ML20050A411

Forwards Proprietary Amend 2 to Gessar II Re Probabilistic Risk Assessment.Rept Available in Central Files Only. Affidavit Encl

ML20050A411
Person / Time
Site:	05000447
Issue date:	03/19/1982
From:	Sherwood G GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19268D113	List: ML20050A411
References
NUDOCS 8204010269
Download: ML20050A411 (5)

Text

_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _________

GENERAL h ELECTRIC NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS DIVISION GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,175 CURTNER AVE., SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95125 MC 682, (408) 925-5040 e r March 19, 1982 # g

e. gce*D U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2 S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation -

APR 011982p. -

Washington, DC 20555 S Sg88"Y Attention: D. G. Eisenhut, Director 't, Division of Licensing Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

SUBMITTAL OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FOR REVIEW 0F 238 NUCLEAR ISLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC STANDARD SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (GESSAR II);

DOCKET NO. STN 50-447 General Electric is submitting 60 copies of the proprietary portion of Amendment No. 2 to GESSAR II docketed February 12, 1982. This submittal consists of the proprietary portion of Amendment No. 2 pertaining to the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) which quantifies the risk associated with operating a BWR/6 standard plant with a reference Mark III containment for the purpose of electrical power generation. We request this information be withheld from public disclosure and considered as proprietary pursuant to Section 2.790 of 10 CFR Part 2.

The information contained herein provides analytical methods and discussions which have been identified as proprietary. It is, therefore, requested that this document be included in the review of GESSAR II and that it be held in confidence and not be released for publication or otherwise disclosed. ,

The nonproprietary information of Amendment No. 2 is provided under separate cover. -

Sincerely, hp .

&W Glenn G. Sherwood, Manager Safety and Licensing Operation g m

Appg

?i Y

O pg ,

GGS:csc:rf/202-R 3/17 i A3 T'S I O Attachments cc: H. J. Faulkner (w/o att.) L. S. Gifford (w/o att.)

R. J. Mattson (w/o att.) J. R. Miller (w/o att.)

R. B. Minogue (w/o att.) D. F. Ross (w/o att.)

R. L. Tedesco (w/o att.) M. C.'Thandani (w/o att.)

0204010269 820319 P. S. Shewmon (ACRS) (w/o att.)

PDR ADOCK 05000447 K PDR _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __________.

l GENERAL ELECTRIC C0MPANY AFFIDAVIT I, Glenn G. Sherwood, being duly sworn, depose and state as follows:

1. I am Manager of Safety and Licensing Operation, General Electric l Company, and have been delegated the function of reviewing the i information described in paragraph 2 which is sought to be withheld ,

and have been authorized to apply for its withholding.

2. The information sought to be withheld is contained in the proprietary ,

supplement to Appendix 150 of 238 Nuclear Island General Electric Standard Safety Analysis (GESSAR II).

3. In designating material as proprietary, General Electric utilizes the definition of proprietary information and trade secrets set forth in the American Law Institute's Restatement Of Torts, Section 757. This definition provides:

i "A trade secret may consist of any formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used in one's business and which gives him an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.... A substantial element of secrecy must exist, so that, except by the use of improper means, there would be difficulty in acquiring infor-mation.... Some factors to be considered in determining whether given information is one's trade secret are: (1) the extent to which the information is known outside of his business; !

(2) the extent to which it is known by employees and others ,

involved in his business; (3) the extent of measures taken by him to guard the secrecy of the information; (4) the value of the information to him and to his competitors; (5) the amount of effort or money expended by him in developing the information; (6) the ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly acquired or duplicated by others."

4. Some examples of categories of information which fit into the definition of proprietary information are:

a. Information that discloses a process, method or apparatus where prevention of its use by General Electric's competitors without license from General Electric constitutes a competi-tive economic advantage over other companies; ,

b. Information consisting of supporting data and analyses, including test data, relative to a process, method or apparatus, the application of which provide a competitive economic advantage, .

e.g., by optimization or improved marketability; 1

c. Information which if used by a competitor, would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position e in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality or licensing of a similar product;

d. Information which reveals cost or price information, produc-tion capacities, budget levels or commercial strategies of General Electric, its customers or suppliers;

e. Information which reveals aspectr. of past, present or future General Electric customer-funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to General Electric;

f. Information which discloses patentable subject matter for which it may be desirable to obtain patent protection;

g. Information which General Electric must treat as proprietary according to agreements with other parties.

