ML20046C945
| ML20046C945 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 07/26/1993 |
| From: | Gody A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Link R WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9308130087 | |
| Download: ML20046C945 (4) | |
Text
.
July 26, 1993
.j Docket Nos.
50-266
^
and 50-301 Mr. Robert E. Link, Vice President Nuclear Power Department Wisconsin Electric Power Company 231 West Michigan Street, Room P379 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201
Dear Mr. Link:
SUBJECT:
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT SECURITY PLAN REVISION, REQUEST FOR INFORMATION We are responding to your letter of February 26, 1993, which transmitted changes identified as Revision 9 to the Point Beach Nuclear Plant Security Plan (PBNPSP) submitted under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p).
Two issues related to vital area policy were referred to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) for review. Comments regarding the remainder of the Revision were transmitted from our Region III Office on April 7,1993.
NRR has comments on the two issues based upon our initial review.
For the first issue, additional information is necessary to determine the acceptability of the change to Section 2.3 of the PBNPSP.
The second issue, regarding a change to Section 7.0 of the PBNPSP, is not consistent with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p).
You may resubmit your changes either in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10 CFR 50.90.
For the second issue, which was identified as unacceptable under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p), the previously approved plan revisions must be followed.
The enclosure to this letter contains specific information regarding our comments on the two issues.
The enclosure to your letter contained Safeguards Information of a type specified in 10 CFR 73.21 and is being withheld from public disclosure.
This request for information affects fewer than-10 respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under Public Law 96-511.
Sincerely, Allen Hansen/for Anthony T. Gody, Jr., Sr. Project Manager Project Directorate III-3 Division of Reactor Projects Ill/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ enclosure:
See next page
- See previous concurrence DISTRIBUTION Docket File ATGody,Jr. NRC & Local PDRs RSkelton PDIll-3 Reading OGC JRoe-ACRS(10)
JZwolinski PDill-3 Reading JHannon Region Ill DRP MRushbrook 0FFICE PD3-3:LA PSGB PD3-3:PM PD3-3:PD y
NAME
- MRushbrook
- RSkelton
- ATGody JHannon k 7 /M193f pl I
DATE 6/21/93 6/21/93 6/21/93
. DOCUMENT NAME: g:\\ptbeach\\pbsecuri.ltl 0FFICIAL RECORD
\\C 9308100087 930726
{f y$ @pjjL;gegg
.. - ~ - e ~ mr e DR ADOCK 0500 6
M,,
= --
e nag y
p a
't E
UNITED STATES i
"i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2
f WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 4 001
\\.....j Docket Nos.
50-266 July 26, 1993 and 50-301 Mr. Robert E. Link, Vice President Nuclear Power Department Wisconsin Electric Power Company 231 West Michigan Street, Room P379 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201
Dear Mr. Link:
SUBJECT:
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT SECURITY PLAN REVISION, REQUEST FOR INFORMATION We are responding to your letter of February 26, 1993, which transmitted changes identified as Revision 9 to the Point Beach Nuclear Plant Security Plan (PBNDSP) submitted under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p).
Two issues related to vital area policy were referred to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) for review.
Comments regarding the remainder of the Revision were transmitted from our Region III Office on April 7, 1993.
NRR has comments on the two issues based upon our initial review.
For the first issue, additional information is necessary to determine the acceptability of the change to Section 2.3 of the PBNPSP.
The second issue, regarding a change to Section 7.0 of the PBNPSP, is not consistent with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p).
You may resubmit your changes either in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10 CFR 50.90.
For the second issue, which was identified as unacceptable under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p), the previously approved plan revisions must be followed.
The enclosure to this letter contains specific information regarding our comments on the two issues.
The enclosure to your letter contained Safeguards Information of a type specified in 10 CFR 73.21 and is being withheld from public disclosure.
This request for information affects fewer than 10 respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under Public Law 96-511.
Y Anthony T. Gody, Jr., Sr. Project Manager Project Directorate III-3 Division of Reactor Projects Ill/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ enclosure:
See next page
i Enclosure I
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT SECURITY PLAN REVISION NO. 9 REVIEW COMMENTS t
SECTION PAGE COMMENT PBNPSP 2.3 4
SECTION 2.2.
For this revision to be acceptable, indicate that procedures exist that require the recipient of those alarms to notify the Central Alarm Station (CAS)/ Secondary Alarm Station (SAS) when they receive those alarms.
PBNPSP 7.0 1
Paragraph 1.
The basic requirements of 10 CFR
_l 73.55(d)(8) must be addressed regarding access during major maintenance.
E
[
i l
l 6
t i
5 i
D Mr. Robert E. Link Point Beach Nuclear Plant Wisconsin Electric Power Company Unit Nos. I and 2 r
cc:
Ernest L. Blake, Jr.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N Street,-N.W.
Washington, DC 20037 Mr. Gregory J. Maxfield, Manager Point Beach Nuclear Plant Wisconsin Electric Power Company 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 Town Chairman Town of Two Creeks Route 3 Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 Chairman Public Service Commission of Wisconsin Hills Farms State Office Building Madison, Wisconsin 53702 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Resident Inspector's Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 6612 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 E