ML20050C271

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
QA Program Insp Rept 99900517/82-01 on 820222-26. Noncompliance Noted:Failure to File Forms & to Document Performance of Evaluation of QA Capabilities
ML20050C271
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/16/1982
From: Brickley R, Hale C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20050C264 List:
References
REF-QA-99900517 NUDOCS 8204080358
Download: ML20050C271 (10)


Text

-

ORGANIZATION:

NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.:

99900517/82-01 DATE(S) 2/22-26/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 29 l

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:

Nuclear Technology, Incorporated ATTN:

Mr. E. Keever President 6835 Via Del Oro San Jose, CA 95119 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT:

Mr. W. E. Booth, Corporate QA Manager TELEPHONE NUMBER:

(408) 629-9800 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Engineering Consultant Activities NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Nuclear Technology, Inc., currently has 34 contracts involving 56 domestic reactor units for various engineering consultant activities such as piping analysis, steel containment vessel design and analysis, con-tainment modification design and analysis, mechanical and electrical equipment evaluation / qualification, system / component performance analysis and design, and materials / welding /QA/ISI consulting.

ASSIGNED INSPECTOR: T4.I G nu]E./w s//4 /rz R. H. Brickley(Jeactor Systems Section (RSS)

Dat'e OTHER INSPECTOR (S):

f APPRr"ED BY:

SL -

3-/(d1 C.J.~HQd,' Chief,RSS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:

A.

BASES:

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.

B.

SCOPE:

QA Program Evaluation l

PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:

Not Identified.

Ccriific3 ty.

kML Mk 8204000330 020325 i

PDR GA999 EECNUCTI j

99900517 PDR l

ORGANIZATION:

NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPEGIl0N NO.:

99900517/82-01 RESULTS:

PAGE 2 of 3 A.

VIOLATIONS:

None B.

NONCONFORMANCES:

1.

Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Section 3.2 of Quality Engineering Procedure (QEP)-010 (Quality Assurance Indoc-trination and Training), Form QEP-010.2 had not been completed for two engineering personnel assigned to a project that requires project unique quality requirements, to indicate that this indoctrination had been received.

2.

Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Sections 2.2 and 4.0 of QEP-016 (Procurement Document Control), procurement document No. CGE-03-182 (T08-81-275) dated April 22, 1981, to Anchor Darling Valve Company, did not require that they have a Quality Assurance Program consistent with ANSI N45.2-1977 nor did it have a Purchase Authorization Form signed by the Project Manager, Quality Assurance Administrator, and Company Officer.

3.

Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Section 7 (Control of Purchased Items and Service) of the Quality Assurance Manual, no evidence exists that the Quality Assurai.re Administrator performed an evaluation of the quality assurance capabilities of the Anchor Carling Valve Company, a supplier of services under procurement document No. CGE-03-182 (T08-81-275).

4.

Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Section 4.3.2 of QEP-011 (Audits and Follow-up Corrective Action) the responsible individual has not responded in writing within 30 days for 9 of the Corrective Action Reports examined.

C.

UNRESOLVED ITEMS:

None D.

OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:

QA Program Evaluation - The NUTECH Quality Assurance Manual and its implementing procedures governing the areas of QA program, organization, engineering control, procurement control, QA records, and audits were reviewed to determine that they were consistent with quality and technical commitments to codes, standards, regulations, and guides.

The documenta-tion of completed work in these areas, consisting of the corporate l

ORGANIZATION:

NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA REPORI ANbFtbliUN NO.:

99900517/82-01 RESULTS:

PAGE 3 of 3 organization chart, indoctrination training records for seven individuals, two management evaluations (of the QA Program), three analyses, two specifications, five drawings, two procurement files, two QA records, five internal audit files, two external audit files, and qualification records of four audit team leaders and one auditor, were examined for program inplementation.

