ML20046A245

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to Core Operating Limits Rept for Cycle 10
ML20046A245
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/22/1993
From:
ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20046A235 List:
References
NUDOCS 9307270139
Download: ML20046A245 (12)


Text

.-

l i

h i

. ENTERGY OPERATIONS:

ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE - UNIT 2

..i i

t CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT I

FOR CYCLE 10 REVISION 0 l

i t

i 3

-i h

f 9307270139 930722

~~

- P

. ADOCK:050003M-[,,

PDR PDR

-m++

y

ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE - UNIT 2 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT FOR CYCLE 10, REVISION 0 INDEX P_ AGE I.

INTRODUCTION 3

II.

AFFECTED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 3

III.

CORE OPERATING LIMITS 4

IV.

METIIODOLOGIES 6

V.

LIST OF FIGURES 7

2

ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE - UNIT 2 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT FOR CYCLE 10, REVISION 0 i

1.

INTRODUCTION l

This COIE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR) has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit 2 (ANO-2) Technical Specification 6.9.5 for ANO-2's Cycle 10. The core operating limits have been developed using the NRC approved methodologies specified in Section IV. This is the initial issuance of the

'l Cycle 10 COLR.

1 II.

AFFECTED TECIINICAL SPECIFICATIONS 1) 3/4.1.1.1 Shutdown Margin - Tavg > 200 F 2) 3/4.1,1.2 Shutdown Margin - Tavg s 200 F 3) 3.1.1.4 Moderator Temperature Coefficient 4) 3.1.3.1 Movable Control Assemblies - CEA Position 5) 3.1.3.6 Regulating CEA Insertion Limits 6) 3 1.3.7 Part Length CEA Insertion Limits 7) 3/4.2.1 Linear Heat Rate 8) 3.2.3 Azimuthal Power Tilt - Tq 9) 3/4.2.4 DNBR Margin 10) 3.2 7 Axial Shape Index 3

lH.

CORE OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific operating limits for the specifications listed are presented below.

1) 3/4.1 1.1 - SHUTDOWN MARGIN-T vg > 200 F a

The SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be greater than or equal to 5.5% Ak/k in Modes 1,2,3, and 4.

2) 3/4.1.12 - SHUTDOWN MARGIN - T s 200 F g

The SIIUTDOWN MARGIN shall be greater than or equal to 5.0% Ak/k in Mode 5.

3) 3.1.1.4 - MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT The Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) shall be:

a) less positive than + 0.5 E-4 A k/k/ F whenever THERMAL POWER is s 70% of RATED THERMAL POWER L

b) less positive than 0.0 A k/k/ F whenever THERMAL POWER is > 70%

L of RATED THERMAL POWER c) less negative than - 3.4 E-4 A k/k/ F at RATED THERMAL POWER i

4) 3.1.3.1 - MOVABLE CONTROL ASSEMBLIES - CEA POSITION With one or more full length or part length CEAs trippable but misaligned from any other CEAs in its group by more than the Technical Specification 3.1.3.1 L

allowed value, the minimuni required Modes 1 and 2 core power reduction is.

specified in Figure 1.

5) 31.3.6 - REGULATING CEA INSERTION LIMITS The regulating CEA groups shall be limited to t! n withdrawal sequence and to:

the insertion lirnits shown on Figure 2.-

i L

=

l i

e 6) 3.13.7 - PAlU LENGTH CEA INSERTION LIMITS The part length CEA group shall be limited to the insenion limits shown on Figure 3.

7) 3/41 LINEAR HEAT RATE With COLSS out of sersice, the linear heat rate shall be maintained s 12.1 kW/ft.

' 8) 3 2.3 - AZIMUTHAL POWER TILT-Tg The measured AZIMUTHAL POWER TILT shall be maintained s 0.10.

9)

- 3/4.2.4 - DNI3R MARGIN The DN13R liiilit shall be maintained by one of the following methods:

a)

With COLSS out of service and at least one CEAC operable - Operate 5

within the Region of Acceptable Operation shown on Figure 4, using any operable CPC channel.

b)

With COLSS out of service an,1 neither CEAC operable - Operate within-the Region of Acceptable Operation shown on Figure 5, using any operable CPC cinnnel.

)

i 10) 3.2.7 - AXIAL SHAPE INDEX i

The core average AXI AL SHAPE INDEX (ASI) shall be maintained within the

)

following limits:

a)

COLSS IN SERVICE

- 0.28 s ASI.< + 0.28

- b)

COLSS OUT OF SERVICE (CPC)

- 0.20 s ASI s + 0.20 1

.i i

j.+

5

.I

  • a:

y IV.

METilODOI.OGIES

- The analytical methods used to determine the core operating limits listed above are those previously reviewed and approved by the NRC in:

1)

"The ROCS and DIT Computer Codes for Nuclear Design," CENPD-266-P-A, April 1983. hiethodology for the limit on Shutdown Margins, MTC, and the Regulating CEA Insertion Limits.

2)

"CE Method for Control Element Assembly Ejection Analysis," CENPD-0190-A, January 1976. Methodology for the Regulating CEA Insertion Limits and Azimuthal Pow er Tilt.

3)

" Statistical Combination of Uncertainties Combination of System Parameter Uncertainties in Thermal Margin Analyses for Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 2" CEN-139(A)-P, November 1980. Methodology for the limits on the DMsR Margin and the ASL 4)

" Calculative Methods for the CE Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model,"

CENPD-132-P, Aup.t 1974. Methodology for the limits on the Linear lleat Rate and Azimuthal Power Tilt.

