ML20049J646
| ML20049J646 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 03/01/1982 |
| From: | METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20049J645 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8203180558 | |
| Download: ML20049J646 (3) | |
Text
s
~
(
P10CEDURE INSTRUCT 10N MEMO IBi1T 2 FROCEDURES
&p $
~
f
'/-
CORRECT ADDRESS d
% /.
- i IF NECESSARY
- d Y@"he ew-
- 74555 RETURN TO: Maureen McKinney PROCEDURE DISTRIBUTION CONTROL ROOM 130 UNIT 2 ADMIN BLDG Date 3-9 "E9 Please update your procedure file with the attached procedures listed below, destroy the superseded procedures, and post your Master Procedure Index accordingly. Also please sign the acknowledgement at the bottom of this memo and return to Maureen McKinney, Room 130. Procedure Distribution Control, Unit 2 Admin. Blda. as shown above.
Procedure No.
Revision No.
l0 $ *l0 l
A0$ Adka
=
I l
i C
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS / COMMENTS D U EI*.**".co'ld E E ",r.U. 7 5 T,.*I. Y O ",i Y !in) EIU * "" * * *****
m 71 5 tfww H 3
1M og cal Con trumon Processr.t
- i::::!!:::::!:::::::::
:::
t I hereby acknowledge suceipt of the items above and have complied with the instruetions.
8203180558 82031E "
A0000491 7-61 PDR ADOCK 05000320 F
--~-_n-..-,,,.,m
L4%" vgsdA-Q z;
" CHANGE" SIDE 1 Three Mile island Nuclear Station AP1001 Procodure Change Request No. p ff-#/
Figure 10013 n r s m, w um, %,..,-
o 1.
Procedure 1054.11 n
Doe Prp.nt R vemon No.
N o.
2.
Recommended Revision (inctod o.g. numon. o.mer.on nume.re..no enart word,no of meommeno.d ce.ne.. An.cn.ddition.:
en.so et necessery.1 Eliminate.
3.
Reason f or Revision Incorporation into EPIP 1054.10.
4.
(a) Does Revision roolece a TCN7 l
l yes W no (b) If "yes" indicate the TCN Number l
I M
_ Sate /gkg/L Recommended by aTF [/ub Date t r.lt.nel 6. Supervisor's Signature t-v s
l 5.
This Section completed by Procedure Coordinator 7.
(a) is procedure on Nuclear Safety Related Procedure List?. (Sec. A.P. tool. App.ndia B)
If "yes", change is reviewed by PORC and a Nuclear Seisty. W yes I
i no Evaluation is prepared (side 2 of this form). If "no", only Department Head review is required.
(b) is procedure on Environmental Impact Proced:re List?
Is A.P.1001 Aco.ndis si if "yes", an Environmental impact Evaluatica must be prepared (s.d. 2 of ivws Formi l l yes W no (Administratise, Chemistry and Health Physics Procedures may require approval of both Unit 8.
Review Unit 2 Unit 1 Department Heed i Y/d%- m Data n/.v/di Department Heed Date Chairman of PORCOWhte 1//J//2.
Chairman of PORC Date WM#
Date NI L
9.
Acoroval w
' Unit Superintendent
- NOTE: If 7 (a) or 7 (b) are "yes% nit Superintendent m pprove evaluation on the other sirie of this form.
/
10.
Aoproval Dats l
Manager, Generation Quality Assurance
" NOTE: M.Q.A. epproval required only on certain Adeninistrative Procedures listed in Enclosure 7 of AP 11.
Change Entered 8-/- 8A d
Rev. No.
Dete TM1 S4. Rev e/77
,.,v.
.u A
t "EV A LU ATION" SIDE 2 Three Mile Island Nacient Sation AP f 001 Nucieer Saf ety/Environmaral Impact Evolustion Figure 10014
.7S* //l 1054.11 Offsice Rad Montenrine_
1.
.orocedure Charge No.
Tice No.
f 2.
Nuclear Safety Evaluation Does the attached procedure change:
increase the probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malfun I
- (a) l nn x equipment imp ortant to safe ty7.......................................
create the possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any evalua
- (b) previously in the saf ety analysis report 7..............................
l no v I no reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis f or any technical specification?.......
I
- (c)
Details of Evatuation (Empe6n swiy anesiers to Was quemone are "no". Atach seMond peces H reav This procedure change does not affect equipmenc readiness and/or operational procedures but merely minimizes paperwork.
h ufk
/
Date Evaluation By
/
(/ (Uf} '
3.
Enviionmental Imoact Evaluation l
^
Does the attacned procedure change:
yes l l no l l
possibly involve a significant environmental im pact?..............................
la)
(if 3 (a) is "yes", snewer questions (b) and (c) and fill in " Details of Evaluation" be yes I l nc j t-l no, sute why by filling in the "Demils of Evaluation" below.)......................
yes i j no i i
have a significant adverse eff ect on the erwironment7............................
(b) involve a significant environmental matter or question not previously reviewed and I no P en tuated by the N.R.C............................................
(c)
Det:iis of Evaluation Attach additional pagesif required l
Date Evaluation By 4.
Unit Superintendent requests PORC review [
[ Checkif YES.
5.
Approvai Evolustion AccompanyingTCN Evatuation Accompanying PCR
- W Wf f.
~>A k 2 SRO ueruse Dam Onit Supermtendpnt Date Reviewed
/
Member of iMant Statf Date Approval Date Unit Supermancent The Evaluation " Accompanying a PCR" evaluation and apptovel chain may be f NOTE:
eex-w g,
f w&89hf
- * *