985-12-0202 December 1985 Affidavit of P Chang Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits No Knowledge of Rept Prior to mid-1985.Related Correspondence ML20205H4071985-11-12012 November 1985 Affidavit of Rc Iotti & Jc Finneran Re Corrections & Clarifications to Affidavits Supporting Motions for Summary Disposition of Pipe Support Design Allegations. Supporting Documentation Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205H3501985-11-12012 November 1985 Affidavit of Rc Iotti & Jc Finneran in Response to ASLB Request for Info Re Variation of Field Configurations of Pipe Supports Utilizing clinched-down U-bolts.Related Correspondence ML20133F8221985-09-0909 September 1985 Affidavit of Aw Serkiz Providing Explanation Re Sser 9, App L,Per ASLB 850918 Memorandum.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133F8161985-09-0909 September 1985 Affidavit of CE Mccracken Providing Further Explanation of Background of Sser 9,App L,Per ASLB 850918 Memorandum 1994-09-19
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20196G4021999-06-18018 June 1999 Comment on FRN Re Rev of NRC Enforcement Policy NUREG-1600, Rev 1 & Amend of 10CFR55.49.Concurs with Need to Provide Examples That May Be Used as Guidance in Determining Appropriate Severity Level for Violations as Listed ML20206H1881999-05-0606 May 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App K Re ECCS Evaluation Models. Commission Grants Licensee Exemption ML20206M5111999-04-30030 April 1999 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1083 Re Content of UFSAR IAW 10CFR50.71(e). Recommends That Listed Approach Be Adopted for Changes to Documents Incorporated by Ref CY-99-007, Comment Supporting Proposed Changes to Improve Insp & Assessment Processes for Overseeing Commercial Nuclear Industry That Were Published in Fr on 990122 & in SECY-99-0071999-02-22022 February 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Changes to Improve Insp & Assessment Processes for Overseeing Commercial Nuclear Industry That Were Published in Fr on 990122 & in SECY-99-007 TXX-9825, Comment Endorsing NEI Comments on Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness at Npps1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment Endorsing NEI Comments on Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness at Npps ML20154C4101998-09-30030 September 1998 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Comanche Peak Electric Station Endorses NEI Comment Ltr & Agrees with NEI Recommendations & Rationale ML20216E1051998-04-0707 April 1998 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1029 Titled Guidelines for Evaluating Electromagnetic & Radio-Frequency Interference in Safety-related Instrumentation & Control Sys ML20217H3611998-03-26026 March 1998 Comment Opposing Draft GL 97-XX, Lab Testing of Nuclear Grade Charcoal, Issued on 980225.Advises That There Will Be Addl Implementation Costs ML20198Q4851998-01-16016 January 1998 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63A by P Crane That Requests NRC Amend Regulations Re Emergency Planning to Require Consideration of Sheltering,Evacuation & Prophylactic Use of Potassium Iodide for General Public ML20211A4871997-09-12012 September 1997 Changes Submittal Date of Response to NRC RAI Re Proposed CPSES risk-informed Inservice Testing Program & Comments on NRC Draft PRA Documents ML20149L0311997-07-21021 July 1997 Comment on Draft Guides DG-1048,DG-1049 & DG-1050.Error Identified in Last Line of DG-1050,item 1.3 of Section Value/Impact Statement.Rev 30 Should Be Rev 11 ML20140A4871997-05-27027 May 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Safety Conscious Work Environ.Util Agrees W/Nuclear Energy Inst Comment Ltr ML20133G5411996-12-0505 December 1996 Transcript of 961205 Meeting in Arlington,Tx Re Comanche Peak Thermo-Lag Fire Barriers. Pp 1-111 ML20135B7881996-11-29029 November 1996 Order Approving Corporate Restructuring of TU to Facilitate Acquistion of Enserch Corp ML20128M8011996-10-0303 October 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Generic Communication, Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism & Other Vessel Head Penetrations ML20097D7321996-02-0909 February 1996 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re CPSES Request for Amend to Its Regulations Dealing W/Emergency Planning to Include Requirement That Emergency Planning Protective Actions for General Public Include Listed Info ML20094Q6421995-11-28028 November 1995 Comment Supporting Petition for RM PRM-50-62 Re Amend to Regulation Re QAPs Permitting NPP Licensees to Change Quality Program Described in SAR W/O NRC Prior Approval If Changes Do Not Potentially Degrade Safety or Change TSs ML20094H4801995-11-0808 November 1995 Comment Supporting Nuclear Energy Inst Comments on Proposed Rules 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Safeguards for Spent Nuclear Fuel or high-level Radwaste ML20091M6441995-08-25025 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Review of Revised NRC SALP Program.Believes That NRC Should Reconsider Need for Ipap or SALP in Light of Redundancy ML20086M7921995-07-0707 