|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20069L2091983-04-22022 April 1983 Supplemental Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069L1991983-04-22022 April 1983 Interrogatories & Document Request.Related Correspondence ML20071D2941983-03-0303 March 1983 Supplemental Response to 820621 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2,transmitting Form for Recording Continuous Type Releases.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083Q3931983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry on Licensee Controlled Land to Observe 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Control Rooms & near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20065C2111983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry Upon Land Controlled by Licensees & to Allow Observance of 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Both Units 2 & 3 Control Rooms & from near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20028C8671983-01-0707 January 1983 Response to Licensee 821203 Ltr Requesting Supplemental Responses to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20064C4481982-12-30030 December 1982 Suppl to Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20070L5471982-12-24024 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Under Commission Question 1 ML20070L5491982-12-22022 December 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Under Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20070F7581982-12-17017 December 1982 Supplementation of Interrogatory Response,Naming Question 1 Witnesses.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069Q5231982-12-0707 December 1982 Supplemental Response to Interrogatories on Commission Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069P7641982-12-0606 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20067B1761982-12-0303 December 1982 Response to 820716 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20067B2391982-12-0202 December 1982 Response to Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Related Correspondence ML20028B2981982-11-24024 November 1982 Replies to 820718 Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20028B4011982-11-22022 November 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20066J2611982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to Interrogatories & Document Requests on Commission Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20066J0411982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028A0491982-11-0303 November 1982 Response to 820526 Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Question 6.Interrogatories Received on 821015 ML20058D5921982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058G5211982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to Final Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5681982-07-21021 July 1982 Response to 8206221 Interrogatories,Objecting to Interrogatories 1-11 as Irrelevant,Beyond Scope of Permissible Discovery & Beyond Scope of Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5791982-07-20020 July 1982 Response to Second Round of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055B8621982-07-19019 July 1982 Interrogatory on Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069C8621982-07-19019 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on Board Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20055A9981982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055A9961982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20055A9901982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Question 1 ML20063E4491982-07-0707 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories on Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5771982-07-0202 July 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories on Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L7991982-07-0101 July 1982 Addl Response to Interrogatories Under Commission Questions 3 & 4 Per ASLB 820625 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5201982-07-0101 July 1982 Supplemental Response to Licensee 820503 Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054M1791982-06-30030 June 1982 Reply to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5501982-06-30030 June 1982 Supplementary Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J9301982-06-25025 June 1982 Final Response to Util Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J5871982-06-25025 June 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H8901982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20054H8941982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J1221982-06-22022 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Requests for Admissions.Details Surrounding TMI-2 Accident Would Require Burdensome & Oppressive Research.Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J1471982-06-21021 June 1982 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2.Related Correspondence ML20054H5661982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H5411982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H5301982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H2601982-06-17017 June 1982 Reply to NRC 820526 Interrogatories ML20054F9801982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re ASLB Contention 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H6081982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 6 ML20054H2631982-06-16016 June 1982 Reply to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories,Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H5811982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to West Branch Conservation Assoc Supplementary Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20054H5881982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Supplementary Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054F6251982-06-14014 June 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl 1983-04-22
