ML20044D862

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notation Vote Response Sheet Disapproving W/Comments, SECY-93-075 Re Issuance of Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Potential Impact on Safety of Power Reactor Licensee Ownership Arrangements
ML20044D862
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/08/1993
From: Selin I, The Chairman
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 9305210036
Download: ML20044D862 (2)


Text

.

N0TATI0N V0TE*

RELEASED TO THE PDR 5

f/l>-/9 5 65 5....d?.'.......?.*?$...5 l

T0:

SAMUEL J. CHILK, SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION FROM:

THE CHAIRMAN

SUBJECT:

SECY-93-075 - ISSUANCE OF AN ADVANCE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING ON THE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON SAFETY.0F POWER REACTOR LICENSEE OWNERSHIP ARRANGEMENTS i

f APPROVED DISAPPROVED x

ABSTAIN F.oT PARTICIPATING REQUEST DISCUSSION C0tEENTS: w, q,x g u u g 9 u g. m u -wwmbsg y u.

bh y

  • C e y.u Gm m m, T L % %%va '.

CD% - q p _ ww444 e e - - w.% - w.A u.. -.x, a S sw w e A M uw c=+u %b w\\. wg <. on.3 d v0\\

b m a w% % W M W bw M t u hm

\\

e A e ys h A 1-gwe a u -- - gwh s

sw w a ma v rh o pge:L.4 TLC SIGNATURE RELEASE VOTE

/ //

HlI DATE WITHHOLD VOTE

/

/ 140040 Ah ENTERED ON "AS" YES No 9305210036 930408 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR t

y g.

Dr. Selin's comments on SECY-93-075 This topic may be interesting and important, but it comes across as a fishing expedition.

Before publication and generation of public response, I'd like to know:

1.

How many licensees seem to be affected 2.

What is the safety, as opposed to economic, nexus?

How many reactor licensees could try to set up a corporate veil to avoid decommissioning costs?

They'd have to be single-plant licenses without other operating assets, and pretty brazen at that -- even if they had a structure that would shield the parent t

l from the operating subsidiary.

l l

4

-