|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARU-602875, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Rule for Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors1997-11-21021 November 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Rule for Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors U-602719, Comment Supporting Proposed Communication;Gl 97-XX, Assurance of Sufficient Net Positive Suction Head for ECCS & Containment Heat Removal Pumps1997-03-20020 March 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Communication;Gl 97-XX, Assurance of Sufficient Net Positive Suction Head for ECCS & Containment Heat Removal Pumps ML20136F2841997-03-11011 March 1997 Memorandum & Order (Terminating Proceeding).* Grants Southwestern Electric Cooperative 970311 Motion to Terminate Proceeding & Dismisses 970228 Petition for Leave to Intervene.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 970311 ML20136F3281997-03-0707 March 1997 Establishment of Atomic Safety & Licensing Board.* Board Being Established in Following Proceeding to Rule on Petitions for Leave to Intervene And/Or Requests for Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 970307 ML20136F3561997-02-28028 February 1997 Petition for Leave to Intervene of Southwestern Electric Cooperative,Inc.* Requests That Commission Grant Petition for Leave to Intervene & Grant Other Relief as Commission Deems Appropriate.W/Certificate of Svc U-602603, Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors1996-06-21021 June 1996 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors U-602559, Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matl.Proposes Changes to Wording of Pr1996-02-27027 February 1996 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matl.Proposes Changes to Wording of Pr U-602408, Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Plant Shutdown & Low Power Operations.Requests Addl Period for Public Comment Be Made Available1995-02-0101 February 1995 Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Plant Shutdown & Low Power Operations.Requests Addl Period for Public Comment Be Made Available ML20071N4861994-07-21021 July 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Changing 10CFR50 & 73 for Frequency W/Which Licensee Conduct Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program from Every 12 Months to Every 24 Months ML20056G3351993-08-27027 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process U-601930, Comment Opposing Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys - 10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting1992-01-30030 January 1992 Comment Opposing Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys - 10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting JSP-860-90, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty1990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty ML20043F9941990-06-0606 June 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55, Coordinating Revs of FSAR W/Refueling Cycles.Approval of Rulemaking Change Would Provide for More Logical & Timely Basis for Incorporating Plant Procedure Changes in Future U-601249, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Nuclear Plant License Renewal (NUREG-1317)1988-10-21021 October 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Nuclear Plant License Renewal (NUREG-1317) ML20204J3461988-10-20020 October 1988 Order Imposing Civil Monetory Penalty in Amount of $75,000. Violation a Occurred as Stated.For Violation C,Violation Most Appropriately Classified at Severity Level IV & Should Be Removed as Violation Supporting Civil Penalty ML20205Q9141988-10-20020 October 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Commission Statement on Fitness for Duty of Nuclear Power Personnel. Commission Requested to Reconsider Efforts Prior to Issuing Final Rule ML20247N7531988-07-28028 July 1988 Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Requesting NRC Action to Review Undue Risk Posed by BWR Thermal Hydraulic Instability.Nrr Should Issue Order Requiring All GE BWRs to Be Placed in Cold Shutdown for Stated Reasons ML20196C5481988-06-0707 June 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break (LBB) Technology.Believes That Extension of LBB Technology to Performance Requirements for Emergency Core Cooling Sys Appropriate U-601050, Advises That Util Endorses BWR Owners Group 870820 Comments on Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document1987-09-30030 September 1987 Advises That Util Endorses BWR Owners Group 870820 Comments on Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document ML20206J2131987-04-10010 April 1987 Transcript of 870410 Public Meeting,Discussion/Possible Vote in Washington,Dc Re Full Power OL for Plant.Pp 1-73. