ML20052B630
| ML20052B630 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/05/1982 |
| From: | Barnes I, Sutton J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20052B619 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900717 NUDOCS 8205030388 | |
| Download: ML20052B630 (8) | |
Text
.
ORGANIZATION:
SQUARE D COMPANY CONTROL GROUP RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.:
99900717/82-01 DATE(S) 3/8-12/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 28 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Square D Company Control Group ATTN:
Mr. D. J. Beck, Plant Manager l
P. O. Box 27446 I
Raleigh, NC 27611 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT:
Mr. W. J. Fightmaster, QA Manager TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(919) 266-3671 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Class 1E starters and contractors.
NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Commercial Nuclear Production of Square D Company, l
Control Group, Raleigh, North Carolina, totals less than 1% of total company production.
Two nuclear contracts are presently in-house for future production.
t l
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR: hW u,h 4-1.-82 J.V W. Sutton, Reactive & Component Programs Section Date (R& CPS)
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
/m APPROVED BY:
J 4+e
- i. - s - e 2.-.
I. Barnes, Chief, R& CPS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
B.
SCOPE:
Follow up previous inspection findings, nonconformance/ corrective action, audits and review of vendor activities.
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
Not identified.
820503o388
ORGANIZATION:
SQUARE D COMPANY CONTROL GROUP RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA REPORT IN5etL110N NO.:
99900717/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 4 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
None C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Deviation A.1&2 (Report 80-01):
Setup and Run Sample Inspection Sheet not completed as required.
Run checks not conducted or required.
The inspector reviewed the corrective action taken by Square D Company to prevent recurrence.
Thirteen shop Setup Sheets completed since issuance of an instruction letter dated June 25, 1980, were reviewed for compliance.
As a result of the review, the inspector determined that inspectors are complying with the inspection procedure and signing the Setup Sheets as required by QA instructions and a Square D letter of June 25, 1980.
2.
(Closed) Deviation B.1&2 (Report 80-01):
Name of issuing engineer not shown in the deviation stamp for extension of a drawing deviation.
The inspector reviewed the corrective action and preventive measures taken by Square O Company to prevent recurrence of this item.
The inspector checked five drawings with current deviations to deter-mine that the engineer is signing the deviated drawing.
In addition, QA audits of the deviation files have been performed for compliance to QA procedures / instructions.
As a result of the review of the above documents, the inspector has determined that drawings are being controlled as required by QA procedures.
3.
(Closed) Deviation C (Report 80-01):
Weekly Delinquent Reports did not include the number of problem reports initiated and resolved during the month, nor the number of problem reports pending.
e-ORGANIZATION:
SQUARE D COMPANY CONTROL GROUP RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA REPORT IN5PtLiiuf4 NO.:
99900717/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 4 l
d The inspector reviewed the revised Standard Practice Instruction (SPI) 655.1-M29 dated June 27, 1980, for revised changes.
In addition, the inspector reviewed six current delinquent Materials Reports to deter-mine if the revised instructions are being followed.
The inspector has determined that corrective action and preventive measures instructions are being implemented as required in the SPI.
4.
(Closed) Deviation D.1,2,3,4 (Report 80-01):
Failure to maintain identifying numbers, cards, recalibration schedules, and calibration stickers on equipment in the controlled Square D calibration system.
The inspector reviewed the corrective action / preventive measures taken by Square D Company to correct this item.
The following areas were checked for conformance.
Letter of June 23, 1980, to all tool and gage inspectors to maintain calibration control.
Review of the cardex system for control of calibration.
The inspector also exa-mined 6 gage control cards for compliance, and examined 10 tools, gages, and bench boxes for calibration stickers and calibration dates.
The inspector also reviewed all QA audits conducted for compliance to preventive action commitments.
As a result of the review of documentation, the inspector determined that activities relating to control of calibration of equipment now conform to QA manual and instruction requirements.
5.
(Closed) Deviation E (Report 80-01):
Basic Device Gaging Fixture and accompanying gage blocks not calibrated to provide assura.:ce that they were of the required accuracy and in acceptable operating condition.