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed GL Process for Changes to Security Plan Without Prior NRC Approval ML20084A0181995-05-19019 May 1995 Comment Suporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Containment Leakage Testing.Supports NEI Comments ML20077M7311994-12-30030 December 1994 Comments Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20077L8711994-12-22022 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50,55 & 73 Re Reduction of Reporting Requirements Imposed on NRC Licensees ML20073B6731994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Re License Amend Request 94-015 ML20073B6951994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Authorizing Signing & Filing W/Nrc OL Amend Request 94-016 ML20058E0561993-11-10010 November 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule Re Staff Meetings Open to Public. Believes That NRC Has Done Well in Commitment to Provide Public W/Fullest Practical Access to Its Activities ML20056G3351993-08-27027 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process ML20045D8321993-06-11011 June 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54, FSAR Update Submittals. ML20044F3271993-05-21021 May 1993 Comments on Draft NRC Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp, Fr Vol 58,Number 52.NRC Should Use EPRI Definitions for Critical Characteristics ML20056C0831993-03-19019 March 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Petitioners Motion to Stay Issuance of Full Power License.* Licensee Urges NRC to Reject Petitioners Motion & to Deny Petitioners Appeal of 921215 Order.Motion Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20056C1881993-03-17017 March 1993 Order.* Directs Util to Respond to Motion by COB 930319 & NRC to Respond by COB 930322.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930317 ML20128D9651993-02-0303 February 1993 Memorandum & Order.* Stay Request Filed by Petitioners Denied.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930203 ML20128F6221993-02-0303 February 1993 Transcript of 930203 Affirmation/Discussion & Vote Public Meeting in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-2.Related Info Encl ML20128D3391993-02-0202 February 1993 Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioners Specific Requests Listed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D4651993-02-0202 February 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioner Request Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Meet Heavy Burden Imposed on Party.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D3461993-01-29029 January 1993 NRC Staff Notification of Issuance of OL for Facility.* Low Power License May Be Issued by 930201.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D6321993-01-29029 January 1993 Memorandum & Order.* Denies Citizens for Fair Util Regulation for Fr Notice Hearing on Proposed Issuance of OL for Facility.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930129 ML20127L9321993-01-26026 January 1993 Affidavit of Re Architzel Re Thermo-Lag Installation at Testing for Unit 2.* Statement of Prof Qualifications Encl ML20128D6111993-01-26026 January 1993 Joint Affidavit of I Barnes & Ft Grubelich Re Borg-Warner Check Valves.* Discusses Issues Re Borg-Warner Check Valves Raised by Cfur & Adequacy of Actions Taken by TU Electric ML20127L9181993-01-26026 January 1993 NRC Staff Reply to Cfur Request for Publication of Proposed Action Re Licensing of Unit 2.* Cfur Request That Notice Re Licensing of Unit 2 Be Published Permitting Parties to Request Hearings Should Be Denied ML20127L9661993-01-26026 January 1993 Affidavit of Rl Pettis Re Borg-Warner Check Valves.* Statement of Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127L9091993-01-25025 January 1993 Tx Util Electric Response to Citizens for Fair Util Regulation Request of 930113.* Request Fails to Raise Worthy Issue & Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127L8891993-01-21021 January 1993 Order.* License Should File Response to Citizens for Fair Util Regulation Ltr Requesting That Commission Issue Fr Notice Providing for Opportunity for Hearing Re Issuance of OL by 930125.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930122 ML20127G9191993-01-19019 January 1993 Order.* Grants Petitioners Extension of Time Until 930122 to File Brief.Replies to Petitioners Brief Shall Be Filed on or Before 930208.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930119 ML20127G9441993-01-19019 January 1993 TU Electric Brief in Opposition to Petitioners Appeal of ASLB Memorandum & Order.* Requests That Petitioners Appeal Be Denied & Licensing Board 921215 Memorandum & Order Be Affirmed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G8041993-01-15015 January 1993 NRC Staff Response to Appeal of Licensing Board Decision Denying Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Filed by Bi & Di Orr.* Board 921215 Decision Should Be Upheld.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127G7451993-01-14014 January 1993 NRC Staff Response to Motion of Petitioners RM Dow & SL Dow, (Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station),For Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G7941993-01-12012 January 1993 Opposition of TU Electric to Motion for Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief by SL Dow (Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station) & RM Dow.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A5931993-01-0808 January 1993 Brief in Support of Petitioner Notice of Appeal.Aslb Erred by Not Admitting Petitioner Contention & Action Should Be Reversed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A6371993-01-0707 January 1993 Notice of Appeal.* Appeal Submitted Due to 921215 Memo Denying Petitioner Motion for Rehearing & Petition for Intervention & Request for Hearings.Proceedings Were Terminated by Aslb.W/Certificate of Svc 1999-06-18
