ML20052E512
| ML20052E512 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/13/1982 |
| From: | Barnes I, Brown R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20052E509 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900251 NUDOCS 8205110180 | |
| Download: ML20052E512 (7) | |
Text
-
ORGANIZATION:
JOSEPH OAT CORPORATION CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY REPOR INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.:
99900251/82-01 DATE(S) 3/8-12/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 31 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Joseph Oat Corporation ATTN:
Mr. J. Benckert, Manager Quality Control 2500 Broadway Camden, NJ 08104 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT:
Mr. J. Benckert, Manager, Quality Control TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(609) 541-2900 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT:
Nuclear Heat Exchangers and Fuel Storage Racks NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY:
Approximately 75% of Joseph Oat Corporation's activity is devoted to the commercial nuclear industry.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
W z
'L Ro'ss L. Brown, Reactive & Components Program Date Section (R& CPS)
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
/ e APPROVED BY:
1 8%m 6 // c /f-2.
I. Barnes, Chief, R& CPS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B; and 10 CFR Part 21.
B.
SCOPE:
Management meeting and status of previous inspection findings.
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
Not identified.
Certified B G205110180 920420 PDR GA999 EMVJOAT 99900251 PDR
ORGANIZATION:
JOSEPH OAT CORPORATION CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY REPORT INSPECilON NO.-
99900251/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 4 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
None C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Violation (81-02):
The inspector verified that Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 has been posted on the employee bulletin boards in the production shop.
2.
(Closed) Nonconformance A.1 (81-02):
Review of weld and heat record for Job 2349-M verified that the record was corrected by QC after per-formance of a review of weld withdrawal slips which identified the weld seam number, weld procedure, welder, and weld electrode heat number.
Indoctrination and training record dated June 26, 1981, verified that the plant manager conducted a training session with all welding personnel relative to the recording of pertinent information for all weld seams.
3.
(Closed) Nonconformance A.2 (81-02):
Review of the weld and heat record sheets verified that the applicable information was recorded for tube to tube sheet welds identified on drawing 6125, Revision 3, and 6128, Revision 4 1
Joseph Oat Corporation (OAT) letter to their customer, dated August 28, 1982, requested that they file the identified filler metal records in the job pacakges for Job Nos. J-2339-A through M.
4.
(Closed) Nonconformance B (81-02):
Review of the interoffice memorandum i
verified that written instructions were issued to the storeroom l
personnel relative to the disposition of returned electrode.
l I
l
r ORGANIZATION:
JOSEPH OAT CORPORATION CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY REPORI INdetu t tuf4 NO.-
99900251/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 4 5.
(Closed) Nonconformance C (81-02):
The welder training session held on June 26, 1981, instructed the welders on the need for record accuracy.
The QC daily inspection record verified conformance with the requirements.
6.
(Closed) Nonconformance D.1 (81-02):
Operation No. 4 on Master Traveler for Job No. 2441-2 has been revised to include the partition plate (longitudinal baffle) to shell welds as detailed on drawings D-7015-5 and D-7014-2.
7.
(Closed) Nanconformance 0.2 (81-02):
Review of the weld heat record sheets for Job No. 2441-2A and B verified the records have been revised to include the applicable information for weld No. 146.
8.
(Closed) Nonconformance E (81-02):
Review of the applicable weld procedure (WPS-22, Rev. 12) verified that backgouging and grinding the backside of the weld to sound metal to remove the tack welds is required.
The review of three travelers verified the removal operation had been performed, inspected, and approved.
Review of four fitter welder records verified they are qualified per ASME Code Section IX.
9.
(Closed) Nonconformance F (81-02):
Review of drawing D-7015, Rev. 5, and D-7013 travelers for Job 2441-2B, and weld and heat record for this jcb verified that the drawing had been revised to identify the weld and that the appropriate activity has been accomplished and information documented.
10.
(Closed) Nonconformance G (81-02):
The inspector verified that the discrepancy in test results of the 7018 electrode used on Job 2335 for the nozzle welds in three Reaction Products Separation Tanks (RPS) for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP) was transmitted to the customer (General Electric Company (GE)) in the Vendor Case Record VCR-J-2335-44.
GE acceptance of the deficiency was verified in their i
letter XL-590-10487 which stated GE has also reviewed the stress in the nozzle where the weld wire was used and found that the weld is lightly loaded, and it is GE's conclusion that the test discrepancy in weld wire has no adverse effect on the safety or function of the tanks.
I I
L
ORGANIZATION:
JOSEPH OAT CORPORATION CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY KtPORI ihd F tb i luit NO.:
99900251/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 4 11.
(Closed) Nonconformance H (81-02):
Review of the OAT forming quali-fication procedure, five laboratory reports representing at least three heats of material for the RPS tanks at CRBRP project and GE's letter SL-590-10487 verified acceptance of Oat forming procedure.
Dat did not attempt to universally qualify the tank material but rgther qualified the forming procedure at the specified temperature of 10 F.