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARJPN-99-029, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20212E4181999-09-15015 September 1999 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting OL for Unit 2 Be Modified or Suspended to Prevent Restart Until Reasonable Assurance That Licensee in Substantial Compliance with Terms of OL & Has Proper Consideration for Public Health & Safety JPN-99-022, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds1999-06-22022 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds ML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20198E9721998-12-21021 December 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities. Orders That Wh Clark Prohibited for 1 Yr from Engaging in NRC-Licensed Activities JPN-98-052, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects1998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects ML20198L2731998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting NEI Re Proposed Rules 10CFR50, 52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments JPN-98-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal ML20155F4561998-08-26026 August 1998 Demand for Info Re False Info Allegedly Provided by Wh Clark to Two NRC Licensees.Nrc Considering Whether Individual Should Be Prohibited from Working in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 JPN-97-037, Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated1997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated ML20148M6471997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Porposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems ML20133N0511997-01-0505 January 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Resturcturing & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20149M4621996-12-0909 December 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Utility Industry ML20077G3481994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Nuclear Power License Renewal ML20070P0561994-04-19019 April 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NRC Draft Policy Statement on Use of Decommissioning Trust Funds Before Decommissioning Plan Approval ML20029C5771994-03-11011 March 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Draft Rule on Decommissioning.Informs That 15 Mrem/Yr Unreasonably Low Fraction of Icrp,Ncrp & Regulatory Public Dose Limit of 100 Mrem/Yr ML20059C3031993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Definition of Commercial Grade Item ML20045H8751993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule ML20045F2451993-06-28028 June 1993 Comment on Proposal Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning NRC-licensed Facilities.Opposes Proposed Criteria ML20044F5681993-05-20020 May 1993 Comment on Draft Commercial Grade Dedication Insp Procedure 38703,entitled Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. Endorses NUMARC Comments Dtd 930517 JPN-02-034, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl JPN-91-021, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants1991-05-13013 May 1991 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants JPN-91-005, Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended1991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended ML20066G4411991-01-23023 January 1991 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Substantive Typo in 901015 Filing on Behalf of Licensee Noted ML20058G6341990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program JPN-90-068, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS1990-10-22022 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS JPN-90-067, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20065H7541990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 on Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Commission Assessment of Four Alternatives Should Be Expanded to Include Not Only Safety Considerations But Other Atomic Energy Act Objectives JPN-90-052, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR1990-07-0909 July 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR JPN-90-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary1990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary ML20012C6491990-03-0909 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events. Any Utilization of NRC Proposed Application of Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2,would Be Inappropriate W/O re-evaluation by NRC ML20005F6521989-12-13013 December 1989 Comment on Proposed Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Concurs w/industry-wide Position Presented by NUMARC & Offers Addl Comments ML20246P6061989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Significant & Independent Industry Efforts Already Underway to Address Issue ML20245K1941989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V9011989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Supports NUMARC Position.Proposed Rule Will Hinder Important Initiatives to Improve Maint JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20205L8521988-10-21021 October 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Cleaning or Disposing of Nuclear Waste.Incineration of Radwaste Oil Should Not Be Allowed JPN-88-015, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site1988-04-18018 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site JPN-88-002, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed1988-01-25025 January 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed JPN-87-062, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex1987-12-31031 December 1987 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex JPN-87-053, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection1987-10-15015 October 1987 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection JPN-87-051, Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl1987-09-28028 September 1987 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl ML20235Y9911987-07-20020 July 1987 Notice of Issuance of Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 Re Emergency Planning for School Children in Vicinity of Indian Point.* Request to Suspend OLs Denied ML20151C5061987-02-18018 February 1987 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning ML20093H6421984-10-15015 October 1984 Comments on Staff Presentation at Commission 841002 Meeting. Commission Should Conclude Proceedings Due to Inescapable Conclusion That Facility Safe to Operate & Poses No Undue Risk to Public.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098D2721984-09-26026 September 1984 Comments on Commission 840905 Meeting Re Facilities,Per Sj Chilk 840911 Memo.Licensee Agrees W/Staff That Further Mitigative Features or Plant Shutdown Unnecessary Due to Low Risk.Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
-
. RELATED CORRESPO.VDN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA E3fE3E ,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 82 GY -5 N1:t6 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD __
In the Matter of )
)
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK) Docket Nos. 50-247 SP (IndianPointUnit2) ) 50-286 SP POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (Indian Point Unit 3) )
PARENTS CONCERNED ABOUT INDIAN FOINT'S FIRS? SET OF REU PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND INTERROGATORIES Pursuant to the rules of the Atomic Sefety and Licensing Board of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, please respond to the reonest ,
for production of documents and the interrogatories by May 31, 1982. .
Recuest
- 1. for Production of Documents to con Edison /PASNY Please make available each draft of the evacuation clan trior to the present plan and all documents used to draw it up at the home ofNew on-Hudson, KathyYorkToscani 10520 at 15 Finev Point Avenue, Croton-on May 13, 1982, 9 a.m.
Interrogatories to be Answered by Con Edison /PASNY $
g
- 1. e Submit stntistics cnd procedures used to determine the number of i people to be efacuated by bus within the 10 mile EPZ.