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20135H3381985-09-11011 September 1985 Order Revoking CPPR-138 ML20133N7801985-08-0707 August 1985 Unexecuted Indemnity Agreement B-91 ML20129A8351985-07-11011 July 1985 Memorandum & Order Terminating Proceeding Per 850517 Motion on Grounds of Mootness.Requests ASLB Authorize NRR to Rescind CPPR-138.Served on 850712 ML20126F1611985-06-13013 June 1985 Memorandum & Order Directing Any Party Wishing to Examine Photographs to File Request W/Aslb by 850701.Photographs Deal w/850611 Memorandum & Order Requesting Addl Info on Unit 2 Excavation.Served on 850614 ML20126A0141985-06-11011 June 1985 Memorandum & Order Requiring NRC to Provide ASLB & Parties W/Photographs,Maps & Accompanying Explanations Referred to in G Laroche 850606 Affidavit Re Evacuation.Served on 850612 ML20126C3271985-06-11011 June 1985 Order Directing NRC Provide ASLB W/Photographs,Maps & Accompanying Explanations Referred to in 850606 Affidavit of Germain Laroche Addressing Environ Conditions of Excavation Site.Served on 850612 ML20125B3021985-06-0606 June 1985 Affidavit of G Laroche Re Environ Conditions of Site,Berm Const & Site Stabilization.Prof Qualifications,Se Turk Notice of Appearance & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20125B2631985-06-0606 June 1985 Response to Applicant 850517 Motion to Terminate Proceeding. No Opposition Offered,Subj to Two Listed Site Redress Conditions.G Laroche Affidavit Encl ML20128P7311985-06-0303 June 1985 Notice of Filing of Answer to Applicant Motion to Terminate Proceeding ML20128P7401985-05-29029 May 1985 Response to Applicant Motion to Terminate Proceeding.No Objections Offered.Method Applicant Proposed for Remediating Unit 2 Excavation Area Questioned.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127G1901985-05-17017 May 1985 Motion to Terminate Proceeding,Due to 831018 Cancellation of Unit & 850409 Withdrawal of Application for OL & Request for Rescission of CPPR-138.All Stabilization Work Described in FSAR Completed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20114D0281985-01-28028 January 1985 Notice of Filing of Joint Stipulation.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20114D0441985-01-28028 January 1985 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20099D2701984-11-15015 November 1984 Third Supplemental Response to State of Il First Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20099D2921984-11-15015 November 1984 Third Supplemental Response to State of Il Second Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20099D2561984-11-15015 November 1984 First Supplemental Response to Prairie Alliance First Round of Discovery.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20099C6261984-11-15015 November 1984 Supplemental Responses to Applicant Interrogatories Re Contentions 2 & 3.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20097G2291984-09-18018 September 1984 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20097G2071984-09-18018 September 1984 Notice of Change of Address & Telephone Number.Related Correspondence ML20098A3921984-09-11011 September 1984 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20094P6621984-08-13013 August 1984 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20090E5021984-06-28028 June 1984 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20090E4831984-06-28028 June 1984 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20092J8221984-06-22022 June 1984 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20091R9621984-05-31031 May 1984 Notice Forwarding NRC Region III Re Independent Design Review.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20090L2101984-05-22022 May 1984 Notice of Appearance of SL Johnson.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20087P8451984-04-0404 April 1984 Second Supplemental Response to State of Il First Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20087P8201984-03-23023 March 1984 Second Supplemental Response to State of Il Second Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20086T9881984-03-0202 March 1984 Notice of Filing of Joint Stipulation in OL Hearing ML20080Q4241983-10-0606 October 1983 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl 1997-03-07
