ML20045H941
| ML20045H941 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 07/12/1993 |
| From: | Gibson A NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement (IE Region II) |
| To: | Medford M Tennessee Valley Authority |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9307220145 | |
| Download: ML20045H941 (20) | |
Text
6Clich l.
July 12, 1993 Docket Nos. 50-327, 50-328 License Nos. CPR-77, DPR-79 Tennessee Valley Authority ATTN: Dr. ; lark 0. Medford, Vice President Technical Support 3B Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
-SEQUOYAH RESTART ISSUES This refers to the meeting conducted at our request at the Region II Offices on July 1, 1993. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss with the NRC' Restart Panel the status of your programs to identify backlogs and items to be corrected prior to restart of the Sequoyah Units.
A list of attendees and a copy of your handouts are enclosed.
It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial to us in aiding our understanding of the actions that you are taking to prepare the Sequoyah Units for restart.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact us.
Sincerely, (ORIGINAL SIGNED BY A. F. GIBSON)
Albert _F. Gibson, Director Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Attendees
- 2. License Handouts cc w/encls: (See page 2) 9307220145 930712 PDR ADOCK 05000327 P
PDR 1 l'
_rso l
' J
0
.i l
'l t-Tennessee Valley Authority 2
July 12, 1993-cc w/encis:
'W. H. Kennoy, Director Tennessee Valley Authority General Counsel ET 12A:
Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive ET 11H Knoxville, TN 37902 400 West. Summit Hill Drive.
Knoxville, TN 37902 R. M. Eytchison, Vice President Nuclear Operations County Judge Tennessee Valley Authority Hamilton County Courthouse 3B Lookout Place Chattanooga, TN 37402 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN. 37402-2801 bec w/encls:
(See page 3)
B. S. Schofield, Manager Nuclear Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Tennessee Valley Authority 5B Lookout ~ Place 1101 Market Street-Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Robert Fenech, Vice President Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P. O. Box 2000 Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379 TVA' Representative Tennessee Valley Authority Rockville Office 11921 Rockville Pike Suite 402 Rockville, MD 20852 Ralph H. Shell Site Licensing Manager Sequoyah Nuclear Plant P. O. Box 2000 Soddy-Daisy,-TN 37379 Michael H. Mobley, Director Division of Radiological Health 3rd Floor, L and C Annex 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1532
4 Tennessee Valley Authority 3
bec w/encls:
J.' Johnson, RII-P..J. Kellogg, RII S. E. Sparks, RII B. Bordenick, 0GC.
D. E. LaBarge, NRR Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2600 Igou Ferry Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379 T
f P
4 t
DRP/ I
-f I
l PKe ogg i
7/(~/93'
'I a
4 t
w w
e
+ - - - - - - =.
,r----o--
-=-:,
e-
-e
=
1m---
ENCLOSURE 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES NRC L. Reyes, Deputy Regional Administrator, Region II (RII)
E. W. Merschoff, Director, Division of Reactor Projects, RII A.
F.
Gibson, Director Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), RII F. J. Hebdon, Director, Project Directorate II-4, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) (by telephone)
D.
E. LaBarge, Project Manager, NRR (by telephone)
C.
Julian, Chief, Engineering Branch, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)
W.
E.
Holland, Senior Resident Inspector, RII (by telephone)
S.
E.
Sparks, Project Engineer (by telephone)
P. J. Kellogg, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 4A, RII B.
R.
Crowley, Reactor Inspector, DRS, RII M.
Thomas, Reactor Inspector, DRS, RII TVA R. M.
Eytchison, Vice President, Nuclear Operations R. A.
Fenech, Vice President,-Sequoyah R.
H.
Shell, Site Licensing Manager M.
A.
Cooper, Restart Manager H.
R. Rogers, Backlog Review Committee Chairman D.
L.
Lundy, Technical Support Manager K.
P.
Powers, Plant Manager i
)
i i
1 1
. 6.
e l
BACKLOGS BACKLOG REVIEWS IIRC MRRC Restart Its klogs Restart Criteria No Direct POST RESTART DEPT. AND SYSTEM READINESS Q
NSR11 Impact on a
Inputs Safe, Reliable Yes Plant y
Operations MRRC Restart Indirect Restart Criteria Depts.
