ML20045B347
| ML20045B347 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/28/1993 |
| From: | Michael Scott NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Afable S SCIENTECH, INC. |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-03-93-031, CON-NRC-3-93-31 NUDOCS 9306170217 | |
| Download: ML20045B347 (7) | |
Text
.
~
DbR
[. s'o UNITED STATES
~
F NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
h WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 9,
.....'#g MAY 2 81933 Scientech, Inc.
Attention:
Shirley Afable 11821 Parklawn Drive, Suite 100 Rockville, MD 20852
Subject:
Task Order No. I entitled, " Beach:
8AW-10166P, Rev. 4 Review",
Under Contract No. NRC-03-93-031
Dear Ms. Afable:
In accordance with Section G.4, Task Order Procedures, of the subject contract, this letter definitizes task order number I with an established ceiling of $19,288.45. This effort shall be performed in accordance with the enclosed statement of work, the contractor's proposal dated April 13, 1993, and revised proposal dated April 26, 1993, incorporated herein by reference, and the following telephonic changes of May 26, 1993:
Reduce fixed fee from $1,755.60 (10%) to $1,580.04 (9%)
The period of performance for task order number 1 is June 1,1993 through December 1, 1993. The total cost ceiling is $19,288.45, of which the sum of
$17,556.02 represents the estimated reimbursable cost, the sum of $152.39 represents facilities capital cost of money, and the sum of $1,580.04 represents the fixed fee.
The amount presently obligated with respect to this task order is $19,288.45.
Notwithstanding the clause FAR 52.232 LIMITATION OF COST, the contractor is not obligated to continue performance under this task order or otherwise incur costs in excess of the estimated cost, until the Contracting Officer notifies the contractor in writing that the estimated cost has been increased.
t In absence of such notification by the Contracting Officer, the Government is not obligated to reimburse the contractor for any costs in excess of the estimated cost specified herein.
Accounting data for this task order is as follows:
B&R No.: 320-19-15-05-0 Job Code: E-2095 B0C:
2542 Appropriation No.: 31X0200.320 Amount Obligated: $19,288.45 The following individual is considered to be essential to the successful performance of the work hereunder: Mr. Daniel Prelewicz. The contre.ctor agrees that such personnel shall not be removed from the effort under the task order without compliance with contract clause H.1, Key Personnel.
7 I
9306170217 930602 hb PDR CONTR g
NRC-03-93-031 PDR yf
1 Page 2 - Task Order No. 1 - Contract No. NRC-03-93-031 Your contacts during the course of this task order are:
Technical Matters:
Harold Polk, Project Officer Telephone:
(301) 504-1264 Contractual Matters:
Catherine Hiltner, Contract Administrator Telephone:
(301) 492-4291 The issuance of this task order does not amend any terms or conditions of the subject contract including the contract ceiling amount of $1,421,951.00.
Please indicate your acceptance of this task order by having an official authorized to bind your organization execute three copies of this document in the space provided and return two copies to the Contract Administrator at the following address:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Contracts and Property Management Contract Administration Branch No. 1, P-902 Attn: Catherine Hiltner 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 You may retain the third copy for your records.
Sincerely, I%hM l
Mary Lynn Scott, Contracting Officer Contract Administration Branch No. 1 Division of Contracts and Pr.operty Management Office of Administration
Enclosure:
As stated ACCEPTED:
DD N Harold t in Name Vice President, Eastern Division Title June 2, 1993 Date
~
STATEMENT OF WORK TASK ORDER 93-01 UNDER JOB CODE E-2095 CONTRACT NUMBER NRC-03-93-031
Title:
BEACH: BAW-10166P, Rev. 4 REVIEW Project Manager:
Harold Polk, TAMS /PMSB, 504-1264 j
Technical Monitor:
Warren Lyon SRXB/DSSA, 504-3892
_]
B&R Number:
320-19-15-05-0 i
TAC Nos.:
M84799 NRR Priority No.:
3 l
Estimated Level of Effort:
About 4 professional staff-weeks in FY 93 BACK6ROUND The topical report " BEACH, A Computer Code for Reflood Heat Transfer'During LOCA," BAW-10166P, October 1992 was submitted to the NRC to providFsupport for future licensing analyses for B&W designed once-through steam generator (OTSG) nuclear power plants as well as for "U" tube steam generator (UTSG) plants. The initial licensing efforts will be in support of the startup for Tennessee Valley Authority's Bellefonte Units I and II, and in support of fuel reloads for Oconee Units I, II, and III.
OBJECTIVE The objective of this technical assistance prograra is to obtain expert technical services from Scientech, Inc. to assist the staff in the review and -
detemination of the technical acceptability of the topical report.
TECHNICAL AND OTHER SPECIAL OUALIFICATIONS REOUIRE[!
The contractor shall provide on~e technical expert in the area of themal-hydraulics and LOCA analysis for this review.
Proficiency of the expert in the interpretation and application of empirical data is required.
The contractor must evaluate revised assumptions regarding thermal-hydraulic behavior and their justifications, which may include comparisons to test data.
i It is the responsibility of the contractor to assign technical staff, i
employees, subcontractors, or specialists who have the required educational background, experience, or combination thereof to meet both the technical and i
regulatory objectives of the work specified in this S0W. The NRC will rely on representations made by the contractor concerning the qualifications of the i
personnel assigned to this task order including assurance that all information j
contained in the technical and cost proposal, including resumes, is accurate and truthful.