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20125B2631985-06-0606 June 1985 Response to Applicant 850517 Motion to Terminate Proceeding. No Opposition Offered,Subj to Two Listed Site Redress Conditions.G Laroche Affidavit Encl ML20128P7401985-05-29029 May 1985 Response to Applicant Motion to Terminate Proceeding.No Objections Offered.Method Applicant Proposed for Remediating Unit 2 Excavation Area Questioned.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127G1901985-05-17017 May 1985 Motion to Terminate Proceeding,Due to 831018 Cancellation of Unit & 850409 Withdrawal of Application for OL & Request for Rescission of CPPR-138.All Stabilization Work Described in FSAR Completed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071E9881983-03-11011 March 1983 Response Opposing Prairie Alliance 830305 Affidavit Opposing Applicant 830117 Motion for Summary Disposition or for Continuance Pending Discovery.Rules Prohibit ASLB Consideration of Late Filed Affidavit.W/Certificate of Svc ML20070V3241983-02-11011 February 1983 Answer Opposing Applicant Motion That Discovery Not Be Had Re Prairie Alliance 830128 Request for Documents.No Good Cause Shown Why Discovery Should Not Be Had.Supporting Statements Irrelevant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070T2041983-02-0303 February 1983 Answer Opposing Applicant Motion for Summary Disposition of Prairie Alliance Contention Vi.Motion Fails to Resolve & Address All Issues of Fact Raised in Contention.All Relevant Documents Not Available to Alliance.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028G2571983-02-0202 February 1983 Motion for Protective Order That Discovery Not Be Had Re Prairie Alliance 830128 Request for Production of Documents on Contention Vi.Motion for Summary Disposition Shows No Remaining Issue of Fact on Contention.W/Certificate of Svc ML20028E3841983-01-17017 January 1983 Motion for Summary Disposition of Prairie Alliance Contention Vi.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists & Util Entitled to Favorable Decision.Statement of Matl Fact Encl ML20028E3161983-01-17017 January 1983 Response in Opposition to Prairie Alliance 830105 Motion to Compel Production of Documents on Contention Vi.No Genuine Issue of Fact Exists Re Contention Vi.Applicants Entitled to Summary Disposition as Matter of Law.W/Certificate of Svc ML20070M1621983-01-0505 January 1983 Motion to Compel Util Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20071P1831982-10-29029 October 1982 Motion to Withdraw as Prairie Alliance Atty.Prairie Alliance Does Not Have Ability to Pay Prof Expenses Incurred,Is Unwilling to Incur Addl Prof Expenses & Desires to Resume Member Coordination.Proof of Svc Encl ML20058J1501982-08-0202 August 1982 Response to 820608 Suppl to Applicant 820422 Motion for Protective Order.Aslb Ruling on Motion Should Be Deferred Unless Parties Disagree on Extent of Disclosure.Proposed Protective Order Encl.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054E6481982-06-0808 June 1982 Suppl to 820422 Motion That Discovery Not Be Had Re Production of Any Documents Re Quality Rept Sys.State & Applicants Are Negotiating on Method & Conditions for Disclosure of Quality Matters ML20054E7231982-06-0707 June 1982 Reply to Prairie Alliance 820513 Answer to Applicant 820505 Motion That Hearings Be Held in Clinton,Il.Lists Blatant Inaccuracies & Omissions in Prairie Alliance Answer That Must Be Corrected.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054E7201982-06-0707 June 1982 Request for Leave to File Reply to Prairie Alliance Answer to Applicant Motion That Evidentiary Hearing Be Held in Clinton,Il.Misstatements & Omissions of Fact Need to Be Corrected ML20052G8281982-05-13013 May 1982 Answer Opposing Applicant 820504 Motion to Hold Evidentiary Hearings in Clinton,Il.Primary Purpose of Motion Is to Cause & Maximize Inconvenience to Intervenors.Applicant Reasons W/O Merit.Proof of Svc Encl ML20051W6401982-05-12012 May 1982 Answer Opposing State of Il 820429 Motion to Allow Discovery on Prairie Alliance Contention 2.Further Discovery Unnecessary Due to Broad Scope of Il Prior Requests & Util Obligation to Suppl Requests.W/Certificate of Svc ML20052F4021982-05-0606 May 1982 Initial Response to Applicant 820422 Motion for Protective Order.Aslb Should Defer Ruling on Motion Until Notified of Parties' Inability to Resolve Issues & State of Il Filed Substantive Response.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052F4091982-05-0404 May 1982 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing to Be Held in Clinton,Il. Strong Public Support Exists for Hearings to Be Held in Clinton & Adequate Facilities Exist to Accommodate Hearings. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052E5801982-04-29029 April 1982 Motion to Allow Discovery on Events Re Prairie Alliance Contention 2 That Have Been Reported or Occurred Since 811111 Cutoff of Second Round Discovery Requests.Addl Problems W/Qa/Qc Plan Discovered.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A4741982-04-22022 April 1982 Motion for Protective Order Re Production of Documents on Quality Rept Sys.Sys Based on Util vice-president/plant Personnel Agreement That Repts Would Be Confidential. Disclosure Would Breach Trust.