No or No POST RESTART Not Applicable DEPT. READINESS y
v Criteria: Any " pile" of work DEPT.
IIRC BRC. Cit 3 3--+-+--
-m t
- rs,-
4 w
w e
y v
w w.
..,-..w s
y
^
BACKLOGS A. How backlogs were identified and reviewed for determining what actions should be taken for restart
- 1. How did we ensure all backlogs were considered - how we developed the list h
- 2. Who reviewed the lists and what criteria was applied to break up the lists for different 1cvels of review or action
- 3. What are the lists
- 4. What type of reviews are/were applied to the above lists
- 5. Where do the 126 workoff curves fit in B. What backlogs will exist at the time of restart and how determined acceptable - differentiate between PROBLEMS and MANAGEMENT ISSUES
- 1. What are the types of PROBLEMS that will exist postrestart
- 2. Why outstanding individual items acceptable - who and how determined
- 3. Why outstanding backlogs collectively are acceptable - who and how determined C. What processes will be in place following restart to ensure acceptability in the future
- 1. How individual items will be evaluated - who and how
- 2. How backlogs will be evaluated in aggregate - who and how
- 3. How backlog reductions will be achieved - scope, priority and schedule
- 4. How we will minimize generation of new backlogs - processes, monitoring D. How we will assess the effectiveness of C.
I
-l
~ ;. '.
A. BACKLOGS
- 1. IIow did we ensure all backlogs were considered - how we developed the list The Backlog Review Committee (BRC) began with a list of backlogs contained in the Site Improvement Plan. NSRB review of engineering backlogs identified additional items which were considered by the BRC e.g. TROI items.
Each department was requested to provide the BRC a list of work in their area. The direction to each department from the Management Restart Review Committee (MRRC) was to identify any work in their department regardless of whether they considered it a backlog or not.
- 2. Who reviewed the lists and what criteria was applied to break up the lists for difTerent levels of review or action A. The BRC evaluated the lists of work to determine which would be considered backlogs of problems subject to special backlog reviews against the restart criteria and which would be considered department workloads to be addressed through other mechanisms.
" Criteria" or typical considerations used to determine which lists of work would NOT be addressed through special backlog reviews included the following:
Work that was unrelated to safe, reliable plant operations (e.g. admin issues
- service reviews, leave, general employee training - or facilities)
Subsets or implementation pieces of other backlogs (e.g. restart WRs, Operations procedure revisions, WRs assigned to modifications)
Normal level-of-effort work activities conducted in accordance with prescribed processes / programs (e.g., ongoing Category 1 drawing updates, procedure revisions resulting from ongoing modifications, FDCNs, NOls)
Examples of work activities which were determined not to require special backlog review are reflected on attachment 1. These work loads were to be considered by the responsible department managers as appropriate as part of overall assessment of department readiness.
B.
For the remaining list of work considered appropriate for inclusion of special backlog review efforts, the BRC further evaluated the lists into two additional categories:
BRC Evaluated Backlogs (as identified on page 73 of the Restart Plan)-
tyically hardware related or of high potential to impact hardware performance support review by system to obtain aggregate impact on system functionality and reliability potential to directly/significantly impact safe and reliable operation These backlogs would be reviewed by the BRC along with the system engineer and/or department against the restart criteria.
Department Evaluated Backlogs (as identified on page 74 of the Restart Plan) -
typically programmatic issues with minor or indirect hardware impact potential not considered to constitute direct /significant potential impact on safe and reliable operation These backlogs would be reviewed by the department against the restart criteria and acceptability addressed through department readiness assessment; more management issues than broke / problem issues. (Note: as indicated in section 4 subsequent management decision was made to include a BRC review of these backlogs)
C. The above breakdown of lists and proposed processes for addressing were compiled by the BRC and presented to senior site management for concurrence.
The "BRC Evaluated" and " Department Evaluated" lists were added to the Restart Plan.
- 3. What are the lists Attachments 1,2 and 3 reflect the above described lists. Attachments 2 and 3 reflect the -
lists contained in the Restart Plan ("BRC Evaluated" and " Department Evaluated").
