ML20052E608
| ML20052E608 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/14/1982 |
| From: | Barnes I, Sutton J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20052E601 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900338 NUDOCS 8205110277 | |
| Download: ML20052E608 (5) | |
Text
.
ORGANIZATION:
SIEMENS-ALLIS, INC.
SMALL MOTOR DIVISION LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.-
99900338/82-01 OATE(S) 2/16-18/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 16 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Siemens-Allis, Inc.
Small Motor Division ATTN:
Mr. William E. Onyett Manager, Quality Assurance 1400 Dineen Crive Little Rock, AR 72206 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT:
Mr. William E. Onyett, Manager, Quality Assurance TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(501) 897-4905 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Small Electric Motors, 5 HP - 75 HP NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Commercial nuclear production of small electric motors Class 1E, 5 HP to 75 HP.
At present all nuclear orders have been filled and shipped.
No commercial nuclear contracts are in house.
/
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
/a/h
/
h/P#h
- f. W. Sutton, Reactive & Components Program Date Section (R& CPS)
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
d m APPROVED BY:
[
- W-E 2 -.
%+
I. Barnes, Chief, R& CPS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B and 10 CFR Part 21.
B.
SCOPE:
Status of previous inspection findings and vendor activities.
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
DESIG11IED ORIGINAL Not identified.
7 Certified B7 8205110277 820420 PDR GA999 ENVSIEMA 99900338 PDR
ORGANIZATION:
SIEMENS-ALLIS, INC.
SMALL MOTOR DIVISION LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REPORI INaetLitua NO.:
99900338/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 3 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
None C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS 1.
(Closed) Violation (80-01):
Current copies of 10 CFR Part 21 not posted.
The inspector verified that current copies of 10 CFR Part 21 have been posted on all office and factory bulletin boards.
2.
(Closed) Deviation A (80-01):
Index checklist for audit report and audit summary had not been formulated or included in revisions to forms.
The inspector verified by review of five nuclear audits, revised QA procedures and forms that the commitments made in Siemens-Allis' February 16, 1981, reply to NRC's letter of February 5, 1981, have been satisfactorily implemented.
3.
(Closed) Deviation 8 (80-01):
Audit reports had not been completely filled out as required by Procedure 10.01.
The inspector reviewed ten audit reports issued during 1981 for compliance to Siemens-Allis' (SA) commitment for filling out audit reports.
The reports reviewed were found to be completed as required by SA's QA procedures.
4.
(Cissed) Deviation C (80-01):
Quality Assurance had not audited or applied " Hold Tags" on certain identified motors.
ORGANIZATION:
SIEMENS-ALLIS, INC.
SMALL MOTOR DIVISION LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REPORf IN5ettliuN NO.:
99900328/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 3 The inspector verified by examination of available shop records, audits and work in progress that " Hold Tags" are being used to identify defective parts or tests for repair or rework.
The QA inspector is stamping those operations that he has witnessed.
The inspector examined six " Hold Tags" for conformance and all were found to have been completed as required by SA QA procedures.
Random audits have been conducted by QA personnel for compliance.
5.
(Closed) Deviation D (80-01):
Measures had not been established and documented to assure control and distribution of documents, including changes to the location or person using the documents.
The inspector reviewed current test specifications, and test station engineering copies of tests, weekly audits, and other available documentation to verify that current documents have been distributed as required by QA procedures.
The documents reviewed were found to be in order and comply with required distribution.
6.
(Closed) Deviation E (80-01):
File copy of operator instruction sheets had not been approved by production or manufacturing.
The inspector reviewed a QA audit of all master NSRE-0IS sheets for signature.
The inspector verifed that all previous sheets had been signed off as required.
Five current sheets and master sheets were reviewed and found to have been signed off as required.
7.
(Closed) Deviation F (80-01):
Aperture cards from product engineering file had not been removed or marked as required by procedure.
The inspectt reviewed the aperture file to determine if procedures a
are being followed.
Procedure GP 15 has been revised to clarify para-graph 4.1.4 requirements.
QA has conducted audits to assure compliance to the revised requirements.
8.
(Closed) Deviation G (80-01):
Item sheets had not been signed off and the person checking the Test Data Sheets had not noted " verified" by his name.
l The inspector verified by review of ten current item sheets that the l
signatures of all required personnel have been recordea and verified.
l SA QA personnel have conducted audits of this area to assure compliance with procedure requirements.
i i
l A
I PERSONS CONTACTED Company OfPM2VS-Allol lPt Dates 1 - J L./ f# f 3-(
Docket / Report No. N f00 3 8 8 Inspector 7, 44/. [Ar /4, Page of NAME(Please Print)
TIT 1.E(Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print) l s, w. Su HeJ Krul.r &<iner uruec.
w.Eavu W.
64 Mwaar0nE 4 Air.
S senwr - A ud.
55,G w ear en. n,S E mbr fie w a r A.a o1 T, Ts96'r.
1rueur ntL h.
3.
F. La.u v.
a-j 1 @ k %de al St l+ Moeb J4.
l 1
l l
l l
l l
Inspector _Ja_.fctf/o et)
Docket No.9f7~7.P:P.
Report No. 8 2.6/
Page ~( o f ~f Scope / Module @ eve _lMIP_ll'ud/P DOCUMENTS EXAMINED Sreaoe n alt.is L'//L. A w A' A'~l' 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/.
B e twwJ- 09_@ g/oere M 2-/-
_2 8
o er/u. P-4 ( 9 o z $ L 3.
3 L @ a) - l O' O / ~ 8'. O /.
J -2 3 - F /_-
'.3
't D
9ud ds -
l Q,.oj - P~. O I to Yx.-fI
,(
8
$ -E_k.7_o1_L3
.S~/ o 2 - 9 o A o o - o z.
Er -J7o r*- 9 o13 : - t.7 o1,-
A- $Lo)- 9 o 3 2 2 - o f - 0 L. E' S~ / Lb-9 03 2 /-
0 / - o
- 1..
I, 6
&J Q*!$ co- /c)-/ El -
2< ao -3.oo-V.oo L~.oo G. O - 2p. Loj - F, o 2. - 9. 0 -/ O.o tO jy o
,o p
7.
9 M
</m L ropa
- Mid &
t.
8 krrhnn.f&L Ad )
9.
_b 5n~., L R Si= t -24 r M2d BL.
_to 6.
Mh
/vA n Bo. k Cu P O 4-/ to 6
Mar /et. Ar.ces -or.t JM TQ
')y 6 - i t,' 3. - 7J%.LW i 2.-
Y.
A%.fect'% EL_p_
'/- / - 7 7 -
13
_.3.
CvP- /,r -
PWsLy__
2.-13 -6 /.
l ty 3
/, / 3- ( 2-D)
W Pam 3, J.
t ? J /-
is.
8 W' Bu;2had - res / P&
ordevwE-nou -
E -J/ 4/
'- R 90 3 3 *2.- /
p_,y_p, Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
A