ML20052A210

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Moves for Appeal of ASLB Order Denying Request to Shut Down Const of Facilities Pending Resolution of Generic Issue of Electromagnetic Pulse Effects on Nuclear Plants
ML20052A210
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 04/21/1982
From: Marshall W
MAPLETON INTERVENORS
To: Edles G, Johnson W, Kohl C
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
References
NUDOCS 8204280009
Download: ML20052A210 (2)


Text

.

. /

r Wcnd ll H. Marshall MAPLETON INTERVENCRS RFD 10 Midland, Michigan 48E40

'C 2 E.7'  ?' 51 April 21, 1982 Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission n- q)

Washington, DC 20555 g s

ATTN: Administrative Judgcs, y N Christine N. Kohl, Chairman - EgU,/Fgg Dr. W. Reed Johnson I: 4 !_

Gary J. Edles v' -

11 Re: The matter of Consumers Power Company g Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 U@

N Dockets #50-329 and #50-330 -

Dear Members of the Safety & Licensing Appeals Board:

Wendell H. Marshall, President of the Mapleton :ntervenors, is moving for leave to file an appeal in this case.

On December 16, 1981, Mr. Wendell H. Marshall, a party to the pending operating license proceedings of the Midland S : lear Plant, filed a letter with the Atomic Safety & Licensing Board to stop construction of the Midland Nuclear Power Plant, pending resolution of an unresolved generic safety issue concerning effects of Ele: ro Magnetic Pulse (EMP) on nuclear power plants.

On January 21, 1982 and February 23, 1982, the Mapleton Intervenors, through Mr. Marshall, provided more information on the Electro Magnetic Pulse effects on nuclear plants. In all of these letters and motions, the Mapleton Intervenors requested the Board t: halt construction of the Midland Nuclear Plant pending resolution of the serious EMP threat.

Further, on March 22 and 25, the Mapleton Intertenors, through Mr.

Marshall, reiterated previous requests to stop construction on the Midland Nuclear Facility.

Based on 10 C.F.R. Chapter 50-13, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board denied the request to stop further construction of the Midland Nuclear Plant, pending the resolution of the generic safety problems -

in this instance, Electro Magnetic Pulse.

820428oco9 s o 1

ca

~

Atomic Safety & Licensing App 2al Board Administrative Judges April 21, 1982 Page Two Notwithstanding 10 C.F.R. Chapter 50-13, the, Nuclear Regulatory Com-mission is the regulatory agency charged with public health and safety and the regulation of these plants and the NRC Staff and the NRC Commission, as always, has the statuatory responsibility to protect the public interest. Therefore, by this motion, the Mapleton Inter-venors appeal the EMP decision to your Board.

For the Mapleton Intervenors, JWh h

.n ell T. Mars

/f al , hresident cc: Charles Bechhoefer, Esq. Mr. Robert W. Huston Mr. Ralph S. Decker Dr. Charles H. Carson, PhD Dr. Frederick P. Cowan U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Jerry Harbour, Esq. Resident Inspectors Office Michael I. Miller, Esq. Ms. Barbara Stamiris Ronald G. Zamarin, Esq. Mr. Myron M. Cherry, Esq Alan S. Farnell, Esq. Mr. R. B. Borsum James E. Brunner, Esq. Mr. Don van Farrowe Ms. Mary Sinclair Mr. Walt Apley Stewart H. Freeman Mr. James G. Keppler Mr. Steve J. Gadler, P.E. P. McCallister, P.E.

Zane M. Goodwin, P.E. Frank J. Kelly Docketing & Service Section, Office of the Secretary WHM/nm