ML20052A883

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Order Concluding That N Newmark Was Not Employed by Util on Plant Matters.Investigation Encl
ML20052A883
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 04/27/1982
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To:
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8204290317
Download: ML20052A883 (2)


Text

.

S

,.se.~

'82 IN 27 5:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION savtD APR27 J82 Y

COMMISSIONERS:

C' Nunzio J. Palladino, Chairman

'g oy

' Victor Gilinsky O

John F. Ahearne

['

S

,f

. [

,; ~

Thomas ti. Roberts n't.l)*

l n

)

U

~/

/2 /

In the Matter of

)

/

N

)

m v

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

)

Docket No J

/

(Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, )

Units 1 and 2)

ORDER Two attorneys in the Commission's Office of the General Counsel l

i conducted an inquiry into whether the late Dr. Nathan Newmark had been employed by Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) to work on matters relating to the Diablo Canyon facility.

In a January 27, 1982 report to the Commission, the attorneys indicated that they had found no indication that Dr. Newmark had been so employed.

The Commission sought the views of the parties on their report.

The only commenter, PG&E, stated that indeed it had never employed Dr. Newmark on Diablo Canyon l

matters.

50) l

} D l

8 2 0 4 29 D 31}

4 2

The Comission, after reviewing the material submitted to it, has concluded that Dr. Newmark was not employed by PG&E on Diablo Canyon matters and has concluded its investigation of the matter.

It is so ORDERED.*

For the Commission

(

y.b SAMUEL J.

CHILK 0 e necU

,9 Q,

Secretary of th( Comission 0

[

7.4

$ :r. ~ '..YL o

,vay o

%... A. b.+v n

T;p,. * '{t;(.} 'I

%k+4 Dated at Washington, D.C.,

this 27th day of April, 1982.

Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act, 42 U.S.C. 5841, provides that action of the Commission shall be determined by a

" majority vote of the members present." Comissioner Roberts was not present at the meeting at which this Order was aprpoved.

Had he been present he would have voted to issue this Order.

Accordingly, the formal vote of the Comission is 3-0.

m