ML20046A987
| ML20046A987 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/02/1993 |
| From: | Remick NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9308020211 | |
| Download: ML20046A987 (2) | |
Text
,,
'A'%
RELEhSED TO THE PDR -l N-0 T A-T I O N VOTE 9//f/95 Gr s
RESPONSE SHEET
!..[/."!*.'........YN....!
-i T0:
SAMUEL J. CHILK, SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION i
FROM:
C0W4ISSIONER REMICK
SUBJECT:
SECY-93-130 - REGULATORY IMPACT SURVEY FOR FUEL CYCLE AND MATERIALS LICENSEES i
X). saws /
APPROVED DISAPPROVED ABSTAIN-NOT PARTICIPATING REQUEST DISCUSSION C044ENTS:
ahc4 / coxwnb f/a)c sie 9308020211 930602 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONNNCE PDR
/' SIGNATURE RELEASE VOTE
/I/
2-uN D DATE WITHHOLD VOTE
/-
/
i ENTERED ON "AS"
- YES /
NO i
.166133 hbY f
-. ~.
g f
Comments of Commissioner Remick on SECY-93-130 in SECY I approve Option 4 (proceed with original proposal)
First, the I recommend this option for several reasons.
130.
licensing of fuel cycle and materials licensees is rightfully receiving increased scrutiny by the Commission and oth'ars I think that it is critical for including Congress and the GAO.
when reconsidering its regulatory role with respect to the NRC, to hear the views of all fuel cycle and materials licensees, A
involved parties including the licensees themselves.
comprehensive regulatory impact survey could accomplish this.
Secondly, I have found the results of the first phase of the regulatory impact survey to be particularly beneficial during this period of reassessing NRC's materials licensing program.
Finally, I Further study should prove to be equally beneficial.
agree with the staff's conclusion in the Regulatory Impact Survey that there appears to be considerable value in surveying a larger number of licensees in a broader variety of categories and from a wider range of licensees with emphasis on small and medium-sized the staff acknowledges that Option 2 licensees.
In SECY-93-130, Option 3 would be will probably not accomplish this objective.
more responsive to this need but Option 4 has the advantage of covering a sample of all materials licensees in most areas of Therefore, I disapprove the staff's regulatory interface. recommendation of Option 2 and recommend that the staff procee with' Option 4.
)