Interrogatories Directed to Con Ed,Pasny,Nrc & Ny State Energy Ofc.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related CorrespondenceML20052E569 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Indian Point ![Entergy icon.png](/w/images/7/79/Entergy_icon.png) |
---|
Issue date: |
05/03/1982 |
---|
From: |
Kessler J ROCKLAND CITIZENS FOR SAFE ENERGY |
---|
To: |
CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC., ESGNYE, NEW YORK, STATE OF, NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD), POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
---|
References |
---|
EP, ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8205110238 |
Download: ML20052E569 (8) |
|
|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20069L1991983-04-22022 April 1983 Interrogatories & Document Request.Related Correspondence ML20069L2091983-04-22022 April 1983 Supplemental Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071D2941983-03-0303 March 1983 Supplemental Response to 820621 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2,transmitting Form for Recording Continuous Type Releases.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083Q3931983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry on Licensee Controlled Land to Observe 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Control Rooms & near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20065C2111983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry Upon Land Controlled by Licensees & to Allow Observance of 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Both Units 2 & 3 Control Rooms & from near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20028C8671983-01-0707 January 1983 Response to Licensee 821203 Ltr Requesting Supplemental Responses to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20064C4481982-12-30030 December 1982 Suppl to Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20070L5471982-12-24024 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Under Commission Question 1 ML20070L5491982-12-22022 December 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Under Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20070F7581982-12-17017 December 1982 Supplementation of Interrogatory Response,Naming Question 1 Witnesses.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069Q5231982-12-0707 December 1982 Supplemental Response to Interrogatories on Commission Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069P7641982-12-0606 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20067B1761982-12-0303 December 1982 Response to 820716 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20067B2391982-12-0202 December 1982 Response to Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Related Correspondence ML20028B2981982-11-24024 November 1982 Replies to 820718 Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20028B4011982-11-22022 November 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20066J2611982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to Interrogatories & Document Requests on Commission Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20066J0411982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028A0491982-11-0303 November 1982 Response to 820526 Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Question 6.Interrogatories Received on 821015 ML20058G5211982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to Final Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5921982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5681982-07-21021 July 1982 Response to 8206221 Interrogatories,Objecting to Interrogatories 1-11 as Irrelevant,Beyond Scope of Permissible Discovery & Beyond Scope of Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5791982-07-20020 July 1982 Response to Second Round of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055B8621982-07-19019 July 1982 Interrogatory on Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069C8621982-07-19019 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on Board Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20055A9981982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055A9901982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Question 1 ML20055A9961982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20063E4491982-07-0707 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories on Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5771982-07-0202 July 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories on Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L7991982-07-0101 July 1982 Addl Response to Interrogatories Under Commission Questions 3 & 4 Per ASLB 820625 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5201982-07-0101 July 1982 Supplemental Response to Licensee 820503 Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054M1791982-06-30030 June 1982 Reply to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5501982-06-30030 June 1982 Supplementary Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J5871982-06-25025 June 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J9301982-06-25025 June 1982 Final Response to Util Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H8941982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H8901982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20054J1221982-06-22022 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Requests for Admissions.Details Surrounding TMI-2 Accident Would Require Burdensome & Oppressive Research.Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J1471982-06-21021 June 1982 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2.Related Correspondence ML20054H5411982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H5301982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H2601982-06-17017 June 1982 Reply to NRC 820526 Interrogatories ML20054H5661982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H2631982-06-16016 June 1982 Reply to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories,Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F9801982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re ASLB Contention 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H5811982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to West Branch Conservation Assoc Supplementary Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20054H5881982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Supplementary Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H6081982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 6 ML20054F6251982-06-14014 June 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl 1983-04-22
