ML20050Z332

Forwards Public Version of Revised Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures,Including Revision 1 to Procedure EPIP 400-1 Re Technical Support.Receipt Form,Procedure History & Safety Evaluation Encl

ML20050Z332
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	03/26/1982
From:	Scott D COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20050Z257	List: ML20050Z212 ML20050Z332
References
81-264, NUDOCS 8204150213
Download: ML20050Z332 (4)

Text

O. Commonwealth Edison Droeden Nuctar' Power Stadon R.R. #1 Morris, Illinois 60450 Telephone 815/942-2920 Date Y 0 nD h A h,, l & Q

~-

g DJS LTR: 81-264 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cocruission Washington, D.C.

20555

Subject:

Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures for Dresden Station Units 1, 2, and 3; NRC Docket Nos. 50-10, 50-237, and 50-249

References:

(a) D. J. Scott letter to H. R. Denton, dated March 12, 1981 (b) Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Appendix E, Part V

Dear Mr. Denton:

Enclosed are ten (10) copies of revisions to Dresden Station Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.

No return of transmittals is necessary.

Sincerely, f

O D.

Scott Station Superintendent Dresden Nuclear Power Station

• DJS:TGB:mt Enclosures cc:

T. Blackmon File /NRC File / Numerical v od o

Bs, DO K O hoofo J

PDR l'

~~

DAP 9-2

.#... DRESDEN STATION PROCEDURE ROUTING Revision 11

~

~ PROCEDURES COORDINATOR NOTIFIED

/ d - /'/- P /

/

']

OATE Index Nu::ber -1 Unit

///4 Procedure EFI F

'/ o o - I Revision No.

/

Title L.,. m S o um c cu r.r4 I

Req'd. Compl. Date Record Retention Requirements:

Action Item No.

IA 1.

Is a Surveillance affected?

A/*

(Submit DAP 11-2 pgs. 5 or 6) uj4-2.

.Is a Station Record Type being -

Modification No.

established?

Draft Review:

a.

If "yes", specify record Deletion?

wS retention requirements.

Posted Procedure?

mn

^(as per Tech. Spec. Sec.

Posted Location? Ao 6.5, ANSI N45.2.9 App. A Typing Required?

/rs or DAP 2-3)

Index Change Requirect ws b.

If "yes", obtain record type number (see R3 Coordinator)

1. A-.../ [<e 4-

- ginator Ori O'

Routing 8.

Ah d N

2 L

v Department-Supervisor

//

gen. Staff Supervisor g/M 4//g 6/P s, /g ss/g 3.

3.

/

Verifier Surveillance Codrainator 4.

b / M /a

//EA 5.

13.

10.

Aj!r7 M!/8 Procedures Cgfrainitor g

14t. Asst.

pr. Rad./ Chem. Sup.

'U 11.

O 5..

Procecures Mana er Opetating En ineerd of SRO

7. d[

PE 12.

K

1. 3

__Or1 3. nato,rjproofread)

Station _Sugt.

O _ g_

9 TRANSMITTAL. RECEIPT g /[

Re star No.

b.

W// W-7 ggy.O C

M APPROVED REMOVE:

6//8

-f &. /

W 24'82 INSERT:

D.O.S.R*

I hereby acknowledge receipt of the above.

(j Signed Date (Sign and return this fom to the Procedures Manager.)

l' FORM 9-2A 18 of 24 ~

Ir

,\\

t[.

s

= r =-

=.:.-.

_. _ _ _ _ ~.._. -. _.. - - _ _ _ _ _. _

.~~....

CAP 9-2 Revision 11 p.

U PROCEDURE HISTORY Procedure EF// '/* * - s Rev. No.

l Description of Procedure Revision or of New Procedure Cnsu m T S c. L a a e, a fm fears Caveses-Su n. bas 7.~

>lera T~S.C.

Ra. L Daaa,J e A ns e n)

(Q

' Justification for New or Revised Procedure g,. s rs.e v,s Supportive References Fom 9-2B g

APPROVED MAR 24'82

~ ~

is of 24 D.O.S.R.

,u l

2

_mm----.. _um-

-m: w ~.~-

=e..

m :- -

~ ~ ~ ~

- - - ~ ~ - - - ~~ ~ r4 g

.r=...--

=

s

=

~

OAP S-2 SAFEYY EVAt.t!ATics Revisien 11 (to CFK 50 53) l Does this procadure/ revision ccnstitute a changa :o procedures as described in 54feev Anaivsis F.ecor:7 i

Yes ( )

No M e

4 is a change in the Tecnnical

! Soect fleation involved?

No ( )

s q

SAFETt EVAL.UATION: Answer tne following questicns wi tn a "yes" or "no", and provide specific reascns Justifying the decisien:

Is the probabliity of an occurrencia, the consequenes of an acci-i 1.

dent, or malfunctiori of safety raia.ced equipment, as previously evaluated in the Final Safety Analysis F.eport, increased?

A./)fe ss&

/14A f

Yes

)( No, because: *//,r

.c is that possibility f'or' an-accident or mat function o' a di fferent 2

^

type than arrr previously evaluated in the Final Safetv Ana. lysis 3

Report created?-

Yes. X No, because: g/. r gdyg Is the margitt of safety, as defined 'irt the basis for any Tech- -

I.

nical Specification, reducedt Yes X No, because:.

Y o r* N d t e o r r a d y, YJ.$~,

Ali Answers No p()

Any Answer

• Yes ( )

r a

Meques -and receive nuclear

' ' ~ "

~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~

~ - ~

Regulatory Cor.:nission APPROVED,..-_

~

auehoer=,etow for ehan,e.

NIR 24'82

,_ ; Author-lzacion Recalved- ()

0.04A _ _ _. _ __ _ _

Inicla:e Frw edure

• NCTE:

- - ~ ~

l Imole:-enca t ion Any answer checksd "yes" shou?d be recc.-ted in the g.

Faden Sy' w

e-.

annual recor-to the CC.

Date /D -/'/-f/

FOP.:t *-2c.

l 20 of 24-

,1 i,

l

.._. 2 --- ; - -

n - n -

R" y