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054B7501982-04-12012 April 1982 Brief Supporting Prairie Alliance 820326 Supplemental Contentions.Proof of Svc Encl ML20050C3381982-03-31031 March 1982 Supplemental Motion Answers to Second Request for Production of Documents.Aslb 820216 Order Covers Matl Sought.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050A5381982-03-26026 March 1982 Motion for Leave to File Statement of Issues Per 10CFR2.715(c).Issues Re Qa/Qc Program & Evaluation for Adverse Sys Interaction Meet Procedural Requirements of Specificity.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K1821982-03-23023 March 1982 Suppl to Answer to Applicant Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 5 & NRC Motion to Defer Consideration. Genuine Issue of Fact Exists Re Whether Applicant Performed ATWS Analysis.Proof of Svc Encl ML20049K0861982-03-23023 March 1982 Suppl to 811221 Answer Opposing Applicant Motion for Summary Disposition of Prairie Alliance Contention 5.ASLB in Perry Case Refused to Dismiss ATWS Contention.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0321982-03-23023 March 1982 Answer Supporting NRC Motion for Dismissal of Prairie Alliance Contention 5.Contention Is Generic & Lacks Requisite Nexus W/Plant & Therefore Fails to Meet Specificity Requirements.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040C0361982-01-15015 January 1982 Answer Opposing State of Il Motion to Compel Answers to Il Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Each Document Specifically Identified as Relevant to Particular Interrogatory.W/Certificate of Svc ML20039G0351982-01-0606 January 1982 Motion for Protective Order Re Prairie Alliance Discovery of Documents Containing Confidential,Research,Development or Commercial Info ML20039D7341981-12-31031 December 1981 Motion for Order Compelling Applicants to Answer Second Set of Interrogratories.General Attempt at Compliance W/First Round Discovery Requests Does Not Foreclose More Specific Requests.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20039D8331981-12-31031 December 1981 Motion for Leave to File Motion to Compel Answers to Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Circumstances Prevented Motion from Being Filed on 811230.Affidavit & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039C2421981-12-21021 December 1981 Answer to Applicants' 811125 Motion for Summary Disposition of Prairie Alliance Contention 5 & to NRC 811207 Motion to Defer Consideration of Motion.Motion Should Be Deferred Until SER Issuance.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039C2461981-12-21021 December 1981 Answer Opposing Applicant Motion for Summary Disposition of Prairie Alliance Contention 5.Statement of Matl Fact as to Which There Is Genuine Issue to Be Heard & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039B7981981-12-15015 December 1981 Motion for Protective Order Disallowing Discovery Re Interrogatories Objected to in Prairie Alliance Partial Second Round of Discovery ML20039B8011981-12-15015 December 1981 Motion for Protective Order Disallowing Discovery Re Interrogatories Objected to in State of Il Second Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20009B2571981-07-0808 July 1981 Answer to 810626 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery.Any Delay at This Time Increases Likelihood of Addl Delay Later in Proceedings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20008G1661981-06-25025 June 1981 Joint Motion for Extension of Time Until 810727 to Complete Discovery Per ASLB 810601 Memorandum & Order.Extension Would Not Seriously Jeopardize Timely Completion of Proceeding. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20002E5541981-01-26026 January 1981 Answer Opposing Prairie Alliance Suppl to Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Suppl Fails to Present Justifiable Contention or Cure Defects in Original Filing. Certificate of Svc & Notices of Appearance Encl 1985-06-06
[Table view] |
Text
,
s .
G?CNEip
.a e' UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'82 E 31 rit :05 IN THE MATTERLOF )
ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY, ) -
SOYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. ) @ 4 and WESTERN ILLINOIS POWER '
)
COOPERATIVE, INC. #x
)
) Docket No. 50-4 OL RECEIVED (Operating License for Clinton ) CE Power Station, Unit 1). )
~ MAR 321982a'O 6 # CNC E34 Nrtem.m$r7 Mc g MOTION FOR LEAVE TO e.
FILE STATEMENT OF ISSUES * / lag \ O '
The State of Illinois (Illinois), by Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, moves the Board for leave to file a Statqment of Issues, pursuant to 10 C.F.R.-2.715(c).
