ML20052D637

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Pertaining to Concern of Training, Research & Test Reactor Community About NRC Proposed Amends to Physical Security Requirements for Nonpower Reactor Licensees
ML20052D637
Person / Time
Site: Texas A&M University, 05000128
Issue date: 04/16/1982
From: Palladino N
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Randall J
TEXAS A&M UNIV., COLLEGE STATION, TX
Shared Package
ML20042C673 List:
References
NUDOCS 8205070029
Download: ML20052D637 (2)


Text

wny1% >.7

./

e UI641E3 51 ATIs NUCLE AR REOULATORY COMMIS$10N o

t was.gissG70*s D C 70655 April 16, 19E' wm e'

Or. John D. Randall, Chairman

' Organization of Training, Research

'and Test Reactors Tenac Engineering [xperiment Station Teams ARM University

-Os11ege Station, Teras 77843 i

Cear Dr. Randall:

Th nk you for your letter of February 8 pertaining to the ccnc.4 training, research and test reactor comunity abcut the NRC's r'ce.'^

agendments to the physical security requirements for nongower r4 n ' u-IlCensees.

As stated in the Federal Register notice of proposed rulemaliru E'. ' fr M333), the inten't of the proposed amendments to the regulation it t require measures to be taken by nonpower reactor licensees tha' <

't provide a level of protection for formula quantities of strate,-

special nucle'r material (SSNM) comparable to that provided fo' the k material at fust cycle facilities.

In addit ion, the proposed a-("e are intended to recognize a number of features of nonpower react."

facilities that map offer inherent protection of SSN'i ag5irst ina

Our basic aim here is to achieve our safeguards objective and r tne same time, insof ar as practicable, allow maximum operational f lemib I

  • s.

In view of your organization's concern that the proposed rule :ra, in your programs without comensurate safeguards benefits, I havt c irec t e

. the staf f, in its preparation of the final rule to give spec i' u atte' to your cossments.

1.

'The Executive Director for Operations has asked John Davis, tt-Du ec*

of' the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards (NM55), u he.

lthe staff meet with your group and other interested persons.

Ne t9 would be in May and would af ford the staf f an opportunity to ar;;re a

Yuller understanding cf specific concerns and corrents and tc d ? sc m '

' concrete suggestions on alternative approaches to achieve f6 '

ebjective while allowing maximum flexibility f or operatars.

f, <,.r..

leformation that may arise in such a meet irx; caid be Dublic i, to the estent that this information is not protected.

4 s.'o'o 7 820alo PDa m 05000059 w

o Dr. John D. Eencall, Chairman l

The staf f 's proposed final rule is not sc hect. W t c t;.

,o Couri',5 son unt i ? late 198.5 hope that f ur t hre c..

,t r n Staff are useful in developinc, a pr oposed f in i! ru !c N ;c adequate safeguards protect ion with operat ion i' f t,..t.il i -

't eschenging views with the staf f, ycur group still as s tres e with the Comission, a pubile meeting could tar ar anae,: it

..o eutstending issues, Sincerely,

'3f)

JA

/ (dLP W f 8kh (t. t 1' Nunzio Pal adino i

4 e

4 e

e 4

t

.