The four nonconformances documented in B above were identified.

i l

l

o.,

PERSONS CONTACTED Company NMECH Dates z/zz-zifrz Docket / Report No. 999dd5/7/F1.o/

Inspector 77:N. Boek/sv Page / of

/

NAME(Please Print)

TITl.E(Please Print)

ORGANIZATION (Please Print) frD Vv 0 hew E q ;ne-r n3 Man %er Ayplied Dynam; c.

YAnt bc)7N (netur w da sim nrw (pA T)Auid Floe,m,,c=

(%c,, r c3 >t E,a s. m e e c (o xL l. L YMM Fiuney euc,Rw MwAc,ea MAruiAm Ao FABDLAOm TE L S HI PP Prcorcer M Gle-

% ncrs Wl. $. l / 777 6 S M T 0 ?n J C G r~ A $ G k 7 MZE (7S t/ ico (C %

P y,,. (

Lyw s D A C,

% Q W/a d Q.A E +< W f. 5) {c) icwhh,30Hwd 3

N v

Do u c, idAAF Paoa M c> rt AJ S P Pnocerr Rh3E9I VlsRMA P2cwcc w a.

Nsp (TM)

Sw 2kr M um-Enainwu Minane Me k tcd Gxv SmA ebE b_

krd(%u&uJ t

u

%e c ekg.i+

car p e.u cr y U k,L. 7c u s OA OA.

c.. pa,

Docket No. 99,oogf7 Inspector "R.M T5eick/cy Report No, sf.o f Scop / Module QA Peo6EAM WA/vMiog DOCUMENTS EXAMINED Page

of 6 1

2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3

4 QoaMy Assuesnes Msxunl-&cks: x,*.if i.e. x.o; s.o,14s.o.q xo a.4 i2o,lao i-

+

OEP-00I (&nd at T.edhni Dmd)

'O 2-3 a

o F-3 3

O eP-co Z(Cerafad e$ BatyAslgjzinct aad Oyj qu /'aju}afh)

Y 7

go 4

3 C EP-oo3 ( 17 T

MM hl I

Y ge e-con (mLuka0 Docamaa$lkaAoA aal DdN-w

')

7 S

3 6

3 QEF-oo6(CovZ6(dex d m ME. /bibtoA) fB I

1 3

o e P-oo c. ( v d u f % m w cr)

Y"4s 6 a P&ith Jindd12n/bla AnD LAaal Lura d>'nd No u

2 3

o EP-Oo7(,z ceP-cog (can0ahw i 7 wx14-wb S

O tl 9

3 IO 3

Q EP-OO9 ( Cerns43 Tjtscr VbJdd Y k )

A 5

ti 3

0 e P-ouO( on la AE A8, iia afM i riuzittiaca)

Wri 6

OEP-OII ( Aiidlk 4 4M rdice Ad

)

4:

9 i%

3 Ausk1248L kY?

Ib 3

QEV-0l3 (QN crtL tr$ Q s1 I

l4 3

QEV-01A(Q ci-A SM E -l 2 D a t i ci a T r & )

3

(

v v

u Document Types:

Column Nos.

1.

Drawing 5.

Purchase Or' der

1. Sequential Item No.

2.

Specification 6.

Internal Memo

2. Type of Document
3.

Procedure 7.

Letter

3. Date of Document

'4.

QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary)

4. Revision No., if applicable

Dccket No. 9994o5/7 Inspector

g. g. T3ric/r/(v Report No. fy.of Scop /"odule QA_73zo.617AM fvk/ddog DOCUMENTS EXA*-!INED Page _f._off 1

2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3

4 QE70IL(y g gygfQ Q f,gfQ )

  • /y,,

o I6

^'s Ilo

~3 Q E P-Ol8(Cmt$tt.ch e$.

[g c3 hh) o sfus fgaatkTrO

  1. /,, n n

t 11 8

Prza* cpl *-Q3, Conwste Rwca 70 JS29/-Q 6,f a Ld,it wn C 70'L 9 33tl7, ~Hzej # IL P-o 3 (exsweraws s,,,,,,)

  • /gr P

/

se r

fu

?