1
- 4. What type of reviews are/were applied to the above lists examples of workloads are assessed by the department as part of overall department readiness considerations. MRRC will review department readiness affirmations. lists of backlogs (BRC Evaluated) have been reviewed by the BRC and system engineer / department against restart criteria. The post restart items will be evaluated by the department and system engineer as part of the department and system readiness affirmations; both will be reviewed by MRRC. lists of backlogs (Department Evaluated and BRC Evaluated) have been reviewed by the department and are undergoing an additional BRC review of the department assessment against the restart criteria; nearing completion. The post restart items will be evaluated by the department as part of the department readiness affirmation. MRRC will review department readiness affirmations.
NSRB subcommittee efforts have included reviews of backlogs to assess adequacy of restart determinations, to identify additional backlogs, to review the processes by which backlogs are formed, and to assess the " root cause" of backlogs.
Nuclear Assurance is conducting an assessment of the backlog review efforts to address the adequacy of the review efforts and plans for reducing the backlogs.
- 5. Where do the 126 workoff curves fit in In parallel with the above described efforts, site management compiled a listing of key site activity workoff curves to use as a management tool to monitor performance and productivity towards outage completion. A listing of 126 work types (attachment 4) included backlog items as described above, many subsets of backlogs broken down by specific interest type, and individual workloads to support various ongoing activities. A cross reference against the attachment 2 and 3 backlog lists is also indicated on attachment 4, as well as items which do not constitute additional backlogs, i.e.,
workloads to support ongoing activities.
j workoff curves are monitored by senior site management or the l
department. There is a subset of approximately 50 curves monitored by senior management on a weekly basis to review productivity and progress for key activities to support restart. The remaining curves are updated biweekly and monitored by the (epartment.
A'ITACIIMENT 1 EXAMPLES OF OTIIER WORK LOADS WRs Assigned to Modifications Tool Room Custodians Facilities Capital Support Material Requirements Plant Support Outage - NOIs/ Scaffolding /TSRFs/ Material Issues /50.59s/
Question Responses / Comp. Qualifications Outage Discovery DCNs Category 1 Drawings 89-10 Porject/ Fire Protection /IPEEE/ Ice Condenser Erosion / Corrosion Westinghouse Issues - FW Nozzles / COPS /Under Clad Cracking Task Managers / Design Control / Backlog Review Group / Secretaries Restart DCNs FDCNs Engineering Drawings - OPS Configurations Site Master Plan Software Restart Issues DCN Closure w/Off.
Impact Reviews Outage Support Backlog Review Support IIandswitch Verification System Readiness Reviews Block Training Leave SIP Upgrade Secondary Plant Reliability Study Credit 575 Procedures GGMS Implementation Individual Development Plans Budget Deviations NOls i
M&TE Calibrations M&TE Out-of-Tolerance Reports J
Service Requests Microfilm Records j
l
ATTACHMENT 2 BRC EVALUATED BACKLOGS
- 1. WR/WO (includes orange ball list and defeated annunciators)
- e
- 2. JCO/EE *
- 3. Comp Measures
- e
- 4. Open DCNs *
- 5. Hold Orders *
- 6. Drawing Changes - Cat 2 & Cat 3 o
- 7. Operator Aids
- e
- 8. Obsolete Equipment e
- 9. Issues (DCRs, MILS) **
- 10. Deferral Request PMs ' Appendix L' j
- 11. Procedure Revisions
- 12. Vendor Manual Updates
- 13. DD Backlog
- 14. SSD Backlog e 15. CAQs (II, PER, FIR, PDFIR, CAQR, SCAR) **
- 16. Q-List e 17. TFARs *
- 18. NER Items
- l e 19. TACFs *
- 20. NRC Commitments
- e 21. Technical Support Investigation Requests *
- 22. Old Work Plans
- 23. Weld Maps
- 24. SMIs
- 25. EQ Backlog
- 26. UVAs in Design Inputs e Areas to be looked on a systems basis. All other areas will be reviewed on a programmatic basis.
BRC reviewed each item.
- BRC reviewed each item and will have individual review paper.
