ML20050B652
| ML20050B652 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/01/1981 |
| From: | Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Gladstone L METRIC MEDICAL LABORATORIES, SOUTHFIELD, MI |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050B653 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-81-458 NUDOCS 8204070079 | |
| Download: ML20050B652 (1) | |
Text
.
90 Yl.-bl V f %,
o UNITE D STATES
[*.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
';j WASHING T ON. D. C. 20555
\\NJ I16 S
. J,,%,,,,.*/
(3 y
December 1,1981 2[
[
~ hg
~
s Mr. Leonard Gladstone, D.0.
y% *...
Director Metro Medical Laboratory 38 East Gibbsboro Road IN RESPONSE REFER
, d I Og Clementon, NJ 08021 TO F01A-81-458
Dear Mr. Gladstone:
This is in response to your letter dated October 27, 1981 in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, a copy of the complaint, and the findings, filed against Metro Medical Laboratory.
A copy of the Inspection Findings, NRC Form 591 dated October 21, 1981, and the release portion of the complaint letter is enclosed. A portion of the complaint letter has been deleted in order to withhold the name and address from public disclosure pursuant to Exemption (7)(D) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7)(J)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(7)(IV))
of the Commission's regulations. Disclosure of this information would disclose the identity of a confidential source.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Commission's regulatier.s, it has been determined that the information withheld is exempt from production or disclosure, and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest.
lne persons responsible for this denial are the undersigned and Mr. Richard C. Young, Jr., Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement.
This denial may be appealed to the Comission's Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter. As provided in 10 CFR 9.11, any such cppeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regubtory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an " Appeal from an Initial F0IA Decision."
Sin,cerely, W
Y
,A t
h.M.Felton, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration 4
79 811201 CLADSTO81-458 PDR
m
,.n s.
s
- n u. s. c cwr#. e & m.a or r ict un -m ti4
- ~.
w c',7/'.' CO
- y._
rd /n...A 2.,,,.
~
~
~T..
u
.. a.... _-
y
~,'?
U.S. NUCLEAR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION'.],
,, y787. ' ' ' '
Y r oau nacant 83-77)
O F F IC E o F,1 N 5P E C T lo N A N D E N F OH C r s.a E N T " Inspection DO.-
f-[
,.. - ~:
4,..,
I INSPECTION FINDINGS AND LICENSEE ACKNOWLEDGHENT..cf ~.M e
.) b ri * (
/*-
- a. n s ceon a t. or r eca
- s. s.sc e ns a t
~
- 7 J.S. Nuclear Regualtory Co ission M e-fgo 37 g
C 6b s lor o M
Xfice of Inspection & Enforcement E l # "' ". 4 A) $
0 8Df')_
Tcgion 1
/
531 Park Avenue Ung_of P_russlag Pac "19_406
- 3. oocucv nuuncnts)
- a. t.icense n uw a r nts)
- a. pays or insrecison T/US f.NO -.'-/0~~-2l-B}.
bem HEC-
]fff g-l %
- g. 4
...n,_.o,.o.no.
The Inspection was an esamination of the actisities conducred undee your license as they sefste to radiation safety and to compliance with the Commission's ruirs and segulations and the eondirions of your license.The Inspection consisted of setects.e esaminations of procedures and sepre.
sentsti=e secords,intestiews with persnnnel, and obsersations by the laspector.The findings as a result of thisinspection are as rottows:
~-;*
.t -
. ?;.. * - :'-
. :..)y.....
.,i.~
~~
N'o items of' oncombli:nce or unsafe conditions'were found.. '
!~-
' f-i."$ '.~.N.WG -
- 1 ' ~^A, u. '
n QN., '{. f
.. ;...' *E
- i
. ~ '..
<a" The folloMng items of noncompliance related to records, signs, and labels were found:, ".
'. -U;n. N -('
i
/
s O.
A. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indicate the presence of a RADIATION AREA.10CFR 20.203(b)or 34.4S O
B. Rooms or areas were not properly posted toindicate the presence of a lilGli RADI TION AREA.
10 CFR 20.203(c)(1) or 34.42 O
C. Rooms or areas were not properly posted to indica:e the presence oran AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITY AREA.
D. Rooms or areas were'not properly posted to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE M ATERIAL.10 CFR 20.203(e)
O E. Containers were not properly labeled to indicate the presence of RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL.--
~
10 CFR 20.203(f)(1) or (f)(2)
O F.'A current copy of 10 CFR 20, a copy of the license, or a copy of the operating procedures was not properly posted or made avallable.10 CFR 20.206(b)
.: ~;
,.('....
-r O
G. FormNRC.3 was not properly posted,.10 CFR 20.206(c) 4 '. -
H. Records of the radiation exposure ofindividuals were not properly maintained.10 CFR,20.401(a) or 34.33(b)
- 1. Records of surveys or disposals were not properly maintained.10 CFR 20.401(b')' or 34.43(d) ~
O J. Iiecords or receipt, transrer. disposal, export or inventory orlicensed material were not properly maintained... "
10 CFR 30.51,'40.61 or 70.51 O
K. Records ofleak tests were nc,4 maintained as prescribed in your license, or 10 CFR 34.23(c)..
O
- 1. Records ofinventories wer.iot maintained.10 CFR 34.26 _
j O
M. Utiliution logs were not maintsiaed.10 CFR 34.27 V
l
. N. Records of radiation survey instrument calibration were not maintained.10 CFR 34.24 '?
O, O. Records N teletherapy electricalinterlock tests were not mainta' escribed in youriicense.
m O
P. Other 1
(_
I
~
ML onu4ce)'
~
' The NRC Inspector fias explained and I understand th items of noncompliance listed abuee. The items of noncornpliance will be'corinted within the next 30 d.ys.
jDb
,aO
- Vgjgg g
IDo rel (fitenser l'ep,esentssix - Tor!r ese n,sitic,n)