[p_gy,,u,g,j{f fjgoy p g s y g sj g 7 7 ( p,,,,,4 y 7 7 9 g,,,,,,,f,; y Q )

y_,,

2' 8

iMG'fazu asE &.1 (%iec+ Plau) hot tilF-63 70 # a166-C-//o/tf (floye decek Pt)A]Fw' d13PC-oI 22-8 T&cchfc(

l

23. - E---.hbbY1o&_Tu.ratius'Eecoriol, Tore 7 pegwnegliflAhdoc%ggfios Q gc,'./

Tlead,*aa_Rn4 capuk Av2 T&pozLs/-atn/e: 7_ mat R MhaH 4,A d /A 6 L 1

_z_

bl !I fpee s #Il-24 E/2$K/-22.7/ Elf /-Zo. 7/-/9' r/-/7,r/-/5 r/-/t,. 7/-gE/-/f.

$6 8

Offl#Ecbt G-7/-/3. 8/-/ 2. K/-//ir/-/d 21e

?

Nodh Tcpwzh /%W-D/-o 3 (NOTElW Idriirsirs/Auf, 7PM 7%jec7')

'/4,,,

cument Types:

Column Nos.

Drawing 5.

Purchase Order

1. Sequential Item No.

Specification 6.

Internal Memo

2. Type of Document.

i Procedure 7.

Letter

3. Date of Document

.l QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.' Revision No., if a' plicap p

Docket No. 999M.9/7 -

  • Inspector

'iz. 5 l. P):zsc k(G y Report No. 22-6/

Scop / Module QA i'izoarrAu EvA/04/,og DOCUMENTS EXAMINED Page l of f 1

2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3

4 17 1

Aud0 Erpse-/ N.9P-s6cy (Idress/ AidMf.:? 7sofech)

% M.

AE 1

kodl Flcozi' DET-oo-o/ ( Frzoisc4 Audl DEFo'l>cG,09s iDr IS')

Wa'un i

29 2r Auk / FcAat low-so-oi(ine'aan/ AuN)

'f'I en 90 3

Aud/ Tlecorcl.9EE-El-o/ (GA A&d}of $su-/A<ssrYFewaxc/r.hNofe) st M

3I E

j]ud-/17 g-/ l}/f/-o2 ( 6g Aud/ o/')),/s /,7/ogg$/ztE9]

Ni U/1 Audd,a '&sxOlcx& EesaA: recoic 'sden/Asb.Zeess/

y 1

eLus'AAE.,fiLo(dir Au M i pushExo!A<o W & sa; na D'>

2 beus Awwn ) Q R 9au un riv Tecored *7 C Jau -3ol-u nzi3 T

seus Aunual QA Souwtsau Tiscort-I

  • E [Julm - Dec. IctEd

~

36 2

H57-LO-ID/

17c+1sn C s c.

rz b rzY Tls' ajaurid PfodXcxf,o*yg )

Ybr o

% _1 ECN N'sP-LD-217

-fo Osc JV9P-4D -/ol, JTerra 91

'l N9P-&D-lD7(Vin /G(ZiAl llEcu/REMEftb+, OrzfE0 g/pggh;V)dj. )

_fg a

%h o gg i

ecx iver-to-zo/

-fo & ivw-so-soz

'Ypf, 39 x scu sw-u-ziz -lo Poe N9P-So-la:2 o

Document Types:

Colunn Nos.

1.

Drawing 5.

Purchase Order

1. Sequential Item No.

,2.

Specification 6.

Internal Memo

2. Type of Document

'3.

Procedure 7.

