ML20046A850

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notation Vote Response Sheet Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-92-287A Re Form & Content for Design Certification Rule
ML20046A850
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/09/1993
From: Remick F
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 9308020005
Download: ML20046A850 (2)


Text

,

N NOTATION V0TC RE!. EASED TO THE PDR i.! L(l93 6

i

..,lf. !3

.........N;f....:

RESPONSE SHEET T0:

SAMUEL J. CHILK, SECRETARY OF THE COMISSION FROM:

COMMISSIONER REMICK

SUBJECT:

SECY-92-287A - FORM AND CONTENT FOR A DESIGN CERTIFICATION RULE J d"~"

, p,d 3, y APPROVED X DISAPPROVED X ABSTAIN NOT PARTICIPATING REQUEST Discussion COMMENTS:

g,,,y y c< / p b r I r l c " M " e " N

\\

(//// SIGNATURE RELEASE VOTE

/X/

9 M*" < P 3 DATE WITHHOLD VOTE

/

/

j ENTERED ON "AS" YEs No 1

k 788" 8888 7J8e '

Ifpb101 3

1 CORRESPONDENCE PDR

\\

1

, u 1

Commissioner Remick's comments on SECY-92-287 and SECY-92-287A:

SECY-92-287 contains eight staff positions associated with its proposed " form and content for a design certification rule" for which the staff is seeking Commission approval.

SECY-92-287A contains four staff positions, which are primarily elaborations i

of several positions of the earlier SECY-92-287.

I address several of the staff positions below from the standpoint of how they should appear in the proposed rule.

For those not addressed specifically, I defer expressing any opinion on the merits, until after staff's evaluation of public comments.

I approve seeking public comment on the staff's proposed general i

approach to the form and content for a design certification rule for a generic evolutionary light water reactor, including a j

recommendation to conduct a workshop or workshops to obtain detailed public discussions.

I approve issuing for comment the staff proposal to adopt certain Commission approved staff positions as " applicable regulations" via the design certification rulemaking.

However, I defer commenting on the merits of the proposal until the pros and cons are better articulated through the public comment process.

l I approve consolidating the approved design related information-into a single master Design Control Document.

I recommend that j

the staff consider eventually entering and maintaining the Design l

Control Document in a retrievable computer system.

I approve designating Tier 2 information as " resolved in connection with the issuance of renewal of a design certification" within the meaning of 10 CFR 52.63 (a) (4).

I I approve that an otherwise expired design certification remains valid for a license referencing that design certification until j

the license expires.

1 I disapprove the use of the backfit standard in 10 CFR j

50.109 (a ) (3 ) for changes to Tier 2 information by the Commission i

l and would retain the use of 10 CFR 52.63 as previously approved l

by the Commission.

t I approve the use of the 10 CFR Part 50.59-like process for Tier i

2 information for COL applicants.

I approve the addition of an exemption procedure for Tier 2 information for COL applicants.

I approve deferring the decision on whether selected requirements from the first design certification rule would apply to subsequent design certification rules.