ATTACIIMENT 3 DEPARTMENT EVALUATED BACKLOGS
- 2. Material Requirements
- 3. Instrument Data Packages
- 4. Labels
- 5. NPRDS Data Input
- 6. PRO, TROI Items
- 7. FSAR Changes
- 8. EMS Updates (Fuse Tab Updates Included)
- 9. Tech Spec Changes
- 10. Delinquent PM
- 11. Bid Reviews, Bin Reviews, Inspection Reports (PEG Material Issues)
- 12. ECN/DCN Backlog Closure
- 13. DCN Impact Review
- 14. Maintenance Ilistory Updates
- 15. Administrative Hold Procedures
- 16. PEG /DCN Procurement
- 17. 56 RIP ltem Work Off
- 18. Calculation Cross Reference Systems (CCRS)
- 19. Non-TS sis (Assume 200 Manhours / Group)
- 20. RCM Study
- 21. SI Reviews
- 22. SI'FS
- 23. FSAR Reviews
- 24. PM Revisions
-..... _ ~ _-
ATTACHMENT 4 l
WORK 0FF CURVE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS NO.
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS ENGINEERING CURVES 1.
Engineering Support Not Backlog - Not Maintained 2.
Unit 2 Restart DCNs Issue To Impact Not Backlog Review 3.
Unit 2 Restart DCNs Issue To MODS Not Backlog 4.
Unit 1 Restart DCNs Issue To Impact Not Backlog Review 5.
Unit 1 Restart DCNs Issue To MODS Not Backlog 6.
Unit 2 Primary Drawings Not Backlog - In Process (Cat. 1)~
7.
Unit 1 Primary Drawings Not Backlog - In Process (Cat. 1) 8.
Unit 1/2 Vendor Manuals Key Safety BRC - Subset of VMs - Item 12' Related & EQ Items 9.
Unit 1/2 SSD Backlog BRC - Item 14 10.
Unit 1/2 Cat 1 Primary DDs BRC - Item 13 11.
Unit 1/2 CAQs Open Packages BRC - Item 15 12.
Unit 1/2 OPS Config Dwgs CAQ Item (Restart Item From CAQ) 13.
Unit 1/2 Tagging Requests Not Bt.cklog (Labeling Support - NE We;kload) 14.
Unit 1/2 Field Support FDCN Not Backlog (NE Workload) 15.
Unit 1/2 Outage Discovery DCNs Not Backlog (NE Workload to Fix
" Problems" Tracked In Other Backlog e.g. CAQs) 16.
Unit 1/2 Software Items Not Backlog (NE Workload to Complete Software RI Items) 17.
Unit 1/2 Vendor Manuals Remaining BRC - Item 12 Backlog 18.
Unit 1/2 EQ Issues BRC - Item 25 (Some Of This Also Covered By CAQs And Separate RIs) 19.
Unit 1/2 Drawing Deviations BRC - Item 13 20.
Unit 1/2 Employee Concerns BRC - Item 15, Dept. - Item 6 (Covered Under C/A Documents and TROI - Subset)-
21.
Unit 1/2 RIP Items Not Backlog (Dedication of Warehouse'Me*erial - Efficiency Issue) 22.
Unit 1/2 Outage DCN Closure Not Backlog (Restart DCN Closure -
NE Workload) 23.
Unit 1/2 Outage CAT 2 & 3 Drawing Not Backlog (NE Workload From Updates Outage Work) 24.
Note:
" Unit 1/2 Old ECN Closure" Dept. - Item 12 Curve To Be Developed Later 25.
Note:
" Unit 1/2 Unverified Assumptions" BRC - Item 26 Curve To Be Developed Later l
l
(?
WORKOFF CURVE
?
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Page "
NO.
DESCRIPTION i
COMMENTS 26.
Note: " Unit 1/2 Fuse Tabs" Curve To Dept. - Item 8 Be Developed Later MODIFICATIONS 27.
Manpower Requirements Not Backlog - Not Maintained 28.
Unit 2 Restart Items Work Order Write Not Backlog - Workload 29.
Unit 2 Restart Items Work Order Implementation and Closure Not Backlog - Workload - MODS, W0s' To Implement DCNs 30.
Unit 1 Restart Items Work Order Write Not Backlog - Workload 31.
Unit 1 Restart Items Work Order Implementation and Closure Not Backlog - Workload - MODS,-W0s To Implement DCNS 32.
Unit 1/2 Restart Items Old Work Plan BRC - Item 22 3
Closure 33.
Unit 2 Restart Items WR Status Both BRC - Item 1 Assigned Maint. and MODS Backlog 34.
Unit 1 Restart Items WR Status Both BRC - Item 1 Assigned Maint. and MODS Backlog 35.