[Table view] |
Text
A 0 %.~n .. KN.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION yet \\ h9 03 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY ANd3, LICENSING BOARD
.:-:=~'
In the Matter of- )
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING ) Docket Nos. 50-445 and COMPANY, ~et al. ) 50-446
)
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric ) (Application for Station, Units 1 and 2) ) Operating Licenses)
AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID N. CHAPMAN REGARDING THE QA/OC ORGANIZATION AT COMANCHE PEAK I, David N. Chapman, being first duly sworn, do depose and state: I am employed by Texas Utilities Generating Company in the position of Manager, Quality Assurance. As ,
such, I am familiar with the Quality Assurance /Ouality Control Organization (OA/QC) for the construction of the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station. The purpose of this affidavit is to demonstrate that an effective OA/OC Organiza-tion has been maintained at Comanche Peak during the cons-truction phase. Further, this' affidavit will demonstrate that Texas Utilities Generating Company has taken all measures necessary during construction to assure that l
l the OA/QC Organization remains effective and meets the applicable NRC Regulations. A statement of my educational and professional qualifications was received into evidence at the hearings in December 1981 (Tr. at 509) and is attached hereto as Attachment 1 for the convenience of the Board.
l l
8205.20161 820510 PDR -DOCK 05000445 i o PDR
4 I. HISTORY OF OA/OC AT COMANCHE PEAK From the beginning of the Comanche Peak project, Texas Utilities Generating Company ("TUGCO"), as the lead Applicant, has maintained ultimate responsibility for the construction OA program at Comanche Peak. In this position, TUGCO carefully monitors and/or conducts all aspects of the OA program to assure that construction of the facility is performed in conjunction with an effective OA/OC program.
Initially, Brown & Root, Inc., the Construction Manager /
Constructor, managed the OA/OC program applicable to work per-formed by them and their contractors for the early stages of the .
project. Brown & Root met its responsibilities in this role. As the project progressed and became more complex, TUGCO determined that a more aggressive program was essential to meet TUGCO's i
OA/OC goals for the project. One area where more aggressive action was needed was Brown & Root's implementation of its OA program with respect to its suppliers. In July 1977, TUGCO initiated action requiring TUGCO involvement in all Brown & Root t
l vendor release inspections. Subsequently, upon assessing the I
success of such direct involvement by TUGCO, it was determined' j
that TUGCO would provide overall technical management of OA/OC functions for CPSES except for those activities under the i
jurisdiction of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III, Division 1 (ASME Code). Although Brown & Root i
retained functional managment of ASME Code work under their I
(
l
OA program, TUGCO continued to have the ultimate responsi-bility for all such work.
The measures taken to restructure the QA organization at Comanche Peak brought about significant improvement in the quality function for the project. A positive relation-ship has developed among OA, QC, and construction personnel resulting in a teamwork approach that focuses attention on identifying and solving problems. In sum, the measures have resulted in a OA/QC Organization tailored specifically for and responsive to the needs of the Comanche Peak project.
In addition to TUGCO and Brown & Root, Gibbs & Hill, as Architect-Engineer, and Westinghouse Electric Corporation
( "We s tinghou s e " )', as nuclear steam supply system ("NSSS")
i supplier, provide OA programs for activities within the scope of their responsibilities. Their basic roles have remained constant throughout the life of the plant and are described more fully below.
II. CURRENT QA/QC ORGANIZATION AT COMANCHE PEAK l
A. Principal Organizations As discussed above, TUGCO, as the lead Applicant, has ultimate responsibility for the engineering, design, procure-ment, construction, and quality assurance activities for Comanche Peak. TUSI 1/ is designated by TUGCO to have the 1/ Te'xas Utilities Services, Inc..("TUSI") is the engineering service organization for Texas Utilities Company.
