ML20052F099
| ML20052F099 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 03/16/1982 |
| From: | Steven Lynch HOLMES & STARR |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| References | |
| FOIA-82-149 NUDOCS 8205120115 | |
| Download: ML20052F099 (4) | |
Text
i
- p
)
y.
HOLMES & STARR A PROrgSSIONAL CORPORATION HARDiN HOLMES 9
g, SulTE 2440
, E Nes ET H L. STARR (303)893-1500 737 SEVE NTE ENTH STREET MECH AEL TOUFF T E L E c o PIE R D E N V E R. C OLORADO80202 3L62 ANN LIVEDALEN (303)393 6960 SIDNET w. De LONO SPECIAL COUNSEL sE r FRET REsM AN
- OH N J. HANLON JOSEDH H.rRETZ STEPHEN F. LYNCH oinat """'""
March 16, 1982 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST FarA 4J-/f'1 Director of Administration NRC Public Document Room 1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20555 Re:
Supplemental Request to FOIA-81-95 Gentlemen:
Examination of documents supplied pursuant to this firm's earlier Freedom of Information Act request, FOIA-81-95, has indicated other documents that would be useful to our inquiry regarding i.he Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Power Plant
("FSV") in Platteville, Weld County, Colorado.
Therefore, I am making a supplemental request pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act for the following documents:
1.
Reports concerning supports for 2" and under piping at FSV, submitted by Public Service Company of Colorado
("PSC") subsequent to PSC Letter P-81019, dated 1/20/81.
2.
PSC reports concerning the seismic Redocumen-tation Program at FSV submitted subsequent to PSC Letter P-80442, dated 12/23/80.
3.
IE Bulletin No. 79-02 (pipe supports) and IE Bulletin No. 79-04 (valve weights).
4.
Documents relating to Seismic Certification, discussed in IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/76-07, at page 14, Details paragraph 4.
5.
Documents relating to examination of Piping r
andi Instrumentation Drawings to determine if drawings had beeh updated to reflect design modifications, indicated in IE Inspection Report No.
50-267/76-07, at pages 26-27, Dethils paragraph 11.c.(2).
i s
8205120115 020316 PDR FOIA PDR LYNCH 82-149
r*
IlOLMES & STARR Director of Administration March 16, 1982 Page 2 6.
Documents relating to the design of any new seismic hangers or seismic reevaluation caused by the modifi-cation (as defined in Administrative Procedure (ADM) 27, Section 3.6) involving the addition of diodes to the operating circuit for the safety related valve HV 2189-1, described in IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/76-07, at page 30, Details paragraph 12.c.(1)(a).
7.
Documents relating to Unresolved Item 7607-4, Seismic and Environmental Qualification, considered to be unresolved or open in:
IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/76-10, at page 8, Details paragraph 3.j; IE Inspection Report No.
50-267/76-13, at page 29, Details paragraph 8.c; IE Inspec-tion Report No. 50-267/77-09, at page 3, Details paragraph 2; IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/77-14, at page 2, Details paragraph 2; and IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/80-24, at page 2, Details paragraph 2, indicating that a status report from the PSC Nuclear Projects Department was overdue.
8.
Documents relating to seismic shaker tests described in IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/76-10, at page 14, Details paragraph 5.
9.
Documents relating to inspection tours of accessible plant areas, including pipe hangers and seismic restraints, indicated in:
IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/
76-13, at page 11, Details paragraph 3.b.(3)(f); IE Inspec-tion Report No. 50-267/77-09, at page 8, Details paragraph 4; IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/78-10, at page 3, Details paragraph 3.a; IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/80-24, at pages 4-5, Details paragraph 3.
10.
IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/76-09 and any documents relating to Infraction A.l.b therein, which con-cerned GA's audit of their architecture engineering firm on September 29 and 30, 1976, and the re-audit scheduled for July, 1977.
11.
Any documents relating to the following audits identified in IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/78-01, at pages 5-6, Details paragraph 5.a:
(a)
Special Audit of PSC Site and Engineer-ing Relative to Seismic and Environmental Program, 4/77;
HOLMES & STARR Director of Administration March 16, 1982 Page 3 (b)
QAA-1701:
Stearns-Roger Contractor QA Program, 6/77.
12.
Any documents relating to Unresolved Item (IR 76-07), concerning deficiency in supports for 2" and under piping, identified in IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/78-10, at page 2, Details paragraph 2.
13.
IE Information Notice No. 79-06.
14.
The revision dated July 18,
- 1979, to IE Bulletin No. 79-14.
15.
The following letters:
PSC Letter P-79161, dated 8/1/79.
PSC Letter P-79198, dated 9/4/79.
PSC Letter P-79292, dated 12/4/79.
NRC Letter G-79210, dated 12/14/79.
PSC Letter P-80282, dated 8/28/80.
In addition, I make the following request:
16.
Any documents concerning FSV relating to the NRC Comparative Classification of Nuclear Power Plants, described in an article (a copy of which is attached to this request) that appeared in the Rocky Mountain News on Sunday, September 13, 1981.
I confirm that all charges in connection with this request will be payed for by the above-named professional corporation.
On receipt of your statement we will remit to you the amount due.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely, Stephen F.