The inspector reviewed the corrective action and preventive measures taken by Square D Company to determine if any other nonidentified gages were in the final inspection / acceptance areas.
The inspector conducted inspection of these areas and found that acceptance gages, tools, etc., had been calibrated and were being controlled.
The QA instructions were being complied with, as required.
6.
(Closed) Unresolved Item C.3.b (Report 80-01):
Manufacturing process control.
There is no requirement to maintain records of routing checks to ML-STD-105D.
The inspector reviewed five Routing Check Sheets to determine if records of routing checks are being completed as required by instructions.
As a result of this review, the inspector determined that QA instruc-tions are being followed as required.
l 1
ORGANIZATION:
SQUARE D COMPANY CONTROL GROUP RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900717/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 4 7.
(Closed) Unresolved Item D.3.b:
Procedure to control salvage activities not available.
The inspector reviewed minutes of weekly meetings held with the QA Manager, Plant Supervisor, General Supervisor of Areas, and General Supervisor Inspection, conducted to determine and follow up on identified salvageable materials that would be returned to stock.
Management has decided that a procedure to control this item is not necessary.
After review and discussion with Square D management personnel, the inspector concurred that the control of salvageable materials was being handled in an acceptable manner.
D.
OTHER FINDINGS:
1.
Nonconformance/ Corrective Action - The inspector reviewed Square D's QA Manual instructions 653-M-165, R655-E-132b-R655.1 and R655-E-126b covering control and disposition of nonconforming items. The inspector reviewed 6 nonconformances,10 Weekly Deficiencies Reports and 11 Quality Problem Reports and associated documentation for con-formance to QA/QC instructions.
The corrective action taken to prevent recurrence was examined for implementation.
Segregation areas designated for storage of nonconforming items were inspected.
Relative to the documents examined, the inspector determined that activities relating to the control and disposition,f nonconforming items complied with Square D's QA/QC program requirements.
2.
Audits - The inspector reviewed Square D's QA Manual, SPI-E-136b, Audits for Compliance to 10 CFR Part 50 Requirements.
Twenty com-pleted audits, corporate group audits, interoffice memos of QA activities and corrective action taken as a result of the audits conducted were reviewed for compliance to QA instructions.
As a result of the review, the inspector determined that the audit requirements, both corporate and plant, were being followed as required by QA instructions.
PERSONS CONTACTED Company Soca[D' h ou4 Dates 3 - A - / 2, - /f/ 2 U
V Docket / Report No. 7ffoo 7/7 //2-o /
Inspector T. u Jo 77o 4/
/
~
Page of i
NAME(Please Print)
TIT 1.E(Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print)
+ b. J.
S c cx PL s aT M s u m e r-Sa u em, ' D
Msn U
s w.J. F,9. to tmsla erno m,. o e, eiid J ilo.
So dAre
'b 4 een.
u v
a G. O Lor =cre a
%, /.< D, A Aud Porp [ N.
E ou s ce ^b ' Ombw -
u v
P. FI S % cl Pc, Jr com sor.
sau n "o' em w, LAr2oa
%. PnAud &<cma,
O '
n j
y n
i a
60an,%
O.uaDaL. Su, w l
^0' snedia-<,
E.
mp N
h
(
a
Docket flo.MSO 9/ 7
<inspectir I
fet M Report flo. P2 -o/
Scope / Modulo /* reg oJ1 [vcape[o U Page
/ of T
DOCUMENTS EXAMIllED ftAdwg t -
4 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
1.
')
& sass f;; W J S e } u j,,, Q, w [ A f j u }.
T% tr-Po
~
tu wec{u U S$o$4-R 3 0 79 8.
% tv-2 o L
s 3
3.
?
A/w St o M - o 33 - o r 16 8 -
L '718 - LI S~L,3 p M
V 3
' 3/ 0 4: z - 0 0 2. -r1 - 3 / o s s. o s v - o f t% T - 3 rot 2.. o n o r -c abh-Ot9-M f.u b 19 Jt,- f 2. % c.
It n r t - o0 2.
