ML20050J037
| ML20050J037 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/21/2020 |
| From: | Doub J NRC/NMSS/DREFS/ENRB |
| To: | |
| Jack Cushing | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20035E782 | List: |
| References | |
| NRC-2020-0051 | |
| Download: ML20050J037 (7) | |
Text
[7590-01-P]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2020-0051]
Environmental Considerations Associated with Micro-Reactors AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance; request for comment.
SUMMARY
- The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is soliciting public comment on its draft Interim Staff Guidance (ISG), Environmental Considerations Associated with Micro-reactors. The NRC staff is preparing for the environmental reviews of prospective design, license, and permit applications for advanced nuclear power reactors (advanced reactors), including micro-reactors. The purpose of this ISG is to modify existing guidance and provide supplemental guidance to assist the NRC staff in determining the scope and scale of environmental reviews of micro-reactor applications.
DATES: Submit comments by [INSERT DATE 75 DAYS FROM DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2020-0051. Address questions about NRC docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges; telephone: 301-287-9127; e-mail:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document.
2 Mail comments to: Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Program Management, Announcements and Editing Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack Cushing, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, telephone: 301-415-1424, e-mail: Jack.Cushing@nrc.gov and Mallecia Sutton, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, telephone: 301-415-0673, e-mail:
Mallecia.Sutton@nrc.gov. Both are staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I.
Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2020-0051 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2020-0051.
NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The documents entitled,
3 Micro-Reactor License Application COL-ISG-029, Environmental Considerations Associated with Micro-reactors, and Regulatory Analysis for Draft Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) 029, are available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML20054B832.
NRCs PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRCs PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC-2020-0051 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II.
Background
The purpose of this ISG is to modify existing guidance and provide supplemental guidance to assist the NRC staff in determining the scope and scale of environmental reviews of micro-reactor applications. The guidance highlights unique considerations for micro-reactors in each resource area typically covered in the staffs environmental review. The ISG also offers guidance on identifying considerations and approaches to
4 simplify and shorten the environmental reviews for micro-reactors relative to the environmental reviews that the NRC has previously performed for other nuclear facilities, such as large light-water reactors (LWRs). The ISG outlines what the NRC staff considers to be an appropriate scope and level of detail for the specific aspects of an environmental review needed to document a micro-reactor licensing action. A micro-reactor may have some, but not necessarily all, of the following characteristics:
Occupies only a small area of land, disturbs only previously disturbed lands, or both.
Uses zero or only small quantities of resources, such as water or fuel.
Releases zero or only small quantities of emissions to the environment.
Avoids environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands and floodplains.
Avoids areas with cultural, historic, or environmental justice significance.
Avoids habitat for threatened or endangered species.
Uses mitigation to reduce impacts.
Involves only low levels of employment for both construction and operation.
Uses simpler designs than those for large LWRs, with limited interfaces with the exterior environment.
While the ISG is designed to aid the NRC staff in developing a micro-reactor environmental impact statement, the staff recognizes the value of the guidance as a supplemental source of insight into the NRCs environmental review process that can inform the development of an applicants environmental report. Applicants should scale their level of effort appropriately when preparing Environmental Reports (ERs),
commensurate with the significance of the impact on the resource area being addressed.
The scope of the ISG is limited to environmental review considerations specific to micro-reactors, such as the following:
pre-application interactions purpose and need for the proposed project size of the proposed project and resources used land use water resources terrestrial and aquatic ecology socioeconomics and environmental justice
5 historic and cultural resources need for power and alternatives meteorology and air quality radiological and nonradiological health postulated accidents severe accident mitigation alternatives (SAMAs);
acts of terrorism fuel cycle impacts, transportation of fuel and waste, and continued storage of spent fuel cumulative impact analysis consistency with safety licensing documents incorporation by reference The NRC staff will continue to look for other opportunities to effectively streamline environmental reviews and work with prospective applicants to identify opportunities to streamline ERs and still meet the NRCs regulations.
III.
Backfitting, Issue Finality, and Forward Fitting Discussion The guidance in this draft ISG-029 clarifies how the NRC will approach environmental reviews for a micro-reactor application for combined license, early site permit, construction permit, operating license and limited work authorization. Issuance of this draft ISG, if finalized, would not constitute backfitting as defined in section 50.109 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) (the Backfit Rule) and as described in NRC Management Directive 8.4, Management of Backfitting, Forward Fitting, Issue Finality, and Information Requests; would not affect the issue finality of an approval under 10 CFR part 52; and would not constitute forward fitting as that term is defined and described in Management Directive 8.4. The staffs position is based upon the following considerations:
- 1. The draft ISG positions, if finalized, would not constitute backfitting or forward fitting or affect issue finality, inasmuch as the ISG would be internal guidance to NRC staff.
6 The ISG provides interim guidance to the staff on how to review an application for NRC regulatory approval in the form of licensing. Changes in internal staff guidance, without further NRC action, are not matters that meet the definition of backfitting or forward fitting or affect the issue finality of a part 52 approval.
- 2. Current or future applicants are not-with limited exceptions not applicable here-within the scope of the backfitting and issue finality regulations and forward fitting policy.
Applicants are not, with certain exceptions, covered by either the Backfit Rule or any issue finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52. This is because neither the Backfit Rule nor the issue finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52 - with certain exclusions discussed below - were intended to apply to every NRC action which substantially changes the expectations of current and future applicants.
The exceptions to the general principle are applicable whenever an applicant references a 10 CFR part 52 license (e.g., an early site permit) and/or NRC regulatory approval (e.g., a design certification rule) with specified issue finality provisions or a construction permit under 10 CFR part 50. The staff does not, at this time, intend to impose the positions represented in the draft ISG section (if finalized) in a manner that would constitute backfitting or affect the issue finality of a part 52 approval. If, in the future, the staff seeks to impose a position in the draft ISG (if finalized) in a manner that constitutes backfitting or does not provide issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision, then the staff would need to address the Backfit Rule or the criteria for avoiding issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision.
The Commissions forward fitting policy generally does not apply when an applicant files an initial licensing action for a new facility. Nevertheless, the staff does not, at this time, intend to impose the positions represented in the draft ISG section (if
7 finalized) in a manner that would constitute forward fitting. If, in the future, the staff seeks to impose a position in the draft ISG (if finalized) in a manner that constitutes forward fitting, then the staff would need to address the forward fitting criteria in Management Directive 8.4.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of February 2020.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Joseph P. Doub, Acting Chief, Environmental Review New Reactors Branch, Division of Rulemaking, Environmental, and Financial Support, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.