1 t
b
TASK ORDER 93-01, JOB CODE E-2095 2
WORK REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE The contractor shall review the topical report with respect to changes from previously approved modeling methodology and shall provide technical recomendations to the NRC staff with bases on the acceptability of the methodology for addressing 10 CFR 50.46 requirements.
In the review, the contractor shall consider the intended use of the methodology and recommend any restrictions or limitations to be placed on its use.
If necessary, the contractor shall provide a request for additional information (RAI) for B&W response and shall review those responses. Upon completion of the review, including resolution of issues where possible, the t
contractor shall provide a technical evaluation report (TER) with its recomendations regarding the acceptability of the reference document.
COMPLETION SCHEDULE JASX I. INITIATE REVIEW AND PREPARE REVIEW QUESTIONS The contractor shall perform an initial technical Complete initial review of the reference documentation.
In performing review within five this review, the contractor should ensure that the weeks following revised models comply with previous and/or new authorization to restrictions imposed on the code (s) and methodologies begin work.
according to their intended use.
In the review of the thennal-hydraulic models described in the report, the Submit any RAI's
~
contractor should consider potential interface within six weeks problems which could result from the introduction of following revised methods and assumptions into previously authorization to accepted models, assumptions, and restrictions on use.
begin work.
If necessary the contractor shall generate a request for additional information (RAI) to be sent to the vendor by the NRC. The questions should be' specific and serve to clarify or obtain additional information on areas not fully discussed in the reference documentation. The questions should be as complete as is practical to avoid the necessity of further questions.
Preliminary discussions should be held with the NRC Technical Monitor and may be held with the vendor, at the arrangement of the Technical Monitor,beforesubmittingquestions$otheNRC.
TASK ORDER 93-01, JOB CODE E-2095 3
- 2. FINAL REVIEW j
The contractor shall thoroughly review the reference Fifteen weeks documentation and clarifying documentation provided by following i
the vendor in response to initial questions.
If authorization to necessary, additional questions may be generated to begin work i
clarify licensee responses which are still not satisfactory or to obtain additional descriptive information to complete the TER. Such questions, if i
any, should be minimal, and will be considered deliverables for this subtask if provided. If additional questions are not necessary, a verbal l
status report shall be provided, and the Draft TER discussed below under Subtask 3 shall constitute the deliverable documentation for this subtask as well as for Subtask 3.
The review may also involve contractor discussions with the vendor, at the arrangement of the l
Technical Monitor, to clarify all technical issues
..g involved in the review.
l
- 3. Prepare a technical evaluation report (TER)
Prepare a draft TER based on the results of the Within twenty weeks a.
above subtasks, and any supplemental information following supplied by the vendor. The TER shall document authorization to the review effort, findings, conclusions and begin work.
recomendations, with bases, on the technical acceptability of the reference documentation for referencing in applicable analyses. Vendor proprietary information shall not be included in the draft TER. The draft TER shall be prepared and deliver to the NRC Technical Monitor for j
review and coment.
b.
Upon receipt of coments from the NRC Technical Within three weeks Monitor, the contractor shall prepare a final TER following receipt which addresses the NRC Technical Monitor's of NRC coments.
coments. Vendor proprietary information shall not be included in the final TER. The TER should be in accordance with NRC Manual Chapter 3202,
' Publication of Unclassified Regulatory and Technical Reports Prepared by NR0' Contractors."
The contractor shal1~ submit one final copy to the NRC Project Manager and four copies to the NRC Technical Monitor.
l
TASK ORDER 93-01, JOB CODE E-2095 4
Level of Effort l
The level of effort is estimated at 4 professional staff weeks, apportioned among the tasks for planning purposes.
TASK LEVEL OF EFFORT.
I 1.5 PSW 2
1.5 PSW 3
1.0 PSW Total 4.0 PSW a
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The period of performance is projected to be six months following initiation of work.
. c.;
DELIVERABLES Technical Reportino Reauirements All draft reports are to be submitted to the Technical Monitor with a copy provided to the Project Manager. All final reports are to be submitted to the Project Manager with copies to the Technical monitor.
1.
At the completion of task 1, submit a technical letter report to the Technical Monitor with a copy of the transmittal letter to the Project Manager, that contains comments and requests for additional information.
2.
During the performance of task 2, the contractor shall provide verbal reports on the progress of each subtask at least twice to the NRC Technical Monitor. These progress reports are in addition to the discussions with the vendor.
~
3.
At the completion of task 3 submit a technical evaluation report, draft (to the Technical Monitor with a copy of the transmittal letter to the Project Manager) and final (to the Project Manager with four copies to the Technical Monitor.
All reports and correspondence shall contain: JOB CODE No., Task Order No.,
TAC No., either in the transmittal letter or on a cover page. RAls may be faxed to the TM with a follow-up letter to the PM.
In which case this identification information shall precede the RAI information.
1
TASK ORDER 93-01, JOB CODE E-2095 5
i Meetinas and Travel l
One one-person trip to the NRC headquarters in Rockville, Maryland should be planned and budgeted for a meeting to resolve open issues.
If used the date will be mutually agreed upon between the NRC Project Manager and the contractor.
NRC Furnished Materials The NRC will furnish one copy of the topical report to the contractor.
N
'.. k
[
I i
g*
O P
T s
b
- -