4 authority to conduct the required engineering, design, procurement, and construction technical support activities for CPSES, including implementation of the QA program at the site.
Gibbs & Hill provides TUSI with certain engineering, design, and procurement services as requested. Gibbs &
~
Hill provides the OA program for QA activities within its scope of work. Westinghouse provides the QA program governing work done on the NSSS structures, systems and components. As discussed above, Brown & Root manages the OA program for ASME Code work and may perform other QA functions ,
as requested by the TUGCO Quality Assurance Manager.
An organization chart for the project QA organization is presented as Attachment 2.
B. Responsibilities of OA Organization
- 1. TUGCO/TUSI The TUGCO QA organization was established to provide effective control of safety-related activities at Comanche Peak. This control extends to all organizations performing services affecting nuclear safety during the engineering, design, procurement, and construction. phases. The TUGCO/TUSI QA organizations participating in the design and construction phase of nuclear power plants are shown in Attachment 3.
This chart illustrates the organizational structure and lines
of reporting for each organization. These are described in the corresponding sections.
- a. TUGCO Quality Assurance Division The TUGCO QA Division is responsible for developing and assuring the implementation of the CPSES QA program for design and construction. The QA Division is headed by the Manager, Quality Assurance. He reports directly to the Vice President, Nuclear. This independent reporting arrange-ment assures that safety considerations are not influenced by cost and scheduling. He reviews the performance of the QA program on a regular basis with the Vice President, Nuclear, reporting on quality status and the overall ef fectiveness of the QA program.
In addition, the Manager, Quality Assurance has the duty and authority to identify quality-related problems; to initiate, recommend or provide solutions; and to verify the implementation and effectiveness of solutions. He has authority to "stop work" in the engineering, design, procurement, and construction phases. He also supervises the Site QA Supervisor at Comanche Peak who is responsible for assuring the implementation of the QA program on a daily basis at the site. The QA Manager has the following qualifications:
(1) Minimum of 10 years experience in design, construction, or operations of power plants.
(2) College degree in an engineering discipline (BS minimum).
(3) Demonstrated ability to manage people and projects.
(4) Knowledge of quality assurance requirements for nuclear plants including a minimum of one year experience in the implementation of a nuclear quality assurance program.
(5) Registered Professional Engineer.
- b. TUSI Project Management For the Comanche Peak project, the Vice President and Project General Manager (TUSI) coordinates and controls engineering, procurement, and constructica activities. He is responsible for cost and schedule and for implementing -
design and construction quality requirements. The Vice President and Project General Manager reports to the f
Executive Vice President of TUSI.
Reporting to the Vice President and Project General Manager is the Engineering and Construction Manager who is responsible for project design, engineering and procurement.
These activities are normally delegated to Gibbs & Hill, Inc.,
Westinghouse and other contractors / vendors. TUSI, however, l
l retains overall responsibility for these activities and performs design functions as necessary.
- 2. Gibbs & Hill TUGCO has retained Gibbs & Hill to provide experienced personnel as needed to assist TUGCO OA with the overall OA program. The Gibbs & Hill Project Manager
directs the engineering, design, and procurement functions and establishes and maintains project relations with TUSI.
The Project Manager is responsible for assuring that esta-blished procedures are implemented. The Project Manager has the authority to "stop work" on engineering and design activities performed by Gibbs & Hill.
The Gibbs & Hill OA Department, headed by the OA Manager, assures the implementation of the Gibbs & Hill OA program through engineering and design audits. Further, the OA Manager is responsible for development of detailed -
QA procedures. He can require the Project Manager to exercise his "stop work" authority. Further, the OA Manager audits the activities of independent Design Review engineers who determine compliance with safety-related design concepts. The OA Department is completely separate and functions independently from those persons or groups having specific project design, scheduling, or budgetary responsibilities. Independence is maintained further by having the OA Manager report to the Vice President.
Attachment 4 is a chart of the Gibbs & Hill OA Organization.
e -.. --- -
---e
- 3. Brown & Root Brown & Roo't provides the OA program for ASME Code construction and other QA functions as may be requested by the TUGCO OA Manager. Brown & Root's OA personnel have the freedom to identify quality problems, to recommend solutions, and to verify that solutions have been implemented. This organization has sufficient independence and authority to carry out the program in an orderly, effective manner. It employs a documentation system which provides necessary record retention and access capability. The Brown & Root OA organization for its Houston office and for site activities
- is shown in Attachment 5.
