ML20049J639

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Public Version of Procedure Change Request 1-MD-82-0040 Deleting Revision 2 to Procedure 1004.11 Re Offsite Radiation Monitoring.Deleted Procedure Has Been Incorporated Into Procedure 1004.10.Receipt Form Encl
ML20049J639
Person / Time
Site: Crane  
Issue date: 03/04/1982
From: Nash B
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20049J638 List:
References
NUDOCS 8203180546
Download: ML20049J639 (3)


Text

_

6 PROCEDUKE_ CANCELLATION MtM0 CDRRECT ADDRESS g,

4 IF NECESSARY RETURN TO: Betty Nash Procedure Control Main. Bldg.

Da tea ~~Y--$A Please remove from your file and de.stroy the cancelled procedures listed below, i

and post your Master Procedure Index accordingly. Also please sign the acknowledge-ment at the bottom of this memo and return to Betty Nash, Procedure Control, Mmin. Bldg. as shown above.

Procedure No.

Revision No.

/0 0V/l 0

    • f/Th MO~f>$dfd

//

(/

l l

M i e mA

/5V N'oh

/ W a e *,. _ W

~

-fu m,,. 7 ~ PJ

'Q ann,ZU1985 Q

\\h 'DiiimbN

\\WiW l

i ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS / COMMENTS

,A 1

- &W/k e Mb. K Vmw.YN, WW l

.ML,DA

- 22,6 t/

7 A

l I hereby acknowledge receipt of this memo and have complied with the go instruc tions.

fg g

l (Signature)

(Ext. No.)

(Date)

A0000457 9-80 l

es%9 0203180546 820312 h

PDR ADOCK 05000289 F

PDR

&c. fo /C-- Yu

~cggn g~

f 1

Three Mile laimed Nuclew S'taition PCR No. @~

UE

~

Procedure Chenge Fisquest NOTE: Instructions and guidelines in AP1001 A must be fo80wed when completing this form.

1.

Procedure 1004.11 1

Offsite Rad fionitorina No Pmosm Ronsion No.

Tsue 2.

Recommended Change: Onclude page numbers. paragraph numbers, and exact wording of recommended change. Attact1additionalsheetsifnecessary.)

=

(

fl4"'ktt/~g/J l

& ic T c p.a d.. -n y:

21-~.<

o f I'M

!"* D * * * -003 9 l

/oc'/./O

  1. 1 3.

Reason for Change:/CM.//

Incorporation of material into 1004.10.

4.

(a) Does Revision replace a TCN ?.

O yesG no (b) If "yes" indicate the TCN Number 5.

Is procedure "important to Safety"?

O yesC no if "Yes" a Safety Evaluation is required (side 2).

6.

ls procedure "Environmentat Impset Related"7 O yes E no If "Yes" an Environmentalimpact Evaluation is required (side 21.

i Review Signatures:

fl(Z.O!Bt

'* b Date 7.

Change Recommended by: *

[NL

~

Date

' > /3 */

8.

Procedure Owner Concurrence: '<

N

/

d/MIkh Date

- /> a / *'/

9.

Responsible Ofhce Department Head Concurrence <

s

10. ApprovalSignature(s): (Per AP1001 A Tabie 2)

NOTE: Procedura coordinator's signature signifies all requared reviews (per "L

1 1 2 5t.

2 2

~g%

,, m n gg_

,, 43 o...

,_.c_._,

3 - v-P 1 A

i i.. Cnange ente,ed 0.ie Rev No e7:O'~1t

"EhALUATION" Side 2 Three Mlle Island Nuclear Station 5.1 < l 0-8-E-te'a4P1 Safety / Environmental Impact Evaluation I -i i i i i rCN 1004.11 Offsite 7ad "enitorinn l

1.

Procedure No Tiue i

2.

Safety Evaluation Ooeti tne attached procedure change:

'fa)' increart the pro'bability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or yes C no C malfunction of equipment important to safety?

"b) create the possibility for an accident or malfunction of aLdifferent type thae Sny yesO nog evaluated previously in the saf ety analysis report?..

  • fc) reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any technical yes C no C specification ?

Details of Evolustion (Explain wny answers to above cuestions c.v. "no* Attach additional pages if recuired.) This channe does not affect ecuiprent read u es or ocerational pr'ocedures but merely minimizes redundant oace;9erk.'

Date

/-

Evaluation By f/VfV

/

  • !f any of these questions are answered"YES" the chan'ge must be reviewed and approved by the NRC onor to implementation.

3.

Environmentalimpact Evaluation Coos the attached procedure change:

yesC noO fa) possibly 'nvoive a significant environment *.limpact ?.

fit 3(a) is "yes", answer cuestions 'bl and (c) and fill in " Details of Evaluation" cetow. if no, state wny by filing in the " Details of Evalua n~ below.)

b) nave a significant adverse effed cry a vir nment?..

yesC noC I

"c) mvolve a significant environrriental matter < r ques not previously reviewed yesC noC l

and evaluated by the N.R.C.....

t

/

l j

Details of Evaluation (Attaen additioratpage sif reg ired)

I Evaluation By Data

  • 1f any of these questions are answered"YES" the enange must be reviewed and approved by the NRC onor to imolementation.
4. Approval (s) for PCR (Per Table Two)

Approval (s) for TCN

_a 7_---.

1. If "Two member of the plant i 2. Normal approveits) per table management staff" route:

I two:

I A

SS/SF witn SRo tsc7e {

p\\

,l e

yps

[

[

1 /

S.grp+4 Caie g[j y b/

2'-/6-k Vempe Pf ant Mng Bad J

/ Qu Daie SignaWe

/

/

)

j

0. e s.p,e Within seven (7) Days f

f v

5'9"*'d' 08

Approval per Tai le bo:

I l

0.i. i s.en.i.e I

oee s.eneiae

.