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARJPN-99-029, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20212E4181999-09-15015 September 1999 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting OL for Unit 2 Be Modified or Suspended to Prevent Restart Until Reasonable Assurance That Licensee in Substantial Compliance with Terms of OL & Has Proper Consideration for Public Health & Safety JPN-99-022, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds1999-06-22022 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds ML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20198E9721998-12-21021 December 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities. Orders That Wh Clark Prohibited for 1 Yr from Engaging in NRC-Licensed Activities JPN-98-052, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects1998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects ML20198L2731998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting NEI Re Proposed Rules 10CFR50, 52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments JPN-98-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal ML20155F4561998-08-26026 August 1998 Demand for Info Re False Info Allegedly Provided by Wh Clark to Two NRC Licensees.Nrc Considering Whether Individual Should Be Prohibited from Working in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 JPN-97-037, Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated1997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated ML20148M6471997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Porposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems ML20133N0511997-01-0505 January 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Resturcturing & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20149M4621996-12-0909 December 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Utility Industry ML20077G3481994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Nuclear Power License Renewal ML20070P0561994-04-19019 April 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NRC Draft Policy Statement on Use of Decommissioning Trust Funds Before Decommissioning Plan Approval ML20029C5771994-03-11011 March 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Draft Rule on Decommissioning.Informs That 15 Mrem/Yr Unreasonably Low Fraction of Icrp,Ncrp & Regulatory Public Dose Limit of 100 Mrem/Yr ML20059C3031993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Definition of Commercial Grade Item ML20045H8751993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule ML20045F2451993-06-28028 June 1993 Comment on Proposal Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning NRC-licensed Facilities.Opposes Proposed Criteria ML20044F5681993-05-20020 May 1993 Comment on Draft Commercial Grade Dedication Insp Procedure 38703,entitled Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. Endorses NUMARC Comments Dtd 930517 JPN-02-034, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl JPN-91-021, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants1991-05-13013 May 1991 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants JPN-91-005, Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended1991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended ML20066G4411991-01-23023 January 1991 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Substantive Typo in 901015 Filing on Behalf of Licensee Noted ML20058G6341990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program JPN-90-068, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS1990-10-22022 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS ML20065H7541990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 on Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Commission Assessment of Four Alternatives Should Be Expanded to Include Not Only Safety Considerations But Other Atomic Energy Act Objectives JPN-90-067, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC JPN-90-052, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR1990-07-0909 July 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR JPN-90-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary1990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary ML20012C6491990-03-0909 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events. Any Utilization of NRC Proposed Application of Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2,would Be Inappropriate W/O re-evaluation by NRC ML20005F6521989-12-13013 December 1989 Comment on Proposed Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Concurs w/industry-wide Position Presented by NUMARC & Offers Addl Comments ML20246P6061989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Significant & Independent Industry Efforts Already Underway to Address Issue ML20245K1941989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V9011989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Supports NUMARC Position.Proposed Rule Will Hinder Important Initiatives to Improve Maint JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20205L8521988-10-21021 October 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Cleaning or Disposing of Nuclear Waste.Incineration of Radwaste Oil Should Not Be Allowed JPN-88-015, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site1988-04-18018 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site JPN-88-002, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed1988-01-25025 January 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed JPN-87-062, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex1987-12-31031 December 1987 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex JPN-87-053, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection1987-10-15015 October 1987 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection JPN-87-051, Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl1987-09-28028 September 1987 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl ML20235Y9911987-07-20020 July 1987 Notice of Issuance of Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 Re Emergency Planning for School Children in Vicinity of Indian Point.* Request to Suspend OLs Denied ML20151C5061987-02-18018 February 1987 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning ML20093H6421984-10-15015 October 1984 Comments on Staff Presentation at Commission 841002 Meeting. Commission Should Conclude Proceedings Due to Inescapable Conclusion That Facility Safe to Operate & Poses No Undue Risk to Public.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098D2721984-09-26026 September 1984 Comments on Commission 840905 Meeting Re Facilities,Per Sj Chilk 840911 Memo.Licensee Agrees W/Staff That Further Mitigative Features or Plant Shutdown Unnecessary Due to Low Risk.Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
?
f( SEIATED CORBMMEC UNITED STATES OF APIRICA ! ."! FF E t MUCLEAR REGULATORY CorciISSIni -"' ^
ATOMIC SAFETY MID LICENSING BOARD ec 2 .3.M, -7 91 :,,
Before Administrative Judges:
Iouis J. Carter, Chairman
~~
g Dr. Oscar H. Paris (
Frederick J. Shon In the Matter of )
) Docket :;os.50-247-SP CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO:!PNIY OF ) 50-286-SP NEW YORK (Indian Point Unit No.2 )
) D POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF )
May 3, 19 O NEW YORK (Indian Point Unit No.3 )
> RECEEVED MAY101982w '
'p; mw er. - == [m nArntiuRIMis -
INTERROGATORIES GE: f OF OL A y.