The Brown & Root Project OA Manager is responsible for implementation of the B&R OA Manual requirements in the fabrication and installation of ASME Code,Section III, Division 1 systems and components. Direction of all site l OA and OC activities other than ASME Code work is provided by the TUGCO Site OA Supervisor. For technical and adminis-i trative supervision of ASME' Code work and for administrative i
supervision in all other areas, the Brown & Root Project
! OA Manager reports to the Brown & Root QA Manager in Houston.
l t
I
i C. Organizational Interfaces For Comanche Peak, TUGCO/TUSI has established the interfaces of the participating organizations in the OA program which are summarized as follows:
- 1. Brown & Root Project GA Manager reports to the Brown & Root OA Manager for technical and administrative supervision of ASME Code work, and for administrative supervision in all other areas. Direction of the Brown &
Root Project OA Manager in areas other than ASME Code work is provided by the TUGCO Site OA Supervisor.
- 2. Construction site inspections are performed under the direction of TUGCO and Brown &
Root (ASME Code work only) or by contractor ,
or subcontractor.
- 3. Periodic audits and surveillances of site Oc and construction activities are performed by TUGCO to verify conformance.
j 4. Vendors are required to provide internal, independent OA programs unless working under the TUGCO OA program.
- 5. TUGCO OA and/or its consultants or agents conduct vendor audits, surveillance and inspections to verify performance.
- 6. Westinghouse provides the OA program for NSSS components.
- 7. Gibbs & Hill provides the OA program for design and engineering.
- 8. TUGCO OA periodically audits Westinghouse, Gibbs & Hill, Brown & Root and internal TUGCO/TUSI safety-related activities.
- 9. Brown & Root periodically audits their ASME OA program onsite, as required.
In summary, the OA/QC organization established for the construction of th'e Comanche Peak facility has been care-fully structured and functions to provide assurance that applicable codes, statidards, and regulatory requirements are met and to assure the safe operation of the facility.
l '(
D A fl
' DavicVS.' Chapinan 1 'Q Subscribed to and sworn before me this 7 day of May 1982. .:-
4 Notary Public
-E -
GLENDA BENSON, N:tary Public g in and for Da!!as Cou ty, xas
- = , My Commission Spir" -
_u.-
l r
[
r ,,
n ATTACEMENT 1 DAVID N. CHAPMAN STATEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS POSITION: Manager, Quality Assurance FORMAL EDUCATION: 1959-1964, B.S.M.E. Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University EXPERIENCE:
1976 - Present Texas Utilities Generating Company, Dallas, Texas, Manager, Quality Assurance. Responsible for assuring effective implementation of the CPSES Quality Assurance Program in nuclear safety-related activities including design, procurement, construction and operations.
1972 - 1976 Texas Utilities Service Incorporated, Dallas, Texas, Project Engineer. Duties included re-
- viewing selected CPSES design documents, PSAR drafts and environmental report drafts. Addi-tional duties included such special projects as site evaluation studies for future genera-ting plants.
! 1967 - 1972 Texas Electric Service Company, Forth Worth, Texas, Senior Engineer, General Office En-gineering Department. Activities included review of design and construction specifi-cations, drawings, and purchase documents for four gas / oil fired generating units.
i l 1966 - 1967 Texas Electric Service Company, Forth Worth, Texas, Associate Engineer, Handey Steam Electric Station. Involved primarily in
, training through " hands-on" operation, main-l tenance, and plant chemistry duties.
l i
l t
l l
O\ }
4 e
I
, i i
-l i
., .m .,
i i
r------------------------------------'
- ';n. . . . ..
.... gj;- m, .m.-.
.g.
, i 0
i r - - - - - - - t, -- - - - - - - 1i r - - - - - - - - Ti - - - - - - - 7, - - - - - - - - -
, a. ........ . . ' "
, . . . , .u. , . ,
...m.. .. ... .
. urL..
. 3 R l
.... l
, i
_______________________________________________2_______________________s >
c R COMANCHE PE AK S.E.S. a v
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Q ,
UNITS 1 and 2 9 2:
>-3 AUTHORITY PROJECT Q A ORGANIZATION y
COORDINATION AMENDMENT 31 APRIL 23, 1982 FIGURE 17.1-2 (1) IN HOUSTON (2) IN NEW YORK
r, -
^
s
!!f?