Identify each bus company and the number of buses available to- 6 participate in an evacuation of school children and trans-portation-dependent 8
5 children and adults in the 10 mile EPZ. ]
3 2 How did you determine how long it would take for buses to j evacuate school children portation-dependent and then return to evacuate the trans-population? s E
g=
- 4. 55 Submit will contracts guarantee the between bus drivers and bus comnanies which U p nuclear emergency. particination of bus crivers in case of a =
5.
g
==
Submit contreets between the bus companies and the utilities E in case county and/or to ensure of a nuclear the particitation of the bus companies emergency. @
2I
- =L 1 E 8205060372 820502 55 PDR ADOCK 05000247 5:
O PDR =:g
Pag,3 2 Request for Production of Documents and Interrogatories by Parents Concerned About Indian Point May 3, 1982 6.
Identify bus drivers who live within the 10 mile EPZ and who have contracted to drive buses in case of an emergency. Inclub their addresses.
- 7. Identify all bus drivers whollive outside the 10 mile EPZ who
'have contracted to drive buses in case of an emergency. Include their addresses.
- 8. What procedures have been taken to insure that bus drivers living outside the 10 mile EPZ will be allowed inside the 10 mile EPZ?'
- 9. ?ihat procedures have been taken to insure that bus drivers can be activated during an evacuation?
10.
What procedures have been taken to insure that all buses are maintained and available 100% of the time?
11.
Have con Edison after school while/EASNY identifiedwork?
their parents children who are home alone (a) if so, describe the procedure by which such children have been identified and the number and ages of such ' children in the 10 mile EPZ.
(b) if not, set forth any procedures which will be used to identify and safely evacuate these children should evacuation become necessary.
- 12. Submit all studies, research, exnert testimony, etc. which shows thatcapability cal children under 18 have to evacuate the mental, emotional and psychologi-themselves.
13 Has Con Edison /PASNY identified those children home unsupervised g after school who are handicapped? If so, submit such statistics.
- 14. Has Con Edison /PASNY identified the number of children in g various programsT c,upervised after school athletic, religious nnd culturd .
(a) if so, state the programs and number of children enrolled d in each. h (b) state the responsibility of the nault in charge of each =
program programs.
in terms of evacuating the children in their (c) stateinstructed.
the method by which these persons have been identified =
and E (d) have these adults and/or organizations submitted their q plans for the evacuation of their children?' h)
E b
=
Idi un m:r e' O t_
~
Pa&Q 3 3R:ou;st for Production of D'oeuments and Interrogatorics by Parcnts Conecrnca About Indian Point May 3, 1982 15 Submit any studies and/or partinent research which nas used to determine that the format of the cmergency planning booklet and the information given is sufficient to prepare the unblic for an evacuation.
16.
- 16. Submit any studies which were used to determine whether the general public has the literacy level and map skills necessary to read the directions, follow the directions and read the maps in the emergency planning booklet.
17~. . What mailing list (s) was used to identify who would receive the emergency planning booklets?
- 18. What procedures have been set up to ensure that newconers receive emergency planning booklets?
- 19. . Describe procedures and submit statistics used to identify and give emergency planning information to illerate adults and non-
'20. Identify physically disabled persons who are to receive suecial provisions as per page 8 in the emergency planning booklet.
- 21. Submit evidence that the emergency planning booklet has been received, read and understood by every person in the 10 mile EPZ.
- 22. Why was a three day figure suggested in the emergency n1anning booklet to plan for in case of a urolonged radiation release?
How was this figure arrived at?
23 Identify all people who particiuated in responding to each interrogatory by name, title and business address.
- 24. Identify any documents utilized in answering interrogatories by title, date author and recipient.
25 What are your procedures for informing reception centers, school reception centers and congregate care centers as to their role and responsibility during an evacuation?
- 26. What is your procedure for an on-going evaluation of the status of the reception centers, school reception centers, and con-gregate care centers?
27 What are your procedures for informing new personnel at receution centers, school reception centers and congregate care centers as to their role and responsibility during an evacuation?
4 e
rud>7J .
H quest for,pr: duction of Documsnto and Interrogatoriec by par:nts Conecrned about Indian point M y 3,1982
- 28. What are your procedures for informing the Red Croos as to its role and responsibility during an evacuation?