,y, ROCKI AND CITIZENS FOR SAFE EN'ERGY Oy j , g-Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 2.740, Intervenor Rockland Citi: ens for Safe Energy (hereinafter referred to as RCSE) requests that t.hese interrogatories be answered fully in writing and under oath by any enplcyees or representa-tives of Consolidated Edison Company and Power Authority of the State of New York (the Licensees), of the NRC Staff, and of the New York State Energy Office who have personal knowledge of the facts and issues in cuestion. Each of the parties named is requested to answer all of the interrogatory. The l
answer to each interrogatory should contair. the name anci identification of each Derson supplying or contributing to the answer, whether or not he or she has verified the answer. The answer should also explain the rcle of each individual i in preparing the answer.
l DEFINITIONS NID INSTRUCTIQlS l
i I Unless otherwise indicated, the following definitic:ns shall apply to t
these interrogatories:
I l (1.) The Licensees shall include not only con Eciiscn and the power i
Authority, but also all agents, employees, attorneys, i=vestigators, contract-l -
820511023882050f7 DR ADOCK 05000g l _ _
PDR 0 $lI l
l l
\
ors and all other persons directly or indirectly subject to the control of i
)
the Licensee, especially including any contractors specifically hired to pre-pare any emergency planning material.
(2.) The word " person" or " persons" shall mean, without limitation, all entities, including any predecessors in interest, individuals, associations, companies, partnerships, joint ventures, corporations, subsidiaries, depart-ments, bureaus, public agencies and boards.
(3.) " Documents" shall mean all written or recorded material of any kind or character known to the parties or in the possession, custody or control, including, but not linited to letters, correspondence, telegrams, memoranda, notes, records, minutes, contracts, agreements, records of notations of tele-phone or personal conversations or conferences, interoffice communications, microfilm, bulletins, circulars, pa.tphlets, studies, notices, summaries, reports, books, articles, worksheets.
(4.) When used with respect to a document, " identify" means, without limitation, to state its date, type of document, the author and addressee, the present location and custodian, and a description of its contents.
(5.) When used with respect to a person, " identify" means, without limi-tations, to state his or her name, address, occupation and professional qualifications.
! (6.) If any of the information contained in the answer to any of these interrogatories is not within the personal knowledge of the person signing the responre to that interrogatory, so state and identify each person, document f and communication on which he or she relies for the information contained in :
E the answers not based solely on personal knowledge. t 5
(7.) If the party cannot answer a portion of the following interroga-tories in full after exercising full diligence to secure the information to do [
I so, so state and answer to the extent possible specifying the inability to an- :
F swer the remainder and stating when the party expects to be able to answer the f r r i
I
, unancwer d porticna.
(8.) These interrogatories are continuing interrogatories and reauire supplemental answers if the party obtains further information between the time the answers are served and the time of an initial decision in this proceeding.
INTERROGATORIES (1.) Please state the party's position with respect to each of RCSE's contentions 3.1, 3. 3, 3. 4 , 4 . 2 and 4 . 7 .
(2.) With respect to each of RCSE's contentions, please (a.) ider;tify each person whom the party expects to call as an ex-pert witness concerning the contention; (b.) state the subject matter on which the expert witness is ex-pected to testify; (c.) state the substance of the fact and opinion to which the expert witness is expected to testify and summarize the grounds for each opinion; (d.) identify all documents relied upon or examined by the expert witness in answering (c.) above; (e.) identify all documents not identified in response to (d.)
above which the expert witness expects to put into evidence or to rely upon in support of his or her testimony in this proceeding.