5. Initial approval of proprietary treatment of a document is made by the Subsection Manager of the originating component, the man most likely to be acquainted with the value and sensitivity of the information in relation to industry knowledge. Access to such documents within the Company is limited on a "need to know" basis and such documents at all times are clearly identified as proprietary.

6. The procedure for approval of external release of such a document is reviewed by the Section Manager, Project Manager, Principal Scientist or other equivalent authority, by the Section Manager of the cognizant Marketing function (or his delegate) and by the Legal Operation for technical content, competitive effect and deter-mination of the accuracy of the proprietary designation in accord-ance with the standards enumerated above. Disclosures outside General Electric are generally limited to regulatory bodies, customers and potential customers and their agents, suppliers and licensees only in accordance with appropriate regulatory provisions or pro-prietary agreements.

7. The document mentioned in paragraph 2 above has been evaluated in accordance with the above criteria and procedures and has been found to contain information which is proprietary and which is customarily held in confidence by General Electric.

8. The information presented in the proprietary supplement of the document mentioned in Paragraph 2 provides test results and '

analytical method discussions which have been identified as proprietary in previously submitted documents.

9. The information to the best of my knowledge and belief, has consis-tently been held in confidence by the General Electric Company, no public disclosure has been made, and it is not available in public .

sources. All disclosures to third parties have been made pursuant i to regulatory provisions of proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in confidence.

2

10. Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the General Electric Company and deprive or reduce the availability of profit-making opportunities because:

a) It was developed with the expenditure of substantial resources exceeding $2,000,000.

b) Public availability of this information would deprive General Electric of the ability to seek reimbursement, would permit competitors to utilize this information to General Electric's detriment, and would impair General Electric's abilit,y to maintain licensing agreements to the substantial financial and competitive disadvantage of General Electric.

c) Public availability of the information would allow foreign competitors, including competing BWR suppliers, to obtain containment information at no cost which General Electric developed at substantial cost. Use of this information by foreign competitors would give them a competitive advantage over General Electric by allowing foreign competitors to ptvduce their containments at lower cost than General Electric.

Glenn G. Sherwood, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he has read the foregoing affidavit and the matters stated therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief.

Executed at San Jose, California, this _19 day of March 1982.

'Glenn G. Sherwood General Electric Company STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF #ANTA CLARA ) ss:

Subscribed and sworn before me this 19 day of March 1982.

cococccccccccecocecocococecoce3 j p_g OFFICIAL SEAL' s

8 g) 2 hjh nNaypu'stfcstYrfas$x !

8 'b NOTARY PUBLIU IN ANDf 0R SAID SANTA CLARA COUNTY R COUNTY AND STATE N My Comrrission Expires De $

Ihococosococcnococo c. 21,1984 occuococci3

! GGS: csc: rf/202-S 3

, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR RE'GULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of )

General Electric Company ) Docket No. STN 50-447 Standard Plant )

SUBMITTAL OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FOR REVIEW OF 238 NUCLEAR ISLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC STANDARD SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (GESSAR II)

General Electric Company, applicant in the above captioned proceeding, hereby submits proprietary information to be included in the review of the 238 Nuclear Island General Electric Standard Safety Analysis Report (GESSAR II) docketed February 12, 1982.

This proprietary material consists of Amendment No. 2 which amends -

GESSAR II by adding Appendix 15D to Chapter 15. Appendix 150 provides a Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) which quantifies the risk associated with operating a BWR/6 standard plant with a reference Mark III containment for the purpose of electrical power generation.

The PRA demonstrates that the risk of operating the BWR/6 standard plant is minimal relative to other societal risks and addresses issues that have been raised with regard to severe accidents. This PRA is provided for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's review of the 238 Nuclear Island GESSAR II Severe Accident Design.

Respectfully submitted, General Electric Company by:

G.' G. Sherwood, Manager (

Nuclear Safety and Licensing Operation Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 day of March 1982.

Y " " " * * "ofy & *g [ " } by: AuW YM o

KAREN 5. VOGELHUBER NOTARY PUBuC. CALIFORNIA' 8

8 SANTA CLARA COUNTY k: My Commission Expires Dec. 21

%mmmmmmmmmmm,1984mman csc:rf/202E4

.