ML20044D138

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notation Vote approving,w/comments,SECY-93-032 Re 10CFR51 Rulemaking on Environ Review for Renewal of Nuclear Power Plant OLs
ML20044D138
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/09/1993
From: Curtiss
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 9305170270
Download: ML20044D138 (2)


Text

.-

~~

NOTATION V0TE

,m f;/6/9 3
_f k

,.,,,,.,,,, jf/p,, _,, *

/

RESPONSE SHEET T0:

SAMUEL J. CHILK, SECRETARY OF THE COMISSION FROM:

C0l44ISSIONER CURTISS

SUBJECT:

SECY-93-032 - 10 CFR PART 51 RULEMAKING ON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR RENEWAL OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANT OPERATING LICENSES X/with APPROVED comments DISAPPROVED ABSTAIN NOT PARTICIPATING REQUEST DISCUSSION C0l44ENTS:

See attached comments.

100068 lSA"C8E48 %R88 '

A4a R b[en CORRESPONDENCE PDR SIGNATURE

~

RELEASE VOTE

/ x/

March 9, 1993 DATE WITHHOLD VOTE

/

/

ENTERED ON "AS" YES X

NO ggg 41

t r

i

?

Comnissioner Curtiss' Comments on SECY-93-032 I approve the staff's proposals in SECY-93-032 as follows --

i 1.

I approve the proposed modifications to certain procedural aspects of the proposed rules that were negotiated with CEQ and EPA, as described on pp. 2-4 of SECY-93-032.

2.

While I do not object to the staff's meeting with state commenters who expressed concerns about preemption of state regulatory authority relative to the need for generating capacity, alternative sources of energy,and utility costs, the staff should propose, and obtain the Commission's approval of, options for responding to the concerns in these areas prior to any such meetings and/or discussions with the states.

The staff's proposal should address in detail the significant legal and policy issues that the states have raised concerning -- (a) need for generating capacity, (b) alternative anergy sources, (c) the NRC's treatment of economic costs, and (d) the NRC's approach to cost-benefit balancing.

The options paper should be submitted no later than May of 1993 for the Commission's consideration.

2.

I approve the staff's proposed schedule for the remainder of-this rulemaking, subject to the modification noted in item 2 above to obtain the Commission's approval prior to any discussions that may be held with the states.

t e

l a

i l

l l

_