In support of this motion Illinois status as follows:
- 1. Illinois may, as an interested State participating in this proceeding pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 2. 715 (c) , raise particular issues of interest or concern to it. Project Management Corp.,
et al. (Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant) , ALAB-354, 4 NRC 383, 392-93 (1976); Gulf States Utilities Co. (River Bend Station, Units 1 and 2) , ALAB-444, 6 NRC 760, 768 (1977). In the past,
' - ^
interested States have raised issues of particular concern, in ~~
addition to admitted contentions, by submitting those issues to the Licensing Board at varying stages of the proceeding. See, e.g., Gulf States Utilities Co., supra at 768-70; Cincinnati D503 y Gas and Electric Co., et al. (William H. Zimmer Nuclear Station), / ()
T.RP-7 9- 7 7, 1. 0 NRC 713, 216 (1979); pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo ' Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 21, 1
LBP-81-5,-13 NRC 226, 232 '1981).
, Illinois is now seeking 8204010391 820326 PDR ADOCK 05000461 Q pyg
s .
permission from the Board in the instant proceeding to submit issues in addition to the contested matters raised by Prairie Alliance.
Attached to this motion is Illinois' partial statement of issues which Illinois wishes to file at this time.
Illinois believes that_the two issues submitted at this time meet the procedural requirements of the NRC Rules of Practice.
Both are framed with sufficient detail and precisenass. And, the five " lateness" factors of 10 C.F.R. 2. 714 (a) do not apply to these issues, because those factors are appropriate for the admission of contentions only. Cincinnati Gas and Electric Co.
(William H. Zim.ner Nuclear Station), LBP-79-22, 10 NRC 213 (1979). However, even if these five factors do apply, it is clear from the, showing below that they weigh in favor of admission of these issues. These factors are as follows:
(i) Good cause, if any, for failure to file on time.
It is well established that the availability of new information or documents is a valid reason for accepting new contentions.
Indiana and Michigan Electric Co. (Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2) , CLI-72-25, 5 AEC 13, 14 (1972); Cincinnati Gas and Electric Co. (Wil'liam H. Zimmer Nuclear Station) , supra l
l at 217. For Issue 1 the new information is found in a series of NRC inspections that have occurred since Prairie Alliance
! submitted its first round of contentions on March 30, 1981. ,
i These inspections uncovered a range of noncompliance activities >
related to the OA/OC program governing CPS-1 construction.
The new information forming the basis for Issue 2 is also found in
i .
these inspection reports and in the'NRC-Staff's review of Unresolved Safety Issue A-17, Systems Interaction in Nuclear Power Plants, in the CPS-1 Safety Evaluation Report (SER) .
(ii) The availability of other means whereby the petitioner's interest will be protected. It is clear that this proceeding is the only means available to Illinois to protect j its interest in these issues. A limited appearance statement at the hearing would be insufficient to bring these issues before the Board. See Nuclear Fuels Services, Inc. (West Valley Reprocessing Plant) , CLI-75-4, 1 NRC 273, 276 (1975). In any event, such an appearance would be superfluous in light of Illinois' active par (icipation in the proceeding on the conten- ,
tions that already have been admitted. And, there is no other fonny such as a state proceeding, in which ' Illinois can raise '
~
these issues. See Florida Power and Light Co. (Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Units 3 and 4) , LBP-79-21, 10 NRC 183, 193 1979). This proceeding is the only means available to Illinois-to raise these issues. [
(iii) The extent to which the petitioner's participa-tion may reasonably be expected to assist in developing a sound record. This factor appears to apply more appropriately to intervention rather than to the matter at. hand. However, to the extent that it is' applicable, Illinois submits that consideration of these issues is essential to the Board's review of the opera-
_ ting license application. Further, Illinois intends to commit substantial legal and technical resources to aid in the development of a sound record regarding these issues. l i
o .
_4_
(iv) The extent to whicP the petitioner's interest will be represented by existing parties. The Commission has held that the representatives of a private party may not effectively re.nresent the presumably broader interests of a governmental body. Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc., supra at 275. Here, Prairie Alliance, a private intervenor in this proce'eding, may not necessarily repre-
~
sent the concerns Illinois, as representative of the citizenry at large, has for these issues. Nor can the NRC Staff be expected to necessarily represent Illinois' interest. See Cincinatti Gas and Electric Co., supra at 215.
(v) The extent to which the' petitioner's participation will broaden the issues or delay the proceedings. The consideration of these issues by the Board will not broaden this proceeding, in that b6Eh the NRC Staff, and the Board, must ' review these issues '
before an operating license is issued. Furthermore, the factual basis for Issue 1.is closely related to that for Prairie Alliance Contention 2, which has already been admitted. Nor will the admission of these issues delay the licensing proceeding.
