ML20045H703
| ML20045H703 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 07/13/1993 |
| From: | Conicella N Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Ralph Beedle POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9307210151 | |
| Download: ML20045H703 (3) | |
Text
,....
__._..___,_,a.
-e M M(/
y,~
T
' 4 E
UNITED STATES 5
3 !
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
(
j/
waswisoton, o.c. 20sss-oooi July 13,1993 Docket No. 50-286 l
Mr. Ralph E. Beedle Executive Vice President - Nuclear Generation Power Authority of the State l
of New York 123 Main Street p
White Plains, New York 10601 l
l
Dear Mr. Deedle:
l
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F SECURITY PLAN CHANGES PURSUANT T0 10 CFR 50.54(p) -
INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 By letter dated March 11, 1993, the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) submitted proposed Revision 13 to the Indian Point 3 security plan.
This proposed revision would incorporate a shared administrative security boundary between Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units No. I and No. 2 (owned 1
and operated by Consolidated Edison) and Unit No. 3.
The issues contained in I
l the proposed revision were considered to be policy issues, thus the proposed i
revision was referred to the NRC for review. During a telephone conversation
)
on May 5, 1993, your staff was requested to submit Figure II-C of the proposed Security Plan.
This figure, which was subsequently submitted by letter dated i
June 21, 1993, shows the administrative separation between the three units.
1 Based upon our review, we have determined that the changes proposed in j
Revision 13 to the security plan are consistent with the provisions of 10 CFR l
50.54(p) since the changes do not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the j
security plan. Therefore, the proposed changes are appropriate for
)
incorporation into the Indian Point 3 security plan.
1 The enclosures to your letiters dated March 11 and June 21, 1993, contain Safeguards Information of a type specified in 10 CFR 73.21 and are being withheld from public disclosure.
Sincerely, W 2. &JW Nicola F. Conicella, Project Manager Project Directorate I-l Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page
]Q{
9307210151'9'30713.
bbb b
O PDR ADOCK 05000286 P
pyg
2 Mr. Ralph E. Beedle Indian Point Nuclear Generating Power Authority of the State Station Unit No. 3 of New York i
cc:
Regional Administrator, Region 1 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant 475 Allendale Road U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Post Office Box 337 Buchanan, New York 10511 Mr. Gerald C. Goldstein Assistant General Counsel Mr. Charles W. Jackson Power Authority of the State Manager, Nuclear Safety and of New York Licensing 1633 Broadway Consolidated Edison Company New York, New York 10019 of New York, Inc.
Broadway and Bleakley Avenues Mr. Robert G. Schoenberger, Buchanan, New York 20511 Acting President Power Authority of the State Mayor, Village of Buchanan of New York 236 Tate Avenue 123 Main Street Buchanan, New York 10511 White Plains, New York 10601 Mr. John H. Garrity Resident Manager Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant Post Office Box 215 Buchanan, New York 10511 Mr. Peter Kokolakis Director Nuclear Licensing - PWR Power Authority of the State of New York 123 Main Street White Plains, New York 10601 Ms. Donna Ross New York State Energy Office 2 Empire State Plaza 16th Floor Albany, New York 12223 Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271
July 13,1993 Docket No. 50-286 Distribution:
Mr. Ralph E. Beedle Docket File SVarga Executive Vice President - Nuclear NRC & Local PDRs JCalvo Generation PDI-1 Reading RACapra Power Authority of the State CVogan NConicella of New York OGC ACRS (10)
-123 Main Street CCowgill, RGN-I PMcKee, 9D24 White Plains,-New York 10601
Dear Mr. Beedle:
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F SECURITY PLAN CHANGES PURSUANT T0 10 CFR 50.54(p)'-
INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 By letter dated March 11, 1993, the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) submitted proposed Revision 13 to the Indian Point 3 security plan.
This proposed revision would incorporate a shared administrative security boundary between Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units No. I and No. 2 (owned and operated by Consolidated Edison) and Unit No. 3.
The issues contained in 4
the proposed revision were considered to be policy issues, thus.the' proposed revision was referred to the NRC for review.
During a telephone conversation on May 5, 1993, your :taff was requested-to submit Figure II-C of the proposed-Security Plan.
This fi9ure, which was subsequently submitted by letter dated June 21, 1993, shows the administrative separation between the three units.
Based upon our review, we have determined that the changes proposed in Revision 13 to the security plan are consistent with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p) since the changes do not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the security plan.
Therefore, the proposed changes are appropriate for incorporation into the Indian Point 3 security plan.
The enclosures to your let'ters dated March 11 and June 21, 1993, conta.in Safeguards Information of a type specified in 10 CFR 73.21 and ars being withheld from public disclosure.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Nicola F. Conicella, Project Manager Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page
- See previous concurrence LA:PDI-l PM:PDI-l-k" DRSS/PSGB D:PDI-1 CVogan (*#
NConicella:smm
- PMcKee RACapra 9/l3/93 I/b/93 7/12/93 l/t3/93
' / /
/ /
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY FILENAME: IP350-28.LTR t
L
<