(3.) Please identify all other persons whom the party expects to call as witnesses concerning the issues raised by the RC3E contentions and in response to Commission questions 3 and 4. Please answer interrogatory (2.) (a.) through (e.) with respect to each potential witness identified by the party in response to this interrogatory.
(4.) Uith respect to all persons identified by the party in response to interrogatory (2) and (3) above, please (a) provide a complete bibliography of all articles, books or
scholarly works published or presented by each person, including a brief description of the substance of each; (b) identify and provide appropriate citations for all proceedings 4
in which the person has previously. appeared as a witness .
(5.) Identify all documents that the party expects to introduce into evi-dence or to use for impeachment or other cross-examination purposes in this proceeding other than those identified in response te other interrogatories.
(6.) What equipment, manpower and training shortfalls does Rockland County have with respect tc compliance with 10 C.F.R. 50.47 b(6) and (7) and NUREG 0654 Sec. II F and II G? What equipment, manpower and training would be needed by Rockland County to comply with 10 C.F.R. 50.47 . (b) (6) and (7) and NUREG 0654 Sec. II F and II G? Please identify any and all deficiencies in com-plying with the evaluation criteria of NUREG 0654 Sec. II F and II G with res-pect to Rockland County.
(7.) With respect to contention 3.3, please provide a listing of all evacuation plan estinate studies done by CONSAD Research Corporation and Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc., and any other time estimate studies done for the Indian Point site, any working papers and documents per-
! taining to these studies, and updates of the studies, including the date of i
all such documents and updates. The NRC Staff is requested to provide a copy of the aforementioned documents to RCSE without charge.
(8.) Please identify which version, if any, of the Rockland County Radio-logical Emergency Response Plan was relied upon in each of the studies or up-dates. Please identify what studies were made of traffic patterns immediately outside of the 10 edleEPZ and of their effects upon traffic egress from the i
10 mile EPZ. Pleate identify the " level of service" assumptions used in com-puting the evacuation time estimates in any known studies and the reasoning for selection of those levels of service in Rockland County.
(9.) Please identify all bottlenecks revealed by any evacuation time
s estimate studies done for Rockland. State any time estfrates that have been computed regarding traffic flow that does not progress in the optimal manner according to the plan.
(10.) Please state the date and time of any and all events which would be classified as unusual events, site alerts, site emergencies or general energencies under current regulations in the operating history of Units 2 and 3. For each of the preceding events, state whether and at what exact time Rockland County and others were notified officially of the event and of its nature. Please supply all documents pertaining to the NRC investigation of the October 1980 fan cooler leak accident.
(ll.) Please identify any studies on sheltering capability within the EPZ in Rockland County. Please identify any standards known for sheltering fac-tors in radiological emergencies. It is requested that the NRC Staff provide any documents and testimony related to sheltering and air turnover rates in buildings.
(12.) tirnat proportion of the population within the Rockland County EPZ is known to be deaf, blind, too young to under stand instructions in the Emer-gency Planning brochures or unable to speak English? What special provisions have been taken to inform these populations of an emergency?
Respectfully submitted, k/ *
) '
udith Kessler, Coordinator Rockland Citizens for Safe Energy 14ay 3,1982
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA @jp NUCLEAR RCGULA'IORY Co!CIISSIG; ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judgest
'g g NI .*44 Louis J. Carter, Chairman ,_ ,_
Dr. Oscar H. Paris /i, Frederick J. Shon " , _
- if , :,i In the Matter of )
)
CONSOLIDATED EDISON CCMPANY OF ) Docket Nos. 50-247-SP NEW YORK (Indian Point Unit No. 2) ) 50-286-SP
)
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF )
NEW YORK (Indian Point thit No. 3) ) May 3, 1982
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have served copies of INTERROGATORIES oF ROCKLAND CITIZENS FOR SAFE ENERGY on the following parties by first class mail, postage paid, this third day of May, 1982:
Louis J. Carter, Esq., Chairman Janice Moore, Esq.
Administrative Judge Counsel for NRC Staff Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Office of the Executive 7300 City Line Avenue Legal Director Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19151 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Frederick J. Shon Administrative Judge Brent L. Brandenburg, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Assistant General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Consolidated Edison Company 20555 of New York, Inc.