PERSONS CONTACTED Company $5dPH 0Af D7tP-Dates 3/g, i2 /9 s Docket / Report No.91r /037,'f/ /FZ-o/
Inspector %s s & /3r2 caci 3 //
c Data Sheet Page /
of 3 NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print) f]), SGA/CC6RY G u Atirt/ D>d M20t A/G2, J 0 AT
/
&, WAPC A /
(yt=A/tj15AL //$4 446 2)2 3 O/J r-
/
e w
\\
jlz/
)e eo r
l e
b n z.
b a
9 P 3-m c
u i
7 c.
N l
ttp oof 4
mnnp NN o eeea t mm tt I uuf er2 ccI k o l oo(
cp ADD
/
/
i n
o e' e t
/
fis /w DR tffo E'r g
nooi a
e s
P 4
M
/e-ueei 3
sqpt v t
neyae Y
mSTDR e
9 u
e h
l e;
o S
t C1234 n
e a
t u w a
z M m D
/
G
'7s &
A 9' s
/c 9 d
. d W a
/
c s
M
=c e
C o
t 3
r a
s i
wM 2-e
=&
2' s
7 3
2 'n u 2[
s D 7 F
a E
6 n
D.
7,.
s o
R 2 o
- m a
i, s
s R 5 o
P o
2 J-4 m
A r
i
/
A a C
4
/
r
(
k 6
).
w D
i 7
~
'C ~7~
o A
M a
E N
T
)
s I
s d
I C
s a
c
/
I o
f 2
G r
l' 7- /
r
/
G a
M E
f m
i A
J S
G e-
'n
=
3 &
s e
r X
B G
M D
/c.
~
/
/
4 A
E U
/
e x
o
/
t S
c>
rf a Y r o e g-$
z Y 9
L c
2 6G S
/
T E
/
l 2
p 7 k't c
/ c 6
r N
L i
7 t
R h
E T
r E (
s e
t
)
s i
M I
h.
u v
'C S
h y-y a
o
~o
'l S M t-U T
r
'2 A A C
C s
c
)-
i a T
/
a O
D V
s
/
/
T r
J z C o s
D k-r-
a D
S O
A r
r.
e 6
a t
4r c
o s 1
i c
E e
l o
i c
W G c C o r e.
r> Z. o.
n
~4 u m
c.
n 's o.
b c.
c f
'c.
b d
2 s
/
e c
)Gds e
O e /s
. f S
l o
i 1
t.
i t,
rE 6
f 7
f
~
"7 A 7
- c. C a s
y d
A Z
/.
?u o
ro f
f(f.
/
7 M.
~
7 a d C (
N 4
S.
T. r em i
~
l de c
s
~
E J
/
u c.
6 z
/ s 8 r
e G
x d
rM e
ss 9
~
7 G
e, O
p s Y M P
l c
A A
a/
Y 'w, S m W E
/e e-l S
a
??
r t
sa
(
4
/
s O
t lt M
~o *r 6- /
anr MY
/
t b ll d t
v i
h rer a 4
~E b t
r D
r c.
t-cet e o
a f.
/- ? W A v unet us rtth 4
n 7~
i O
t-(
u N M D
c.
G n P
n D G =d 1
/
PILO 7
7 P
D a
n 1
S
- &- s D z
e D
2 C.
r c.
3 2 "
l-L Y
e 3
r /,
Y 'wllOD~Y %
2 f.
A A
7
(/
b
{2
- d Y '/ g t
5678 9 /'t 3 r
s
/
k U 5
^
/
r*y 3,
o a i
l e
~/
r s
no L.
a i
n s
t 7
W yV s
s Y 2' V e
ael W 6' 5 p
cra
/
T C
9 8 s
'7 s
/
2 7
y gi uu Tnfd n b5/
iiea e /,
t wccM naeo l
erprA
/< f&j u
mDSPQ
)/
l z & '1 b-G.
- 1. f l
r d
9 3
u lZ c
/
/
y 2
o o
l
/
c t
M o.
c
/
1 D1 234 e
e p
p s
o n
c' I
S L
- nspector Ass L[ f3gms2
' ~
Docket No.c7 h zs
~
Report No. 22. -o f
- cope / Module 3 r e u p. & Scusa a 3 9,gg Syggg pggg z' og gg_
DOCUMENTS EXAMINED
/ntspea r r-a serirr c ear c. S.
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/W Ts' lhn D oit C. Ass 7Zscope.c>
//C 72
~G-2 '33 s - t,/c/
/9 7
C7salesent-6 ~c.d e rx rc. G o (GE L.ffrs g X l. - $% -t o'lB 7 ao 3
onr 6 m,,,c o u a<., m a,, w Auc.snu a
- z/79 y
sj 2'
S'L. 4 is 72a t ciz. V 7MPoe:r-o,c / m t2a c. 7 T&s ra fo x.
S sa - S 35 G7:$ps A C.< ass I /H&r drzin< - / dss r-Ac.
)
92 s'9{.,
'-/ 5 - 53 ca z /, '722 sc7 - 4 3 - Cac.3o c, efps sc - <JB -o c,sa s, r
l
'i2P EG c.o</799', no. 2 gWE f.a 6 5-4 %
I l
- r i
I f
t~.
i Document Types:
Columns:
I 1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document.
3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
-