ML20045H292

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-440/93-11 on 930501-0623.Violations Noted.Licensee Slow in Identifying Safety Significance of Event & Did Not Take Appropriate Corrective Actions
ML20045H292
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/12/1993
From: Greenman E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Stratman R
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
Shared Package
ML20045H293 List:
References
EA-93-176, NUDOCS 9307200056
Download: ML20045H292 (3)


See also: IR 05000440/1993011

Text

n-

.

JUL 121993

l

,

Docket No. 50-440

License No. NPF-58

EA 93-176

,

l

l-

Centerior Service Company

ATTN: Mr. R. A. Stratman

Vice President

Nuclear - Perry

c/o The Cleveland Electric

Illuminating Company

l

10 Center Road

l

Perry, OH 44081

Dear Mr. Stratman:

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-440/93011

This refers to the inspection conducted'by Messrs. A. Vegel, D. Kosloff, and

E. Duncan of this office, on May 1 through June 23, 1993.

This inspection

included a review of activities authorized for your Perry Nuclear Power' Plant,

Unit 1, facility. At the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were

discussed with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures

and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of

activities in progress. The purpose of the inspection was to determine

whether activities authorized by the license were conducted safely and in

accordance with NRC requirements,

i

Based on the results of this inspection, 50-440/93011(DRP), two apparent

l

violations were identified and are being considered for escalated enforcement

l

action in accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for

l

NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement Policy), 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C.

90

One of the apparent violations contains three examples of' failure to

adequately identify and correct conditions in the drywell, containment, and

\\\\

suppression pool to preclude fouling and deformation of emergency core cooling

\\

syst'im (ECCS) strainers.

Specifically, on May 25, 1993, you failed to assure

that corrective actions had been taken to assure that the drywell and

containment were sufficiently clean to preclude fouling of the ECCS

suppression pool suction strainers.

In addition, following the identification

of debris in the suppression pool (as early as July 1989) and following

observation of debris on the residual heat removal (RHR) "A",and "B" strainers

(May 1992), you failed to identify the cause for the poor cleanl~iness of the

l

9307200056 930712 ~

PDR

ADOCK 05000440

'

0

PDR-

}

t

--

.

t

Centerior Service Company

2

?

suppression pool and strainer fouling and failed to take action to clean the

suppression pool to prevent the fouling from recurring. The strainer fouling

and deformation identified in May 1992 was not documented and reported to the

appropriate levels of management as required. Finally, you failed to identify

the presence of fibrous material in the suppression pool as a significant

contributor to the strainer deformation (January 1993) and the strainer

fouling phenomenon identified during review of video tapes taken in February

,

1993 and during subsequent investigations conducted prior to April 14, 1993.

i

Following the identification of fibrous material in February 1993, you failed

to take adequate corrective action to remove the fibrous material from the

pool which resulted in the recurrence of the RHR "B" strainer fouling and

deformation identifiad on April 14, 1993.

The second apparent violation was

for failure to have a procedure appropriate to the circumstances for testing

the "B" RHR pump in April 1993.

Based on our review, we have concluded that you were slow to identify the

safety significance of the event and did not take corrective action

appropriate to the safety significance of the event until the recurrence of

strainer fouling and deformation in April 1993.

Accordingly, no Notice of Violation is presently being issued for these

inspection findings.

In addition, please be advised that the number and

characterization of apparent violations described in the enclosed inspection

report may change as a result of further NRC review.

An enforcement conference to discuss these apparent violations has been

scheduled for July 20, 1993. The decision to hold an enforcement conference

does not mean that the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or

that enforcement action will be taken. The purpose of this conference is to

discuss the apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to

provide you the opportunity to point out any errors in our inspection report;

to provide an opportunity for you to present your proposed corrective actions.

In addition, this is an opportunity for you to provide any information

,

t

concerning your perspectives on 1) the severity of the violations, 2) the

application of the factors that the NRC considers when it determines the

amount of a civil penalty that may be assessed in accordance with Section

4

VI.B.2 of the Enforcement Policy, and 3) any other application of the

Enforcement Policy to this case, including the exercise of discretion in

accordance with Section VII.

You will be advised by separate correspondence

of the results of our deliberations on this matter.

No response regarding

-

these apparent violations is required at this time.

,

4

.

.

JUL 121993

..

Centerior Service Company

3

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of

this letter and its enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Sincerely,

  • ttiri g l E!y ad by E.G. Gtte ra "

i

Edward G. Greenman,-Director-

Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosure:

Inspection Report

flo. 50-440/93011/0RP)

cc w/ enclosures:

R. W. Schrauder, Director, Nuclear

Services Department

D. P. Igyarto, General Manager,

Perry Nuclear Power Plant

Vs . P. Donovan, Manager,

Licensing and Compliance Section

'

N. L. Bonner, Director, Perry

Nuclear Engineering Dept.

H. Ray Caldwell, General

Superintendent Nuclear Operations

Licensing Fee & Debt Collection

Branch

j

Resident Inspector, RIII

Terry J. Lodge, Esq.

James R. Williams, State of Ohio

Robert E. Owen, Ohio

Department of Health

A. Grandjean, State of Ohio

Public Utilities Commission

J. Lieberman, OE

J. Goldberg, 0GC

J. Partlow, NRR

bcc:

PUBLIC

45

Y0

h

RIII

RIII

Rhl

I

RIII

RIII

o

M,1,

'

wS

pp

wijk

r

ao

b%. h

fqfa'tte ,g ,

Hoak+ inss,

,n

Lan sbury

Gre er

E

Olteanu

v

8