Unit 1/2 Restart Items TROI Action Dept.
- Item 6 (RI Closure)
Closure 36.
Unit 1/2 Restart Items Weld Maps BRC - Item 23 (Old and Current) 37.
Unit 2 Restart Issues Erosion Corrosion -
Not Backlog Projected Manpower 38.
Unit 1 Restart Issues Erosion Corrosion -
Not Backlog Projected Manpower 39.
Unit 2 Restart Issues Erosion Corrosion -
Not Backlog Projected Period Costs 40.
-Unit 1 Restart Issues Erosion Corrosion -
Not Backlog Projected Period Costs MAINTENAIOE 41.
Staffing Plan Unit 0/1/2 42.
LOE Distribution Unit 0/1/2 Not Backlog -.Not Maintained Not Backlog - Not Maintained 43.
Restart Planning WRs Unit 1 - Unplanned Not Backlog - Workload 44.
Restart Planning WRs Unit 2 - Unplanned Not Backlog - Workload-45.
Delinquent PMs-Unit 0/1/2 Dept. - Item 10 46.
PM Revisions Unit 0/1/2 - Normal Dept. - Item 24 47.
WO Workoff Unit 0/1/2 Corrective BRC - Item 1.
Maintenance 1
i q
i i
'i
)
t WORKOFF CURVE' PERFORfWiCE INDICATORS Page NO.
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS 48.
WO Workoff Unit'0/1/2 Non-Correcitve BRC - Item 1 Maintenance 49.
WO Workoff Unit 2 Restart BRC - Item 1 50.
WO Workoff Unit 1 Restart BRC - Item 1 51.
Maintenance History Unit 0/1/2 Not Backlog (Workload - History Updates to Planner) 52.
RCM Study Completion Unit 0/1/2 Dept. - Item 20 53.
Maintenance CADS Unit 0/1/2 BRC - Item 15 (Corrective Action Documents) 54.
Equipment Labeling - Restart Unit 0/1/2 Dept. - Item 4 55.
Equipment Labeling - Non-Restart Unit Dept. - Item 4 0/1/2 56.
EQPMs Unit 0/1/2 Not Backlog (Workload -- Writing PMs For Future.EQ Tasks) 57.
Procedure Revisions Unit 0/1/2 BRC - Item 11 58.
NPRDS Input Unit 0/1/2 Dept. - Item 5 59.
WO & PMs complete Status Unit 0/1/2 Not Backlog (In Process Reviews -
Workload)-
60.
PM Revisions Due To RCM Unit 0/1/2 Subset to 46 - Dept. - Item 24 61.
Delinquent Safety Related Unit 0/1/2 Dept. - Item 3 & 19 (Instr. Cal's Instr Calibrations For Restart Were Handled Under Non-TS sis -
Being Converted to Instr. Data Packages 62.
Delinquent Non-Safety Related Dept. - Item 3 & 19 (Instr. Cal's Calibrations Unit 0/1/2 - Instr Were Handled Under Non-TS sis'-
Calibrations (Non-Restart)
Being Converted to Instr. Data Packages 63.
Non-Tech Spec sis - Restart Unit 0/1/2 -
Dept. - Item 3 & 19:(Instr. Cal's Safety Related. Instr Data Pkds To Be Were Handled-Under'Non-TS sis -
Written Being Converted to' Instr. Data Packages 64.
Non-Tech Spec sis - Non-Restart Unit Dept. - Item 3 & 19'(Instr. Cal's 0/1/2 - Safety Related Instr Data Were Handled Under Non-TS sis -
Pkgs To Be Written Being Converted to. Instr. Data Packages 65.
Non-Tech Spec sis Unit 0/1/2 Non
' Dept. - Item 3:& 19 (I,nstr. Cal's Safety Related Instr Data Pkgs To Were Handled Under Non-TS sis -
Be Written Being Converted to-Instr. Data Packages 66.
EMS Update From MODS Unit 0/1/2 Dept. - Item 8 67.
'PMs to MPAC Convesstua. Unit 0/1/2 Not Backlog (Man. Tool Enh.)
68.
MPT UNID Assignment. Unit 0/1/2 Not Backlog - Maint. Cleanup a
WORK 0FF CURVE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Page NO.
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS 69.
