ML20046D368
| ML20046D368 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 08/11/1993 |
| From: | Maynard O WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| WO-93-0150, WO-93-150, NUDOCS 9308180273 | |
| Download: ML20046D368 (4) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ s. 1 WOLF CREEK ' NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION i Otto L Maynard Vce Pressdent Ptant Opera'sonn August 11,-1993 WO 93-0150 1 3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mall Station F1-137 i ] Washington, D. C. 20555 t
Subject:
Docket No. 50-482: Semi-annual Fitness!for Duty Program Performance Data Report L Gentlemen: i I The purpose of this letter is to transmit the Semi-annual Fittes-for Duty j Program Performance Data Report for Wolf Creek Generating btation in -accordance with 10 CFR 26.71(d). This report covers the - six month. period - beginning January 1, 1993 and ending on June 30, 1993. Very truly yours, ^ is i Otto L.# aynard M Vice President Plant Operations OLM/jad -{ Enclosure cc: V. D. Johnson (NRC), w/a J. L. Milhoan (NRC), w/a G. A. Pick _(IEC), w/a i V. D. Reckley (imC), w/a i t i 17003G l ' O #'"# "' "" d 9308180273 930811 f, An Equal O;9Munity Employer M/F/HCNET PDR ADDCK 0",000482 r{,x-R PDR w -i ~ < -
p a Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 6/30/93 WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION Cuncam e M:ves Enent, Burlington, Kansas Lomson Gary Burchart, Wolf Creek - Human Resources (316) 364-8831 EXT 8591 Coa:a= Name P*ione (incta area coce) Cutoff s: Screert'Confirmaten (ng'mi) 3 Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana / Amphetamines / / Cocaine / Phencychdine / / Opiates / Alcohol (% BAC) / Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average NumDer we Unesconed Access 1289 239 224 l Tested Positive Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 8 0 32 1 726 2 [ Post act. it g g g g g g 0 h Observed behavior 0 0 1 0 11 7 Random 439 0 83 0 24 1 Follow-up 3 1 1 0 4 0 Other 117 1 Total 450 1 765 10 Rev.1/92
4 l Attachment to WO 93-0150 +. 1 WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION Fitness for 1/uty Events Report for Period of January 1, 1993 - June 30, 1993 1 1 POSITIVE TEST RESULTS i Follow-Up One employee tested positive for cocaine on a " follow-up" test..This employee was not a supervisor or licensed operator. Therefore, there was no reporting obligation under 10 CFR 26.73. However, due to this employee's history of failure to comply with WCNOC's FFD policy, his unescorted access authorization was revoked and the employee was terminated. Pre Access i One contractor tested positive for cocaine on a " pre-access" screen and was never granted access. One contractor tested positive for both THC and cocaine on a " pre-access" screen and was never granted access. One contractor tested positive for both breath and blood alcohol on a " pre-access" screen and was never granted access. For Cause 5 t Two outage contractors were tested "for-cause" following a report from the local sheriff's office advising that their girlfriends had been arrested in possession of marijuana and had recently been in their company. These samples j were tested at limits of detection. Unescorted access authorization was suspended until the results of the test were confirmed. Following confirmation from the MRO that levels of THC were present, access was j terminated. } Five outage contractors tested positive for alcohol. All five were denied 'i unescorted access authorization and terminated. Random i l One outage contractor tested positive :for alcohol on a random screen. Unescorted access authorization was denied and the contractor was terminated. Events Reported in Accordance Vith 10 CFR 26.73 No events occurred during this reporting period requiring reporting in accordance with 10.CFR 26.73. i 4
.i Attachment to WO 93-0150 Initiatives Taken The feasibility of beginning an on-site testing. program was studied during this reporting period to determine whether increased plant safety, decreased cost and improved turn-around time could result from an on-site program. Analysis showed that on-site testing would have a very minimal impact, if any, on plant safety, turn-around time would not be significantly improved, and cost would increase significantly with on-site testing. ' Therefore, ~it was determined to be in the best interest of the company. to continue using a NIDA laboratory for all specimen processing. i 4 i j s 1 i 7 I 6 s 9 a r -,n.-, - -,,. >}}