29 What are your procedures for determining whether Red Cross ' ,
personnel are adequately trained in decontamination urocedures? l
- 30. Submii3our procedures for determining whether Red Cross personnel are adeauately trained to recognize and treat radiation sickness.
- 31. Submit evidence that reception centers have decontamination eauip-ment.
- 32. Submit evidence that you will have on-going evaluations of decon-tamination equipment.
33 Describe procedures used to determine whether sunplies for a prolonged stay are at the congregate care centers' or not.
If not, why do you feel these supplies are unnecessary?
34 Identify procedures used to determine how many Red Cross personnel would be necessary to accomodate the number of evacuees.
35 What were your procedures for determining how many evncuees would need the services of the congregate core center?'
- 36. What is your program for informing new bus drivers as to the location and routes to schools to be evacuated, school recention centers and congregate care centers?
- 37. What were your trocedures for determing whether school reception centers con evacuate their population in sufficient time to allow evacuees to enter?
- 38. Have you identified the short-term effects of radiation poisioning?
If so, what are these effects?
39 Have you identified radiation disaster training for the teachers who are chcrged with the care of school children in the school?
On the buses? At the host centers?
- 40. Have manuals been devised to inform and train teachers in deeling with the physiological symptoms of radiation voisoning?
- 41. Have manuals been devised to inform and train teachers how to deal with the psychological problems of children under extremely stressful situations?
- 42. Have you identified how children react in stressful situations?
Show evidence of that and how adults, esnecially teachers, react in stressful situations.
+- ;- - =- r> y
' .l f . ._ f f .&^ -.I 3__f I . l l- l .
3 2-
" i-. ~
i {-
" =#'
~
g 9
. a-*
.._*-Q ,
+
~~ - .
pag 3 5 . ..
, Rcquast for,yroduction of Documents and Interrogatorios
. by parents Concerned About Indian point May 3, 1982
- 43. Submit contracts between yourselves and the teachers within the 10 mile EPZ obliging them to accompany the evacuating children-on the school buses.and to stay with the children once at the host centers.
- 44. Submit evidence that you have made supplies available to the teachers for administering radiation disaster treatment.
- 45. Have you any evidence detailing the ability of teachers to administer radiation disaster treatment if they themselves are suff.ering from radiation poisoning.
- 46. Have you identified any information proving distressed and dis-tracted teachers' abilities to care for their school children,
- when their own children are in serious danger at a different location within the 10 mile EPZ?
Interrogatories to be Answered by Westchester County
- 1. Identify and submit names and addresses of family dqf care homes in the Westchester County section of the EPZ.
- 2. How many children are in family day care in the Westchester County section of the EPZ.
4 Res tfully ,yubmitted, 0
fahy/h'oscaniM4tlQg[
P. O. Box 125 Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y. 10520 Service List attached 1
r 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ~~~ !E C ~'
AR EU "#0 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING tr:
Ii?. ; - -
In the Matter of )
)
CONSOLIDATED EDIS0N COMPANY OF NEW YORK ) Docket Nos. 50-247 SP (Indian Point Unit 2) 50-286 SP POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK )
. (Indian Point Unit 3) )
- 1. Dated: May 3, 1982
- 2. Heading: Certificate of Service 3.
Introduction:
I hereby certify that copies of PARENTS CONCERNED ABOUT INDIAN POINT'S FIR 3T SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND INTERROGATORIES have been served on the following by denosit ;
in the United States mail, first class, this 3rd day of May,1982.
Louis J. Carter, Esq., Chairman Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Vlashington, D. C. 20555 Mr. Frederick J. Shon Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Brent L. Brandenburg, Esq.
Assistant General Counsel l Consolidated Edison Co. of New York Inc.
4 Irving Place New York, N.Y. 10003
_, . 4 Q. .
y .. . , . : c. ,y . _, ; ;
- . Q
- . , . - -
- ~> . , K . . f ., ' :k- 47 7.. f .C:? . :~ ~,2 -O.7 l- 2.% 4-:; ': = : . - -
L -L u E n v: &: ;b% p Gi = . M[u&;% = ~ & "f::.~ . < ^z&%;c:? : : p kg;2[
Pag 2 d;rtificatoofScuvicelisth o . .- ,
Paul P. Calarulli, Esq .
Joseph J. Lefin, Jr., Esq.