Washington, D.C.
4 Irving Place New York, New York 10003 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Ellyn R. Weiss, Esq.
William S. Jordan, III, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Harmon and Weiss 1725 I Street, N.W., Suite 506 Docke, ting and Service Branch Washington, D.C. 20006 Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Charles A Scheiner, Co-Chairperson 20555 Westchester People's Action Washington, D.C. Coalition, Inc.
Joan Holt, Project Director P.O. Box 488 Indian Point Project White Plains, New York 10602 New York Public Interest Research Alan Latman, Esq.
Group 5 Beekman Street 44 Sunset Drive New York, New York 10038 Croton-On-Hudson, New York 10520
4 .
John Gilroy Ezra I. Bialik, Esq.
Westchester Coordinator Steve Leipzig , Esq.
Indian Point Project Environmental Protection Bureau New York Public Interest Research New York State Attorney Group General's Office 240 Central Avenue Two World Trade Center White Plains, New York .
10606 New York, New York 10047 Jeffrey M. Blum, Esq. Alfred B. Del Bello New York University Law School Westchester County Executive 423 Vanderbilt .all .
Westchester County
~ 40 Washington Square South 148 Martine Avenue New York, New York 10012 White Plains, New York 10601 Charles J. Maikish, Esq. Andrew S. Roffe, Esq.
Litigation Division New York State Assembly The Port Authority of New York Albany, New York 12248 and New Jersey One World Trade Center Marc L. Parris, Esq.
New York, New York 10048 Eric Thorsen, Esq.
County Attorney ,
County of Rockland Pat Posner, Spokesperson 11 New Hempstead Road Parents Concerned About Indian New City, New York 10956 Point P.O. Box 125 Stanley B. Klimberg, Esq.
Croton-on-Hudson, New York 10520 General Counsel Renee Schwartz, Esq. New York State Energy Office Botein, Hays, Sklar and Herzberg 2 Rockefeller State Plaza Attorneys for Metropolitan Albany, New York 12223 Transporation Authority 200 Park Avenue I Atomic Safety and Licensing New York, New York 10166 Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Honorable Ruth W. Messinger Washington, D.C. 20555 Member of the Council of the City of New York Atomic Safety and Licensing District #4 Appeal Board Panel City Hall U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission New York, New York 10007 Washington, D.C. 20555 Greater New York Council Honorable Richard L. Brodsky on Energy Member of the County Legislature Westchester County c/o Dean R. Corren, Director County Office Building New York University White Plains, New York 10601 26 Stuyvesant Street New York, New York 10003 Zipporah S. Fleisher Geoffrey Cobb Ryan West Branch Conservation Conservation Committee Chairman Association Director, New York City 443 Buena Vista Road New City, New York 10956 Audubon Society 71 West 23rd Street, Suite 1828 New York, New York 10010 M yor George V. Begany Village of Buchanan 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, New York 10511
~
f~ 7.. .
m4_' -' '
...[* ,' ' , M ***' ,.# ,N '
M " " *
$*- '* , *- .f" -
.[
p
Paul F. Colarulli, Esq. David H. Pikus, Esq.
Joseph 3. Levin, Jr., Esq. Richard F. Czaja, Esq.
Pamela S. Horowitz, Esq. 330 Madison Avenue Charles Morgan, Jr., Esq. New York, New York 10017 Morgan Associates, Chartered 1899 L Street, N.W. Ms. Amanda Potterfield, Esq.
Washington, DC 20036 ,
P.O. Box 384 i Village Station Charles M. Pratt, Esq. New York, New Yorx 10014 Thomas R. Frey, Esq.
Power Authority of the State of New York 10 Columbus Circle Lorna Salzman New York, NY 10019 Mid-Atlantic Representative Friends of the Earth, Inc.
205 West 13th Street New York, New York 10011 Respectfully submitted, d$f} d.Cb?- ~
Jtfdith Kessler, Coordinator Rocklan:1 Citizens for safe Energy l Huntsville, Alabama May 3, 1982 l
l I
\ _ ._ _