ML20046D411

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards AIT Insp Rept 50-213/93-80 on 930630-0709 Re 930622 & 26 Loss of Offsite Power Events & 930627 Failure of motor- control-ctr-5
ML20046D411
Person / Time
Site: Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date: 08/16/1993
From: Hodges M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Opeka J
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20046D412 List:
References
NUDOCS 9308190253
Download: ML20046D411 (4)


See also: IR 05000213/1993080

Text

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. . . .

.

.

t

R SIGg\\

g&

f

UMTED STATES

.

yg

'

h

l g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

c

7J

-

[

REGION 1

'

C,.

.

.,'

475 ALLENDALE ROAD

,/

KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406 1415

%, '

4 /

.....

AUG 161993

Docket No. 50-213

Mr. John F. Opeka

Executive Vice President - Nuclear

Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company

P. O. Box 270

Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270

Dear Mr. Opeka:

SUBJECT:

NRC AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM (AIT) REGARDING TWO LOSS

OF OFFSITE POWER EVENTO AND THE LOSS OF MOTOR-CONTROL-

CENTER-5 NRC REPORT NO. 50-213/93-80

The encloseli rerort n fers to the NRC Augmented Inspection Team (AIT), led by

Mr. Jame; Tra p of t' tis office, on June 30 through July 9,1993, at the Haddam Neck Plant

in Hadda, CannectMut. The purpose of this inspectioa was to review the circumstances

regarding two ap& rate loss of offsite power events, and a loss of motor-control-center-5

(MCC-5) that occurred during the conduct of test activities At the conclusion of the

inspection, the team findings were discussed with Mr. Stetz and members of your staff at an

exit meeting that was open for public observation on July 27,1993.

The scope of the inspection included developing a detailed event description, evaluating the

root causes for the events, assessing the effectiveness of corrective actions, and evaluating

the safety significance of each event. The inspection consisted of selective examination of

procedures and representative records, observations of testing and inspections, and inten'iews

with personnel.

1

The less of offsite power events were significant because they caused a temporary loss of

shutdown cooling and the loss of offsite power is a precursor to station blackout. The

l

reliable operation of MCC-5 is vital to plant safety because both trains of emergency core

cooling system injection valves are powered from this motor-control-center. Based on the

significance of these events, all of which occurred in a short time period, the NRC

dispatched an AIT.

j

190070

/gI

f

f

9308190253 930e16

-

PDR

ADOCK 05000213

0

PDR

y.

>

AUG I C D33

"

,

Mr. John F. Opeka

2

The root causes for the June 22 and June 26,1993, loss of offsite power events were

positisely identified as a wiring error and a blown fuse, respectively. For both events, the

operator actions to mitigate the consequences of the events were appropriate. The corrective

actions taken in response to these events were reviewed by the AIT and determined to be

acceptable. The NRC team concluded that these events were the result of defcctive

nonsafety-related equipment and were not the result of recent performance deficiencies by

plant staff or procedures.

The root cause for the June 27,1993, failure of the MCC-5 automatic bus transfer scheme

was not positively identified. Although the root cause was not identified, two highly suspect

components were identified and replaced. Your corrective actions and compensatory

measures taken to ensure the reliability of MCC-5 were outlined in your letter to the NRC,

dated July 15,1993, " Commitments to Test Motor-Control-Center-5." We have reviewed

these commitment, and determined that the proposed actions and compensatory measures are

appropriate. While trouble-shooting the automatic bus transfer (ABT) failure, your staff

identified a potential generic problem with the Westinghouse DB 25 breaker, 52X relays. At

the conclusion of this inspection, this potentially generic breaker failure concern was still

under review by your staff and the breaker vendor. We expect that this issue will be

resolved and appropriate actions will be taken in an expeditious manner. In addition, your

letter states that you plan to conduct a review of potential design changes to the ABT which

could improve the reliability of this scheme. We request that you provide the results of this

design review and the schedule for implementing any design changes identified to the

Region I Regional Administrator.

The NRC team also noted two issues regarding the licensing basis of MCC-5. The updated

UFSAR, Section 8.3, states, in part, that "The Class 1E system has he redundancy,

capacity, capability, and reliability to supply power to all safety-related loads. This system

ensures a safe plant shutdown to mitigate accident effects, even in the event of a single

failure." This statement does not appear to be accurate as related to single failures and

MCC-5. In addition, the team questioned the applicability of 10 CFR 50.46(d), which

explicitly states that the performance of the emergency core cooling syste

(ECCS) system

must include in particular Criterion 35 of Appendix A, which requires that le ECCS safc:y

function be accomplished assuming a single failure. The current design of the ECCS system

does not satisfy the requirement of Criterion 35 due to the single failure vulnerabilities of

MCC-5. While the team noted that an exemption had been granted by the NRC for the

MCC-5 single failure vulnerability during original plant licensing, an explicit exemption from

the 50.46 requirement was not apparent to the team. Both of these issues are currently being

reviewed by the NRC.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this lettcr and

the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

_

<

.

$r. John F. Opeka

3

We will gladly discuss any questions you have conceming this inspection.

Sincerely,

Y Gyl D,

17 7EL

,

Marvin W. Hodges, Dir-ctor

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosure: NRC Region I Inspection Report No. 50-213/93-80

cc w/ encl:

W. D. Romberg, Vice President, Nuclear, Operations Services

J. P. Stetz, Vice President, Haddam Neck Station

G. H. Bouchard, Director, Nuclear Quality Services

D. J. Ray, Unit Director

R. M. Kacich, Director, Nuclear Licensing

Gerald Garfield, Esquire

Nicholas Reynolds, Esquire

K. Abraham, PAO (2)

Public Document Room (PDR)

local Public Document Room (LPDR)

l

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident inspector

State of Connecticut SLO

.

,-

<

~-

-

.

.

,

4

Mr. John F. Opeka

bec w/ encl:

Region 1 Docket Room . with concurrences)

(

bec w/enci (VIA E-51 AIL):

J. Stolz, NRR/PD I-4

V. McCree, OEDO

A. Wang, PM, NRR

bec w/o enci (VIA E-31 AIL):

M. Hodges, DRS

J. Durr, DRS

J. Trapp, DRS

bec w/ encl: AIT Reports Only

The Chairman

Commissioner Rogers

Commissioner Remick

Commissioner DePlanque

J. Taylor, EDO

T. Murley, NRR

Paul Boehnert, Chairman, ACRS

Ken Raglin. Director, TCC

DCD (OWFN Pl-37) (Dist. Code #1E10)

A. Chaffee. NRR/ DORS /EAB

E. Jordan, AEOD

INPO

- -

.

.

.