TUCC0/TUSI PRESIDtMi I I y h TUCC0 EXECUTIYt t D is (VICE PRESIDENT (p IM TUGCO) hC, VICE PRESIDENT, NUCttAR I
I I I I MANAGE R pgg7y MANAGER. [NGINttRING &
PAttAd PHYSICS QUAtitV Administrative OPERATIONS ASSURANCE SERVICt5
~
$UPERVISOR, QA 5tRVICc3
\
$PECIAL ifMfl!
_inll,0gg I VICE FRESI0 TNT
& PROJECT ctMERAI m MGtR, Slit QA mMAGER -
ItANT OrtRAil0NS SurtRVISOR i i i I l AMENDMENT 31 mA vutR. I ro5outt
^'"'asstR^rivt itCnniCAL LNGINitalaG R APRIL 23, 1982 d$r"" meGtR 5,jgj;g 5 surr0Rr coNgtron' s,n n,r,Roa,tCr n Gt e
COMANCHE PE AK S.E.S. y I FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT LEGEND UNITS 1 and 2 z
-AUTHORITY , e
-C00RI DI N ATION TUGC0/TUSI HOME OFFICE w AND CPSES FIELD ORGANIZATION
- FOR OTHER THAN ASME SECTION FIGURE 17.1-6
. _. III DIVISION I ACTIVITY ONLY ,. _ _______-
o s
$8>n g _
. s S l e
. wt i
E *
.Y n t
.* " O N i
tg I ST 02 3 n N E P 'I - t E
D IRRI G
N mT i
N F(
S R
2 8 KF AA E8, R
T A
l 1
7 s
t a
0 0
S t[ R [( 9 ES S I
i 1 C 1
Ein E R0 H I
u"E iN HI l I 3
- P " M 2 L IS E 8 PFl M R CG , C R /
G i N - ST l
[ N G ( 3 EA YI R O
U G
a t
C l
Y E M N - 2 HNLN CIRU A I
F 9
9
/
- L NF O M I A N ' f R M A l l
0
- P O 9 A C C D
TS R B NT E G OD S EC A $ JN E DE TR AR S IJ ,N CL E E P
SO ,O
,N E( NRN C C tR I JN I IEG N G nP ,T OI LEI l N T r ,C RG rNS f i l R R E PN iIE f R i EE J E tCD iN l D CN O SM R I O E IO I( O D U T
VP R O T
N P N R R R E I 0 C D 1 I
- U 0 R O I
M R [ O L S -
E S n
9
= - - .
I L
Y N AG R EG R O R
- 0. OL E iI S
T f (r 1DNlGO G 5.ilIHNN A N
tV tR CNnF EI i nURC I
>E I JG II rSE[
A M OP O N S
_. N E1 RU RER R PS F LO N CCIN O q , 0 O I
GE R 0 V NN O
~
- =
\
R
, _
c L 'O V CR I
_ a, u -
' J C[
Ur Tu I , S E , _
R O
/ _
+
T 1 N D N 0 r L (A0 O 0 l R
_ RI C O OS C H I O DS IIE N N Nr I Nn.D Er 5 1 3
E n
H l
Y t
R C m S C C C O O o t lC n v r 4 I.lJ !j
N. , m' '
,G '
Q j.#
D t
POWER GROUP GROUP VICE-PRESIDENT l
l POWER GROUP QUALITY POWER GROUP SENIOR CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE MANAGER NATERIALS ENGINEERING MANMENENT STAFF l ,
HOUSTON !
SITE
__9______.-______.__.______._.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ .
g i
MU AS U N GER p - -- - - J TUSI p l i l i
i r---------------:------- . l i
l PROCUREMENT l l WAREHOUSING l l
MTERIALS ASSISTANT CONSTRUCTION l CONTROL PROJECT MANAGER I GROUP l
SITE oE SITE oc ! I I I I GROUP GROUP PROJECT DOCUMENT l CALIBRATION l(DEPARTMENTS)
NE It L WELDING ENGINEER sirrnfNTrNnrNT CONTROL -
],LGL@ AMEN 0 MENT 31 Authority PIPING j APRIL 23, 1982 ,
Coordination ---- p
- For ASME Section III -l MILLWRIGHTS l COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. j Division I Activities Only FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT >
O d HANGER l UNITS 1 and 2 g
B&R QUALITY ASSURANCE Q ORGSNIZATION CHART y FGM 17.1-9 m
__