Pamela S. Horowitz, Esq.
Charles Morgan, Jr., Esq.
Morgan Associates, Chartered 1899 L Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036 Charles M. Pratt, Esq.
Thomas R. Frey, Esq. -
Power Authority of the State of New York 10 Columbus Circle New York, N.Y. 10019 Ellyn R. Weis, Esq. ,
William S. Jordan, III, Esq.
Harmon & Yteiss 1725 I Street, N.W., Suite 506 Washington, DC 20006 Joan Holt, Project Director Indian Point Project New York Public Interest Research Group 5 Beekman St. '
New York, N.Y. 10038 Charles A. Scheiner, Co-Chairperson Westchester People's Action Coalition, Inc.
P. O. Box 488 White Plains, N.Y. 10602 Alan Latman, Esq.
44 Sunset Drive Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y. 10520 Lorna Salzman Mid-Atlantic Representative Friends of the Earth, Inc.
208 #est 13th Street New York, N.Y. 10011 Zipporah S. Pleisher West Branch Conservation Association 443 Buena Vista Road New City, N.Y. 10956 Docketing and Service Section office of the Secretary U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20535 Mayor George V. Begany Village d Buchanan 236 Tate Avenue .
Buchanan, N.Y. 10511 3 .y ,+ s o
paga 3 dortificatoof Sarvico Lioti
- I Judith Kccs1cr, Coordinator Rockland Citizens for Safe Energy 300 New Hempstead Rodd New City, N.Y.10956 Jonathan L. Levine, Esq.
Rockland Citisens for Safe Energy P. O. Box 74 New City, N.Y.10956 Marc L. Parris, Esq.
County Attorney .
County of Rockland 11 New Hempstead Road New City, N.Y.10956 i e
Geoffrey Cobb Ryan B Conservation Committee Chairman, Director g New York City Audubon Society 3 j
71 West 23rd St., suite 1828 New York, N.Y.10010 3 i
Greater New York Council on Energy c/o Dean R. Corren, Director Fe New York University $
26 Stuyvesant Street 8 New York, N.Y.10003 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Penel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 'T
.7ashington, D. C. 20555 d
==
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel C U1 S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission E Washington, D. C. 20555 15
!!E
~
tw Honorable Richard L. Brodsky 5 Member of the County Legislature y W0stchester County 5;g County Office Building $
White Plains, N. Y. 10601
John Gilroy, .Vestchester Coordinator :=:S Indian Point Pro ject ii N:w York Public Interest Research Group @
gg 240 Central Avenue =$
White Plains, N.Y. 10606 "
_3
.===
Jeffrey M. Blum, Esq.
N;w York University Law School F.:==-
ME 423 Vanderbuilt Hall 5, 40 Washington Square South !E N;w York, N.Y.10012 E5%
!22 55it li!!E kh
. , PGg 4 d:rtificato of Scrvico Listi
. Charloo J. Maikish, Esq.
Litigation Division The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey One World Trade Center New York, N.Y. 10048 .
David H. Pikus, Esq.
Richard F. Czaja, Esq.
330 Eadison Avenue New York, N.Y. 10017 E=r.a I. Bialik, Esq.
Steve Leipsiz, Esa.
Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Attorney General's Office Two World Trade Center New York, N.Y. 10047 Alfred B. Del Bello
'Vestchester ' County Executive Westchester County 148 Eartine Avenue White Plains, N.Y. 10601 Stanley B. Klimberg -
General Counsel New York State Energy Office 2 Rockefeller State Plaza
. Albany, N.Y. 12223 Honorable Ruth Messinger Member of the Council of the City of New York '
District #4 City Hall New York, N.Y. 10007 Janice Moore, Eso.
Counsel for NRC Staff Office of the Executive Legal Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
?Inshington, D. C. 20555 Andrew S. Roffe, Esc..
New York State Aseembly Albany, N.Y. 12248 Ms. Amanda Potterfield, Esq.
P. O. Box 384 Village Station .
New York, N.Y. 10014 Margaret Oppel, Esq.
Larens R. Schwartz, Esq.
Paul Chessin, Esq.
Renee Schwartz Esa.
Botein, Hays, Sklar & Herzberg 200 Park Avenue New York, N.Y. 10166