Letter

3. Date of Document 4.

QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary)

4. Revision No., if applicable

Docket No. gggx5/7 Inspector J/,//.///zg/(/5f/

Report No. _f,2-B/

.I Scop / Module h w _fve/fg / foe /

DOCUMENTS EXAMINED Page

  1. ofj 1

2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3

4 4D I

NN-92/66 (Egin{sacswisx/ d /hedzx/>)g &Le ndse Dirswixa J c

_WL-3AD9't(&dAxmss/ sfAssfadsxs.LdE47!s< azsines + )

'NL o 4I I

HH-q2 tot {Ne wiv'zf-7zerc Mdine Ba/o/,ha E,wt i,ve ize.5-z'-rE

?'ki A 42.

n D

I NH-92toX (Ape %p,ose'-ECIC kadist BaL% LAsodhhs FZ95-F-FE lc

/?

14 7

Calaldoa oP Tre %s/sauexfe &L A&brIsrc/= zo.s7"Ldw&w d V"la D

46 1

C_plailsbit of 7]sur De /A curx/+ a is ro L/xibh/asA/7/ZES. /csi

-(L D

~

l i

i Cs/cdedosof7~es_paphaearaldHarfizxdss xzz?

3t l@

- 1 o

till-97a** *b (&9/_/ OCA do utbublb (Nna/Astb/31<oSM 2//;y/A//s/biw+fe $1 A_

47 I

Appuzaved happ/sae Ast

'I'Po. + '

41 1

MZM-37-06Girae AinAao/ futivg_&4 x iex2, Axxus/ lxbremfass+

hp l JM fa Bb j y)EP-12 -D//[fvAlu4boH ol' W /_JgJoe/sM/E+

V yG GI 5

CSE-63-lL2(TbH-E/-X76]fAivc/rotz_DArclik /%sAbequalikxfsy

  1. %i Asfrioie of A/DV-See/irr VAlvsd 32 7

(3&E L/z "GA-/Eb/ ( Yb!s/o/t WoorzovAls]

W

,6

]cument Types:

Column Nos.

Drawing 5.

Purchase Order

1. Sequential Item No.

Specification 6.

Internal Memo

2. Type of Document.

Procedure 7.

Letter

3. Date of Document QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary)

4. Revision No., if a'pplicab

Docket No. f y pe fly Inspector TZ.H 8 arch ley Report No. g2-of Scop /Mcdule OLjksgAm Evg/ppfcw' DOCUNEniS EXAMINED Page 5~ o f S 1

2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3

4 Yhr.o 53.

6 MPL-D/-46V fo Wy/g_febs (65.yy7/gpr' 32y Tsy/ 7xuam) 51.

7 tYuTft A/s KGB-79-474 (sis; Tx7/sx/ Vny Tc+/}

?k 51-5 bd/ Emx/ W /-79-o/fDifuoWsfIdi/c LwJs)

$n

~

Y 57 7

Nortcy1/a 7ax-v9-o2o (7znagu,fb_Q//)22-y ja'd-/Ead) 5dc 6%

CatANicdbW of /Zadrsw Dr/ha azdAse/Faa cypem/

S QA Tiscogd Fnle ooJ00, ors (Paojscl Teleacfians-artis12tAld

~

A 7

OA Tlecolid F,Ie acacoso_z.alTrLOf&Gbl0F AME T2S$bl& legeo_wnl Vecorz 3)

~

~

._6L 3

icument Types:

Column Nos.

Di awing 5.

Purchase Order

1. Sequential Item No.

Specification 6.

internal Memo

2. Type of Document.

Procedure 7.

Letter

3. Date of Document QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.' Revision No., if applica@

q l

ATTENDANCE LIST l

l COMPANY: N#TECM POCKET NO. 9emy/7 h

zz-o/

Date-r/24/EZ l Pre-Inspect!on Conference @ 6st Inspection Co i"

ere.. e l

(Please N AW (Please Prind TITLE (Please Print)

ORGANIZATION Print)

R.//Bmb/c/tv 7m7fa Emivruz A/RC/777V l'

noa,rm e

,maan sa Aiureca l

ols.,fooN WBNl<x> xb/bs7

&sen/Wewr,fsne Me72tW A. F.1%ednN c a as L'. L J nura U

V p

i I

l i

L; 5

I i

s e

8 G

J

.~

--