~
li L i - o I - %_3 O O _ ' 3 // o 2. - o f 3 -o r Als E.. - 310f6 - Oo V-o / 4 W91 L /-A / dh A) 3/ b W-o 30 -o / Ru / - 2 711 - X 2 -fw 6 3/ o t/ V -00 7 -o / O r, - 3 // JJ -o 2 3 o f & A - aj of-o g _ g / /H 3/ a10 - o /1 o f. O 6, 9-,-ro S
3 ryo-n-nt a L
3 GuD PJ.e a D eu.
1 I
brW 3 / n N h 9-A 3ie u -- o/ 2 - D s to c.3-oo2.
/
h n i nf r-OP O.
g g
M oi, F M w bh.
n v
T 3.
lo M C. / ~ M 2 9 7~
10 6
SiL W
&a~l.
"I nNW.
v e
y v
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Docunent 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) l
1nspector LO) ]ct N W.
Docket flo.ff)lw}/7 a
Report No. pg oj Scope /Moduleh.4 A [Krg.h Page _2. of _ 3 r
g DOCUMENTS EXAMINED 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
//.
?
ddA 8 /'
-/ M*
_6 - ZJO'2 -
1.k i
M ca.
MM.
- l. 2 2
[Lh' _
14 2.
&YM Gb /
W E 40.
E G y - C NL - Pauf. l-C_
2 9 y9). - C_32 2 7 - P 1yo 3-9 7 &tsj
_L_E L u i. - b o 7 9o v - t;.LJ - - P A6 6 3 - P R VG -d'l O VJ~
F1 c rr, e
K.
3
& 3A -tor D-L 4t w' b.
_g 8
.s4~hE_l, 53-M- /(d-G.
4
_Q&
%t now_4E-l2-P-22 Ii 4
CA t u ktu k R 62 - E_LLA _
tt-P-JP 0,
f
_NA thMlraJu tros-c !"? - @' PA y.
a-23-+o a~
19 4
'Lo E2d--to G.
C A h.f & m s,h i.
_}D 9
Elo K-E " /R in P S a W ex 0>t l M A fa d
_&t 4
Rd, a-d WA 0
hea,.
_Da V.
f& Rwd 400 - 31 $b 9 - 2cr>nu-oo3 - 30s.Lo-46/
310 3r~ OeE3, 21o it
,g y,3gop p oog _ gjogg_ css 9 c
3iI0% 'blX ~
31oy;~p2;- 3;o75 Ocj'),
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal tiemo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
1 J
i l
ll1
)
f e
f r
l
@jf e
b b
a m
c u
i N
l
~
tt p o
4 mnnp o
l eeea f
6 t mm t
I uuf e
ccI k
l oo(
b-v W
c ADD o
i n
D g
tff o a
F nooi Jp 7
P e
s
?
4 ueei 3
s q pt v ft c
neyae
-r mSTDR u
l
/
o C1234 S
O
^
2 o
O 1
~
6 Jt
/
- /7 N
D f-
_ oD Z
J
/
2 f D
y
/ }D d
~
E o3 N
T I
C
/_ 0 f
M E
A J
X B
3 f
&Lm E
U 7/
S S
/
D T
E
- V f
N L
o E
T
)
4 M
I o
y U
T r
D]
o C
a 3
O s
D s
/
(,
e I,
'l fy-m c
3 en
/
D A
f f
&7 i
c S' C
-y 4
ro f
3 t
M em i
_ 3 i
de c
1 1
rM e
m8 (1
- y 9
O p
n g
l S
u s
anr sa
(
a ts h rer
/
1-cet e
)
ri rtth 3&05 n
f 4
unet 9
0 0
n P
~
K
/
S 5678 1
G l 3
d l
~
n no u
i 8
s t
e ael v~
p cra i
f 2
E 8
) 2 Y y gi uu d
1 3 Tnfdn i iea t wccM e
naeo l
erprA u
mDSPQ r
d u
o o
c 1 3_ u
- f...k_ Q t
M o
o D1234 c
/
1 1
e e
p p
- s o
n c
'I S
4 o
II l
l l