ML20052E482
| ML20052E482 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 04/21/1982 |
| From: | Seidle W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20052E478 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-482-81-10, NUDOCS 8205110146 | |
| Download: ML20052E482 (1) | |
Text
-
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Kansas Gas and Electric Company Docket No. STN 50-482 Wolf Creek, Unit 1 As a result of the investigation conducted at the Wolf Creek, Unit 1, site in Burlington, Kansas, on May 5-6, May 11-14, June 17-18, and August 31, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violation was identified:
Failure to Maintain Sufficient Records Relative to Installation of Safety-Related HVAC Hangers 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion X states, in part, "A program for inspection of activities affecting quality shall be established and executed by or for the organization performing the activity to verify conformance with the documented instructions, procedures, and drawings for accomplishing the activity."
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII states, in part, " Sufficient records shall be maintained to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality."
Contrary to the above, the record shown below was identified that did not furnish evidence of activities affecting quality in that it was, in part, a falsified document, and no QC inspection was conducted.
Weld Control Record Supplement Sheet No. H-10C, traveler for safety-related HVAC Hanger No. R3349, did not furnish evidence of activity affecting quality in that there was:
I 1.
nonexistence of a valid traveler 2.
no record of actual QC inspection of safety-related hanger No. R3349 This is a Severity Level IV violation.
(Supplement II-D)
Pursuanttotheprovisionsof10CFR2.2bl,KansasGasandElectricCompany is hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) the corrective steps which will be taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as ammended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
Dated:
April 21, 1982 N/
W. C. Seidle, Chief Reactor Project Branch 2 8205110146 820421 PDR ADOCK 05000482 G
PDR c
l m
--n-psm p--
w
-,y e,,
_