Instrument Data Packages Unit 0/1/2 Dept. - Item 3 i
Quality Related Instruments OPERATIONS 70.
U1/U2 LOE Manpower Requirements Not Backlog - Not Maintained 71.
U2 Configuration Verification Not Backlog - RI 72.
UO Configuration Verification Not Backlog - RI 73.
U2/UO Control Room Deficiencies BRC - Item 1 74.
U1 Control Room Deficiencies BRC - Item 1 75.
Ul/U2 Tech Spec Overdue sis Not Backlog - Overdue Past Admin 76.
U1/U2 Non-Tech Spec Overdue sis Date, Internal Man. Tracking Not Backlog - Overdue Past Admin 77.
Ul/U2 Degraded Annunciator Windows Date, Internal Man. Tracking-BRC - Item 1 78.
Ul/U2 Operator Aides Removal BRC - Item 7 79.
Ul/U2 Old Hold Orders (>90 Days)
BRC - Item 5 80.
Ul/U2 Procedural Issue Resolution Not Backlog - Workload 81.
U1/U2 SOI-Drawing Review Not Backlog - Workload 82.
Ul/U2 DCN Procedure Impacts Not Backlog - Workload 83.
Ul/U2 Stattup Procedures Dept. & BRC - Ops Proc Rev's Resulting From Multiple Sources - CAQs, TROI, DCNs, Enhancements Real Time Proc.
Requests, etc. - Separate Curves For Different Piles 84.
Ul/U2 TROI Action Items Dept. - Item 6 & BRC - Item 15 -
Ops Proc Rev's Resulting From Multiple Sources
'CAQs, TROI, DCNs, Enhancements Real Time Proc. Requests, etc. - Separate Curves For Different Piles 85.
U1/U2 SI-SO Differences Dept.: & BRC - Ops Proc Rev's Resulting-From_ Multiple l
Sources - CAQs, TROI, DCNs, Enhancements'Real Time Proc.
l Requests, etc. - Separate Curves For Different' Piles.
1
WORK 0FF CURVE o
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Page F NO.
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS 86.-
U1/U2 Admin Hold Procedures Dept. & BRC -. Ops Proc Rev's
-Resulting From Multiple Sources - CAQs, TROI, DCNs, _
Enhancements Real Time Proc.
Requests, etc. -' Separate Curves For Different Piles 87.
Ul/U2 Procedure Revision Backlog Breakdown of_ Ops Proc. Revisions Dept. & BRC - Ops Proc Rev's Resulting From Multiple Sources -_CAQs, TROI, DCNs,
Enhancements Real Time Proc.-
Requests, etc. - Separate Curves For Different Piles 88.
Ul/U2 TROI Procedures Breakdown of Ops Proc.' Revisions Dept. & BRC - Ops Proc Rev's Resulting From Multiple
-Sources - CAQs, TROI, DCNs, Enhancements Real Time Proc.
Requests, etc. - Separate Curves For Different Piles TECHNICAL SUPPORT 89.
Manpower Requirements Not Backlog - Not Maintained 90.
Unit 2 Restart Items DCN Impact Review Not Backlog - Workloads 91.
Unit 1 Restart Items DCN Impact Review Not Backlog - Workloads 92.
Unit 1/2 FDCNS Impact Review Not Backlog - Workloads 93.
Unit 1/2 Backlog WRs/W0s Not Backlog - Workloads 94.
Unit 1/2 Trending Failure Analysis Rpts BRC - Item 17 95._
Unit 1/2 System Reviews Not Backlog (Restart Plan RI To Conduct System Readiness Reviews) 96.
Unit 1/2 TACFs BRC - Item 19 97.
Unit 1/2 Plant Issue (MIL) Support Not Backlog - Workload 98.
Unit 1/2 TROI Actions Dept. - Item 6 99.
Unit 1/2 Handswitch Verification Not Backlog (Restart Support Activity to Ops) 100.
Unit 1/2 Drawing Deviations BRC - Item 13
.~. -
WORK 0FF CURVE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Page NO.
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS l
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL AND CHEMISTRY I
101 Unit 1/2 Manpower Requirements Not Backlog - Not Maintained 102.
Unit 1/2 Corrective Actions (II, INPO, BRC - Item 15 i
CAQ, Environ Compl) 103.