Lynch SFL:cc Enclosure i
ge@l2MNF#"
y tN
- Sen $ hlf' M-,,
~ --
Mchiefi,,r(ap,lNhbdrfCc'kN /..#antidenial k.mx a@wawn '
~m ~hp-p4, nts,below avera. %e ~M s
100 (API - The Rev. Jesse _Jacksond.. Theletter,writtenb'y Vincent E Reeda
~ 2' 5 usae
, assis.
" W S' HINGTON(AP) 'The Nuclear Regu-g 5 cancellation of an $825 000 grant asyondary education said "Inli ht f c-
.n admnustration s way,"to discredit.. ing refusal to cooperate in an accounting system g o yourcontmu-
.y PUSIL, latory Commission has classified 15 operating According to Sunday editions of the New -
5' a
nl rights leader termed the canc;ella4make the grant to PUSit ' c *' gaudit,1we have no alternative but to decline to
,y nuclear plants as "below average" and will York Times, whose rankings were' confirmed ds last week for Jackson's PUSH forp,,iwe.cannot provide f d "t the agency said Saturday night.
were: Arkansas 1 and 2 at Russellville, plants devote more inspections to them, sources in by NRC sources, the below average
.i Inc. a pol i
! assessment.jtical strategy, not an.rthat fail to' cooperate with.the most minimum Ark.
un s o organizations "A rating of below average does not mean Beaver Valley 1, Shippingport, Pa.; Browns;4 yr, Jackson maintam.
E the plant is unsafe. We expect high perf Ferry 1,2 and 3, Decatur, Ala.: Brunswick 1 :
1als were m Washington on Friday to.., Jackson, an activist since the 1960ed, he and other p. requirem 3
mance from all plants," said one source. or-and 2. Southport, N.C.; Davis-Besse,0ak Har-s,.said Nine other plants were classified as above bor, Ohio; Crystal River 3, Red Level. Fla.;
i listributed to local school districts. grant themselves and suggest the.'; Saturday.he never got a copy of the letter.' ?
average and will get fewer inspections, the James A. FitzPatrick, Scriba, N.Y.; Indian' ere not down the a begging' for.',@GChicago based Operation PUSH,is an education-PUSH foy Excellence sources said. Twenty-six were classified as Point 2, Buchanan, N.Y.;.Nine Mile Point 1,
' average and will see no change. 4 Scriba, N.Y.; Oyster Creek Toms River, N.J '-
a vere down there r egotiating to give pal program for minorities and the poor launghed
' It was the NRC's first attempt to compare Palisades, South Haven, Mich.; Pilgrim it back, because they are too dishoo4,without federal. funding by Jackson in 1976.
Plymouth, Mass.; Rancho Seco, Clay Station, f
all the nation's operatin al with," J2ckson asserted; ' '
mt was canceled because Jhckson.Clate.1970s to give the program $1 million an. U.D ' The de
' plants at the same time. g. nuclear power Calif.; Salem 1 and 2, Salem, N.J. and Sorry 1 and 2 Gravel Neck, Va.
let federal officials audit the pro-The plants were rated by senior regional
.s. an Education department spokes- - ally for three years, subject tb annual review..NRC staffers on the basis of management The above-average plants were: Cooper at j
nu.
quality, radiation and fire protection, cornpli. Brownville. Neb.; Farley Units 1 and 2. Do-Friday.
~'
tobinson said the agency notified ? for a research firm tostudy the program SeverThe." department simultaneously arr ance with regulations and the occurence of than, Ala.; Fort Calhoun, Fort Calhoun, Neb.;
)
4 events that must be reported to the commis-Millstone 1 and 2, Waterford, Conn.; Oconce i letter last week of its decision to %al reports critical of PUSil-EXCEL were issued-sion during late 1979 and 1980.
1,2 and 3, Seneca, S.C.; Point Beach I and 2,
- PUSH EXCEL, which previously c.by the firm in the past few years, sa ing the No attempt
- was made to consider such Two Crooks, Wis.; Prarie Island I and 2, Red 2
re tbn $2 million from the depart.T program was little more than a series o. speech.
things as plant electrical efficiency, said the Wing, Minn.; Vermont Yankee,.Vernon, Vt.'
v'
, i ; 5 M Tes made by Jackson and others.
- g and Yankee Rowe, Rowe, Mass.
Csource. U ) ;., W,-
'1 All other operating plants were average.
+,"
m
@Mgypp 7
"J* R L FTf E ygga v
c
$w~ w 1-Qg G l
- [4*g,g~g. '
finds church l
lnyestigation -
3 g$
];
- la had dynamite t
Oh Q Qf "?y ',
'(d bsE j
~
v Fg<y.e./
.,'. s.
n c-
)
L. js 4hi >
c MIRACLE VALLEY Ariz.
4 a
T b..
'F M N
(AP) - A religious 'grou,p that lost a member to a bomb explo-( Q, N, M M % !J "
g sion last week had bought dyna-f %,p(7,.' :
,.p M % d g
p g
Ig%
mite several m)nths ago but M
i,
~,
contended it was to be used for 3
6m k A W '. '
- T" ; d,..,.... > : W T
g mining, officials say.
.{
I b "I d-
.i a,
cN
-wIE, i **5 ki3I'd '" '"p's members
{(q)
One of the grou
' $ R'i94, m x@