5)

" Calculational Methods for the CE Large break LOCA Evaluation Model,"

CENPD-132-P, Supplement 1, February 1975. Methodology for the limits on the MTC, Linear Heat Rate, Azimuthal Power Tilt and ASI.

. 6)

" Calculational Methods for the CE Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model,"

CENPD-132-P, Supplemer luly 1975. Methodology for the limits on the MTC, Linear Heat Rate,

. Nal Power Tilt and ASI.

7)

" Calculational Methods for the CE Small Break LOCA Evaluation Model,"

CENPD-137-P, August 1974. Methodology for the limits on the MTC, Linear lleat Rate, Azimuthal Power Tilt and ASI.

8)

"CESEC. Digital Simulation of a Combustion Engineering Nuclear Steam Supply System", December 1981. Methodology for the limits on the Shutdown Margins, MTC, Movable Control Assemblies - CdA Position, Regulating CEA Insertion Limits, Part Length CEA Insertion Limits and Azimuthal Power Tilt.

l 6

w

l e.

i V.

LIST OF FIGUltES ~

Figure 1.

Recuired Power Reduction After CEA Deviation i

Figure 2 CEA Insertion Limits Versus Thermal Po'wer :

.l Figure 3.

Part Length CEA Insertion Limit.Versus Thermal Power.

Figure 4 DNBR Margin Operating Limit Based on Core Protection Calculators (COLSS Out of Service, CEAC Operable) l Figure 5 DNBR Margin Ope-ating Limit Based on Core Protection-Calculators (COLSS Out of Service, Both CEACs Inoperable) 4 1

r P

7

FIGURE 1 Iti:QUlitED POWER REDUCTION AFTER CEA DEVIATIONa

  • When core power is reduced to 60% of rated power per this limit curve, further reduction is not required 30 1

-i 2

O F

O D

0me 20 g

f (60 MIN. ;20%)

Cw

/

W 3 3: o 0 c.

l

c. a r

u m

/

ML Qs s

m<

f g

cc 10 i

s O

j

/

wa r

CEA gC i

~~

MISALIGNMENT d

s l-g, a

-1

/

i 7

[I 1

I f

z 0

en 4

n i

2 0

15 30

'45 -

60 TIME AFTER DEVIATION (MINUTES) 8.

1 i

l FIGURE 2 1

l CEA INSERTION LIMITS VERSi 3 TIIERMAL PO'WER i

-O 8

H i

5 l

3 8

I i

2 9

8-o a

e e

w e

a_ g 5

O.

E ro '

lg-I o

J

_e_ g<

l/

3

  • O

_o-o z

t:

/

3

/t itWM NO1183SNI o

l 31Y1S AcV31S

- o-co g

<C nua1 Auous w

l o

i U

l 8 /'

i I

C o

/

f i

i c

i ilMn Not183SNI 4

.- 31Y19 AOY31S O

nW31 DNO7

'9g ~ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ l_ _ _l _,l _ _ _. _

c cv l

-8 o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o N.

H 9

v.

(1 9

o o.

o o

o o

o o

o USMOd lVV483H1 031VU dO NOllOVlad 9

..t t

i

(

.)

FIGURE 3 PART LENGTil CEA INSERTION LIMIT VERSUS TIIERMAL POWER P

o i

"no m

i b

N o

b I

I z

z o

9 E

r

- cr b

l I

w

>- s J

t w

oa I

E

-$z 8

3<

s no Z

3:

CC W

E6 O

F E

WE I

5 g

i S

em H

oQ l

I

-.s w o

w g

as LLS 1

O 1

-J N,

d

\\

0-

\\j

)

l. ~

st

'l o

.l i

i l

'd o

4 i

e a

i LO o

o o

o o

o o

o o

'o o

o" 9

C?

9 m

N H

9 M

q oi 5

o o

o o

o o

o o

o BBMOd

~l V W B E H 1 GB1VB 30 NOllovtid 1

'l

.}..

j I

)

10 1

2.3 l

l l

l

- REGION OF ACCEPTABLE OPERAll0N (0.06,2.26)

-~ T --

l c

J 0

?

.O z

v /.

[.

2 o

/r n3 v:

tu C

c :.

e

'2 -

/

5 Es

)

2 3

/

C 30 O

/

C2

~

3

/

E MC

=

on 0

m-5 k.

c 2

n x

3

/

.M 2~

M 2

/

n n2 I

M

>0

?

2.1 -

=s

/

rr

/

O n-C C3 o

REGION OF ' 4 ACCEPTABLE OPERATION y

{Q J

o, U

(-02,2.075) c

-i c C>

- v:

m w

2.0 -

-2

-1 0

.1

.2 CORE AVERAGE AXIAL SHAPE #1DEX

2.9 l

I t

I i

I J I

i l

O 4-_ w _ _ 7.. -

t I

l l

{

l y

a Z

AEGION OF ACCEPTABLE OPERATION C

_j-.d a

=

O ^=

I l

l l

1 I

w 2.e o

OE J

t 1

E>

22

(-0.2. 2.8)

(0.2, 2.8) v:

m

-O 3

o C*

a

-s o a

O m e a

I' Om O

m F

c 2

C O5 3

H z2 M

2 n2 Z-2.7 O

>O m

m --

n :-

2 s-n PQ 0

REGION OF UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION to c.

>M

~

O Z

4 :::

O o>

m

- v:

h 5

=

t""

2.6 -

O

.2

.1.

0

.1

.2 CORE AVERAGE AXIAL SHAPE WDEX

....