Unit 1/2 Restart Activities Not Backlog (Restart List Items) 104 Unit 1 Restart DCNs Issue To Impact Not Backlog - Workload i
Review 105.
Unit 2 Restart DCNs Issue To Impact Not Backlog - Workload i
Review 106.
Manpower Requirements Not Backlog - Not Maintained 107.
Unit 1/2 Corrective Actions Commitments BRC - Item 15 (This Curve Is An Overall Reduction Beyond Evaluation Against Restart Criteria) 108.
Unit 1/2 CCTS BRC - Item 20 109.
Unit 1/2 Mode 4 Holdpoint Train Duplicate to 122 Below-Operators On Outage Mods fi NUCLEAR ASSURANCE 110.
Manpower Requirements Not Backlog - Not Maintained 111.
Unit 1/2 Erosion / Corrosion Inspections Not Backlog - Workload 112.
Unit 1 ASME XI Inspections Not Backlog - Workload SECURITY & SITE SUPPORT I
I 113.
Manpower Requirements Not Backlog - Not Maintained l
114.
Procedures / Graphics Work Not Backlog - Man Tracking cf Incoming / Outgoing -^. Workload i
l MATERIALS & PROCUREMENT HEADCOUNT 115.
Materials & Procurement Headcount Not Backlog - Not Maintained 116.
Materials - DCNs W/Matl Restraints Not Backlog - Workload 117.
Unit 1/2 Materials - WRs W/Matl Not Backlog - Man. Tracking of Restraints Efficiency-
~
118.
Unit 1/2 Restocking Not Backlog - Man. Tracking of 4
Efficiency
-119.
Unit 1/2 Surplus Materials Not Backlog - Man. Tracking of Efficiency 1
t i
1
,_.e
't WORK 0FF CURVE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Page s NO.
DESCRIPTION COMMENTS s
TRAINING 120.
Manpower Requirements Not Backlog - Not Maintained 121.
Unit 1 Mode 2 Holdpoint Train Operators Not Backlog - Workloads On Dilution To Critical 122.
Unit 1/2 Mode 4 Holdpoint Train Operators Not Backlog - Workloads On Outage MODS 123.
Unit 1/2 Procedure Adherence Training Not Backlog - Workloads 124.
Unit 1/2 New Independent Verification
-Not Backlog - Workloads Program Training l
2 OUTAGE PLANNING J
125.
Manpower Requirements
.Not Backlog - Not Maintained BACKLOG REVIEW COMMITTEE 126.
Unit 1/2 Backlog Review Not Backlog - Workload Curve for l
BRC Reviews i
i I
.. r i
1 e
PL355202/2790 l
's B. BACKLOGS B. What backlogs will exist at the time of restart and how will they be determined acceptable - differentiate between PROBLEMS and MANAGEMENT ISSUES
- l. What are the types of PROBLEMS that will exist at restart The two lists of backlogs which we are reviewing against restart criteria contain a wide variety of issues, from broken equipment, to problems, to deficiencies, to weaknesses, to enhancements; not all items constitute PROBLEMS. Additionally, there is some overlap / duplication between categories, e.g. CAQ's and JCO's.
To establish what problems will exist at restart, we will define which of the backlogs are real PROBLEMS and eliminate duplication in accounting. The following actions will be taken to establish the backlogs of problems that will exist at restart:
- a. BRC will develop criteria for defining problems and/or criteria for stratifying types of problems - July 2
- b. Departments will complete Post Restart Backlog Evaluations - July 7
- c. BRC will meet with departments to review evaluations
- d. BRC will establish list of problems with accompanying basis for all backlog categories i
- c. Results of this effort will be presented to MRRC - July 14
)
- 2. Why outstanding individual items are acceptable - who/how determined i
1 Individual items will have been reviewed against the restart criteria 1
as part of prescribed processes subject to management review and independent oversight.
.I 1
5
- 3. Why outstanding backlogs collectively are acceptable - wholhow determined System evaluations will verify acceptable aggregate impact on system functionality and reliability Department evaluations in conjuction with BRC review will verify that the aggregate backlog is acceptable from consideration of restart criteria application and consideration of post restart management perspective Where appropriate, comparisons of restart targets against industry norms are being conducted s
c I
t
[
i l
y w
g m--
y
-