Currently construction of certain parts of CPS-1 is under a stop work order, and the proposed date for loading fuel has been postponed indefinitely. And, the SER, which was scheduled for publication in January of 1982, was not issued until February 16, t
1982.
s
.a --
For the foregoing reasonsi'rl'iinois moves the Board for leave to file instanter its Statement of Issues, which is attached hereto.
Respectfully submitted, TYRONE C. FAHNER Attorney General State of Illinois BY: / -
PHILIP H. WILLMAN Assistant Attorney General-Environmental Control Division 188 West Randolph Street Suite 2315 Chicago, Illinois 60601 (312) 793-2491
% ~
OF COUNSEL REED NEUMAN .
Assistant Attorney General 500 South Second Street Springfield, Illinois 62701 DATED: March 26, 1982 g'm 6 9m - .e M
h l-i l
o g , , -y - --- -
, , - - -r- w y ,-y,, -
y, -
THE STATE OF ILLINOIS' STATEMENT OF ISSUES
- 1. The Applicants have failed to establish and execute a Quality Assurance (QAVQuality Control (QC) program during construction of CPS-1 that adheres to th'e criteria set forth in 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendix B. Numerohs problems in the QA/QC program
~
have been discovered during construction of CPS-1, resuluing, in some instances, in the termination of construction work. Many of these problems directly affect the construction at CPS-1 of safety related systems. Yet, the NRC Staff in its SER has failed to adequately address these problems. Thus, there is no assurance that CPS-1 has been constructed in such a way that it will not
. endanger the health and safety of the public.
l l --
- 2. The Applicants and the NRC Staff in its SER have failed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of CPS-1 for adverse systems interaction, as required by 10 C.F.R. Part 50, Appendix A, Criteria 19, 20, 22 and 29. Neither the Applicants nor the NRC Staff has adequately addressed the interaction of nonsafety grade components, equipment, systems, structures, and human and function-factors with safety sy' stems and the effect this interaction will have during operations, transients, and accidents. This inadequacy is exacerbated by the Applicants' failure to adhere to a satis-factory Quality Assurance / Quality Control program during construc-tion of CPS-1.
~
s .-.'
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF ILLINOIS )
POWER COMPAUY, SOYLAND )
POWER COOPERATIVE, INC., )
and WESTERN ILLINOIS POWER )
COOPERATIVE, INC. ) Docket No. 50-461 OL
)
(Operating License for Clinton )
Power Station, Unit 1). )
NOT ICE TO: Hugh K. Clark, Esq., Chairman P.O. Box 127A Kennedyville, Maryland 21645 Dr. George A. Ferguson School of En}ineering Howard University 2300 Sixth Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20059 .
Dr. Oscar H. Paris Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Richard J. Goddard Office of the Executive Legal Director United States Nuclear Regulatory j Commission -
Washington, D. C. 20555 Sheldon A. Zabel -
Schiff, Hardin & Waite 7200 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 Jan L. Kodner Tutt & Kodner 173 West Madison
~
Suite 1004 Ch'icago, Illinois 60602
a Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 ,
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that"today I have caused to be filed with the Secretary, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C. 20555, Attention: Chief, Docketing and Service Section, one original and two conformed copies of Illinois' Motion For Leave To File Statement of Issues. A copy of this document is attached and served upon you.
Respectfully submitted, TYRONE C. FAHNER Attorney General State of Illinois BY: -
PHILIP I4 WILLMAN ~
Assistant Attorney General Environmen'tal Control Division 188 W. Randolph Street - Suite 2315 Chicago, Illinois 60601 (3121 793-2491 DATED: March 26, 1982
o UNITED STATES-OF--AMERICA, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF )
ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY, )
SOYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. )
and WESTERN ILLINOIS POWER )
COOPERATIVE, INC. )
) Docket No. S0-461 OL (Operating Licenst zr Clinton )
Fower Station, Un' 1) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I served copies cf Illinois' i
Motion For Leave To File Statement Of Issues on the persons listed on the attached Notice by causing them to be deposited in the United StateN' mail, first class, postage prepaid, on this 26th day of March, 1982.
t, A<h)4.Wa % ~
PHILIP L WILLMAN S M e e